Gross v. The Shores at Rainbow Lake: Kalway, Rentals, and Occupancy Limits

Arizona HOA Rental Amendments | Kalway | 1 CA-CV 23-0394

Gross is the cleanest Arizona published rental-amendment roadmap after Kalway. The short-term lease ban was invalid, but the unrelated-person occupancy limit survived because it refined existing single-family use restrictions.

Last updated June 3, 2026. Case: Gordon Gross, et al. v. The Shores at Rainbow Lake Community Association, Arizona Court of Appeals No. 1 CA-CV 23-0394; Navajo County Superior Court No. S0900CV202200042.

Scope note: This page covers the published appellate opinion, amended opinion order, mandate, and uploaded trial/appellate record. The complete uploaded source-document index below is generated from the local raw source folder, including court PDFs, court DOC/DOCX notices, and AI/source CSVs where present. AI-generated CSV summaries were reviewed only as orientation and are not treated as court authority.

The rule in one sentence

Under Kalway, an HOA rental amendment can be partly invalid and partly valid: a new short-term rental ban may be unforeseeable while an occupancy limit can survive if it refines an existing single-family-use covenant.

Case snapshot

Court result

Judgment was affirmed.

Invalid part

Thirty-day minimum lease term was stricken.

Valid part

Four-unrelated-person occupancy limit survived.

Fee result

Each side bore its own appellate fees and costs.

Case Dossier

This generated dossier mirrors the structured data surfaced on the OAH/ADRE case pages. It is added from the curated court-case record and the custom page source package, while the hand-authored analysis below remains intact.

Case Summary

Case ID / citation1 CA-CV 23-0394
Court / tribunalCourt of Appeals
Decision / key dateOctober 10, 2024
Judge / panelPresiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Michael J. Brown
PartiesOwners challenged a 2021 amendment that banned short-term rentals and limited occupancy by unrelated renters in a planned community.
Topics
cc-and-rsprocedure
Outcome / holding

The court held that the new short-term rental ban was invalid under Arizona amendment-notice principles, but the cap on unrelated renters was valid because it was reasonably foreseeable from the existing CC&Rs.

Primary public sourceView source opinion/order

Parties, Court, and Research Coverage

Uploaded source package121 PDFs, 10 supporting source/review files
Step-by-step docket roadmap6 roadmap entries
Video overviewGross v. The Shores at Rainbow Lake: Kalway, Rentals, and Occupancy Limits
Study / briefing material2 sections
FAQ / homeowner questions3 questions
Curated download aliases5 download links

Key Issues & Findings

Case Summary

Gross applied Kalway in a practical, highly relevant HOA setting: rental restrictions. The community amended its CC&Rs to prohibit rentals shorter than 30 days and to bar more than four unrelated individuals from leasing a property. The Court of Appeals split the amendment. It held the short-term rental ban was invalid because it prohibited conduct the earlier CC&Rs had allowed and was not reasonably foreseeable from the original declaration. But it upheld the unrelated-persons occupancy limit because that restriction was viewed as a clarification and refinement of existing use limits rather than a brand-new burden. The opinion is one of the clearest Arizona appellate examples of how courts separate an impermissible new use restriction from a permissible refinement of an existing one.

Key Issues & Findings

The court framed the dispute as one about owner notice and reasonable expectations. A recorded declaration can be amended, but only within the fair scope of what the original declaration put buyers on notice might later be refined. Under that approach, an amendment cannot simply reverse an existing freedom and call the result a refinement.

Applying that rule, the short-term rental ban was too much because the preexisting documents had not warned owners that leasing could later be cut off in that way. The unrelated-occupants limit came out differently because the original scheme already contained structure about occupancy and residential use, making the later cap a closer fit with the bought-for framework.

Why It Matters

Gross is one of the best Arizona Court of Appeals cases for short-term-rental disputes after Kalway. It gives both sides a usable analytic framework for asking whether an amendment is genuinely foreseeable or instead a new restriction in disguise.

Boards considering rental amendments should read it before drafting. Homeowners challenging new lease limits will cite it often.

Why this case matters

Gross gives Arizona homeowners and boards a detailed framework for rental amendments after Kalway. The court treated the short-term rental ban as a new burden because the original CC&Rs expressly allowed leasing and did not set a minimum lease duration.

At the same time, Gross rejected the idea that every rental-related amendment fails. The unrelated-person cap was upheld because the original CC&Rs already limited use to single-family residential use and defined Single Family. That made the cap a refinement rather than an entirely new covenant.

Video overview: Kalway, rentals, and occupancy limits

Watch this overview for Gross v. The Shores at Rainbow Lake, where the Court of Appeals split a rental amendment into an invalid short-term rental ban and a valid unrelated-person occupancy limit.

Homeowner study guide: Kalway, rentals, and occupancy limits

Homeowner questionStudy-guide answerCase lesson
Can The Shores enforce the 2021 minimum 30-day lease requirement?No. The court held the short-term rental ban invalid and unenforceable.A later amendment cannot add an unforeseeable rental-duration restriction where the original CC&Rs allowed leasing without a minimum term.
Why did the 30-day rule fail under Kalway?The original declaration allowed leasing and did not contain a lease-duration limit.The court treated the new 30-day minimum as an entirely new burden rather than a foreseeable refinement.
Did earlier Shores litigation matter?Yes. Horton v. Hartsook had already treated similar community language as permitting short-term rentals.Prior interpretation of the same or similar covenants can shape what later owners reasonably could foresee.
Can the association limit unrelated occupants?Yes. The court upheld the four-unrelated-person limit.That provision refined an existing Single Family residential-use covenant rather than creating a new rental ban.
Does Single Family residential use address only building type?No. Gross treated the covenant as addressing use and occupancy, not just architecture.Owners should read use restrictions as controlling how the property is occupied as well as how it is built.
Is a 67 percent amendment vote enough by itself?No. Procedural approval does not override the common-law reasonable-and-foreseeable requirement.An amendment can receive enough votes and still be unenforceable if it exceeds the original covenant notice.
What happened to voter-irregularity claims?Those alternative claims were dismissed with prejudice after the homeowners chose not to pursue them to expedite final judgment.Gross is mainly useful for the contract-enforceability analysis, not as a voting-process ruling.
Does the Planned Communities Act displace Kalway common law?No. The court followed Kalway and held A.R.S. 33-1817(A) does not eliminate the reasonable-and-foreseeable amendment limit.Arizona associations must satisfy both procedural amendment rules and substantive foreseeability limits.

Litigation roadmap

Step 1 February 2021

Adopted amendment restricting leases shorter than 30 days and limiting unrelated occupants.

Filed by: Association

Creates the CC&R amendment challenged by rental owners.

Download PDF
Step 2 February 2022

Filed suit challenging the amendment under Kalway.

Filed by: Homeowners

Frames the case as a property-rights and contract-notice dispute.

Download PDF
Step 3 September 2022

Invalidated the short-term lease ban but upheld the remaining challenged provisions.

Filed by: Superior Court

The split trial ruling became the appellate issue.

Download PDF
Step 4 May 2023

Entered amended final judgment.

Filed by: Superior Court

Created final appeal/cross-appeal posture.

Download PDF
Step 5 October 10, 2024

Published opinion affirmed the split result.

Filed by: Court of Appeals

This is the key statewide authority.

Download PDF
Step 6 March 26, 2025

Issued civil mandate after later review proceedings concluded.

Filed by: Court of Appeals

Marks appellate finality.

Download PDF

Complete uploaded source-document index

This index is generated from every public-facing source file currently present in assets/court_case_downloads/gross-v-the-shores-at-rainbow-lake-community-association/raw/: 121 PDFs, 10 supporting review/media files. Files are ordered by the date/sequence embedded in the normalized filename; AI-generated review materials are labeled separately and should not be treated as court filings.

Source 1 2023-06-29

Index Of Record

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Download source file
Source 2 2023-06-29

Verified Complaint

Type: Opening pleading

Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.

Source 3 2023-06-29

Attachment 1 St To Index Number 001

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 4 2023-06-29

Attachment 2 Nd To Index Number 001

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 6 2023-06-29

Attachment To Index Number 004

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 7 2023-06-29

Summon Issuedre The Shores At Rainb

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 8 2023-06-29

Acceptance Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 9 2023-06-29

Notice Of Appearance

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 10 2023-06-29

Judicial Noticesetting Hearing

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 12 2023-06-29

Answer To Complaint

Type: Opening pleading

Starts or reframes the case and identifies the claims or relief requested.

Source 16 2023-06-29

Stipulation For Entry Of Prelimina

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 18 2023-06-29

Attachment To Index Number 015

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 20 2023-06-29

Attachment To Index Number 017

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 24 2023-06-29

Judicial Noticesetting Hearing

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 26 2023-06-29

Combined Reply And Response

Type: Briefing paper

Reply paper; usually the final written response before the court takes the issue under advisement.

Source 30 2023-06-29

Attachment To Index Number 027

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 32 2023-06-29

Attachment To Index Number 029

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 37 2023-06-29

Declaration Of Counsel In Support O

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 38 2023-06-29

Notice Of Lodging

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 39 2023-06-29

Attachment To Index Number 035

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 40 2023-06-29

Objection To Form Of Judgment

Type: Decision or judgment

Opposing or responsive paper; compare it to the motion or request filed immediately before it.

Source 41 2023-06-29

Attachment To Index Number 037

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 43 2023-06-29

Attachment To Index Number 039

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 47 2023-06-29

Judicial Orderre Attorney Fees

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Source 49 2023-06-29

Final Judgmentfiled 12062022

Type: Decision or judgment

Decision document; read it to understand the controlling result before moving to later filings.

Source 50 2023-06-29

Motion For New Trial

Type: Motion/application

A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.

Source 51 2023-06-29

Notice Of Appeal

Type: Procedural/service filing

Moves the dispute into appellate or judicial-review procedure; use it to track the next forum.

Source 52 2023-06-29

Notice To Court Re Appeal

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 53 2023-06-29

Response To Motion For New Trial

Type: Motion/application

A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.

Source 54 2023-06-29

Notice Of Crossappeal

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 57 2023-06-29

Order Denying Motion For New Trial

Type: Court order/minute entry

A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.

Source 59 2023-06-29

Appellate Clerk Notice

Type: Procedural/service filing

Moves the dispute into appellate or judicial-review procedure; use it to track the next forum.

Source 66 2023-06-29

Attachment To Index Number 63

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 67 2023-06-29

Hearing

Type: Court notice/document

Court notice or document from the appellate upload; read it with the surrounding docket filings.

Download source file
Source 68 2023-06-29

Hearing

Type: Court notice/document

Court notice or document from the appellate upload; read it with the surrounding docket filings.

Download source file
Source 69 2023-06-29

Notice Of Lodging

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 70 2023-06-29

Objection To Form Of Judgment

Type: Decision or judgment

Opposing or responsive paper; compare it to the motion or request filed immediately before it.

Source 71 2023-06-29

Reply Supporting Entry Of Final Jud

Type: Briefing paper

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 74 2023-06-29

Amended Final Judgment

Type: Decision or judgment

Decision document; read it to understand the controlling result before moving to later filings.

Source 75 2023-06-29

Hearing On Amended Jugment

Type: Court notice/document

Court notice or document from the appellate upload; read it with the surrounding docket filings.

Source 76 2023-06-29

Hearing On Amended Jugment

Type: Court notice/document

Court notice or document from the appellate upload; read it with the surrounding docket filings.

Source 78 2023-06-29

Notice Of Appeal

Type: Procedural/service filing

Moves the dispute into appellate or judicial-review procedure; use it to track the next forum.

Source 79 2023-06-29

Transcript 17 May 2023

Type: Court/source PDF

Adds hearing transcript material to the record for later review or appeal.

Source 82 2023-07-06

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 83 2023-07-13

Case Management Statement

Type: Court/source PDF

Case-management filing; it tells the court how the parties propose to schedule and manage the case.

Source 84 2023-07-13

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 86 2023-07-28

Case Management Statement

Type: Court/source PDF

Case-management filing; it tells the court how the parties propose to schedule and manage the case.

Source 88 2023-08-08

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 90 2023-08-10

Order Supplementing Record

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Source 92 2023-08-10

Appellate Clerk Notice

Type: Procedural/service filing

Moves the dispute into appellate or judicial-review procedure; use it to track the next forum.

Source 93 2023-08-10

Notice Of Crossappeal

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 95 2023-08-17

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 98 2023-08-28

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 99 2023-09-18

Opening Brief

Type: Briefing paper

Opening merits brief; this is where the appellant or moving party frames the legal argument.

Download source file
Source 100 2023-09-18

Certificate Of Compliance

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 101 2023-09-18

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 103 2023-10-27

Certificate Of Compliance

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 104 2023-10-27

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 107 2023-12-06

Certificate Of Compliance

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 108 2023-12-06

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 109 2023-12-21

Reply Brief On Cross Appeal

Type: Briefing paper

Reply paper; usually the final written response before the court takes the issue under advisement.

Source 110 2023-12-21

Request For Oral Argument

Type: Motion/application

A request for a specific ruling or procedural action; the next document is often a response or order.

Source 111 2023-12-21

Certificate Of Compliance

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 112 2023-12-21

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 113 2023-12-21

Certificate Of Service

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 115 2024-01-04

Court Of Appeals Memorandum

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 120 2024-03-06

Sign-in Sheetcase Is Under Adviseme

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 122 2024-10-10

Opinion

Type: Decision or judgment

Decision document; read it to understand the controlling result before moving to later filings.

Download source file
Source 124 2024-11-07

Notice Of Appearance

Type: Procedural/service filing

Procedural filing that documents service, appearance, compliance, or a required notice step.

Source 128 2024-12-12

Div 1 Transmittal Of Partial Record

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 129 2025-03-05

Letter From Asc 03052025 Re Petitio

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 130 2025-03-26

Civil Mandate

Type: Decision or judgment

Decision document; read it to understand the controlling result before moving to later filings.

Download source file

For homeowners

  • Use Gross when a new amendment restricts rental duration after the original CC&Rs allowed leasing.
  • Do not assume every rental-related restriction fails; compare each clause separately.
  • Preserve the original CC&Rs, the amended language, voting materials, and evidence of historical rental use.

For boards and managers

  • Draft rental amendments around the specific original covenants that already exist.
  • Separate lease-duration limits from occupancy limits; Gross analyzes them differently.
  • Expect courts to blue-pencil severable provisions rather than treat a multi-part amendment as all-or-nothing.

FAQ

Did Gross invalidate all rental restrictions?

No. It invalidated the 30-day minimum lease term but upheld the unrelated-person occupancy limit.

Why did the 30-day rental ban fail?

The original CC&Rs allowed leasing and had no minimum lease duration, so owners were not on notice that a majority could later ban shorter rentals.

Why did the occupancy cap survive?

The CC&Rs already contained a single-family residential use covenant and a Single Family definition, so the cap was treated as a permissible refinement.

← Back to Court of Appeals cases

Facebook Comments Box