A.R.S. § 33-1811

Posted on by

A.R.S. § 33-1811 addresses HOA board contracts and conflicts of interest, requiring disclosures and, in some cases, member approval. Our dataset tracks 9 administrative cases citing this statute, with homeowners prevailing in 2 cases and associations in 8 cases (22.2% homeowner win rate). Use the summaries and filters below to see how judges apply these rules in real disputes.

Total Cases9
Homeowner Case Wins2
HOA Case Wins8
Homeowner Win Rate22.2%

📜 Relevant Arizona Revised Statutes

A.R.S. § 33-1811

Board of directors; contracts; conflict
33- 1811. Board of directors; contracts; conflict If any contract, decision or other action for compensation taken by or on behalf of the board of directors would benefit any member of the board of directors or any person who is a parent, grandparent, spouse, child or sibling of a member of the board of directors or a parent or spouse of any of those persons, that member of the board of directors shall declare a conflict of interest for that issue. The member shall declare the conflict in an open meeting of the board before the board discusses or takes action on that issue and that member may then vote on that issue. Any contract entered into in violation of this section is void and unenforceable.

Common Governing Documents Cited

  • Alleged Violation Of Regarding Conflict Of Interest Of Board Members. (1 cases)
  • Whether A Contract Or Action For Compensation Requires A Direct Financial Benefit To Trigger The Disclosure Requirements Under . (1 cases)
  • Whether The Respondent Violated Regarding Conflict Of Interest Disclosures For Board Members. (1 cases)
  • Whether Respondent Failed To Disclose Conflicts Of Interest When Hiring The Association's Property Manager In Violation Of . [1] (1 cases)

Top Respondent Firms

  • (No recorded respondent firm): 4 cases
  • CHDB Law LLP: 2 cases
  • Goodman Law Group: 1 cases
  • Gordon & Rees LLP: 1 cases
  • Maxwell & Morgan, P.C.: 1 cases

Top Petitioner Firms

  • Boyes Legal, PC: 1 cases
  • Clark Hill PLC: 1 cases
  • Tiffany & Bosco: 1 cases

Cases Involving This Violation

    Facebook Comments Box