HOA Judgment | CV2017-002958
The court approved the formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy.
Last updated July 2, 2026. Case: Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC v. Thomas C Tracy, Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2017-002958.
Current-status note: Allegations, settlements, procedural dismissals, and notices are not findings of liability unless a cited court order expressly makes that finding.
Scope note: This page covers Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC v. Thomas C Tracy (Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2017-002958) as a public Arizona superior-court HOA case guide. It is built from the court’s collected minute entries through 2018-05-02; the complete set of collected minute entries is available in the source-document index below. Currency caveat: later filings, satisfaction history, appeals, and the formal written orders referenced by the minutes may not be included in these records. Superior-court rulings bind only the parties and are not precedent. This page is educational and is not legal advice.
The takeaway
The court approved the formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy.
Case Participants
Petitioner Side
- Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC (Plaintiff)
Association party in the HOA-related dispute. Court party records list counsel as Christina Morgan.
Respondent Side
- Thomas C Tracy (Defendant)
Opposing homeowner or property-side party identified in the case caption.
Neutral Parties
- Hon. Karen (Judge)
Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries. - Hon. Hugh Hegyi (Judge)
Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries. - Hon. James (Judge)
Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries.
What happened
The court approved and settled a formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy for Enclave Villas after earlier default-related proceedings and motion practice.
The minute entries identify the association and opposing property-side parties, then record the court’s disposition.
The collected record does not state a detailed legal analysis or full judgment terms, so this guide does not infer them.
Video overview of the ruling
An AI-generated video overview of Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC v. Thomas C Tracy (CV2017-002958 (Maricopa County Superior Court)). Enclave Villas obtained a formal judgment against the owner after default-related proceedings. This plain-language summary was generated from the court’s filings; the court’s own ruling controls.
Listen: audio deep dive on the ruling
An AI-generated audio deep dive walking through the court’s reasoning and disposition in Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC v. Thomas C Tracy. Generated from the case filings; verify against the linked ruling below.
Procedural timeline
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced document(s).
IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is denied.
IT IS ORDERED setting Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Lien Foreclosure for August 22, 2017 at 9:00 a.
IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Lien Foreclosure.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall, by August 31, 2017, communicate with Plaintiff’s counsel as to the proposed dates in the report.
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the dismissal calendar for dismissal on October 31, 2017, unless an amended joint report and scheduling order is filed by that date.
Minute entry filed.
IT IS ORDERED extending the deadline to complete a settlement conference to April 15, 2018.
IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in its present form.
IT IS ORDERED correcting the January 5, 2018 minute entry to reflect the correct judicial officer as Honorable Karen A.
IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: TRIAL This matter is set for a Bench Trial on May 2, 2018 at 9:30 a.
IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Deadline to File Trial Exhibits on April 12, 2018.
Complete source-document index
This index contains 14 PDFs from the reviewed public source packet. Byte-identical copies are listed once. Files are ordered by the date and sequence in the public filename, and party filings or research materials are labeled separately from court rulings.
Default Judgment
Type: Decision or judgment
Shows the filer trying to move the case forward because the opposing party had not timely appeared.
Default Judgment
Type: Decision or judgment
Shows the filer trying to move the case forward because the opposing party had not timely appeared.
Oral Argument Set
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Oral Argument
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Ruling
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Status Conference
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Judgment Entered
Type: Decision or judgment
Judgment-entry minute entering or approving judgment for the association.
FAQ
What did the superior court decide?
The court approved the formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy.
Is this superior-court ruling precedent?
No. It binds the parties in this case but is useful only as a public record of how this dispute was handled.
Does the page summarize addresses or unit numbers?
No. Residential addresses and unit identifiers from the minute entries are intentionally omitted.
Who was the association party?
The association party identified in the collected court records was Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC.
Does this replace legal advice?
No. This is an educational case guide based on public minute entries, not legal advice.
Case Dossier
This dossier combines the case metadata, linked court sources, and the explanatory sections below. It distinguishes court rulings from party filings, allegations, and requested relief.
Case Summary
| Case ID / citation | CV2017-002958 (Maricopa County Superior Court) |
|---|---|
| Court / tribunal | Superior Court |
| Decision / key date | May 2, 2018 |
| Judge / panel | Hon. Karen, Hon. Hugh Hegyi, Hon. James |
| Parties | Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC (Plaintiff) v. Thomas C Tracy (Defendant) |
| Topics | AssessmentsLiensProcedureCondominiums |
| Outcome / holding | The superior court approved the parties' stipulation to entry of judgment and covenant not to execute, then approved and settled the formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy signed May 1, 2018 and entered May 2, 2018. |
| Primary public source | View source opinion/order |
Parties, Court, and Research Coverage
| Reviewed source package | 14 PDFs |
|---|---|
| Step-by-step docket roadmap | 12 roadmap entries |
| Video overview | Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC v. Thomas C Tracy |
| Study / briefing material | 1 section |
| FAQ / homeowner questions | 5 questions |
| Featured download links | 1 download link |
Key Issues & Findings
The court approved and settled a formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy for Enclave Villas after earlier default-related proceedings and motion practice.
The court approved and settled a formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy for Enclave Villas after earlier default-related proceedings and motion practice.
The collected entries do not include substantive analysis of assessment calculations, lien priority, or CC&R interpretation. The page therefore treats the ruling as a procedural judgment record only.
This case is useful as a public record of an HOA judgment or foreclosure disposition, but the collected minute entries are too thin to serve as guidance on contested HOA law.