★ Must-read
Jimmie Klatt v. SunBird Golf Resort Homeowners Association Inc.
1 CA-CV 25-0709
Why it matters
CC&R amendment adding a $300 golf-course assessment was void as unforeseeable under Kalway.
Read case analysis →HOA Court Cases
Search 213 Arizona court rulings on HOA law. Filter by topic, court, or year to find cases relevant to your dispute — each card leads with why the ruling matters.
Prefer a single-court page? Superior Court · Court of Appeals · Arizona Supreme Court · Federal Court
Analysis pages
Source-backed explanations of selected rulings, with full dockets and media where available.
★ Must-read
Baoan Andy Gia Le, et al. v. North Shore Condominium Association, et al.
1 CA-CV 25-0476
Why it matters
A board-adopted rule setting a 30-day minimum lease term is valid under Kalway because it reasonably and foreseeably…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association
1 CA-CV 25-0424
Why it matters
Open-meeting agendas must give members reasonable notice of board votes and formal HOA action.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
AZNH Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association
1 CA-CV 25-0424
Why it matters
HOA votes and formal actions must occur in open meetings with agenda notice of what will be decided.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
AZNH Revocable Trust v. Kay Abramsohn, Arizona Office of Administrative Hearings, Arizona Department of Real Estate, and Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association
CV2025-036466 / OAH 24F-H047-REL-RMD
Why it matters
The Superior Court granted special-action relief in part, vacated OAH orders issued on or after September 26, 2025…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Sundance Adult Village Homeowners Association v. Elliott
2 CA-CV 2024-0314
Why it matters
HOA had to repair a common-area wall; architectural guidelines could not shift the cost to owners.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Pat Mah v. Canterra at Squaw Peak Condominium Association, Inc.
CV2021-018876 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Declaration made limited-common-element balcony repairs a common expense shared by all condo owners.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Thomas J. Gusich v. Sun City Grand Community Association, Inc.
CV2025-002634 / 1 CA-CV 25-0929
Why it matters
The Superior Court dismissed the claims, entered final judgment for Sun City Grand, awarded reduced attorney fees…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Pointe 16 Community Association v. GTIS-HOV Pointe 16, LLC, et al.
CV-24-0182-PR
Why it matters
A general contractual anti-assignment clause does not, without clearer language, bar homeowners from assigning…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
AZNH Revocable Trust v. Arizona Department of Real Estate and Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association
LC2025-000025 / OAH 24F-H047-REL
Why it matters
The Superior Court dismissed the broader administrative appeal, remanded for a limited evidentiary hearing on…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Six v. IQ Data International, Inc.
129 F.4th 630 (9th Cir. 2025)
Why it matters
Ninth Circuit revived the FDCPA case; the district court separately sanctioned IQ Data and CHDB counsel.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
State of Arizona, et al. v. Foothills Reserve Master Owners Association, Inc.
CV-23-0292-PR
Why it matters
Homeowners may recover severance-type damages when condemnation takes HOA common-area easements.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Susan M. Marcella v. The Legend Trail Community Association
CV2023-052094 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court denied the homeowner's motion for partial summary judgment on all grounds, holding that disputed…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Cao v. PFP Dorsey Investments
257 Ariz. 82, 545 P.3d 459 (2024)
Why it matters
Condo termination statute allowed forced sale procedures, subject to constitutional compensation limits.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Susan Wellman
CV2021-001865 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Self-help nuisance cleanup costs were secured by the HOA assessment lien and could support foreclosure.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Colin Preston, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Las Sendas Community Association, Inc., Defendant/Appellee
1 CA-CV 22-0761
Why it matters
The 1995 CC&Rs, read in their entirety, provided sufficient notice that a durational limit on leases could be…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Richard Rudner v. Bellasera Community Association, Inc.
CV2023-002424 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Kalway invalidated an unforeseeable CC&R amendment expanding architectural enforcement authority.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Cheryl Marie McCoy, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Leslie Johnson, Defendant/Appellee
1 CA-CV 21-0676
Why it matters
Members and candidates of a large homeowners' association's board are limited-purpose public figures for defamation…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Doubletree Canyon Homeowners Association v. Teodora Cupes
CV2021-014955 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Nonmatching exterior doors and windows violated the CC&Rs and had to be corrected in 90 days.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Michael Lyon v. Regency House Association
CV2020-008665 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
On reconsideration under Kalway v. Calabria Ranch HOA, LLC, the superior court granted the homeowner summary…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Villa Sendero Homeowners Association Inc v. Diana Costain
CV2022-004188 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court denied the homeowner's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, holding that a party need not file a…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Keith and Kathy Campbell, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Florence Gardens Mobile Home Association, an Arizona non-profit corporation; Gail and Steven Haskett; Nick and JoAnn Treinen; Emily J. Webster; Gerald C. and Patricia M. Palmatier; Judith A. and Martin C. Weber, Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants
2 CA-CV 2021-0091
Why it matters
The court affirmed dismissal of the homeowners' breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim, holding the allegations were…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Kalway v. Calabria Ranch HOA, LLC
252 Ariz. 532; 506 P.3d 18 (2022)
Why it matters
HOA amendments must be reasonable and foreseeable from the original CC&Rs, not entirely new obligations.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Gene D. Watson, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Leisure World Community Association, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee
1 CA-CV 20-0592
Why it matters
Both the 2013 Consolidated Declaration and the 2014 Amendment were invalid amendments adopted without the owner…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Marybeth Abodeely v. The Oasis Association
CV2020-001329 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Fine claims survived where Oasis may have fined before the A.R.S. § 33-1803 response period expired.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Club West Conservancy v. Foothills Club West Community Association
CV2020-003577 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA lacked authority to accept golf-course declarant rights without a 75% CC&R amendment vote.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Sycamore Hills Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Zablotny
250 Ariz. 479; 481 P.3d 705 (App. 2021) (No. 2 CA-CV 2019-0200)
Why it matters
A trial court that has general subject-matter jurisdiction over the underlying contract action may enter a…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Robert Wollner, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Spanish Hills Condominium Association, Defendant/Appellee
1 CA-CV 19-0341
Why it matters
Because the bylaws provide that directors are elected at the annual meeting and no July annual meeting was held, no…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Nicdon 10663 LLC v. Desert Mountain Master Association
CV2018-015165 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
CC&R amendment adding a 30-day rental minimum upheld under the declaration's voting procedure.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Bolton Anderson, et al. v. Recreation Centers of Sun City Inc.
CV2015-012458 (see also 2019 Ariz. Sess. Laws Ch. 185 / SB 1094)
Why it matters
RCSC was briefly treated as a planned-community association before SB 1094 retroactively overruled the theory.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Swain v. Bixby Village Golf Course, Inc.
247 Ariz. 405, 450 P.3d 270 (App. 2019) (No. 1 CA-CV 18-0397)
Why it matters
A restrictive covenant in a community declaration can impose an affirmative duty, here a duty to actually operate a…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Ironwood Commons Community Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Shannon K. Randall
246 Ariz. 412, 439 P.3d 1193 (App. 2019), 1 CA-CV 17-0381
Why it matters
The HOA validly renewed the docketed judgment by filing in the county where the transcript was docketed, but it…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Robert Peshek v. Anasazi Village Condominiums Homeowners Association, Inc.
CV2017-056168 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Condo board recall upheld where the association followed A.R.S. § 33-1243(H) and the Declaration.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Chula Vista Homeowners Association v. Olson
2 CA-SA 2018-0031, 426 P.3d 1228 (App. 2018)
Why it matters
Open-meeting and slander-of-title fee awards required a reduced supersedeas bond on appeal.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
McNair v. Maxwell & Morgan, PC
893 F.3d 680 (9th Cir. 2018) (No. 15-17383)
Why it matters
Ninth Circuit held Maxwell & Morgan falsely represented unapproved HOA foreclosure fees.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
William M. Brown v. Terravita Country Club, Inc.
CV2017-055475
Why it matters
HOA compliance with an administrative records order defeated contempt and private enforcement relief.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Troon North Association v. City of Scottsdale
CV2017-015460 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA lacked CC&R authority to appeal a zoning decision for members' collective property interests.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Norman Zwicky v. Premiere Vacation Collection Owners Association
244 Ariz. 309, 418 P.3d 1108 (App. 2018), 1 CA-CV 16-0659
Why it matters
A timeshare owner who follows the statutory request procedure and has a 'proper purpose' — a desire to obtain…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Tapestry on Central LLC v. Tapestry on Central Condominium Association
CV2014-090103 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
CC&R assessment duties survived a parking-agreement defense, but the owner won a larger implied-covenant verdict.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Darryl J. Roberts, et al. v. Windy Walk Homeowners Association, et al.
CV2016-011505 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court denied the eight moving defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss without prejudice, holding…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Rene Bishop v. Sunland Village Community Association
CV2016-051857 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Member vote validly approved equalizing annual assessments under A.R.S. § 33-1803 and the CC&Rs.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Zakia Mashiri v. Epsten Grinnell & Howell; Debora M. Zumwalt; Does 1-25
845 F.3d 984 (9th Cir. 2017) (No. 14-56927)
Why it matters
HOA collection letter plausibly overshadowed FDCPA validation rights by threatening imminent lien action.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Mullins v. Nisbet Greens Homeowners Association
CV2015-053962 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Owner claims failed because board duties were derivative and the CC&Rs allowed the assessment increases.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Christine Davis v. Westglen Villas Homeowners Association Inc
CV2015-091129 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court denied the defendants' motion for partial summary judgment as to Christine Davis on both counts…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Richard J. Murtland, et al. v. Astragal Condominium Unit Owners Association
CV2015-091102 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
A declaration amendment imposing a six-month minimum rental period was not subject to the unanimous-consent…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Camelback House Homeowners Association INC v. Marc Secter
CV2013-095878 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
A condo association could foreclose once A.R.S. § 33-1256 delinquency thresholds were met.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Chauncey Ranch Office Condominium Association v. North Scottsdale Pain Center, LLC
CV2013-003636 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Unit owner won summary judgment against association breach-of-contract and architectural claims.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Troon Ridge Estates III & IV Homeowners Association v. 4AAR Holdings, LLC
CV2012-094261 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Escrow payoff requests do not erase HOA liens absent a real transaction; paid assessments defeated foreclosure.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Lisa Marx v. Fiesta Villas Condominium Association
CV2013-095464 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Special-declarant rights let 26 condo-unit votes proceed despite unpaid transfer and working-capital fees.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Merlie v. Val Vista Lakes Community Association
CV2011-016976 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
CC&R debris injunction granted, but HOA enforcement reasonableness remained a fact question.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
David B. Vanyo v. Carefree Foothills Homeowners Association
CV2006-011927 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Juries found HOA waiver of a CC&R use restriction and later allowed private condemnation of CC&R access.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Nickerson v. Green Valley Recreation, Inc.
228 Ariz. 528, 269 P.3d 1179 (App. 2011) (2 CA-CV 2010-0197)
Why it matters
Covenants requiring homeowners to maintain membership in, and pay dues and assessments to, a recreational…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Raimey v. Ditsworth (Dreamland Villa Community Club, Inc.)
227 Ariz. 552, 261 P.3d 436 (App. 2011)
Why it matters
On special-action review of a judgment entered on remand, the Court of Appeals held that the Dreamland Villa Second…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
In re Shawn Burgueno, Debtor
451 B.R. 1 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2011)
Why it matters
Post-petition HOA assessments and collection fees remain nondischargeable while the debtor holds title.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Villa De Jardines Association v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
227 Ariz. 91, 253 P.3d 288 (App. 2011)
Why it matters
Recorded first deeds of trust have priority over planned-community assessment liens.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Gelb v. Department of Fire, Building & Life Safety
225 Ariz. 515, 241 P.3d 512 (App. 2010)
Why it matters
Arizona’s former HOA administrative-hearing system violated separation of powers and lacked jurisdiction.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Dominick Abatemarco v. Canterra at Squaw Peak Condominium Association, Inc.
CV2007-053132 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The association, not the individual unit owner, was responsible under the Declaration for repairing the defective…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Dreamland Villa Community Club, Inc. v. Raimey
224 Ariz. 42, 226 P.3d 411 (App. 2010)
Why it matters
Generic amendment language did not permit adding mandatory recreation-club membership and dues.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Richard Gayer v. Willo Neighborhood Association
Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2008-029900
Why it matters
On a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the member's bylaw-amendment quorum and notice claim against the association stated a…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
The Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Association v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc.
218 Ariz. 574, 190 P.3d 733 (2008)
Why it matters
Builder-vendors are not the only parties potentially liable for implied warranty construction defects.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Santa Fe Ridge Homeowners' Association v. Bartschi
219 Ariz. 391, 199 P.3d 646
Why it matters
A homeowners' association's lawsuit to compel a homeowner's compliance with existing, already-recorded CC&Rs is not…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Carpediem Investments LLC v. Desert Mountain Master Association
CV2006-052755 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Association could review plans but could not force two recorded lots to stay assembled as one parcel.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Richard B. Nolan and Patricia E. Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Association
1 CA-CV 06-0572
Why it matters
Fair-housing and covenant claims failed because the homeowners did not prove HOA misconduct.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
McDowell Mountain Ranch Community Association, Inc. v. James F. Simons
216 Ariz. 266, 165 P.3d 667 (App. 2007)
Why it matters
Mandatory CC&R fee clauses must be enforced according to their terms after covenant litigation.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Flying Diamond Airpark, LLC v. Meienberg
215 Ariz. 44, 156 P.3d 1149 (App. 2007)
Why it matters
Affirming a mandatory injunction, the Court of Appeals held that a property owner who has actual or constructive…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Powell v. Washburn
211 Ariz. 553, 125 P.3d 373 (2006)
Why it matters
Arizona courts interpret restrictive covenants by intent and purpose, not reflexive free-use rules.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Wilson v. Playa de Serrano
211 Ariz. 511, 123 P.3d 1148 (App. 2005); No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0072
Why it matters
Absent specific authorization in the recorded Declaration (CC&Rs), a common-interest homeowners' association cannot…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
John W. Shamrock, et al. v. Wagon Wheel Park Homeowners Association
206 Ariz. 42, 75 P.3d 132 (Ct. App. 2003), 1 CA-CV 02-0403
Why it matters
Mandatory membership in a new HOA cannot be imposed without consent or original covenant notice.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
John W. Shamrock, et al. v. Wagon Wheel Park Homeowners Association
206 Ariz. 42, 75 P.3d 132 (App. 2003) (No. 1 CA-CV 02-0403)
Why it matters
Mandatory membership in a new HOA cannot be imposed without consent or original covenant notice.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
David C. Johnson and Wendee L. Johnson v. The Pointe Community Association, Inc., Patrick and Carol Boyle
205 Ariz. 485 (Ct. App. 2003), 1 CA-CV 02-0160
Why it matters
Courts interpret HOA restrictive covenants independently; associations receive no special deference.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Garden Lakes Community Association, Inc. v. Madigan and Speak
204 Ariz. 234, 62 P.3d 983 (Ct. App. 2003), 1 CA-CV 00-0570
Why it matters
Whether a homeowners association's architectural guidelines 'effectively prohibit' the installation or use of a…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Garden Lakes Community Association, Inc. v. Madigan
204 Ariz. 238, 62 P.3d 983 (App. 2003)
Why it matters
HOA solar restrictions are void if they effectively prohibit solar-energy device installation.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Scott Canady, Ralph and Margaret Canady, and Pamela Garapich v. Prescott Canyon Estates Homeowners Association, Prescott Canyon Estates Homeowners Association Board of Directors, and Don Larson, President
204 Ariz. 91 (Ct. App. 2002), 1 CA-CV 02-0138
Why it matters
Age-restricted communities may need to waive age limits as a fair-housing reasonable accommodation.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Association, Inc. v. George M. Turner and Betty C. Turner
196 Ariz. 631, 2 P.3d 1276 (App. 2000) (Nos. 1 CA-CV 98-0233, 1 CA-CV 98-0528)
Why it matters
Although the homeowners violated the association's CC&Rs and Architectural Committee Guidelines, the trial court did…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Association, Inc. v. Bach
193 Ariz. 401, 973 P.2d 106 (1999)
Why it matters
Ordinary litigation expenses are not attorney fees, but computerized legal research may be recoverable.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Mountain View Condominiums Homeowners Ass'n v. Scott
No. 2 CA-CV 93-0288; 180 Ariz. 216, 883 P.2d 453 (App. 1994)
Why it matters
A condominium unit owner's obligation to pay association assessments arises from unit ownership itself, which…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Arizona Biltmore Estates Association v. Tezak
177 Ariz. 447, 868 P.2d 1030 (App. 1993)
Why it matters
Declaration text and purpose controlled whether architectural covenants barred a second-story addition.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
The Villas at Hidden Lakes Condominiums Association v. Geupel Construction Co.
No. 1 CA-CV 90-263; 174 Ariz. 72, 847 P.2d 117 (App. 1992)
Why it matters
Developer authority over assessments survived if supported by the declaration and admissible records.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Shelby v. Registrar of Contractors
172 Ariz. 95, 834 P.2d 818 (1992)
Why it matters
Condo owners may be injured persons when common-element construction defects damage appurtenant rights.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Federoff v. Pioneer Title & Trust Co.
166 Ariz. 383, 803 P.2d 104 (1990)
Why it matters
Recorded mutual restrictive covenants may bind later owners with notice even if later deeds omit them.
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Camelback Del Este Homeowners Ass'n v. Warner
156 Ariz. 21, 749 P.2d 930 (App. 1987)
Why it matters
Restrictive covenants limiting a subdivision to single-family residential use are enforceable against commercial…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
La Esperanza Townhome Association, Inc. v. Title Security Agency of Arizona
142 Ariz. 235, 689 P.2d 178 (App. 1984)
Why it matters
An amendment to a subdivision's restrictive covenants must apply uniformly to all lots; an amendment that releases…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Casita de Castilian, Inc. v. Kenneth K. Kamrath and Mary Elizabeth Kamrath
129 Ariz. 146, 629 P.2d 562 (App. 1981)
Why it matters
A condominium council of co-owners may, through a validly adopted majority-vote bylaw amendment, shift…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co.
124 Ariz. 413, 604 P.2d 1124 (1979)
Why it matters
When a recorded declaration expressly authorizes amendment or revocation by the specified vote of owners, Arizona…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass'n v. Esser
115 Ariz. 330, 565 P.2d 207 (App. 1977)
Why it matters
A valid, enforceable subdivision deed restriction must be enforced by injunction, and the trial court abused its…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Decker v. Hendricks
97 Ariz. 36, 396 P.2d 609 (1964)
Why it matters
Arizona courts may order removal of a knowingly noncompliant structure, and defenses based on delay, outside-area…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Palermo v. Allen
91 Ariz. 57, 369 P.2d 906 (1962)
Why it matters
Restrictions are not enforceable among later owners as part of a general plan unless the deeds or related…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Murphey v. Gray
84 Ariz. 299, 327 P.2d 751 (1958)
Why it matters
Restrictive covenants remain enforceable despite increased land value or zoning overlap unless surrounding changes…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Condos v. Home Development Co.
77 Ariz. 129, 267 P.2d 1069 (1954)
Why it matters
Violations of some subdivision restrictions do not automatically destroy a separate covenant, and a private…
Read case analysis →★ Must-read
Whitaker v. Holmes
74 Ariz. 30, 243 P.2d 462 (1952)
Why it matters
Failure to sue earlier or remote violators does not automatically waive the right to enforce a restrictive covenant…
Read case analysis →Reed v. CHDB Law LLP et al.
D. Ariz. No. 2:25-cv-04355-MTL
Why it matters
Reed alleged time-barred HOA judgment collection by CHDB; defendants denied liability and the case settled.
Read case analysis →Fields v. Sun Groves HOA
CV2026-001831 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Sun Groves HOA was dismissed from a quiet-title suit because no ownership or other claim was alleged against it.
Read case analysis →Trilogy at Power Ranch Community Association v. Steve Berman, et al.
CV2025-036771
Why it matters
An Arizona HOA cannot convert member criticism — even repeated, anonymous, and harsh mass emails about board…
Read case analysis →Sandra Rodriguez v. Gardens-Gilbert Community Association, et al.
Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2024-005940 (consolidated with CV2024-013806)
Why it matters
On the operative pleading, the court held that an HOA's CC&Rs are the contract between owner and association, so…
Read case analysis →Val Vista Classic Community Association v. Levi Rosenbaum
CV2024-003271 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Routine HOA assessment foreclosure: unpaid assessments supported summary judgment for the association.
Read case analysis →Everett Huffman v. Magic Ranch Estates Homeowners' Association, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation
2 CA-CV 2025-0008
Why it matters
The homeowner's allegations — slamming mailbox doors, vehicle stereos and idling, slammed car doors, headlights…
Read case analysis →Kokoskov v. Harapko and Grayhawk Community Association
CV2026-004481 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Preliminary injunction denied against Grayhawk-approved construction under disputed design guidelines.
Read case analysis →Desert Crown III Homeowners Association, an Arizona nonprofit corporation v. Debabrata Gupta, an unmarried man
2 CA-CV 2025-0138
Why it matters
Affirmed. A self-represented (in propria persona) appellant is held to the same procedural standards as a licensed…
Read case analysis →Trilogy at Power Ranch Community Association v. John Doe #1-50
CV2025-036877
Why it matters
An association cannot keep an injunction case alive against unidentified 'John Doe' defendants it never serves…
Read case analysis →Shawn Blakley v. Roosevelt Grover Parker, et al.
CV2023-014388 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA won all claims and fees under § 12-341.01 for alleged contractual enforcement-duty failures.
Read case analysis →AZNH Revocable Trust v. Susan Nicolson, Tammy Eigenheer, and Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association
CV2026-008484
Why it matters
Pending special-action challenge over ADRE/OAH response authority; no final merits ruling in the file set.
Read case analysis →Barcelona Manor Association, Inc. v. Travis L. Nolte
2 CA-CV 2025-0183
Why it matters
Condo owners cannot withhold assessments as self-help even when alleging association nonperformance.
Read case analysis →Steve Pandi v. Crown Point Homeowners Association, et al.
CV2025-060700 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Separate HOA foreclosure claims were dismissed as mandatory counterclaims in a pending assessment case.
Read case analysis →Sierra Verde Ranch Property Owners Association, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Scott B. McLaren, Defendant/Appellant
1 CA-CV 25-0384
Why it matters
An owner who accepts a deed subject to recorded CC&Rs is contractually bound to pay HOA assessments, and that…
Read case analysis →Windrose Estates Homeowners Association v. Justin T. Wright; and Justin T. Wright v. Sunstate Acquisitions, LLC and SV 1, LLC
2 CA-CV 2024-0074 and 2 CA-CV 2025-0058
Why it matters
A.R.S. § 33-1807 implicitly abrogates the usual common-law authority to undo an HOA foreclosure sale for grossly…
Read case analysis →Ballard v. Carriage Square at Gainey Village Homeowners Association
CV2025-007913 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA answer was struck after default, but loss-of-value damages still required a judge-run proof hearing.
Read case analysis →Coventry Tempe Community Association v. Faisal Elhassan
CV2024-090807 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Coventry Tempe won summary judgment because the owner offered no evidence disputing the ledger.
Read case analysis →Russell Ranch Homeowners Association v. Gregory T Heard
CV2025-010660 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Russell Ranch obtained a foreclosure judgment and order of sale after default proceedings.
Read case analysis →Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Cahill
CV2024-017272 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Val Vista Lakes obtained default judgment after findings on service and reasonable fees and costs.
Read case analysis →Mountain Vista Ranch Owners Association v. Ismael Rivas
CV2024-037894 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Mountain Vista Ranch obtained a foreclosure judgment and order of sale after default proceedings.
Read case analysis →Russ v. Sonoran Mountain Ranch Homeowners Association
CV2024-022259 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA-meeting complaint was dismissed because the pleading did not give each defendant fair notice of the claims.
Read case analysis →Robert Jashinsky v. Dorada Estates Community Association, Inc.
1 CA-CV 24-0721
Why it matters
Broad design-review discretion still had to be exercised within the governing documents and evidence.
Read case analysis →Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Brooks
CV2024-022478 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Val Vista Lakes obtained a formal judgment after default proceedings, with no amount stated in the entries.
Read case analysis →Merrick Avenue Management, LLC v. Troon Village Association, et al.
CV2023-008406 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court granted Troon Fairways HOA and the moving individual defendants summary judgment on all counts…
Read case analysis →Lisa Marx v. Tara Condominiums Association, Inc.
CV2025-012980
Why it matters
Pending condo-governance suit with nine July 2026 summary-judgment motions and no final merits decision.
Read case analysis →Val Vista Lakes Community Association, The v. Ben J. Rodriguez, et al.
CV2024-090662 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA won assessment-collection summary judgment after homeowners missed Rule 56 response requirements.
Read case analysis →Oleg Bortman v. First Service Residential Arizona, LLC, et al.
CV2024-031553 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court dismissed the First Amended Complaint without prejudice: Bortman and JIMBO, LLC lacked standing…
Read case analysis →Paul Gounder, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Royal Riviera Condominium Association, Defendant/Appellee.
1 CA-CV 24-0594
Why it matters
Gounder failed to file a notice of appeal within the 20-day window and, even if his filings were treated as a timely…
Read case analysis →Desert Cove Condominium Association v. BCK Coatings Inc.
CV2023-093035 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Condo association won $1.04M summary judgment for defective contractor work after BCK lacked usable evidence.
Read case analysis →Lakewood Estates Homeowners Association, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Michael A. Urbano, Defendant/Appellant
1 CA-CV 24-0377
Why it matters
Justice court lacked jurisdiction to void all future HOA assessments in a small-claims collection case.
Read case analysis →Iqtunheimr LLC v. Val Vista Lakes Community Association
CV2024-002225 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Community-wide HOA claims were derivative, while direct selective-enforcement claims survived before fees and sanctions.
Read case analysis →Gordon Gross, et al. v. The Shores at Rainbow Lake Community Association
1 CA-CV 23-0394
Why it matters
The new short-term rental ban was invalid under Arizona amendment-notice principles, but the cap on unrelated…
Read case analysis →Gallery Community Association v. K. Hovnanian at Gallery
1 CA-CV 23-0375
Why it matters
Planned-community HOA had standing to pursue construction-defect claims for maintained lot components.
Read case analysis →Daniel Mason, et al. v. La Glorieta Homeowners Association, et al.
1 CA-CV 23-0437
Why it matters
An HOA has no duty to enforce its CC&Rs against a violating owner unless the governing documents expressly obligate…
Read case analysis →Vista Del Corazon Homeowners Association v. Smith
2 CA-CV 2023-0071
Why it matters
Applying Kalway v. Calabria Ranch HOA, the court held that an HOA cannot use the CC&R amendment process to impose…
Read case analysis →R. L. Whitmer v. Hilton Casitas Homeowners Association
CV2022-014709 / 1 CA-CV 23-0350
Why it matters
The courts rejected contempt enforcement against Hilton Casitas because the 2015 administrative budget order did not…
Read case analysis →Reilly v. Jackson Builders / Orchard House Condominium Association
CV2023-010115 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Condo bylaws supported owner contract claims for private-unit damage despite board-enforcement arguments.
Read case analysis →Village of Oakcreek Association v. Lance E. Bonham
1 CA-CV 22-0780
Why it matters
The Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal for Bonham and held the challenged short-term-rental amendments were not…
Read case analysis →Jennifer Duncan v. LaBlonde Development Corporation and Talus Homeowners' Association
CV2021-019511 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA fine injunction resolved construction-enforcement claim; both sides lost fee requests.
Read case analysis →Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Russell
CV2023-092215 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Val Vista Lakes obtained a stipulated judgment, with no amount or merits analysis in the minute entry.
Read case analysis →R. L. Whitmer v. Hilton Casitas Homeowners Association
CV2021-050888 / 1 CA-CV 22-0202
Why it matters
The Superior Court dismissed the statutory enforcement claims, but the Court of Appeals vacated the contract-based…
Read case analysis →TRAILS AT AMBER RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, an Arizona nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. GERARDO MACIAS, a married man, as his sole and separate property; COMMUNITY HOUSING RESOURCES OF ARIZONA; ARIZONA HOME FORECLOSURE PREVENTION FUNDING CORPORATION, Defendants/Appellees, MARICOPOLY, LLC, a limited liability company, Intervenor/Appellant.
2 CA-CV 2022-0096
Why it matters
Although the trial court erred by granting the junior lienholder's motion to release excess foreclosure proceeds…
Read case analysis →Cheryl Marie McCoy, et al. v. Ken Hassen, et al.
1 CA-CV 21-0524
Why it matters
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Read case analysis →Sun Groves Homeowners Association v. Greene
CV2021-018062 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Sun Groves obtained a default foreclosure judgment and order of sale, with no merits analysis in the entries.
Read case analysis →Tortosa Homeowners Association v. Davis Garcia; Maricopoly, LLC, Intervenor/Appellant/Cross-Appellee; Durable Investments, LLC, Assignee/Appellee/Cross-Appellant
2 CA-CV 2021-0114
Why it matters
Senior lienholder was not automatically entitled to excess proceeds from a junior HOA foreclosure.
Read case analysis →Village At Grayhawk Owners Association v. Kathryn Marie Jones
CV2016-050453 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Self-represented owner lost on summary judgment after failing to respond with admissible Rule 56 facts.
Read case analysis →Cottonfields Community Association v. RCP Southern Ridge, LLP
CV2021-051550 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court found by clear and convincing evidence that RCP Southern Ridge, LLP was violating the judgment…
Read case analysis →Maricopoly LLC v. Tierra Santa Community Association
CV2020-013607 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Fraud allegations over an extinguished HOA lien sale defeated summary judgment; § 33-420 did not apply to the firm.
Read case analysis →Janis Wolf, Plaintiff, v. Carpenter Hazlewood Delgado & Bolen LLP, Defendant.
No. CV-20-00957-PHX-DLR
Why it matters
CHDB won Wolf, but the Ninth Circuit assumed a possible FCRA violation and flagged HOA credit-report concerns.
Read case analysis →Coventry Tempe Community Association v. Faisal H Elhassan
CV2021-001103 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Coventry Tempe obtained a foreclosure judgment and order of sale after default proceedings.
Read case analysis →Silverton Deer Village Homeowners Association v. DeFine
CV2020-092936 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA collection case expanded into third-party FDCPA and abuse-of-process claims that survived pleading attacks.
Read case analysis →Suntrails III Homeowners Association v. John Ward
CV2021-094264 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Suntrails III obtained a formal judgment in a thin minute-entry record.
Read case analysis →Sun City Home Owners Association v. Arizona Corporation Commission, et al.
CV-20-0047-PR (Ariz.)
Why it matters
Arizona Supreme Court upholds utility rate consolidation and reviews constitutional compliance de novo.
Read case analysis →Edet Effiong Asuquo v. La Fuente Condominium Association
CV2019-015684 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The court enforced a Rule 80 settlement resolving roof and HVAC claims against La Fuente.
Read case analysis →Eli v. Procaccianti AZ II LP
1 CA-CV 20-0476 (Ariz. Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2021) (mem. decision)
Why it matters
Disputed litigation settlement was unenforceable without the written assent required by Rule 80(a).
Read case analysis →Val Vista Lakes Community Association, The v. Safwat S. Aziz, et al.
CV2021-001880 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA obtained uncontested summary judgment in an injunctive-relief case, with final judgment still to be lodged.
Read case analysis →Jason Komorowski, et al. v. Whisper Mountain Homeowners Association
CV2018-014261 (Maricopa Cnty. Super. Ct.)
Why it matters
Court ordered HOA to pay $17,800 in damages and permanently maintain a drainage ditch to prevent flooding.
Read case analysis →Glawe v. Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen PLC
9th Cir. No. 19-17090 (memorandum disposition)
Why it matters
Ninth Circuit revived Glawe's FDCPA theory; PACER filings show disputed CHDB fee-ledger allegations.
Read case analysis →Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Leeds
CV2021-002089 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Val Vista Lakes obtained a default foreclosure judgment, with no merits analysis in the minute entries.
Read case analysis →Toepke v. Pioneer Condominium Association
CV2019-010791 (Maricopa Cnty. Super. Ct.)
Why it matters
A condo association needed unanimous owner consent to add rental and occupancy use restrictions.
Read case analysis →Tarter, et al. v. Bendt, et al.
1 CA-CV 19-0703 (Ariz. App. Div. 1 Jan. 28, 2021) (memorandum decision — not precedential under Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 111(c))
Why it matters
The Court of Appeals affirmed the defamation judgment in full.
Read case analysis →Bergeson v. West Frontier Condominiums HOA, Inc.
No. 2 CA-CV 2019-0117 (Ariz. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2020) (mem. decision)
Why it matters
The condominium association was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the wrongful-death negligence claim.
Read case analysis →Boles v. Tarrell
CV2018-053929 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Quiet-title claimant lost after a sheriff’s sale cut off any ownership or possession rights.
Read case analysis →Laveen Meadows Homeowners Association v. Mejia
1 CA-CV 18-0276
Why it matters
HOA lien foreclosure judgment properly included assessments, fees, and statutory lien priorities.
Read case analysis →Greenberg v. McGowan
1 CA-CV 19-0061
Why it matters
Greenberg showed no error in the interpretation and enforcement of the recorded CC&Rs — the covenants did not…
Read case analysis →Sycamore Hills Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Jones Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., et al.
CV2019-094307 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
An attorney's alleged failure to follow a client's oral directions — including directions from the settlement…
Read case analysis →Westerman v. Bridgewood Nine 30 Property Owners Association
CV2019-005775 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Pleading-stage HOA claims narrowed: no fiduciary duty or tort good-faith remedies, but contract enforcement survived.
Read case analysis →North Canyon Ranch Owners Association v. Allen
CV2014-097453 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
After appeal, the HOA received foreclosure judgment and post-bankruptcy fees; pre-bankruptcy amounts were excluded.
Read case analysis →Woodmar IV Association, Inc. v. Paul S. Rubin, Inc.
CV2017-094721 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Management company could not win judgment on the pleadings against HOA computer-data claims.
Read case analysis →Montelena Villas Homeowners Association v. Deborah Minamyer
LC2018-000441 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court affirmed dismissal of old condominium roof-leak claims on limitations grounds.
Read case analysis →Paloma Paseo Homeowners Association v. David Falk
LC2018-000421 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
A justice-court post-judgment fee award to an HOA was vacated as untimely after final judgment.
Read case analysis →The Lakewood Community Association v. Stephen S. Edwards et al.
CV2017-003266 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Court recommended vexatious-litigant limits after repeated filings from a CC&R wall dispute.
Read case analysis →Palm Valley Community Association v. Stella Benton
CV2018-090922 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court granted the Association summary judgment on its assessment-lien foreclosure complaint, finding no…
Read case analysis →Goldman v. Sahl / Villas at Copperwynd Association
CV2017-011347 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA counsel's letters to members about threatened litigation were privileged; sanctions were limited.
Read case analysis →Joyce Jasper-Burnett v. Chateau De Vie Four Townhouse Association, et al.
CV2017-015815 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court granted in part and denied in part the defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss: it dismissed…
Read case analysis →R. L. Whitmer v. Hilton Casitas Homeowners Association, et al.
1 CA-CV 17-0543
Why it matters
Superior court could enforce a final administrative HOA dispute decision after the appeal period expired.
Read case analysis →Diana R. Shaffer, et al. v. Procaccianti AZ II, L.P., et al. (Hilton Casitas Council of Homeowners) (consolidated with Whitmer and London)
1 CA-CV 16-0628 (consolidated with 1 CA-CV 16-0629 and 1 CA-CV 16-0654)
Why it matters
Prior judgment did not preclude later litigation over the HOA status, authority, and assessment claims.
Read case analysis →Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC v. Thomas C Tracy
CV2017-002958 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Enclave Villas obtained a formal judgment against the owner after default-related proceedings.
Read case analysis →Patricia Bocchino v. Fountain Shadows Homeowners Association
1 CA-CV 16-0710
Why it matters
The Court of Appeals affirmed judgment for Bocchino and held the HOA improperly assessed attorney fees against her…
Read case analysis →Turtle Rock III HOA v. Fisher
1 CA-CV 16-0455
Why it matters
The trial court's injunction ordering property repairs is affirmed because the homeowner waived her interior…
Read case analysis →Turtle Rock III Homeowners Association v. Fisher
1 CA-CV 16-0455 (243 Ariz. 294, 406 P.3d 824 (App. 2017), later depublished)
Why it matters
HOA fines require statutory and CC&R authority plus a properly promulgated penalty schedule.
Read case analysis →Kaplan v. AAM / Regency House Condominium
CV2015-005625 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Condo manager faced negligence trial over guest key-fob access; security vendor won summary judgment.
Read case analysis →Sundance Residential Homeowners Association v. Glawe
CV2015-095178 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Sundance won breach summary judgment, but no late fees, collection fees, or foreclosure after payment.
Read case analysis →Colette McNally v. Sun Lakes Homeowners Association #1, Inc.
1 CA-CV 15-0744
Why it matters
HOA board lacked authority to exclude a duly elected director from executive sessions.
Read case analysis →Suzanne Sallus v. Sunrise Desert Vistas P.O.A.
CV2013-004301 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
POA document suit ended in dismissal with prejudice and an $8,185.75 fee award to defendants.
Read case analysis →Hallcraft Villas East I, II & III Homeowners Association v. Gaston
CV2015-094714 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA obtained judgment and fees, but notice and contract-breach fact disputes kept related claims alive.
Read case analysis →Tanglewood HOA v. Fagen
CV2014-094190 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA default packet for lien foreclosure was rejected after the case had already been dismissed.
Read case analysis →Tanglewood HOA v. Goode
CV2014-094502 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Unopposed HOA summary judgment entered; later order addressed redemption-period waste.
Read case analysis →Hilton Casitas Council Of Co-owners v. R L Whitmer
CV2015-053091 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The court dismissed a receivership case against Hilton Casitas and later denied Rule 60 relief.
Read case analysis →Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern
2 CA-CV 2015-0069 (Ariz. Ct. App.)
Why it matters
Unilateral CC&R fee provisions do not mandate reciprocal fee awards under A.R.S. 12-341.01(A).
Read case analysis →Cottonflower Goodyear Community Association, Inc. v. Bey
CV2013-015763 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA foreclosure judgment stood after challenges, with later excess-sale proceeds handled through court process.
Read case analysis →McMullen v. Val Vista Lakes Community Association
CV2015-090368 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA and related defendants won summary judgment on HOA-board and website-related defamation theories.
Read case analysis →Ralph Bianco v. Terravita Country Club, Inc.
CV2014-053595 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Fact issues over Tract G use and covenant enforcement defeated the community association's summary judgment.
Read case analysis →Troon North Association v. Ripson Holdings, LLC
CV2014-094169 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA foreclosure judgment quieted lien priority and rejected homeowner recording-penalty theories.
Read case analysis →Lake Park Village I Homeowners Association v. Spyropoulos
CV2014-090909 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA won summary judgment to foreclose its assessment lien after the court found no factual dispute over delinquency.
Read case analysis →Steven Piper v. Will Rogers Equestrian Ranch Community Association
CV2013-014446 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The superior court granted the association's verified motion for summary judgment on all four of the plaintiffs'…
Read case analysis →Andrew Kuhn v. Southern Village Estates Condominium Association
CV2012-018443 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Water shutoff collection rule went to factfinder; Pride was not an FDCPA debt collector for pre-default HOA dues.
Read case analysis →Dynamite Mountain Ranch HOA v. Larson
CV2012-090015 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
After a home-business injunction settlement, the HOA won $35,000 in fees under CC&Rs and sanctions rulings.
Read case analysis →Ballantrae Ridge Homeowners Association v. Windy Walk Properties, LLC
CV2012-012813 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The excess proceeds from the sheriff's sale following the association's lien foreclosure must be distributed by lien…
Read case analysis →Penelope Johnson v. The Pointe South Mountain Residential Association
CV2012-017609 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
After a bench trial, the court held that the Declaration did not permit the Association to use courthome…
Read case analysis →Mesa Sierra Ranch II Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Rosales M. Escobedo
LC2013-000373-001 DT
Why it matters
The superior court dismissed the HOA's record appeal as untimely, leaving the justice court's dismissal and fee…
Read case analysis →Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Holmes
CV2013-008642 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Val Vista Lakes obtained a stipulated judgment against one defendant, with no merits analysis in the minute entry.
Read case analysis →Camelback House Homeowners Association INC v. Terri A Ware
CV2013-095550 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Camelback House obtained a stipulated foreclosure and money judgment.
Read case analysis →Hawk v. PC Village Association
1 CA-CV 12-0362
Why it matters
A.R.S. § 33-441 bars enforcement of certain old covenants only prospectively.
Read case analysis →Labadi v. Bellasera Community Association
CV2012-050858 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Bellasera won reconsideration because disputed facts remained over claimed access through its gated roads.
Read case analysis →Sunrise Meadows Estates Community Association v. Erlinda B. Isip
LC2012-000034-001 DT
Why it matters
Improper service justified setting aside the HOA default judgment in an assessment collection case.
Read case analysis →Joan Tober, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Civano 1: Neighborhood Association, Inc., an Arizona nonprofit corporation; and Rick Hanson, Mark Levine, George Luis, Lee Rayburn, Bob Small, Chris Shipley, and Les Shipley, Defendants/Appellees
2 CA-CV 2012-0129
Why it matters
Under A.R.S. § 33-1812, a planned community association may conduct its board election exclusively by mail-in…
Read case analysis →AAM, LLC v. Board of Legal Document Preparers
LC2012-000317 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
AAM won a special action allowing an authorized legal document preparer to sign an HOA lien as agent.
Read case analysis →Caroline Brown v. Camelback Village Improvement Association, Inc.
CV2011-008669 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The Declaration undisputedly required CVIA to procure a blanket insurance policy insuring the owners with proceeds…
Read case analysis →Empire West Title Agency LLC v. Charles Hoskins
CV2011-053961 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Two HOAs received priority distributions from trustee-sale proceeds before the remaining balance went to a lender.
Read case analysis →Pinnacle Peak Vistas III Homeowners' Association v. Derailed, LLC
No. 1 CA-CV 10-0604 (Ariz. Ct. App. Div. One May 31, 2011) (mem. decision)
Why it matters
Court affirmed owner wins on landscaping/structure theories but remanded the narrower unsightly-object issue.
Read case analysis →Cypress on Sunland HOA v. Orlandini
1 CA-CV 10-0142 and 1 CA-CV 10-0235 (Consolidated)
Why it matters
Under A.R.S. § 33-1807(B)(2), a recorded first deed of trust has priority over a homeowners association's assessment…
Read case analysis →Cropley v. Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc.
1 CA-CV 10-0034
Why it matters
Affirmed. Recreation Centers waived any right to challenge the validity or interpretation of the 1979 Agreement…
Read case analysis →College Book Centers v. Carefree Foothills HOA
1 CA-CV 08-0450
Why it matters
The homeowners' association did not waive its CC&R restrictions because two prior roadway easements in a…
Read case analysis →Gary Lafleur, et al. v. Val Vista Lakes Community Association Inc., The, et al.
CV2008-054299 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
TRO over architectural committee decisions dissolved, then HOA won fees after voluntary dismissal.
Read case analysis →Tierra Ranchos HOA v. Kitchukov
1 CA-CV 06-0474
Why it matters
Architectural-review discretion is judged under the governing documents and record, not board preference alone.
Read case analysis →Multari v. Gress
1 CA-CV 06-0221
Why it matters
A developer cannot utilize private deed restrictions on multiple lots in a residential subdivision to alter uniform…
Read case analysis →Mountain Vista Ranch Owners Association v. John Dickerson
CV2005-012018 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
The court entered $454 for late fees, fines, and NSF charges but denied association attorney fees.
Read case analysis →Vales v. Kings Hill Condominium Association
1 CA-CV 04-0816
Why it matters
The Court of Appeals issued its opinion and memorandum decision on December 22, 2005, and subsequently issued a…
Read case analysis →Summer Place Terrace Homeowners Association v. Sundance Unlimited
CV2005-091216 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Summer Place Terrace obtained a default quiet-title judgment against corporate defendants on a thin record.
Read case analysis →Tempe Gardens Townhouse Corp. v. Gary Tibshraeny
CV2004-092611 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Tempe Gardens obtained summary judgment and a reasonable-fee finding in a thin minute-entry record.
Read case analysis →Hallcraft Villas East v. Lamb
CV2002-092314 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
HOA could take judgment on the property while an insurer’s interest was treated as subordinate by stipulation.
Read case analysis →Tatum Highlands Community Association v. Michael R Burns
CV2002-002028 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Why it matters
Tatum Highlands obtained judgment in a one-entry record with no merits analysis.
Read case analysis →Search-only confirmed docket archive
A factual second depth for confirmed HOA-related public court records. Enter at least three characters in the search box to load matching rows; the archive does not populate the page by default. These rows contain no case narrative or private opposing-party names. Browse aggregate attorney litigation profiles.
Privacy by design. Only docket facts, the association, and HOA-side counsel appear here. Private homeowners and other private opposing parties stay redacted.
Enter a docket number, association, or HOA-side counsel above to search the archive.
| Docket | Court | Type | Year | Association | HOA-side counsel |
|---|
No cases match your filters.