HOA Judgment | CV2021-094264
The court approved and settled the formal written judgment for Suntrails III.
Last updated July 2, 2026. Case: Suntrails III Homeowners Association v. John Ward, Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2021-094264.
Scope note: This page covers Suntrails III Homeowners Association v. John Ward (Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2021-094264) as a public Arizona superior-court HOA case guide. It is built from the court’s collected minute entries through 2021-12-01; the complete set of collected minute entries is available in the source-document index below. Currency caveat: later filings, satisfaction history, appeals, and the formal written orders referenced by the minutes may not be included in these records. Superior-court rulings bind only the parties and are not precedent. This page is educational and is not legal advice.
The takeaway
The court approved and settled the formal written judgment for Suntrails III.
Case Participants
Petitioner Side
- Suntrails III Homeowners Association (Plaintiff)
Listed in the court party records as plaintiff. Court party records list counsel as Kristopher Amundsen.
Respondent Side
- John Ward (Defendant)
Opposing homeowner or property-side party identified in the case caption.
Neutral Parties
- Hon. Rodrick Coffey (Judge)
Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries.
What happened
The court approved and settled a formal written judgment for Suntrails III Homeowners Association after placing the case on a dismissal calendar unless judgment or dismissal papers were filed.
The minute entries identify the association and opposing property-side parties, then record the court’s disposition.
The collected record does not state a detailed legal analysis or full judgment terms, so this guide does not infer them.
Procedural timeline
Complete uploaded source-document index
This index is generated from every public-facing source file currently present in assets/court_case_downloads/suntrails-i-i-i-homeowners-association-v-john-ward/raw/: 3 PDFs. Files are ordered by the date/sequence embedded in the normalized filename; AI-generated review materials are labeled separately and should not be treated as court filings.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Judgment Entered
Type: Decision or judgment
Judgment-entry minute entering or approving judgment for the association.
FAQ
What did the superior court decide?
The court approved and settled the formal written judgment for Suntrails III.
Is this superior-court ruling precedent?
No. It binds the parties in this case but is useful only as a public record of how this dispute was handled.
Does the page summarize addresses or unit numbers?
No. Residential addresses and unit identifiers from the minute entries are intentionally omitted.
Who was the association party?
The association party identified in the collected court records was Suntrails III Homeowners Association.
Does this replace legal advice?
No. This is an educational case guide based on public minute entries, not legal advice.
Case Dossier
This generated dossier mirrors the structured data surfaced on the OAH/ADRE case pages. It is added from the curated court-case record and the custom page source package, while the hand-authored analysis below remains intact.
Case Summary
| Case ID / citation | CV2021-094264 (Maricopa County Superior Court) |
|---|---|
| Court / tribunal | Superior Court |
| Decision / key date | December 1, 2021 |
| Judge / panel | Hon. Rodrick Coffey |
| Parties | Suntrails III Homeowners Association (Plaintiff) v. John Ward (Defendant) |
| Topics | assessmentsliensprocedure |
| Outcome / holding | The court approved and settled the formal written judgment for Suntrails III. |
| Primary public source | View source opinion/order |
Parties, Court, and Research Coverage
| Uploaded source package | 3 PDFs |
|---|---|
| Step-by-step docket roadmap | 3 roadmap entries |
| Video overview | No video embed currently configured |
| Study / briefing material | 1 section |
| FAQ / homeowner questions | 5 questions |
| Curated download aliases | 1 download link |
Key Issues & Findings
The court approved and settled a formal written judgment for Suntrails III Homeowners Association after placing the case on a dismissal calendar unless judgment or dismissal papers were filed.
The court approved and settled a formal written judgment for Suntrails III Homeowners Association after placing the case on a dismissal calendar unless judgment or dismissal papers were filed.
The collected entries do not include substantive analysis of assessment calculations, lien priority, or CC&R interpretation. The page therefore treats the ruling as a procedural judgment record only.
This case is useful as a public record of an HOA judgment or foreclosure disposition, but the collected minute entries are too thin to serve as guidance on contested HOA law.