Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC v. Thomas C Tracy: Arizona HOA Superior Court Case Guide

HOA Judgment | CV2017-002958

The court approved the formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy.

Last updated July 2, 2026. Case: Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC v. Thomas C Tracy, Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2017-002958.

Scope note: This page covers Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC v. Thomas C Tracy (Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2017-002958) as a public Arizona superior-court HOA case guide. It is built from the court’s collected minute entries through 2018-05-02; the complete set of collected minute entries is available in the source-document index below. Currency caveat: later filings, satisfaction history, appeals, and the formal written orders referenced by the minutes may not be included in these records. Superior-court rulings bind only the parties and are not precedent. This page is educational and is not legal advice.

The takeaway

The court approved the formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy.

Case Participants

Petitioner Side

  • Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC (Plaintiff)
    Association party in the HOA-related dispute. Court party records list counsel as Christina Morgan.

Respondent Side

  • Thomas C Tracy (Defendant)
    Opposing homeowner or property-side party identified in the case caption.

Neutral Parties

  • Hon. Karen (Judge)
    Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries.
  • Hon. Hugh Hegyi (Judge)
    Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries.
  • Hon. James (Judge)
    Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries.

What happened

The court approved and settled a formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy for Enclave Villas after earlier default-related proceedings and motion practice.

The minute entries identify the association and opposing property-side parties, then record the court’s disposition.

The collected record does not state a detailed legal analysis or full judgment terms, so this guide does not infer them.

Procedural timeline

Step 2017-03-15 IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced document(s).
Step 2017-05-16 IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is denied.
Step 2017-08-03 IT IS ORDERED setting Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Lien Foreclosure for August 22, 2017 at 9:00 a.
Step 2017-08-22 IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Lien Foreclosure.
Step 2017-08-25 IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall, by August 31, 2017, communicate with Plaintiff’s counsel as to the proposed dates in the report.
Step 2017-10-03 IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the dismissal calendar for dismissal on October 31, 2017, unless an amended joint report and scheduling order is filed by that date.
Step 2017-11-09 Minute entry filed.
Step 2018-01-05 IT IS ORDERED extending the deadline to complete a settlement conference to April 15, 2018.
Step 2018-01-19 IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in its present form.
Step 2018-01-19 IT IS ORDERED correcting the January 5, 2018 minute entry to reflect the correct judicial officer as Honorable Karen A.
Step 2018-03-12 IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: TRIAL This matter is set for a Bench Trial on May 2, 2018 at 9:30 a.
Step 2018-04-13 IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Deadline to File Trial Exhibits on April 12, 2018.

Complete uploaded source-document index

This index is generated from every public-facing source file currently present in assets/court_case_downloads/enclave-villas-condominium-council-of-co-owners-inc-v-thomas-c-tracy/raw/: 14 PDFs. Files are ordered by the date/sequence embedded in the normalized filename; AI-generated review materials are labeled separately and should not be treated as court filings.

Source 1 2017-03-15

Default Judgment

Type: Decision or judgment

Shows the filer trying to move the case forward because the opposing party had not timely appeared.

Source 2 2017-05-16

Default Judgment

Type: Decision or judgment

Shows the filer trying to move the case forward because the opposing party had not timely appeared.

Source 3 2017-08-03

Oral Argument Set

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 4 2017-08-22

Oral Argument

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Download source file
Source 5 2017-08-25

Minute Entry

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Download source file
Source 6 2017-10-03

Minute Entry

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Download source file
Source 7 2017-11-09

Minute Entry

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Download source file
Source 8 2018-01-05

Minute Entry

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Download source file
Source 9 2018-01-19

Ruling

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Download source file
Source 10 2018-01-19

Minute Entry

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Download source file
Source 11 2018-03-12

Status Conference

Type: Court/source PDF

Uploaded source file in the case record; read it in sequence with the surrounding filings to follow the procedure.

Source 12 2018-04-13

Minute Entry

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Download source file
Source 13 2018-05-02

Minute Entry

Type: Court order/minute entry

Court or agency order; this is usually the document that tells readers what changed next.

Download source file
Source 14 2018-05-02

Judgment Entered

Type: Decision or judgment

Judgment-entry minute entering or approving judgment for the association.

FAQ

What did the superior court decide?

The court approved the formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy.

Is this superior-court ruling precedent?

No. It binds the parties in this case but is useful only as a public record of how this dispute was handled.

Does the page summarize addresses or unit numbers?

No. Residential addresses and unit identifiers from the minute entries are intentionally omitted.

Who was the association party?

The association party identified in the collected court records was Enclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC.

Does this replace legal advice?

No. This is an educational case guide based on public minute entries, not legal advice.

Case Dossier

This generated dossier mirrors the structured data surfaced on the OAH/ADRE case pages. It is added from the curated court-case record and the custom page source package, while the hand-authored analysis below remains intact.

Case Summary

Case ID / citationCV2017-002958 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Court / tribunalSuperior Court
Decision / key dateMay 2, 2018
Judge / panelHon. Karen, Hon. Hugh Hegyi, Hon. James
PartiesEnclave Villas Condominium Council Of Co-owners INC (Plaintiff) v. Thomas C Tracy (Defendant)
Topics
assessmentsliensprocedure
Outcome / holding

The court approved the formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy.

Primary public sourceView source opinion/order

Parties, Court, and Research Coverage

Uploaded source package14 PDFs
Step-by-step docket roadmap12 roadmap entries
Video overviewNo video embed currently configured
Study / briefing material1 section
FAQ / homeowner questions5 questions
Curated download aliases1 download link

Key Issues & Findings

Case Summary

The court approved and settled a formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy for Enclave Villas after earlier default-related proceedings and motion practice.

Key Issues & Findings

The court approved and settled a formal written judgment against Thomas C. Tracy for Enclave Villas after earlier default-related proceedings and motion practice.

The collected entries do not include substantive analysis of assessment calculations, lien priority, or CC&R interpretation. The page therefore treats the ruling as a procedural judgment record only.

Why It Matters

This case is useful as a public record of an HOA judgment or foreclosure disposition, but the collected minute entries are too thin to serve as guidance on contested HOA law.

← Back to Superior Court cases

Facebook Comments Box