HOA Summary Judgment | Ledger Dispute | CV2024-090807
The court granted Coventry Tempe summary judgment because the owner did not create a factual dispute over the association’s ledger.
Last updated July 2, 2026. Case: Coventry Tempe Community Association v. Faisal Elhassan, Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2024-090807.
Current-status note: This page is published as a litigation record based on the source files available through 2025-12-09. Later filings, appeals, mandates, settlements, or dismissal orders may change the posture; the linked court records control.
Allegations, settlements, procedural dismissals, and notices are not findings of liability unless a cited court order expressly makes that finding.
Scope note: This page covers Coventry Tempe Community Association v. Faisal Elhassan (Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2024-090807) as a public Arizona superior-court HOA case guide. It is built from the court’s collected minute entries through 2025-12-09; the complete set of collected minute entries is available in the source-document index below. Currency caveat: later filings, satisfaction history, appeals, and the formal written orders referenced by the minutes may not be included in these records. Superior-court rulings bind only the parties and are not precedent. This page is educational and is not legal advice.
The takeaway
An owner opposing HOA summary judgment must point to actual evidence; disagreement with a prior judgment and unsupported ledger objections were not enough here.
Case Participants
Petitioner Side
- Faisal Elhassan (Plaintiff)
Opposing homeowner or property-side party identified in the case caption.
Respondent Side
- Coventry Tempe Community Association (Defendant)
Association party in the HOA-related dispute. Court party records list counsel as Jill Ormond.
Neutral Parties
- Hon. Rodrick Coffey (Judge)
Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries. - Hon. David Mcdowell (Judge)
Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries.
What happened
The owner sued Coventry Tempe after earlier litigation involving the same parties. The court first allowed implied-covenant and unjust-enrichment claims to proceed while dismissing other theories.
Coventry Tempe later moved for summary judgment. The court found the owner’s factual references concerned matters already decided in the earlier case.
The court also found the owner produced no documents, receipts, cancelled checks, bank statements, or other evidence to dispute the association’s ledger of charges and credits.
Summary judgment was granted in full for the association, and reconsideration was denied.
Video overview of the case record
An AI-generated video overview of Coventry Tempe Community Association v. Faisal Elhassan (CV2024-090807 (Maricopa County Superior Court)). Coventry Tempe won summary judgment because the owner offered no evidence disputing the ledger. This plain-language summary was generated from the court’s filings; the court’s own ruling controls.
Listen: audio deep dive on the case record
An AI-generated audio deep dive walking through the court record and procedural posture in Coventry Tempe Community Association v. Faisal Elhassan. Generated from the case filings; verify against the linked case records below.
Procedural timeline
IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond and extending the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss until May 1, 2024.
IT IS ORDERED granting the Defendants Motion for Enlargement of Time for Defendants to File a Responsive Pleading, electronically filed on February 28, 2024.
IT IS ORDERED granting the Defendant, Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado and Bolen, LLP’s Motion to Dismiss Caption, electronically filed March 8, 2024 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice against Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado and Bolen, LLP.
IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff request.
IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint.
IT IS ORDERED approving and settling the formal written Judgment signed by the Court on September 10, 2024 and filed [entered] by the clerk on September 12, 2024.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants may file a response to that Motion by no later than October 25, 2024.
Minute entry filed.
IT IS ORDERED denying Defendants’ Motion to Strike Notice of Appeal.
IT IS ORDERED denying in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with regard to Plaintiff’s claims for: 1) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and 2) unjust enrichment.
IT IS ORDERED setting oral argument for October 28, 2025 at 11:30 a.
IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety.
Complete source-document index
This index contains 14 PDFs from the reviewed public source packet. Byte-identical copies are listed once. Files are ordered by the date and sequence in the public filename, and party filings or research materials are labeled separately from court rulings.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Judgment Entered
Type: Decision or judgment
Decision document; read it to understand the controlling result before moving to later filings.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Ruling
Type: Court order/minute entry
Ruling granting in part and denying in part Coventry Tempe’s motion to dismiss, leaving only implied-covenant and unjust-enrichment claims.
Oral Argument Set
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ruling
Type: Court order/minute entry
Ruling granting Coventry Tempe summary judgment because the owner failed to show a genuine issue of material fact.
Oral Argument
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ruling
Type: Court order/minute entry
Ruling denying reconsideration of the summary-judgment order.
FAQ
What did the superior court decide?
It granted summary judgment for Coventry Tempe.
Is this superior-court ruling precedent?
No. It binds the parties in this case but is useful only as a public record of how this dispute was handled.
Does the page summarize addresses or unit numbers?
No. Residential addresses and unit identifiers from the minute entries are intentionally omitted.
Who was the association party?
The association party identified in the collected court records was Coventry Tempe Community Association.
Does this replace legal advice?
No. This is an educational case guide based on public minute entries, not legal advice.
Case Dossier
This dossier combines the case metadata, linked court sources, and the explanatory sections below. It distinguishes court rulings from party filings, allegations, and requested relief.
Case Summary
| Case ID / citation | CV2024-090807 (Maricopa County Superior Court) |
|---|---|
| Court / tribunal | Superior Court |
| Decision / key date | October 28, 2025 |
| Judge / panel | Hon. Rodrick Coffey, Hon. David Mcdowell |
| Parties | Faisal Elhassan (Plaintiff) v. Coventry Tempe Community Association and other defendants |
| Topics | AssessmentsLiensGood Faith & Fair DealingProcedure |
| Outcome / holding | The court granted Coventry Tempe’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety and later denied reconsideration, explaining that the ruling rested on the grounds stated in the order rather than the owner’s absence from oral argument. |
| Primary public source | View source opinion/order |
Parties, Court, and Research Coverage
| Reviewed source package | 14 PDFs |
|---|---|
| Step-by-step docket roadmap | 12 roadmap entries |
| Video overview | Coventry Tempe Community Association v. Faisal Elhassan |
| Study / briefing material | 1 section |
| FAQ / homeowner questions | 5 questions |
| Featured download links | 1 download link |
Key Issues & Findings
The court allowed two claims to proceed past dismissal, then granted Coventry Tempe summary judgment. It found the owner’s factual references related to issues already decided in CV2021-001103 and that he produced no documents, receipts, cancelled checks, bank statements, or other evidence disputing the association’s ledger of charges and credits.
The January 2025 dismissal ruling allowed claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unjust enrichment to proceed, while dismissing other theories.
At summary judgment, the court applied Arizona summary-judgment standards and found the owner relied on matters already fully and finally determined in CV2021-001103, including disputes about judgment, default, and satisfaction. The court further found he did not produce evidence disputing the ledger of charges and credits attached to the association’s statement of facts.
Because the owner did not meet his burden to show a genuine issue of material fact, the court granted summary judgment for the association and directed it to lodge a proposed judgment and any fee application.
This standard case is useful for repeat-litigation and ledger-proof issues after an HOA judgment. It is not must-read because it applies ordinary summary-judgment and preclusion concepts rather than interpreting HOA statutes or governing documents.