HOA Stipulated Judgment | CV2013-008642
The court entered a stipulated judgment for Val Vista Lakes Community Association against one defendant.
Last updated July 2, 2026. Case: The Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Wanita S. Holmes, et al., Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2013-008642.
Scope note: This page covers The Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Wanita S. Holmes, et al. (Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2013-008642) as a public Arizona superior-court HOA case guide. It is built from one filed minute entry: the November 20, 2013 judgment-entry minute entry. Currency caveat: no complaint, written judgment text, satisfaction, appeal, sale, or collection history is included in the collected minute entries. Superior-court rulings bind only the parties and are not precedent. This page is educational and is not legal advice.
The takeaway
The only sourced point is that the court entered a stipulated judgment for the association against one defendant. The collected entry does not provide the amount, the legal theory, or any analysis of HOA statutes or governing documents.
Case Participants
Neutral Parties
- The Val Vista Lakes Community Association (Plaintiff)
Association that obtained the stipulated judgment. - Wanita S. Holmes (Defendant)
Defendant against whom judgment was entered. - Beach Club Village at Val Vista Lakes Owners Association (Defendant)
Named defendant; the collected entry does not state any judgment or relief against this entity. - Beth Mulcahy (Counsel)
Counsel listed for the association in the minute entry. - Hon. Sally Schneider Duncan (Judge)
Judge who signed the judgment-entry minute entry.
What happened
The association filed a case against Wanita S. Holmes and another association entity. The only collected minute entry concerns a stipulation to judgment filed by the plaintiff.
The court entered judgment in favor of The Val Vista Lakes Community Association and against Wanita S. Holmes in accordance with the formal written judgment signed and filed in November 2013.
The entry does not describe the claim, amount, lien rights, payment terms, or any effect on the other named defendant. This page therefore does not infer those details.
Video overview of the ruling
An AI-generated video overview of Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Holmes (CV2013-008642 (Maricopa County Superior Court)). Val Vista Lakes obtained a stipulated judgment against one defendant, with no merits analysis in the minute entry. This plain-language summary was generated from the court’s filings; the court’s own ruling controls.
Listen: audio deep dive on the ruling
An AI-generated audio deep dive walking through the court’s reasoning and disposition in Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Holmes. Generated from the case filings; verify against the linked ruling below.
Procedural timeline
Complete uploaded source-document index
This index is generated from every public-facing source file currently present in assets/court_case_downloads/val-vista-lakes-community-association-v-holmes/raw/: 1 PDF. Files are ordered by the date/sequence embedded in the normalized filename; AI-generated review materials are labeled separately and should not be treated as court filings.
Judgment Entered
Type: Decision or judgment
Judgment-entry minute entry entering judgment in favor of Val Vista Lakes Community Association against Wanita S. Holmes under a stipulation to judgment.
FAQ
What did the court enter?
The court entered judgment in favor of The Val Vista Lakes Community Association against Wanita S. Holmes under a stipulation to judgment.
Does the collected entry state the amount of judgment?
No. The minute entry does not state the amount.
Does the entry explain the basis of the HOA claim?
No. It does not describe whether the claim involved assessments, lien rights, CC&Rs, or another theory.
Was there any ruling against Beach Club Village at Val Vista Lakes Owners Association?
The collected entry names that entity as a defendant but does not describe any judgment or relief against it.
Is this case precedential?
No. It is a superior-court stipulated judgment entry and is not precedent.
Why is this case classified as standard?
It is a thin stipulated judgment record with no substantive analysis of HOA law.
Case Dossier
This generated dossier mirrors the structured data surfaced on the OAH/ADRE case pages. It is added from the curated court-case record and the custom page source package, while the hand-authored analysis below remains intact.
Case Summary
| Case ID / citation | CV2013-008642 (Maricopa County Superior Court) |
|---|---|
| Court / tribunal | Superior Court |
| Decision / key date | November 20, 2013 |
| Judge / panel | Hon. Sally Schneider Duncan |
| Parties | The Val Vista Lakes Community Association (Plaintiff) v. Wanita S. Holmes and Beach Club Village at Val Vista Lakes Owners Association (Defendants) |
| Topics | assessmentsliensprocedure |
| Outcome / holding | The court entered judgment for The Val Vista Lakes Community Association against Wanita S. Holmes in accordance with the formal written judgment submitted with the parties’ stipulation to judgment. |
| Primary public source | View source opinion/order |
Parties, Court, and Research Coverage
| Uploaded source package | 1 PDF |
|---|---|
| Step-by-step docket roadmap | 2 roadmap entries |
| Video overview | Val Vista Lakes Community Association v. Holmes |
| Study / briefing material | 1 section |
| FAQ / homeowner questions | 6 questions |
| Curated download aliases | 1 download link |
Key Issues & Findings
The superior court entered judgment in favor of The Val Vista Lakes Community Association and against Wanita S. Holmes under a stipulation to judgment. The collected record does not describe the amount, claims, lien terms, or any merits analysis.
The only collected minute entry states that the court received the plaintiff’s stipulation to judgment and therefore entered judgment in favor of the association against Wanita S. Holmes. The entry does not state the amount of judgment, identify the claims, analyze governing documents or statutes, or describe any relief against Beach Club Village at Val Vista Lakes Owners Association.
This case is useful only as a narrow record of a stipulated judgment obtained by an HOA. Because the collected minute entry contains no legal analysis or factual detail, it should not be read as authority on assessment validity, lien priority, or CC&R enforcement.