A Z N H is a high-value case for Arizona HOA governance fights. It gives owners a published appellate tool for challenging rubber-stamp secrecy, vague agendas, and closed-door votes. For boards and managers, it is a real compliance case, not just a technical one. Meeting notices, agendas, and executive-session practic…

Windrose is likely to become a central Arizona authority on post-sale challenges to HOA foreclosures. It gives purchasers and associations a strong finality argument once a sale has been completed. For homeowners, the case means defenses and cure efforts need to happen earlier. After the sale, equitable arguments that…

Gross is one of the best Arizona Court of Appeals cases for short-term-rental disputes after Kalway. It gives both sides a usable analytic framework for asking whether an amendment is genuinely foreseeable or instead a new restriction in disguise. Boards considering rental amendments should read it before drafting. Ho…

Gallery is not about everyday rule enforcement, but it is highly relevant to Arizona HOA governance and litigation authority. It broadens what an association can do when pursuing developer or builder claims tied to common-area and common-maintenance obligations. For boards, it is a strong appellate foundation for cent…

Bonham is a practical short-term-rental amendment case for Arizona HOAs and homeowners. It shows that an association cannot rely on generic business-use language as a substitute for a real leasing covenant when trying to enforce a later rental ban. It also pairs well with Gross: both cases apply Kalway to rental amend…

This is a useful Arizona appellate decision for anyone litigating HOA foreclosure surplus funds. It narrows arguments by senior lenders and helps define where the surplus does and does not go. For investors and owners, Tortosa is important because surplus disputes often decide whether an HOA sale leaves any real equit…

Laveen Meadows is a strong collection-side precedent for Arizona HOAs. It makes late-stage partial cures much less likely to derail a case once statutory foreclosure eligibility has attached. For homeowners and counsel, it means payoff strategy matters. A partial payment may reduce exposure, but it may not undo the as…

This case matters for HOA lawyers who handle long-tail collection work. It helps answer where to renew a transcribed judgment and reduces the risk that a valid assessment judgment will lapse through a procedural mistake. At the same time, it warns associations not to assume that every later collection step automatical…

Whitmer is the appellate answer when an HOA loses in the administrative process but still refuses to comply. It confirms that the superior court is the proper place to seek enforcement rather than starting over from scratch. For practitioners, the case helps frame post-agency strategy in Arizona HOA disputes and reinf…

Bocchino is a practical limit on HOA fee accounting. It warns associations not to self-award litigation fees by placing them on an owner account after a separate court proceeding. For homeowners, it is a useful authority when an HOA account ledger includes attorney fees that were never awarded by the court or tribunal…

For Arizona homeowners and timeshare owners, Zwicky is a strong, citable precedent that statutory records-inspection rights are enforceable in court, that an owner does not need the board’s blessing, and that ‘proper purpose’ is read in the member’s favor. For associations and managers, it confirms two things at once:…

McNally is highly useful in HOA board-power disputes. It limits majority control tactics against dissident directors and reinforces that board process must track real authority, not political convenience. For directors and members, the case supports the idea that elected office in an HOA carries enforceable participat…

For HOA collection counsel, this case is mandatory reading. It shows that Arizona appellate courts will not treat sloppy or aggressive default foreclosure practice as harmless when lien priority is misrepresented. For owners, lenders, and title insurers, Cypress is a powerful case for attacking HOA foreclosure judgmen…

Dreamland is an important Arizona foundation for later Kalway-style amendment limits. It is especially useful for older subdivisions, recreation clubs, and hybrid HOA-like entities that try to convert voluntary participation into mandatory assessments. For homeowners, it supports the argument that a new economic burde…

This case matters because it shows that not every accessibility dispute in an HOA becomes a winning fair-housing or contract case. Plaintiffs still need a clear link between the requested accommodation, the statutory duty, and the actual housing-related barrier. For boards, Nolan is not a license to ignore disability…

This is a major Arizona authority on whether an association can bootstrap itself into mandatory status. It is especially useful in disputes involving older subdivisions, informal neighborhood associations, and retrofitted assessment schemes. For boards and developers, the lesson is blunt: if the burden is supposed to…

This is a foundational Arizona case for homeowners arguing selective or non-enforcement. It limits the idea that a board can avoid judicial review by labeling a dispute as an exercise of association discretion. For boards, the case is a warning that they need a document-based reason for enforcement choices, especially…

This is one of the clearest Arizona HOA cases on disability accommodations. Boards cannot assume that a valid CC&R or age restriction automatically ends the analysis when a disability-related request is made. For homeowners and counsel, the case is a strong reminder that fair-housing duties can override otherwise enfo…