HOA Summary Judgment | Ledger Dispute | CV2024-090807
The court granted Coventry Tempe summary judgment because the owner did not create a factual dispute over the association’s ledger.
Last updated July 2, 2026. Case: Coventry Tempe Community Association v. Faisal Elhassan, Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2024-090807.
Scope note: This page covers Coventry Tempe Community Association v. Faisal Elhassan (Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2024-090807) as a public Arizona superior-court HOA case guide. It is built from the court’s collected minute entries through 2025-12-09; the complete set of collected minute entries is available in the source-document index below. Currency caveat: later filings, satisfaction history, appeals, and the formal written orders referenced by the minutes may not be included in these records. Superior-court rulings bind only the parties and are not precedent. This page is educational and is not legal advice.
The takeaway
An owner opposing HOA summary judgment must point to actual evidence; disagreement with a prior judgment and unsupported ledger objections were not enough here.
Case Participants
Petitioner Side
- Faisal Elhassan (Plaintiff)
Opposing homeowner or property-side party identified in the case caption.
Respondent Side
- Coventry Tempe Community Association (Defendant)
Association party in the HOA-related dispute. Court party records list counsel as Jill Ormond.
Neutral Parties
- Hon. Rodrick Coffey (Judge)
Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries. - Hon. David Mcdowell (Judge)
Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries.
What happened
The owner sued Coventry Tempe after earlier litigation involving the same parties. The court first allowed implied-covenant and unjust-enrichment claims to proceed while dismissing other theories.
Coventry Tempe later moved for summary judgment. The court found the owner’s factual references concerned matters already decided in the earlier case.
The court also found the owner produced no documents, receipts, cancelled checks, bank statements, or other evidence to dispute the association’s ledger of charges and credits.
Summary judgment was granted in full for the association, and reconsideration was denied.
Procedural timeline
Complete uploaded source-document index
This index is generated from every public-facing source file currently present in assets/court_case_downloads/faisal-elhassan-v-coventry-tempe-community-association/raw/: 14 PDFs. Files are ordered by the date/sequence embedded in the normalized filename; AI-generated review materials are labeled separately and should not be treated as court filings.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Judgment Entered
Type: Decision or judgment
Decision document; read it to understand the controlling result before moving to later filings.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Minute Entry
Type: Court order/minute entry
Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.
Ruling
Type: Court order/minute entry
Ruling granting in part and denying in part Coventry Tempe’s motion to dismiss, leaving only implied-covenant and unjust-enrichment claims.
Oral Argument Set
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ruling
Type: Court order/minute entry
Ruling granting Coventry Tempe summary judgment because the owner failed to show a genuine issue of material fact.
Oral Argument
Type: Court/source PDF
Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.
Ruling
Type: Court order/minute entry
Ruling denying reconsideration of the summary-judgment order.
FAQ
What did the superior court decide?
It granted summary judgment for Coventry Tempe.
Is this superior-court ruling precedent?
No. It binds the parties in this case but is useful only as a public record of how this dispute was handled.
Does the page summarize addresses or unit numbers?
No. Residential addresses and unit identifiers from the minute entries are intentionally omitted.
Who was the association party?
The association party identified in the collected court records was Coventry Tempe Community Association.
Does this replace legal advice?
No. This is an educational case guide based on public minute entries, not legal advice.
Case Dossier
This generated dossier mirrors the structured data surfaced on the OAH/ADRE case pages. It is added from the curated court-case record and the custom page source package, while the hand-authored analysis below remains intact.
Case Summary
| Case ID / citation | CV2024-090807 (Maricopa County Superior Court) |
|---|---|
| Court / tribunal | Superior Court |
| Decision / key date | October 28, 2025 |
| Judge / panel | Hon. Rodrick Coffey, Hon. David Mcdowell |
| Parties | Faisal Elhassan (Plaintiff) v. Coventry Tempe Community Association and other defendants |
| Topics | assessmentsliensgood-faith-and-fair-dealingprocedure |
| Outcome / holding | The court granted Coventry Tempe’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety and later denied reconsideration, explaining that the ruling rested on the grounds stated in the order rather than the owner’s absence from oral argument. |
| Primary public source | View source opinion/order |
Parties, Court, and Research Coverage
| Uploaded source package | 14 PDFs |
|---|---|
| Step-by-step docket roadmap | 12 roadmap entries |
| Video overview | No video embed currently configured |
| Study / briefing material | 1 section |
| FAQ / homeowner questions | 5 questions |
| Curated download aliases | 1 download link |
Key Issues & Findings
The court allowed two claims to proceed past dismissal, then granted Coventry Tempe summary judgment. It found the owner’s factual references related to issues already decided in CV2021-001103 and that he produced no documents, receipts, cancelled checks, bank statements, or other evidence disputing the association’s ledger of charges and credits.
The January 2025 dismissal ruling allowed claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unjust enrichment to proceed, while dismissing other theories.
At summary judgment, the court applied Arizona summary-judgment standards and found the owner relied on matters already fully and finally determined in CV2021-001103, including disputes about judgment, default, and satisfaction. The court further found he did not produce evidence disputing the ledger of charges and credits attached to the association’s statement of facts.
Because the owner did not meet his burden to show a genuine issue of material fact, the court granted summary judgment for the association and directed it to lodge a proposed judgment and any fee application.
This standard case is useful for repeat-litigation and ledger-proof issues after an HOA judgment. It is not must-read because it applies ordinary summary-judgment and preclusion concepts rather than interpreting HOA statutes or governing documents.