Arizona Condo Governance | Open Meetings | Direct Claims
This pending-case guide now includes the July 2026 partial-summary-judgment series, Tara’s response to the supplemental complaint, and the court’s order postponing the Colby discovery ruling until after the Rule 12(c) motion.
Last updated July 22, 2026. Case: Lisa Marx v. Tara Condominiums Association, Inc., Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2025-012980; Hon. Randall H. Warner and Hon. Adele Ponce.
Current-status note: This pending litigation record is current through docket events posted July 22, 2026. Later filings or orders may change the posture; the linked court records control.
The July summary-judgment motions and supporting statements present plaintiff's positions. No ruling on those motions appears in the reviewed record.
Allegations, declarations, exhibit descriptions, proposed orders, procedural dismissals, and notices are not findings of liability unless a cited court order expressly makes that finding.
The earlier audio and video overview is temporarily unavailable because it predates the July 2026 filings.
Posture note: This is a pending Superior Court record guide, not a final merits summary. The July 2026 partial-summary-judgment papers state Marx’s allegations and requested relief. No ruling on those motions—and no final judgment resolving the case—appears in the reviewed record.
The posture in one sentence
Marx v. Tara remains pending: Tara’s Rule 12(c) direct-versus-derivative motion and Marx’s nine July 2026 partial-summary-judgment motions await decision, while the Colby discovery dispute has been postponed until after the Rule 12(c) ruling.
Case snapshot
A Tara condominium owner alleges the association acted without proper board votes, notice, records access, statutory compliance, and member approval.
The court denied a preliminary injunction, denied Tara’s first derivative-claim dismissal motion against the association, and dismissed individual board members.
Tara’s Rule 12(c) motion remains undecided. Marx then filed nine partial-summary-judgment motions addressing grouped governance, records, insurance, budget, spending, and amendment claims.
The reviewed public packet now contains 214 deduplicated PDFs plus a filing roadmap. Loose discovery exhibits and unsigned July proposed orders remain outside the public index pending privacy and source-status review.
Case Dossier
This dossier combines the case metadata, linked court sources, and the explanatory sections below. It distinguishes court rulings from party filings, allegations, and requested relief.
Case Summary
| Case ID / citation | CV2025-012980 |
|---|---|
| Court / tribunal | Superior Court |
| Decision / key date | April 14, 2025 |
| Judge / panel | Hon. Randall H. Warner, Hon. Adele Ponce |
| Parties | Lisa Marx, a Tara condominium owner, sued Tara Condominiums Association over alleged open-meeting, records, insurance, common-element, voting, and declaration/bylaw violations. |
| Governing law |
|
| Topics | Meetings & RecordsBoard GovernanceCC&RsRecords RequestsProcedureAttorney Fees |
| Outcome / holding | No final merits ruling appears in the reviewed public court-source set. The June 2025 record denied preliminary injunctive relief and, for the motion then before it, treated Marx's claims against the association as member-right claims rather than derivative claims. The July 2025 record dismissed the individual board-member defendants. A July 16, 2026 minute entry granted Tara's request to postpone the Colby Management discovery ruling until after the court resolves Tara's still-pending Rule 12(c) motion. |
| Primary public source | View source opinion/order |
Parties, Court, and Research Coverage
| Reviewed source package | 214 PDFs, 1 other source file |
|---|---|
| Step-by-step docket roadmap | No separate litigation roadmap table on this page |
| Video overview | Temporarily unavailable while the expanded case record is reviewed |
| Study / briefing material | 1 section |
| FAQ / homeowner questions | 7 questions |
| Featured download links | 24 download links |
Key Issues & Findings
Lisa Marx filed Maricopa County Superior Court case CV2025-012980 against Tara Condominiums Association after disputes over board votes, open meetings, records inspection, landscaping/common-element decisions, insurance changes, amendments, expenditures, and alleged governance defects. The case remains pending. The court denied preliminary injunctive relief in June 2025, denied Tara's first partial derivative-claims dismissal motion as to the association, dismissed the individual board-member defendants, and in July 2026 postponed a Colby Management discovery ruling until after Tara's unresolved Rule 12(c) motion. Marx filed nine partial-summary-judgment motions in July 2026; those motions state her allegations and requested relief, not court findings.
The June 2025 preliminary-injunction ruling found no irreparable harm warranting emergency relief on that record. The June 26, 2025 derivative-claims ruling treated the claims then framed against the association as attempts to enforce Marx's own membership rights under the declaration, bylaws, and statutes, with damages limited to her own proven harm. The July 31, 2025 dismissal ruling distinguished association obligations from personal-liability claims against individual directors. The July 16, 2026 discovery-stay ruling found that deciding the Rule 12(c) motion first could promote efficiency and might make the disputed discovery unnecessary.
This pending condominium case collects Arizona open-meeting, records, insurance, common-element, amendment, budget, and direct-versus-derivative arguments in one record. The July 2026 motion series also shows how a self-represented owner divided a sprawling complaint into claim-specific partial-summary-judgment packages. None of those July motions has been granted in the reviewed record, so they are useful as litigation positions and source maps, not precedent or adjudicated fact.
Case Participants
Petitioner Side
- Lisa Marx (Plaintiff)
Self-represented condominium owner plaintiff.
Respondent Side
- Tara Condominiums Association, Inc. (Defendant)
Association party named in Marx’s condominium-governance claims. - Mark Gottmann (Defendant)
Tara Condominiums Association
Individual defendant named in the amended complaint. - Dennis Anderson (Defendant)
Tara Condominiums Association
Individual defendant named in the amended complaint. - Charles H. Oldham (Counsel)
CHDB Law LLP
Counsel served by Marx in the case filings. - Ari Bowhay (Counsel)
CHDB Law LLP
Counsel served by Marx in the case filings.
Neutral Parties
- Randall H. Warner (Judge)
Superior Court judge listed in the amended complaint and orders. - Adele Ponce (Judge)
Later Superior Court judge listed in the case metadata.
What the record shows
The Second Amended Complaint frames the case as breach of contract, Arizona Condominium Act, corporate-records, and declaratory-judgment claims against Tara Condominiums Association. Marx alleges that board actions were taken without proper notice, agenda, discussion, vote, or approval and that she was denied statutory inspection rights.
The early motion practice produced several important but limited rulings. The court denied preliminary injunctive relief in June 2025 because the record did not show irreparable harm requiring immediate intervention, even while noting that some board actions allegedly should have been voted on in an open meeting.
The court then denied Tara’s first partial motion to dismiss claims as derivative, treating the claims against the association as attempts to enforce Marx’s own membership rights under the declaration, bylaws, and law. A later ruling dismissed individual board members Mark Gottmann and Dennis Anderson from the case.
Tara’s March 30, 2026 response to the supplemental complaint acknowledges that the association approved declaration amendments, distributed written-consent forms, conducted a vote, and allowed the prior master property policy to expire, while denying Marx’s legal conclusions and asserting defenses. The response is a party pleading, not an admission that the process was unlawful.
Marx’s July 2026 motion series asks for partial summary judgment on grouped claims spanning declaration validity, corporate records, appointments, meeting procedure, insurance, budgets and ballots, roof and lien decisions, legal expenses, landscaping, and other association spending. On July 16, the court separately granted Tara’s request to postpone the Colby Management discovery ruling until after the Rule 12(c) motion. None of the nine summary-judgment motions is resolved in the reviewed record.
What the court has already done
The June 2025 preliminary-injunction ruling did not give emergency relief on insurance, meeting, or records issues because the court did not find irreparable harm on that record.
The June 26, 2025 minute entry denied Tara’s first partial motion to dismiss, explaining that member-right claims against the association were not derivative as framed.
The July 31, 2025 ruling dismissed Mark Gottmann and Dennis Anderson, distinguishing association obligations from personal liability claims against board members.
The July 16, 2026 minute entry grants Tara’s request to postpone the Colby discovery ruling until after the still-pending Rule 12(c) motion. It does not decide Rule 12(c), the merits, or Marx’s July summary-judgment motions.
The Rule 12(c) motion and the Colby discovery stay
Tara’s May 27, 2026 motion for judgment on the pleadings argues that community-wide claims over common property, association funds, insurance, and governance belong to the association and must satisfy derivative-action requirements.
Marx’s June 2, 2026 opposition accepts that Iqtunheimr is published Arizona authority, but argues it decided only a common-area maintenance derivative claim and does not convert open-meeting, notice, voting, records, insurance-accounting, or declaration-amendment claims into derivative claims.
The same June 2 packet opposed Tara’s request to stay the pending Colby Management discovery dispute. Marx argued that the subpoenaed Colby materials go to direct claims already recognized by the June 26, 2025 ruling.
The court later granted Tara’s stay request in a July 16, 2026 minute entry, reasoning that deciding Rule 12(c) first could promote efficiency and might make the discovery request moot. The court said it would address Marx’s pending discovery issues after the Rule 12(c) ruling.
The June packet’s two proposed orders remain only proposed forms of relief. They are not signed rulings.
What the June 2026 response packet adds
Marx argues her claims seek direct relief for her own Condominium Act, declaration, voting, inspection, and fair-administration rights, not recovery of association funds or generalized damages for all units.
Marx argued the court should not pause her motion to compel Colby Management records. The court later granted Tara’s stay request, leaving the discovery issues for after the Rule 12(c) ruling.
Exhibit D is Marx’s organizational aid. It asserts that 89 of 103 listed claim paragraphs are open-meeting violations and that Tara’s motion targets 60 open-meeting items.
The proposed orders asked the court to deny Rule 12(c) and the discovery stay. They are not rulings; the July 16 minute entry instead granted the stay request.
June 2026 filings added to the record guide
| Date | Document | What it adds | Download |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 2, 2026 | Plaintiff’s response opposing stay of Colby Management production | Argues the Colby subpoena remains relevant to direct claims and should not be paused while Tara’s Rule 12(c) motion is pending. | Response opposing Colby stay |
| June 2, 2026 | Plaintiff’s opposition to Tara’s Rule 12(c) motion | Argues Iqtunheimr does not eliminate direct member-right claims over open meetings, voting, records, insurance accounting, declaration amendments, or individualized statutory relief. | Rule 12(c) opposition |
| June 2, 2026 | Exhibit D – Organization of Claims for Presentation | Organizes 103 claim paragraphs for presentation. Treat this as plaintiff’s categorization aid, not an independent court finding. | Claim organization exhibit |
| June 2, 2026 | Proposed order denying Tara’s Rule 12(c) motion | Proposed form of relief that would deny judgment on the pleadings or, alternatively, narrow relief/allow amendment rather than dismiss with prejudice. | Proposed Rule 12(c) order |
| June 2, 2026 | Proposed order denying Tara’s motion to stay Colby discovery ruling | Proposed form of relief that would deny the stay and leave the pending Colby motion to compel for ordinary-course decision. | Proposed Colby stay order |
Nine July 2026 partial-summary-judgment motions
The Maricopa County docket independently lists nine plaintiff partial-summary-judgment motions filed from July 5 through July 21, 2026. The reviewed packet includes each motion with a separate statement, declaration, and exhibit index. Together they divide the complaint into claim groups rather than asking the court to resolve the entire case in one motion.
Every theory in this section is attributed to Marx because the papers are advocacy filings. A motion, separate statement, declaration, exhibit index, or unsigned proposed order does not establish a fact or legal violation. No order granting or denying any of these nine motions appears in the reviewed record.
The exhibit notices and master index are public below. The 71 loose exhibit copies delivered with this update were reviewed for context but are not republished here because many are discovery or Bates-labeled materials containing private identifiers, and their status as public docket attachments was not independently established.
What each July motion asks the court to decide
| Filed | Claim group | Plaintiff's theory | Evidence map in the packet | Motion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 5 | 2025 declaration amendment | Marx argues the recorded amendment improperly shifted property-insurance duties, changed unit or common-element burdens without the required consent, used an invalid written-consent process, and imposed an unforeseeable covenant burden. | Original and recorded declarations, amendment materials, written-consent and vote communications, Tara’s March response, and insurance/cancellation records. | Amendment motion |
| July 10 | Claims 120 and 121 | Marx argues Tara failed to keep accurate June 2024 minutes and records of actions taken without a meeting, contrary to A.R.S. § 10-11601. | Meeting notice, minutes, audio/transcript, later minutes and emails, financial records, discovery responses, and the Marx declaration. | Corporate-records motion |
| July 11 | Claims 46/91, 42/87/127, 98/126 | Marx challenges a master-policy deductible increase, adoption of the 2025 budget and assessment by mail-only ballot, and ballot access or timing. | Governing documents, insurance renewals and minutes, budget records, ballots, vote results, owner communications, and objections. | Insurance, budget, and ballot motion |
| July 13 | Claims 30/47/74/103/108, 48/92 | Marx argues the chair negotiated roof-repair cost allocation before an authorized vote, shifted a common-element cost without owner culpability, and released a repair lien without full payment or proper approval. | Governing documents, roof-repair affidavit and communications, notices and minutes, financial records, lien documents, and executive-session materials. | Roof and lien motion |
| July 16 | Claims 26/70, 27/71, 28/72, 29/73, 43/88 | Marx challenges a reserve transfer, restrictions on correcting minutes, workers’ compensation coverage, Bermuda-grass spending, and a lighting reimbursement as actions lacking an open board vote. | Financials, notices, minutes and audio, policy records, seed invoices, vouchers, and the Marx declaration. | Reserve, minutes, policy, and spending motion |
| July 16 | Claims 23/67, 24/68, 25/69, 33/34/77/78, 49/93 | Marx challenges officer and director appointments, dissolution of a landscaping committee, and creation or enforcement of a two-minute owner-comment rule. | Bylaws, executive-session and open-meeting records, announcements, emails, admissions, audio/transcripts, and the Marx declaration. | Appointments and speaking-rule motion |
| July 19 | Claims 32/76, 39/84, 83, 44/89 | Marx challenges common-area work, a Home Depot purchase, creation and funding of a second bank account, and tree work outside the landscaping contract as actions taken without a majority vote in an open meeting. | Executive-session material, meetings, newsletters, affidavits/photos, records requests, vouchers, financials, bank records, and landscaping contracts. | Landscaping and spending motion |
| July 20 | Claims 31/75, 35/79, 36/80, 37/81, 38/82, 45/90 | Marx challenges sprinkler-trench work, retention and payment of association counsel, retroactive approval or preauthorization of work, and an association payment to Marx. | Work photos and affidavit, counsel engagement and invoices, financials, meeting records, demand/payment materials, and the Marx declaration. | Common-area work and legal-expense motion |
| July 21 | Claims 40/85, 41/86, 51/95, 53/97 | Marx challenges off-record budget development, the board chair’s role in budget-committee meetings and membership, and landscaping or maintenance work and spending without a vote. | Executive and budget-committee records, audio/transcripts, competing budgets, emails, agreements, vouchers, bank statements, photos, and 2026 budget materials. | Budget-committee and maintenance motion |
How the July packet was incorporated
The court’s current docket confirms the nine motion events, the filed separate statements shown there, the exhibit notices, and Tara’s March 30 response.
Separate statements and declarations explain what Marx says the evidence proves. The page does not convert those assertions into judicial findings.
The intake contained nine distinct unsigned proposed orders, including an editable Count VII form. None is presented or indexed as an entered court order.
The master index and filing notices show the exhibit structure. Loose discovery, financial, insurance, correspondence, affidavit, contract, and image copies remain outside the public download set pending privacy and public-status review.
Timeline highlights
| Date | Event | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| April 2025 | Original complaint packet begins the CV2025-012980 record. | The initial claims focused heavily on open meetings, board authority, records, committee action, and association governance. |
| June 23, 2025 | The court held an evidentiary hearing on preliminary injunctive relief. | The hearing created the record for the June 2025 emergency-relief ruling. |
| June 25, 2025 | The court denied the motion for preliminary injunction. | The ruling matters because it separates alleged procedural defects from the emergency showing needed for immediate injunctive relief. |
| June 26, 2025 | The court denied Tara’s partial motion to dismiss association claims as derivative. | This is the key early ruling treating the claims against the association as member-right claims rather than derivative claims, at least for that motion. |
| July 31, 2025 | The court dismissed Mark Gottmann and Dennis Anderson. | The ruling draws a line between claims against the association and personal liability theories against individual directors. |
| October 2025 | The record includes emergency TRO filings over master insurance, amendments, and owner insurance obligations. | The case expanded from meeting and records issues into insurance/amendment governance disputes. |
| March 30, 2026 | Tara responded to Marx’s Rule 15(d) supplemental complaint. | The response acknowledges the amendment vote and expiration of the prior property policy while denying illegality and asserting defenses. |
| May 27, 2026 | Tara filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. | The motion asks the court to treat many community-wide claims as derivative after newer Arizona appellate authority. |
| June 2, 2026 | Marx filed opposition papers and proposed orders addressing the Rule 12(c) motion and the Colby discovery stay. | This moves the live briefing posture from Tara’s motion alone to a disputed pending motion, with Marx asking the court to preserve direct claims or narrow relief rather than dismiss. |
| July 5-21, 2026 | Marx filed nine partial-summary-judgment motions on grouped claims. | The motions cover declaration validity, corporate records, appointments, meetings, insurance, budgets, ballots, roof and lien issues, legal expenses, landscaping, and spending. They remain unresolved in the reviewed record. |
| July 16, 2026 (filed July 20) | The court granted Tara’s request to postpone the Colby discovery ruling. | The court will address the discovery issues after deciding Rule 12(c); the order does not resolve Rule 12(c) or the merits. |
Curated document roadmap
The complete source index below lists the reviewed public files. This earlier document-by-document roadmap preserves the chronology, document type, and stated case relevance supplied with the original packet so readers can understand how the pre-July materials fit together.
The separate July motion map above covers the new 2026 summary-judgment filings. This earlier roadmap intentionally excludes drafts that were not confirmed as part of the court record.
Reference numbers in the final column come from the supplied roadmap. They are not legal findings, and the linked court filings and orders remain the controlling sources.
Earlier document-by-document roadmap
| Date | Document | Type | How it fits the case | Roadmap refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 19, 1970 | Declaration of Restrictions, Establishment of Board of Management and Lien Rights | CC&Rs | Foundational governing document defining common elements, board authority, maintenance, lien, and insurance duties. Marx uses it as the contract source for alleged breaches involving board authority, maintenance, and building-structure insurance. | 1-7 |
| March 29, 2022 | CC&R Amendment Update from the Arizona Supreme Court – CHDB Law | Article / news | Kalway-related legal analysis used by Marx to argue that the 2025 insurance amendments were not reasonable or foreseeable enough to bind owners. | 8 |
| July 31, 2023 | Homeowner Tara COA July 2023 Financials | Financial statement | Historical association financial record used as a comparison point for later disputed budget, insurance, and expense decisions. | 7 |
| January 11, 2024 | Organizational Meeting Minutes | Meeting minutes | Board organizational minutes. Marx cites them to show board-position decisions, knowledge of meeting requirements, and alleged inaccuracies about leadership and procedure. | 9, 10 |
| January 20, 2024 | January 20, 2024 Board Meeting Minutes | Meeting minutes | Documents committee-volunteer discussion and the Landscaping Committee, which Marx later uses to challenge the committee’s dissolution and her removal. | 7, 9 |
| January 30, 2024 | Trench on Newcastle done by Mark and Dennis | Evidence / report | Maintenance-work documentation used to support claims that individual board members acted unilaterally or performed unauthorized maintenance work. | 7 |
| February 1, 2024 | Email removing Lisa from committees and dissolving them | Evidence that Marx was removed from the Landscaping Committee and committees were dissolved, supporting alleged open-meeting violations and selective targeting. | 7, 10 | |
| February 5, 2024 | Email announcing new board member | Announcement of a new board member without a recorded open board vote, supporting the A.R.S. § 33-1248 board-action theory. | 7, 11 | |
| February 5, 2024 | Gmail – Claim Message from USAA | Insurance-claim correspondence used to support allegations about improper insurance handling and board-member maintenance involvement. | 7 | |
| February 17, 2024 | February 17, 2024 Board Meeting Minutes | Meeting minutes | Minutes reflecting discussion and speaking limits. Marx alleges those rules were used selectively and that board-membership status was misdocumented. | 7, 9 |
| March 16, 2024 | March 16, 2024 Board Meeting Minutes | Meeting minutes | Minutes referencing a workers-comp policy and Bermuda-grass plan, cited as examples of alleged unilateral chair action without open meeting votes. | 7, 9 |
| March 17, 2024 | Spring newsletter 3-17-24 | Newsletter | Association communication to residents, used as evidence of public board statements and owner-facing messaging. | 7 |
| May 27, 2024 | Dennis working on the shutters | Evidence / report | Documentation of Dennis Anderson performing maintenance work, supporting allegations that board members acted outside authorized roles. | 7 |
| June 15, 2024 | June 15, 2024 Tara Board Meeting Minutes | Meeting minutes | Procedural record of board actions during summer 2024. | 7 |
| July 2, 2024 | DAnderson 07 02 24 Expense Voucher | Expense voucher | Financial record used to test whether board-member reimbursement and expenditures were properly authorized. | 7 |
| July 16, 2024 | 07 16 24 Letter to Lisa Marx re Petition Response | Letter | Association correspondence to Marx about a petition, part of the pre-litigation governance-dispute history. | 7 |
| July 23, 2024 | American Family Master Insurance Policy Invoice Voucher 2024 2025 | Financial document | Shows prior master-insurance cost and coverage before the disputed 2025 insurance amendments and policy changes. | 7 |
| July 27, 2024 | July 27 2024 Tara Board Meeting Minutes | Meeting minutes | Procedural record of board actions and decisions. | 7 |
| July 31, 2024 | Travis Law Firm July Inv Voucher | Invoice voucher | Legal-fee invoice used to support claims about association legal spending and approval procedure. | 7 |
| August 29, 2024 | Travis Law Firm August 2024 Invoice Voucher | Invoice voucher | Additional legal-fee record used in the unauthorized-expenditure and approval-procedure theory. | 7 |
| November 1, 2024 | 2025 Tara Condominiums Budget Letter | Budget letter | Board letter recommending a $50 assessment increase due to insurance, sewer, and legal-fee increases; part of the financial buildup to the insurance dispute. | 12 |
| November 3, 2024 | Issues regarding the 2025 Budget Vote | Marx email arguing that the budget-vote process violated statute, used to show an earlier voting-procedure objection. | 13 | |
| April 11, 2025 | Civil Complaint for Breach of Contract | Complaint | Original filing against the association and individual board members, opening the litigation and asserting governance and CC&R breach theories. | 14-16 |
| April 14, 2025 | Minute Entry Denying TRO | Court order | Early ruling denying temporary restraining relief because emergency TRO requirements were not met. | 17 |
| April 16, 2025 | Amended Emergency Orders: TRO and Temporary Injunctive Relief | Motion for injunctive relief | Request to preserve declaration and insurance status quo while the case proceeded. | 18, 19 |
| May 28, 2025 | Association’s Partial Motion to Dismiss | Motion | Association argued many claims were derivative and Marx lacked individual standing to pursue community-wide harms. | 20 |
| June 4, 2025 | Responsive Memorandum to Association’s Partial Motion to Dismiss | Responsive memorandum | Marx opposed dismissal by arguing the claims asserted direct individual harms and member-right violations. | 14-16 |
| June 6, 2025 | Reply to Response to Request for TRO and Injunctive Relief | Reply memorandum | Reply supporting emergency relief and addressing alleged service-delay and response-timing issues. | 18 |
| June 26, 2025 | Minute Entry – Claim not Derivative | Court order | Key early ruling treating Marx’s claims against the association as direct member-right claims rather than derivative claims for that motion. | 21, 22 |
| July 15, 2025 | Motion to Dismiss Defendants Mark Gottmann and Dennis Anderson | Motion | Individual board members sought dismissal based on director protections and lack of personal liability. | 23 |
| July 20, 2025 | Response Memorandum to Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants | Responsive memorandum | Marx opposed dismissal by arguing Gottmann and Anderson acted in bad faith and outside their authority. | 14, 24, 25 |
| July 25, 2025 | Minute entry order to file amended complaint | Court order | Order requiring a more definite statement, leading to amended pleadings. | 26 |
| July 31, 2025 | Ruling dismissing Mark and Dennis | Court order | Dismissed individual defendants, creating a major procedural setback for the personal-liability claims. | 27, 28 |
| August 6, 2025 | Travis Law Firm Budget Letter / Proposing Amendments | Budget letter / letter | Counsel letter explaining proposed amendments to shift insurance responsibilities to owners, initiating the core insurance-amendment dispute. | 4-6, 29-31 |
| August 10, 2025 | Motion for Partial Reconsideration of July 31, 2025 Ruling | Motion | Marx sought reconsideration of the dismissal of the individual board members. | 32 |
| August 11, 2025 | Exhibit N Cert of Ins for 25 26 | Certificate of liability insurance | Insurance certificate showing property coverage effective August 1, 2025 to August 1, 2026, used to contrast later claimed coverage changes. | 6, 33 |
| August 12, 2025 | Order Denying Motion for reconsideration | Court order | Maintained dismissal of Gottmann and Anderson. | 34 |
| August 15, 2025 | First Amended Complaint (FAC) | Amended complaint | Updated pleading reasserting claims and refining the legal counts against the association and directors. | 2, 14 |
| September 6, 2025 | Plaintiff’s Initial Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement | Discovery disclosure | Mandatory disclosure identifying factual bases, witnesses, and evidence Marx expected to use. | 35, 36 |
| September 11, 2025 | Stipulation for Extension of Time | Legal stipulation | Agreement extending Marx’s deadline to respond to fee applications; later relevant to arguments about premature fee rulings. | 28, 37 |
| September 15, 2025 | Order Denying Motion to Strike Reply | Court order | Denied Marx’s request to strike Tara’s reply regarding the amended complaint. | 38 |
| September 15, 2025 | Second Amended Complaint (SAC) | Amended complaint | Operative complaint against the association after dismissal of the individual defendants. | 28, 39-41 |
| September 15, 2025 | Order on Stipulation to Extend Time | Court order | Granted an extension to respond to attorney-fee requests. | 42 |
| September 20, 2025 | Minutes for a Board Meeting of the Tara Condominiums Association | Meeting minutes | Board minutes covering approval of the plan to present CC&R amendments for owner vote. | 43 |
| September 22, 2025 | Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint | Motion | Marx sought to reinstate direct claims against individual board members and add alleged post-filing violations. | 14, 44, 45 |
| September 24, 2025 | Urgent Concerns on Proposed CC&R Amendments | Email / letter | Marx letter to owners identifying claimed risks of the proposed amendments, including costs, title, loan, and insurance issues. | 4, 46 |
| September 25, 2025 | Meeting needs to be called to turn in ballots | Marx demanded an open meeting for the amendment vote, preserving her objection to the voting process. | 6, 47 | |
| September 27, 2025 | Proposed Insurance amendments (Board/Owner Emails) | Correspondence framing the association’s justification for the insurance shift and Marx’s objections under statutory and declaration duties. | 5, 6, 30, 48 | |
| September 30, 2025 | Minute Entry Denying Motion to Vacate | Court order | Denied Marx’s request to vacate a fee-related order before the fee award was entered. | 49 |
| October 1, 2025 | Order Granting Application for Attorney’s Fees | Court order | Awarded individual defendants $5,957.70 in fees after dismissal; Marx contends the award was premature. | 28, 49, 50 |
| October 5, 2025 | Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction | Motion | Attempt to block implementation of proposed amendments based on alleged statutory and declaration violations. | 6, 51 |
| October 9, 2025 | Motion for Expedited Hearing | Motion | Request for a hearing within five days before the amendment-vote deadline. | 31, 52, 53 |
| October 14, 2025 | Scheduling Order | Court order | Set discovery tiers, litigation deadlines, and a September 14, 2026 trial date. | 54 |
| October 15, 2025 | Action by Written Consent | Voting form | Owner written-consent form used for three proposed declaration amendments. | 55 |
| October 17, 2025 | Amendment to Declaration of Restrictions | Recorded amendment | Recorded amendment No. 2025-0605584 shifting insurance responsibility to owners; Marx challenges its validity. | 31, 56, 57 |
| October 18, 2025 | Results of Tara CC&R amendment vote | Announcement that amendments passed and owners had to obtain insurance by November 15, 2025. | 58, 59 | |
| October 22, 2025 | Stipulation to Continue Case Deadlines | Legal stipulation | Joint extension of deadlines due to Marx’s medical hospitalization. | 60 |
| October 26, 2025 | Meeting to view ballots (Transcript) | Transcript | Transcript in which Gottmann allegedly refused to show owner signatures or vote choices, supporting A.R.S. § 33-1258 inspection-right claims. | 61, 62 |
| October 29, 2025 | Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order | Motion | Emergency request to stop cancellation of master insurance and implementation of recorded amendments. | 31, 63 |
| October 30, 2025 | 2025 Budget | Financial document | Association budget showing a $50 assessment increase for insurance premiums, part of the financial basis for the amendment dispute. | 64 |
| October 30, 2025 | Order Granting Leave to File Reply Out of Time | Court order | Procedural relief allowing Marx to file a late reply related to the third amended complaint. | 65 |
| November 6, 2025 | Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Set Evidentiary Hearing | Motion | Request for an evidentiary hearing on the voting process and alleged harm from insurance lapse. | 66, 67 |
| November 10, 2025 | Reminder to obtain homeowner insurance | Board email setting a December 1, 2025 proof-of-structural-insurance deadline. | 68 | |
| November 12, 2025 | Notice of Appeal | Legal notice | Notice concerning dismissal of individual defendants and cost/fee issues. | 69, 70 |
| November 13, 2025 | Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s Consolidated Response | Motion / reply | Reply supporting preliminary-injunction relief based on claimed individualized harm and flawed amendment process. | 71 |
| November 17, 2025 | Minute Entry (Dismissing TAC and Injunction) | Court order | Denied leave to file the Third Amended Complaint and denied injunction relief, prompting later judge-change efforts. | 70, 72 |
| November 21, 2025 | Official Ballot 2026 Budget Ratification | Ballot | Budget ballot showing a proposed $15 assessment decrease after removing association insurance duties. | 73, 74 |
| November 21, 2025 | Civil Complaint for Declaratory Judgment | Complaint | New action CV2025-062973 challenging the October 2025 amendments and potential master-policy cancellation. | 75 |
| November 23, 2025 | Motion for Change of Judge for Cause | Motion | Marx sought to remove Judge Warner, leading to reassignment to Judge Adele Ponce. | 72, 76 |
| November 24, 2025 | Request for Answers to Interrogatories | Discovery request | Interrogatories targeting board decisions and maintenance work to develop the ultra vires theory. | 11 |
| November 25, 2025 | Case Reassignment / First Amended Civil Complaint | Court order / complaint | Case reassignment to Judge Ponce and amended pleading in the second insurance-shift action. | 70, 75, 77-79 |
| December 1, 2025 | Motion for Reconsideration of Nov 17 Minute Entry | Motion | Marx asked Judge Ponce to reconsider denial of the third amended complaint and injunction relief. | 70, 80 |
| December 3, 2025 | Minute Entry Case Consolidation | Court order | Consolidated CV2025-062973 with CV2025-012980, folding the insurance-amendment dispute into the main litigation path. | 81 |
| December 3, 2025 | Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of Consolidation | Motion | Marx opposed consolidation, arguing the actions involved distinct facts and emergency concerns. | 82 |
| December 4, 2025 | Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification and Expedited Hearing | Motion | Challenge to characterization of the complaint and request for expedited hearing on insurance risk. | 75 |
| December 5, 2025 | Joint Notice of Outstanding Motions and Hearings | Legal notice | Catalog of pending matters for Judge Ponce after reassignment. | 70 |
| January 4, 2026 | Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss | Response memorandum | Opposition to dismissal of the second action, arguing insurance termination was a new occurrence requiring separate attention. | 19 |
| January 20, 2026 | Certificate of Liability Insurance (Master Policy 2025-2026) | Insurance certificate | Certificate showing liability and D&O coverage but no building property insurance, used as key evidence that buildings became uninsured. | 83, 84 |
| January 20, 2026 | Notice of Intent to Serve Amended Subpoena | Discovery notice | Notice for records subpoena to Colby Management, part of the discovery fight over association records. | 85 |
| January 30, 2026 | Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Reconsideration | Legal memorandum | Filing using the January 20 insurance certificate as new evidence of claimed statutory insurance violations. | 83 |
| February 26, 2026 | Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Compel | Legal notice | Procedural withdrawal of a discovery motion. | 86 |
| March 16, 2026 | Minute Entry (Oral Argument and Rule 15d conversion) | Court order | Converted the second lawsuit into a Rule 15(d) supplemental-pleading path in the main case. | 41, 87 |
| May 27, 2026 | Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings | Motion | Tara’s attempt to dismiss asserted community-wide claims as derivative after newer appellate authority. | 88 |
| June 2, 2026 | Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Motion to Stay Colby Management Discovery | Response memorandum | Marx opposes Tara’s request to stay a ruling on the Colby Management subpoena dispute, arguing the requested insurance-claim accounting, communications, checks, and board-directive materials remain relevant to direct claims and that discovery deadlines were approaching. | 166 |
| June 2, 2026 | Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings | Response memorandum | Marx argues Iqtunheimr does not convert her open-meeting, notice, voting, records, insurance-accounting, amendment-validity, and individualized statutory-right claims into derivative claims, and asks the court to deny dismissal or narrow relief/allow amendment. | 167 |
| June 2, 2026 | Exhibit D – Organization of Claims for Presentation | Exhibit / organizational aid | Marx’s exhibit groups 103 claim paragraphs for presentation, including her assertion that 89 are open-meeting violations and that Tara’s motion targets 60 open-meeting items. | 168 |
| June 2, 2026 | Proposed Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings | Proposed order | Proposed form of order submitted by Marx. It is not a ruling unless and until the court signs or enters an order. | 169 |
| June 2, 2026 | Proposed Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Stay Ruling on Colby Production | Proposed order | Proposed form of order submitted by Marx to deny Tara’s requested stay of the Colby discovery ruling. It is not a court ruling. | 170 |
| Not dated in CSV | Plaintiff’s First Requests for Production of Documents | Discovery request | Formal request for insurance, financial, and related records, aimed at evidence about the 2024 insurance claim and policy-rate increases. | 90 |
| September 10, 2020 | Marx Warranty Deed | Deed | Warranty deed conveying Unit 5 to Lisa Marx, establishing her standing as unit owner and association member. | 2, 91, 92 |
How to read this case without overclaiming it
- Treat interim rulings as interim rulings. The June and July 2025 orders are important, but they do not equal a final merits judgment on every later claim.
- Separate association claims from individual-director claims. The uploaded record shows the court was willing to let some claims proceed against the association while dismissing individual board members.
- Track the exact injury theory. The direct-versus-derivative question turns on whether the claim seeks to remedy a member’s individual statutory/contractual injury or a generalized association injury.
- Do not skip the procedural posture. Preliminary injunction, motion to dismiss, judgment on the pleadings, and final judgment apply different standards.
- Use the source index. The upload is large. The normalized roadmap and complete source-document index are the safest way to follow the record in order.
Practical lessons for condo disputes
- Tie each claim to the specific statute, declaration section, bylaw, vote, notice, record request, or personal harm.
- Preserve agendas, minutes, emails, insurance notices, amendment materials, ballots, and records-request correspondence.
- Do not assume that proving a board process defect automatically proves irreparable harm.
- Keep direct personal injury theories separate from generalized association harm.
- Document board authorization, open-meeting votes, executive-session limits, and ratification steps.
- Handle records requests with clear statutory deadlines, production logs, and written explanations.
- Treat insurance and amendment changes as high-risk governance events requiring clean notices, votes, and member communications.
- Do not rely on derivative-action arguments without addressing member-right statutes and declaration enforcement language.
Complete source set
Download the updated filing roadmap
The reviewed public packet contains 214 deduplicated PDFs and this roadmap CSV. It cross-checks original names against normalized public filenames. Loose July exhibits and unsigned proposed orders are retained off-page pending privacy and public-status review.
FAQ
Is this case finally decided?
No. The reviewed record is current through docket events posted July 22, 2026. It includes important interim rulings and nine July partial-summary-judgment motions, but no final judgment resolving the full case.
Did the court say all of Marx's claims are direct claims?
No. The June 26, 2025 minute entry denied Tara’s first partial derivative-claims motion as to the association and described the claims as member-right claims as framed. Tara’s May 2026 Rule 12(c) motion asks the court to revisit direct-versus-derivative treatment for asserted community-wide claims, and Marx’s June 2026 opposition disputes that characterization.
Were the individual board members kept in the case?
No. The uploaded July 31, 2025 ruling dismissed Mark Gottmann and Dennis Anderson, while distinguishing those personal-liability theories from claims against the association.
Why does insurance appear in an open-meeting case?
The record expanded beyond early open-meeting and records allegations. Later filings challenged master-insurance changes, declaration amendments, owner insurance obligations, and related voting/notice procedures.
Did Marx win the July 2026 summary-judgment motions?
Not in the reviewed record. The court docket confirms the motion events, but no order granting or denying any of the nine motions appears in the source set. The motions, statements, declarations, and proposed orders are party submissions—not findings or judgments.
Why are the loose July exhibits not all available for download?
The master index and filed notices identify the exhibit sets, and the materials were reviewed for this update. The loose copies include discovery, financial, insurance, correspondence, affidavit, contract, and image records with private identifiers, and their status as independently public docket attachments was not established. They remain outside the public source index pending that review.
What should be added next?
The next high-value update would be the court’s ruling on Tara’s May 27, 2026 motion for judgment on the pleadings, responses and rulings on the July summary-judgment motions, any later Colby discovery order, final judgment, or appeal docket.
Complete source-document index
This index contains 214 PDFs, 1 other source file from the reviewed public source packet. Byte-identical copies are listed once. Files are ordered by the date and sequence in the public filename, and party filings or research materials are labeled separately from court rulings.
1 Minute Entry 4 14 25
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
1 2025 05 28 Partial Mtd Plaintiffs Derivative Claims 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
2 Minute Entry 6 23 25 From Court Hearing Same Date
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
3 6 25 25 Minute Entry Denying The Motion For Preliminary Injunction
Type: Court order/minute entry
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
4 Minute Entry 6 26 25 Claim Not Derivative
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Responsive Memo 7 18 25
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
5 Minute Entry 7 25 25 Order To File Amended Complaint
Type: Court order/minute entry
Order granting the motion for a short and plain statement and directing the homeowner to file an amended complaint complying with Rule 8.
6 Ruling 7 31 25 Dismissing Mark And Dennis
Type: Court order/minute entry
Ruling granting the motion to dismiss and dismissing all claims against individual board members Mark Gottmann and Dennis Anderson.
7 Order 8 12 25 Denying Motion For Reconsideration Filed The 14 Th
Type: Court order/minute entry
Order denying the homeowner’s motion for reconsideration of the ruling dismissing the individual board members.
Affidavit In Support Of Attorneys Fees 9 4 25
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Application For Attorneys Fees 9 4 25
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Statement Of Costs 9 4 25
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
9 Order 9 10 25 To File Amended Complaint
Type: Court order/minute entry
Order granting the motion to require an amended complaint and directing the homeowner to remove dismissed individual parties.
10 Order 9 15 25 Denying Motion To Strike Reply In Support Of Motion To Strike Portions Of Amended Complaint
Type: Court order/minute entry
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
11 Order 9 15 25 On Stipulation To Extend Time To File Response For Attorneys Fees
Type: Court order/minute entry
Opposing or responsive paper; compare it to the motion or request filed immediately before it.
1 Exhibit I 9 20 25 Minutes
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit U Ltr To Bd 9 27 25
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
12 Order Granting Defendants Application For Attorneys Fees 10 1 25
Type: Court order/minute entry
Order granting the dismissed individual defendants’ application for attorneys’ fees and costs.
13 Minute Entry 10 2 2025 Vacated 10 7 25
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
4 Ex F Email 10 5 25 From Lisa Marx To View Voting Materials
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ex F Email 10 5 25 From Lisa Marx To View Voting Materials
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
14 Minute Entry Ruling 10 7 25 Vacating The September 30 2025 Minute Entry Filed October 2 2025
Type: Court order/minute entry
Ruling vacating the September 30 minute entry on attorneys’ fees so the fee issue could be resolved by later judgment.
2 Request For Expedited Hearing 10 9 25
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
26 Request For Expedited Hearing 10 9 25
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Joint Report 10 10 25 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Case-management filing; it tells the court how the parties propose to schedule and manage the case.
15 10 14 25 Adr Referral
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
16 Minute Entry 10 15 25 Regarding Attorneys Fees And Costs
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
19 Scheduling Order 10 15 25
Type: Court order/minute entry
Order granting costs only and entering a modified Rule 54(b) judgment for the dismissed individual defendants.
17 Minute Entry Order 10 16 25 Docketed 10 17 25 Correcting Adr Referral
Type: Court order/minute entry
Order correcting the ADR referral minute entry and leaving the remainder of the referral order in effect.
4 Ex D Amendment Change 10 17 25 Recorded
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ex D Amendment Change 10 17 25 Recorded
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
4 Ex A Email 10 18 25 Announcing Amendment Vote Tally
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ex A Email 10 18 25 Announcing Amendment Vote Tally
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
4 Ex B Email From Mark 10 22 25 To Review Voting Materials
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
27 2025 10 22 Proposed Order Extending Case Deadlines
Type: Proposed order (not a ruling)
Unsigned form of relief requested by a party. It is not a ruling unless the judge signs and enters it.
27 2025 10 22 Stipulation To Continue Case Deadlines
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ex B Email From Mark 10 22 25 To Review Voting Materials
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
4 Ex C 10 23 25 Email From Mark Re Viewing Ballots
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ex C 10 23 25 Email From Mark Re Viewing Ballots
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
20 Proposed Order Granting Leave Reply To Third Amended Complaint 10 31 25
Type: Proposed order (not a ruling)
Unsigned form of relief requested by a party. It is not a ruling unless the judge signs and enters it.
21 Proposed Order To File Reply Late For Temporary Injunction 11 4 25
Type: Proposed order (not a ruling)
Unsigned form of relief requested by a party. It is not a ruling unless the judge signs and enters it.
6 Ex A Email 11 10 25 From Board With 12 1 25 Deadline For Insurance Proof
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
23 Minute Entry 11 18 25
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
24 Case Reassignment Civil Presiding Judge 11 26 25
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
25 Minute Entry 12 4 25 Case Consolidation
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
26 Alternative Dispute Resolution Vacated 12 19 25
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
27 Minute Entry 1 9 26 Motion For Reconsideration No Authority Due To Appeal
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Subpoena For Casey Bell American Family Ins 1 20 26
Type: Motion/application
Discovery or evidence request material; read it with the later order to see what was allowed or denied.
Subpoena To Colby 1 20 26
Type: Motion/application
Discovery or evidence request material; read it with the later order to see what was allowed or denied.
Affidavit Of Service Civil Subpoena Colby Management 1 23 26
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Proof-of-service material; check it to understand who was served and when deadlines started.
Affidavit Of Service Of Civil Subpoena Casey Bell Agency 1 23 26
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Proof-of-service material; check it to understand who was served and when deadlines started.
1 30 26 Supplemental Memorandum In Support Of Pending Motions
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
28 Minute Entry Order 2 12 26
Type: Court order/minute entry
Order addressing pending preliminary-injunction and amendment-related filings while the remaining Tara condominium claims continued.
29 Minute Entry 2 27 26 Motion To Compel Withdrawan Wo Prejudice
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
30 Minute Entry 3 16 2026 Hearing
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
31 Minute Entry 3 16 26
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
32 Minute Entry 3 30 26
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Defendant Response To Rule 15 D Supplemental Complaint
Type: Opening pleading
Tara's filed response to Marx's Rule 15(d) supplemental complaint, admitting that amendment and insurance events occurred while denying that they were unlawful.
2026 05 27 Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings
Type: Decision or judgment
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Response Opposition Motion Stay Colby Management Discovery
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Opposition Motion Judgment On Pleadings Rule 12 C
Type: Decision or judgment
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Exhibit D Organization Of Claims For Presentation
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Proposed Order Denying Motion Judgment On Pleadings Rule 12 C
Type: Proposed order (not a ruling)
Unsigned form of relief requested by a party. It is not a ruling unless the judge signs and enters it.
Proposed Order Denying Motion Stay Colby Management Discovery
Type: Proposed order (not a ruling)
Unsigned form of relief requested by a party. It is not a ruling unless the judge signs and enters it.
Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment 2025 Declaration Amendment
Type: Motion/application
Marx's motion asking the court to invalidate the 2025 declaration amendment. The statutory, voting, and foreseeability theories are plaintiff's arguments, not findings.
Plaintiff Separate Statement 2025 Declaration Amendment
Type: Statement of facts
Moving party's asserted facts and cited evidence. These are not findings made by the court.
Lisa Marx Declaration 2025 Declaration Amendment
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Exhibit Index 2025 Declaration Amendment
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment Claims 120 121
Type: Motion/application
Marx's motion on corporate-records claims 120 and 121, alleging incomplete meeting minutes and unrecorded board action. No ruling on the motion appears in the reviewed record.
Plaintiff Separate Statement Claims 120 121
Type: Statement of facts
Moving party's asserted facts and cited evidence. These are not findings made by the court.
Lisa Marx Declaration Claims 120 121
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Exhibit Index Claims 120 121
Type: Exhibit index
Index identifying the supporting exhibits cited by a party; use it to trace the evidence without treating the descriptions as findings.
Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment Claims 46 91 42 87 127 98 126
Type: Motion/application
Marx's motion challenging an insurance-deductible change, 2025 budget and assessment procedures, and ballot access or timing. These are disputed party positions.
Plaintiff Separate Statement Claims 46 91 42 87 127 98 126
Type: Statement of facts
Moving party's asserted facts and cited evidence. These are not findings made by the court.
Lisa Marx Declaration Claims 46 91 42 87 127 98 126
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Exhibit Index Claims 46 91 42 87 127 98 126
Type: Exhibit index
Index identifying the supporting exhibits cited by a party; use it to trace the evidence without treating the descriptions as findings.
Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment Claims 30 47 74 103 108 48 92
Type: Motion/application
Marx's motion concerning roof-repair cost allocation and release of a repair lien. It requests a ruling; it is not one.
Plaintiff Separate Statement Claims 30 47 74 103 108 48 92
Type: Statement of facts
Moving party's asserted facts and cited evidence. These are not findings made by the court.
Lisa Marx Declaration Claims 30 47 74 103 108 48 92
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Exhibit Index Claims 30 47 74 103 108 48 92
Type: Exhibit index
Index identifying the supporting exhibits cited by a party; use it to trace the evidence without treating the descriptions as findings.
Minute Entry Granting Discovery Stay Until Rule 12 C Ruling
Type: Court order/minute entry
Official minute entry granting Tara's request to postpone the Colby Management discovery ruling until after the court decides the pending Rule 12(c) motion.
Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment Claims 26 70 27 71 28 72 29 73 43 88
Type: Motion/application
Marx's motion concerning a reserve transfer, meeting-minute corrections, workers' compensation coverage, Bermuda-grass spending, and a lighting reimbursement.
Plaintiff Separate Statement Claims 26 70 27 71 28 72 29 73 43 88
Type: Statement of facts
Moving party's asserted facts and cited evidence. These are not findings made by the court.
Lisa Marx Declaration Claims 26 70 27 71 28 72 29 73 43 88
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Exhibit Index Claims 26 70 27 71 28 72 29 73 43 88
Type: Exhibit index
Index identifying the supporting exhibits cited by a party; use it to trace the evidence without treating the descriptions as findings.
Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment Claims 23 67 24 68 25 69 33 34 77 78 49 93
Type: Motion/application
Marx's motion concerning officer and director appointments, dissolution of a landscaping committee, and a two-minute owner-comment rule.
Plaintiff Separate Statement Claims 23 67 24 68 25 69 33 34 77 78 49 93
Type: Statement of facts
Moving party's asserted facts and cited evidence. These are not findings made by the court.
Lisa Marx Declaration Claims 23 67 24 68 25 69 33 34 77 78 49 93
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Exhibit Index Claims 23 67 24 68 25 69 33 34 77 78 49 93
Type: Exhibit index
Index identifying the supporting exhibits cited by a party; use it to trace the evidence without treating the descriptions as findings.
Master Index Of Exhibits
Type: Exhibit index
Plaintiff's master index grouping proposed supporting evidence into governing-document, meeting, financial, audio, executive-session, and discovery sets. The index descriptions are not court findings.
Notice Exhibits Set 1 Governing Documents
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Notice Exhibits Set 2 2024 Meetings
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Notice Exhibits Set 2 Continued 2024 Meetings
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Notice Exhibits Set 3 2025 Meetings
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Notice Exhibits Set 4 2023 2024 Financials
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Notice Exhibits Set 5 2025 Financials
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Notice Exhibits Set 6 Audio Transcripts Authentication
Type: Procedural/service filing
Adds hearing transcript material to the record for later review or appeal.
Notice Exhibits Set 6 Continued
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Notice Exhibits Sets 7 And 8 Executive Session Minutes
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Notice Exhibits Set 9 Discovery Financials
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Notice Conventional Filing Exhibit Set 9
Type: Procedural/service filing
Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.
Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment Claims 32 76 39 84 83 44 89
Type: Motion/application
Marx's motion concerning common-area work, a Home Depot purchase, a second bank account and transfer, and tree work outside the landscaping contract.
Plaintiff Separate Statement Claims 32 76 39 84 83 44 89
Type: Statement of facts
Moving party's asserted facts and cited evidence. These are not findings made by the court.
Lisa Marx Declaration Claims 32 76 39 84 83 44 89
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Exhibit Index Claims 32 76 39 84 83 44 89
Type: Exhibit index
Index identifying the supporting exhibits cited by a party; use it to trace the evidence without treating the descriptions as findings.
Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment Claims 31 75 35 79 36 80 37 81 38 82 45 90
Type: Motion/application
Marx's motion concerning sprinkler-trench work, retention and payment of association counsel, retroactive work approval, and a payment to Marx.
Plaintiff Separate Statement Claims 31 75 35 79 36 80 37 81 38 82 45 90
Type: Statement of facts
Moving party's asserted facts and cited evidence. These are not findings made by the court.
Lisa Marx Declaration Claims 31 75 35 79 36 80 37 81 38 82 45 90
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Exhibit Index Claims 31 75 35 79 36 80 37 81 38 82 45 90
Type: Exhibit index
Index identifying the supporting exhibits cited by a party; use it to trace the evidence without treating the descriptions as findings.
Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment Claims 40 85 41 86 51 95 53 97
Type: Motion/application
Marx's motion concerning preparation of the 2025 budget, budget-committee leadership and membership, and landscaping or maintenance spending.
Plaintiff Separate Statement Claims 40 85 41 86 51 95 53 97
Type: Statement of facts
Moving party's asserted facts and cited evidence. These are not findings made by the court.
Lisa Marx Declaration Claims 40 85 41 86 51 95 53 97
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Exhibit Index Claims 40 85 41 86 51 95 53 97
Type: Exhibit index
Index identifying the supporting exhibits cited by a party; use it to trace the evidence without treating the descriptions as findings.
1 Exhibit A Marx Warranty Deed
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit B Tara Ccrs
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit C Travis Law Firm
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit D Proposed Amendments
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit E Plaintiff Email
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit F Statement Read
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit G Plaintiff Letter
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit H Email To Homeowners
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit J Action
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit K Changes To Ccr Ltr
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit L Differences
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit M Board Email
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit N Cert Of Ins For 25 26
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit O Cert Of Ins Ltr 25 26
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit P Tara 2025 Budgetletter
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit Q Budget Vote 24 Email
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit R 2025 Budget
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit S Tara 25 Bud Ballot
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
1 Exhibit T Pl Motion For Leave
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
1 Plaintiffs Motion For Preliminary Inj Copy
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
1 St Amended Complaint 8 15 25
Type: Opening pleading
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
3 Plaint 1 PDF 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
4 Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order Arcp 65 B
Type: Court order/minute entry
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
4 November 5 2025 Minute Entry Denying Emergency Motion Tro
Type: Court order/minute entry
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
4 Ex E 251025 001 Meeting To View Ballots
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
5 Ex V Tara 2026 Budget Ballot
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
5 Ex W 2026 Budget Tara Condominium Association 15 Reduction
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
5 Plaintiffs Amended Motion To Set Evidentiary Hearing On Motion For Preliminary Injunction
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
8 Proposed Order To Extend Time Joint Report And Scheduling
Type: Proposed order (not a ruling)
Unsigned form of relief requested by a party. It is not a ruling unless the judge signs and enters it.
11 Motion To Dismiss Defendants Mark Gottmann And Dennis Anderson
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
15 Plaintiffs Initial Rule 26 1 Disclosure Statement
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
16 Noti 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
16 1 Order Granting Defendants Application For Costs Oct 15 2025
Type: Court order/minute entry
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
18 Order Extending Case Deadlines Oct 24 2025
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
18 1 Response To Motion To Vacate Order On Attorneys Fees
Type: Court order/minute entry
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
22 November 5 2025 Minute Entry Denying Emergency Motion Tro
Type: Court order/minute entry
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Affidavit Of Lisa Marx In Support Of Motion For Change Of Judge For Cause
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Affida 1 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Affida 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Case No CV 2025 012980 Responsive Memorandum To Associations Partial Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs Claims That Are Derivi
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Cc And R Amendment Update From The Arizona Supreme Court Chdb Law
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Colby Subpoena
Type: Motion/application
Discovery or evidence request material; read it with the later order to see what was allowed or denied.
Colbyn 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
CV 2025 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
CV 2025 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Defendants Reply To Plaintiffs Response To Motion
Type: Motion/application
Reply paper; usually the final written response before the court takes the issue under advisement.
Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order Arcp 65 B Expedited Consideration Requested
Type: Court order/minute entry
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Ex A Copy Second Amended Complaint
Type: Opening pleading
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
Ex A Master Insurance As Of Dec 1 2025
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ex B Copy First Amended Civil Complaint For Declaratory Judgment And Injunctive Relief
Type: Decision or judgment
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
Ex D Organization Of Claims For Presentation
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ex E 251025 001 Meeting To View Ballots
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ex W 2026 Budget Tara Condominium Association 15 Reduction
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ex V Tara 2026 Budget Ballot
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Exapla 1 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Exapla 1 2
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Exapla 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Exbaff 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Exhibit A Email Requesting Reply To Motion Be Rescinded
Type: Motion/application
Reply paper; usually the final written response before the court takes the issue under advisement.
Exhibit B Email Requesting Stipulated Extension
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
First Amended Civil Complaint For Declaratory Judgment And Injunctive Relief
Type: Decision or judgment
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
Insurance Subpoena
Type: Motion/application
Discovery or evidence request material; read it with the later order to see what was allowed or denied.
Insura 2
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Jointn 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Minute 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Motion For Change Of Judge For Cause Pursuant To Arcp 42 2
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Motion For Leave For 3 Rd Complaint
Type: Opening pleading
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
Motion For Reconsideration Of October 1 2025 Order
Type: Court order/minute entry
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Motion To Strike Defendants Reply In Support Of Motion To Strike Portions Of Amended Complaint
Type: Opening pleading
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
Motion To Vacate Order On Attorney Fees
Type: Court order/minute entry
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Motion 1 1
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Motion 1
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Notice Of Withdrawal Of Motion To Compel
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Objection To Plaintiffs Notice
Type: Briefing paper
Opposing or responsive paper; compare it to the motion or request filed immediately before it.
Object 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plain Reply To 3 Rd Amended Complaint
Type: Opening pleading
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
Plaintiffs First Supplemental Disclosure Statement
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaintiffs Motion For Preliminary Inj Copy
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Plaint 1 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 10
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 11
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 12
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 2
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 3
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 4
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 5
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 6
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 7
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1 8
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plaint 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Plares 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Reply To Resp And Obj To Mot For Lea
Type: Briefing paper
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Reques 1 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Reques 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Reques 2
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Response To Motion To Dismiss Mark Gottmann And Dennis Anderson 1
Type: Motion/application
A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.
Response To Motion To Strike Portions Of Amended Complaint
Type: Opening pleading
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
Respon 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Second Amended Complaint
Type: Opening pleading
Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.
Stipul 1
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Supplemental Verified Affidavit Of Lisa Marx
Type: Declaration or affidavit
Witness statement submitted under oath or declaration; its assertions are evidence offered by a party, not court findings.
Source File Roadmap 2026 07 22
Type: Source roadmap CSV
Upload/source spreadsheet that helps cross-check filing order, source names, or AI review notes.
Primary sources
- Original complaint packet
- Second Amended Complaint
- June 25, 2025 preliminary-injunction minute entry
- June 26, 2025 derivative-claim minute entry
- July 31, 2025 ruling dismissing individual board members
- May 27, 2026 motion for judgment on the pleadings
- June 2, 2026 response opposing Colby discovery stay
- June 2, 2026 opposition to Rule 12(c) motion
- June 2, 2026 Exhibit D claim organization
- June 2, 2026 unsigned proposed order denying Rule 12(c) motion
- June 2, 2026 unsigned proposed order denying Colby discovery stay
- March 30, 2026 Tara response to supplemental complaint
- July 16, 2026 minute entry granting Colby discovery stay
- July 5 motion on 2025 declaration amendment
- July 10 motion on corporate-records claims 120 and 121
- July 11 insurance, budget, and ballot motion
- July 13 roof and lien motion
- July 16 reserve, minutes, policy, and spending motion
- July 16 appointments and speaking-rule motion
- July 19 landscaping and spending motion
- July 20 common-area work and legal-expense motion
- July 21 budget-committee and maintenance motion
- July 16 master index of plaintiff's exhibits
- Normalized source-file roadmap
Reviewed against the supplied filings and the Maricopa County docket through events posted July 22, 2026. Party allegations, separate statements, declarations, exhibit descriptions, and proposed orders are not treated as court findings. No July proposed order is signed or entered. This page is educational information for Arizona HOA and condominium governance research, not legal advice for any specific dispute.