Case Summary
| Case ID | 21F-H2121059-REL |
|---|---|
| Agency | ADRE |
| Tribunal | OAH |
| Decision Date | 2021-09-08 |
| Administrative Law Judge | Tammy L. Eigenheer |
| Outcome | partial |
| Filing Fees Refunded | $1,000.00 |
| Civil Penalties | $0.00 |
Parties & Counsel
| Petitioner | Jeffrey D Points | Counsel | — |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent | Olive 66 Condominium Association | Counsel | MacKenzie Hill |
Alleged Violations
A.R.S. § 33-1258
A.R.S. § 33-1248
Outcome Summary
The Petitioner’s petition was affirmed in part (violation of A.R.S. § 33-1258 regarding documents) and denied in part (no violation of A.R.S. § 33-1248 regarding open meetings). Respondent was ordered to reimburse $500.00 of the filing fee and comply with A.R.S. § 33-1258.
Why this result: Petitioner failed to prove the violation of A.R.S. § 33-1248 because evidence of improper notice was lacking and the topic discussed in executive session was likely covered by a statutory exemption.
Key Issues & Findings
Access to Association Records
Respondent violated A.R.S. § 33-1258 by failing to provide certain requested 2021 invoices that were in existence at the time of the request within the statutory 10-day period.
Orders: Respondent must comply with A.R.S. § 33-1258 going forward. Petitioner reimbursed $500.00 filing fee.
Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: Yes
Disposition: petitioner_win
- A.R.S. § 33-1258
- A.R.S. § 33-1805
Open Board Meetings
Petitioner failed to establish a violation of A.R.S. § 33-1248 regarding the March 25, 2021, board meeting, as the issue regarding notice was not established and the topic discussed (Landscaping Bid Review) likely fell under a statutory exemption.
Orders: Petitioner failed to establish the alleged violation of A.R.S. § 33-1248.
Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: No
Disposition: petitioner_loss
- A.R.S. § 33-1248
- A.R.S. § 33-1804
Analytics Highlights
- A.R.S. § 33-1248
- A.R.S. § 33-1258
- A.R.S. § 33-1804
- A.R.S. § 33-1805
- A.R.S. § 32-2199 et seq.
- A.A.C. R2-19-119
Video Overview
Audio Overview
Decision Documents
21F-H2121059-REL Decision – 909631.pdf
21F-H2121059-REL Decision – 909633.pdf
Questions
Question
Can I demand to inspect every single HOA document in person at the management office?
Short Answer
No. While records must be reasonably available, you do not have the right to peruse all documents at will.
Detailed Answer
The Administrative Law Judge ruled that the statute requiring records be 'reasonably available' does not grant an unlimited right to inspect all documents in person. The HOA can withhold certain confidential documents, and sorting through everything to remove them may be considered unduly burdensome.
Alj Quote
Nothing in the statute however, grants a condominium unit owner the right to peruse all of the association’s documents at will as some documents may properly be withheld.
Legal Basis
A.R.S. § 33-1258
Topic Tags
- Records Request
- Inspection Rights
Question
Is it a violation if the HOA fails to provide requested invoices within 10 days?
Short Answer
Yes. If the documents exist and are not provided within the statutory timeframe, it is a violation.
Detailed Answer
The ALJ found the Association in violation of the law because they acknowledged that requested invoices existed at the time of the request but were not provided to the homeowner.
Alj Quote
Respondent’s witness acknowledged that certain invoices requested by Petitioner were in existence at the time of the request, but were not provided to Petitioner. Such a failure to provide the documents requested was a violation of A.R.S. § 33-1258.
Legal Basis
A.R.S. § 33-1258
Topic Tags
- Records Request
- Invoices
- Timeliness
Question
Can the HOA Board discuss vendor contracts or issues in a closed executive session?
Short Answer
Yes, if the discussion involves specific complaints or performance issues regarding an individual employee of the contractor.
Detailed Answer
The ALJ ruled that a 'Landscaping Bid Review' was properly held in executive session because the testimony indicated it involved specific performance issues with an employee of the landscaping company.
Alj Quote
Respondent’s witness asserted that the issue regarding the landscaping bid review was a specific performance issue with an employee of the landscaping company. As that topic falls under the exception listed in A.R.S. § 33-1248(A)(4), Respondent properly considered the issue in an executive session closed to its members.
Legal Basis
A.R.S. § 33-1248(A)(4)
Topic Tags
- Open Meetings
- Executive Session
- Vendors
Question
Will the HOA be fined if they are found to have violated records request laws?
Short Answer
Not necessarily. The ALJ has discretion regarding civil penalties.
Detailed Answer
In this case, even though a violation was found regarding the failure to provide invoices, the judge decided that no civil penalty was appropriate based on the facts presented.
Alj Quote
Based on the facts presented, the Administrative Law Judge finds no civil penalty is appropriate in this matter.
Legal Basis
Administrative Discretion
Topic Tags
- Penalties
- Enforcement
Question
Who has the burden of proof in a dispute with the HOA?
Short Answer
The homeowner (Petitioner) must prove the violation by a preponderance of the evidence.
Detailed Answer
The homeowner is responsible for providing evidence that outweighs the evidence offered by the HOA. If the homeowner fails to provide sufficient evidence (such as proof of when a meeting agenda was issued), the claim will likely fail.
Alj Quote
In this proceeding, Petitioner bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent violated A.R.S. § 33-1248 and A.R.S. § 33-1258.
Legal Basis
A.A.C. R2-19-119
Topic Tags
- Legal Standards
- Burden of Proof
Question
Can I get my filing fee reimbursed if I win?
Short Answer
Yes, typically for the portion of the case on which you prevail.
Detailed Answer
The ALJ ordered the Association to reimburse the homeowner $500.00, which represented the filing fee for the specific issue (records request) where the homeowner won.
Alj Quote
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent reimburse Petitioner their $500.00 filing fee for the issue on which they prevailed.
Legal Basis
Order
Topic Tags
- Remedies
- Fees
Question
What if I suspect the HOA altered a document they sent me?
Short Answer
You must provide proof. Mere assertion is not enough.
Detailed Answer
The homeowner claimed a landscaping contract was altered but provided no evidence. The ALJ ruled that an assertion without merit cannot be the basis for finding a violation.
Alj Quote
Petitioner’s assertion that the landscaping contract was altered in some way is completely without merit and cannot be the basis for a finding that Respondent violated A.R.S. § 33-1258.
Legal Basis
Evidence
Topic Tags
- Evidence
- Fraud Allegations
Question
Do Open Meeting laws apply to Condominium Associations?
Short Answer
Yes, under A.R.S. § 33-1248.
Detailed Answer
Although the homeowner originally cited the Planned Community statutes (A.R.S. § 33-1804), the hearing proceeded under the correct Condominium statutes (A.R.S. § 33-1248), which contain similar open meeting requirements.
Alj Quote
After discussion, the hearing proceeded with the understanding that the statutes applicable to the instant matter were A.R.S. § 33-1248… and A.R.S. § 33-1258…
Legal Basis
A.R.S. § 33-1248
Topic Tags
- Jurisdiction
- Condos vs HOAs
Case
- Docket No
- 21F-H2121059-REL
- Case Title
- Jeffrey D Points vs. Olive 66 Condominium Association
- Decision Date
- 2021-09-08
- Alj Name
- Tammy L. Eigenheer
- Tribunal
- OAH
- Agency
- ADRE
Questions
Question
Can I demand to inspect every single HOA document in person at the management office?
Short Answer
No. While records must be reasonably available, you do not have the right to peruse all documents at will.
Detailed Answer
The Administrative Law Judge ruled that the statute requiring records be 'reasonably available' does not grant an unlimited right to inspect all documents in person. The HOA can withhold certain confidential documents, and sorting through everything to remove them may be considered unduly burdensome.
Alj Quote
Nothing in the statute however, grants a condominium unit owner the right to peruse all of the association’s documents at will as some documents may properly be withheld.
Legal Basis
A.R.S. § 33-1258
Topic Tags
- Records Request
- Inspection Rights
Question
Is it a violation if the HOA fails to provide requested invoices within 10 days?
Short Answer
Yes. If the documents exist and are not provided within the statutory timeframe, it is a violation.
Detailed Answer
The ALJ found the Association in violation of the law because they acknowledged that requested invoices existed at the time of the request but were not provided to the homeowner.
Alj Quote
Respondent’s witness acknowledged that certain invoices requested by Petitioner were in existence at the time of the request, but were not provided to Petitioner. Such a failure to provide the documents requested was a violation of A.R.S. § 33-1258.
Legal Basis
A.R.S. § 33-1258
Topic Tags
- Records Request
- Invoices
- Timeliness
Question
Can the HOA Board discuss vendor contracts or issues in a closed executive session?
Short Answer
Yes, if the discussion involves specific complaints or performance issues regarding an individual employee of the contractor.
Detailed Answer
The ALJ ruled that a 'Landscaping Bid Review' was properly held in executive session because the testimony indicated it involved specific performance issues with an employee of the landscaping company.
Alj Quote
Respondent’s witness asserted that the issue regarding the landscaping bid review was a specific performance issue with an employee of the landscaping company. As that topic falls under the exception listed in A.R.S. § 33-1248(A)(4), Respondent properly considered the issue in an executive session closed to its members.
Legal Basis
A.R.S. § 33-1248(A)(4)
Topic Tags
- Open Meetings
- Executive Session
- Vendors
Question
Will the HOA be fined if they are found to have violated records request laws?
Short Answer
Not necessarily. The ALJ has discretion regarding civil penalties.
Detailed Answer
In this case, even though a violation was found regarding the failure to provide invoices, the judge decided that no civil penalty was appropriate based on the facts presented.
Alj Quote
Based on the facts presented, the Administrative Law Judge finds no civil penalty is appropriate in this matter.
Legal Basis
Administrative Discretion
Topic Tags
- Penalties
- Enforcement
Question
Who has the burden of proof in a dispute with the HOA?
Short Answer
The homeowner (Petitioner) must prove the violation by a preponderance of the evidence.
Detailed Answer
The homeowner is responsible for providing evidence that outweighs the evidence offered by the HOA. If the homeowner fails to provide sufficient evidence (such as proof of when a meeting agenda was issued), the claim will likely fail.
Alj Quote
In this proceeding, Petitioner bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent violated A.R.S. § 33-1248 and A.R.S. § 33-1258.
Legal Basis
A.A.C. R2-19-119
Topic Tags
- Legal Standards
- Burden of Proof
Question
Can I get my filing fee reimbursed if I win?
Short Answer
Yes, typically for the portion of the case on which you prevail.
Detailed Answer
The ALJ ordered the Association to reimburse the homeowner $500.00, which represented the filing fee for the specific issue (records request) where the homeowner won.
Alj Quote
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent reimburse Petitioner their $500.00 filing fee for the issue on which they prevailed.
Legal Basis
Order
Topic Tags
- Remedies
- Fees
Question
What if I suspect the HOA altered a document they sent me?
Short Answer
You must provide proof. Mere assertion is not enough.
Detailed Answer
The homeowner claimed a landscaping contract was altered but provided no evidence. The ALJ ruled that an assertion without merit cannot be the basis for finding a violation.
Alj Quote
Petitioner’s assertion that the landscaping contract was altered in some way is completely without merit and cannot be the basis for a finding that Respondent violated A.R.S. § 33-1258.
Legal Basis
Evidence
Topic Tags
- Evidence
- Fraud Allegations
Question
Do Open Meeting laws apply to Condominium Associations?
Short Answer
Yes, under A.R.S. § 33-1248.
Detailed Answer
Although the homeowner originally cited the Planned Community statutes (A.R.S. § 33-1804), the hearing proceeded under the correct Condominium statutes (A.R.S. § 33-1248), which contain similar open meeting requirements.
Alj Quote
After discussion, the hearing proceeded with the understanding that the statutes applicable to the instant matter were A.R.S. § 33-1248… and A.R.S. § 33-1258…
Legal Basis
A.R.S. § 33-1248
Topic Tags
- Jurisdiction
- Condos vs HOAs
Case
- Docket No
- 21F-H2121059-REL
- Case Title
- Jeffrey D Points vs. Olive 66 Condominium Association
- Decision Date
- 2021-09-08
- Alj Name
- Tammy L. Eigenheer
- Tribunal
- OAH
- Agency
- ADRE
Case Participants
Petitioner Side
- Jeffrey D Points (petitioner)
Appeared on their own behalf
Respondent Side
- MacKenzie Hill (respondent attorney)
The Brown Law Group, PLLC
Represented Olive 66 Condominium Association - Nathan Tennyson (respondent attorney)
Represented Olive 66 Condominium Association - Cathy Hacker (association manager)
Olive 66 Condominium Association
Provided testimony as Association Manager, - Musa (individual/contractor)
Mentioned regarding 1099s and invoices; referred to as 'Musa', and 'M. Sayegh' - Lorinda Brown (individual/contractor)
Mentioned regarding 1099s and invoices
Neutral Parties
- Tammy L. Eigenheer (ALJ)
Office of Administrative Hearings - Judy Lowe (ADRE Commissioner)
Arizona Department of Real Estate
Other Participants
- Tim (individual)
Mentioned regarding 1099s/invoices; reportedly 'has not done any work on the property',