Camelback House Homeowners Association INC v. Terri A Ware: Arizona HOA Superior Court Case Guide

HOA Foreclosure Judgment | CV2013-095550

The court accepted the stipulation and entered the formal order regarding judgment on foreclosure and money judgment.

Last updated July 2, 2026. Case: Camelback House Homeowners Association INC v. Terri A Ware, Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2013-095550.

Scope note: This page covers Camelback House Homeowners Association INC v. Terri A Ware (Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV2013-095550) as a public Arizona superior-court HOA case guide. It is built from the court’s collected minute entries through 2013-10-29; the complete set of collected minute entries is available in the source-document index below. Currency caveat: later filings, satisfaction history, appeals, and the formal written orders referenced by the minutes may not be included in these records. Superior-court rulings bind only the parties and are not precedent. This page is educational and is not legal advice.

The takeaway

The court accepted the stipulation and entered the formal order regarding judgment on foreclosure and money judgment.

Case Participants

Petitioner Side

  • Camelback House Homeowners Association INC (Plaintiff)
    Association party in the HOA-related dispute. Court party records list counsel as Mark Waldron.

Respondent Side

  • Catholic Healthcare West (Defendant)
    Listed in the court party records as defendant.
  • Donald Ware (Defendant)
    Listed in the court party records as defendant.
  • Mercy Care Plan (Defendant)
    Listed in the court party records as defendant.
  • Orchid Family Revocable Living Trust Agreement, The (Defendant)
    Listed in the court party records as defendant.
  • Terri A Ware (Defendant)
    Opposing homeowner or property-side party identified in the case caption.

Neutral Parties

  • Hon. Mark F. Aceto (Judge)
    Judicial officer appearing in the collected minute entries.

What happened

The court accepted a stipulation for judgment on foreclosure and money judgment involving Camelback House and the Ware trust defendants.

The minute entries identify the association and opposing property-side parties, then record the court’s disposition.

The collected record does not state a detailed legal analysis or full judgment terms, so this guide does not infer them.

Video overview of the ruling

An AI-generated video overview of Camelback House Homeowners Association INC v. Terri A Ware (CV2013-095550 (Maricopa County Superior Court)). Camelback House obtained a stipulated foreclosure and money judgment. This plain-language summary was generated from the court’s filings; the court’s own ruling controls.

Listen: audio deep dive on the ruling

An AI-generated audio deep dive walking through the court’s reasoning and disposition in Camelback House Homeowners Association INC v. Terri A Ware. Generated from the case filings; verify against the linked ruling below.

Audio overview generated with Google NotebookLM from the case’s court filings.

Procedural timeline

Step 2013-10-29 IT IS ORDERED accepting the Stipulation electronically filed on October 23, 2013, all in accordance with the formal written Order e-signed by the Court on October 28, 2013 and entered (e-filed) by the clerk on October 29, 2013.

Complete uploaded source-document index

This index is generated from every public-facing source file currently present in assets/court_case_downloads/camelback-house-homeowners-association-inc-v-terri-a-ware/raw/: 1 PDF. Files are ordered by the date/sequence embedded in the normalized filename; AI-generated review materials are labeled separately and should not be treated as court filings.

Source 1 2013-10-29

Minute Entry

Type: Court order/minute entry

Judgment-entry minute entering or approving the formal written Judgment and Decree of Foreclosure and Order of Sale.

Download source file

FAQ

What did the superior court decide?

The court accepted the stipulation and entered the formal order regarding judgment on foreclosure and money judgment.

Is this superior-court ruling precedent?

No. It binds the parties in this case but is useful only as a public record of how this dispute was handled.

Does the page summarize addresses or unit numbers?

No. Residential addresses and unit identifiers from the minute entries are intentionally omitted.

Who was the association party?

The association party identified in the collected court records was Camelback House Homeowners Association INC.

Does this replace legal advice?

No. This is an educational case guide based on public minute entries, not legal advice.

Case Dossier

This generated dossier mirrors the structured data surfaced on the OAH/ADRE case pages. It is added from the curated court-case record and the custom page source package, while the hand-authored analysis below remains intact.

Case Summary

Case ID / citationCV2013-095550 (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Court / tribunalSuperior Court
Decision / key dateOctober 29, 2013
Judge / panelHon. Mark F. Aceto
PartiesCamelback House Homeowners Association INC (Plaintiff) v. Terri A Ware (Defendant)
Topics
assessmentsliensprocedureforeclosure
Outcome / holding

The court accepted the stipulation and entered the formal order regarding judgment on foreclosure and money judgment.

Primary public sourceView source opinion/order

Parties, Court, and Research Coverage

Uploaded source package1 PDF
Step-by-step docket roadmap1 roadmap entry
Video overviewCamelback House Homeowners Association INC v. Terri A Ware
Study / briefing material1 section
FAQ / homeowner questions5 questions
Curated download aliases1 download link

Key Issues & Findings

Case Summary

The court accepted a stipulation for judgment on foreclosure and money judgment involving Camelback House and the Ware trust defendants.

Key Issues & Findings

The court accepted a stipulation for judgment on foreclosure and money judgment involving Camelback House and the Ware trust defendants.

The collected entries do not include substantive analysis of assessment calculations, lien priority, or CC&R interpretation. The page therefore treats the ruling as a procedural judgment record only.

Why It Matters

This case is useful as a public record of an HOA judgment or foreclosure disposition, but the collected minute entries are too thin to serve as guidance on contested HOA law.

← Back to Superior Court cases

Facebook Comments Box