Case Summary
| Case ID | 13F-H1314002-BFS |
|---|---|
| Agency | DFBLS |
| Tribunal | OAH |
| Decision Date | 2014-02-27 |
| Administrative Law Judge | M. Douglas |
| Outcome | no |
| Filing Fees Refunded | $0.00 |
| Civil Penalties | $0.00 |
Parties & Counsel
| Petitioner | David & Loree Janusz | Counsel | — |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent | Cresta Norte HOA | Counsel | Curtis S. Ekmark, Esq.; Molly J. Streiff, Esq. |
Alleged Violations
Cresta Norte Guidelines Section N Miscellaneous (7)
Outcome Summary
The ALJ dismissed the petition, ruling that the HOA did not violate its CC&Rs or Design Guidelines by denying the homeowners' request to install exterior shutters. The guidelines required committee approval, which was properly denied.
Why this result: The petitioners failed to meet the burden of proof to show the HOA violated governing documents; the ALJ found the guidelines granted the HOA authority to approve or deny architectural changes.
Key Issues & Findings
Denial of architectural request for exterior shutters
Petitioners alleged the HOA violated design guidelines by denying their request to install exterior shutters. Petitioners argued the guidelines explicitly list 'shutters' as an example of exterior changes, implying they are permitted.
Orders: Petition dismissed; Cresta Norte deemed prevailing party.
Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No
Disposition: respondent_win
- Cresta Norte Guidelines Section N Miscellaneous (7)
- A.R.S. § 41-2198.01
Decision Documents
13F-H1314002-BFS Decision – 384508.pdf
13F-H1314002-BFS Decision – 389432.pdf
**Case Summary: David & Loree Janusz v. Cresta Norte HOA**
**Case No. 13F-H1314002-BFS**
**Forum and Parties**
This matter was heard before the Arizona Office of Administrative Hearings on February 18, 2014. The Petitioners, David and Loree Janusz, represent themselves against the Respondent, Cresta Norte Homeowners Association (HOA), regarding a dispute over architectural improvements.
**Background and Main Issues**
The Petitioners, homeowners in Scottsdale, Arizona, submitted an Architectural Change Request to install exterior shutters on their residence. The Cresta Norte Architectural Committee denied the request, and the HOA Board of Directors subsequently denied the Petitioners' appeal. The Petitioners filed a claim alleging the HOA violated the community’s Design Guidelines and CC&Rs by refusing the installation. The central issue was whether the guidelines, which mention shutters, mandated their approval or if the Board retained discretion to deny them based on community aesthetics.
**Hearing Proceedings and Key Arguments**
**Petitioners' Argument:**
David Janusz, a former Board President (2006–2010) and Architectural Committee chairman, testified that the guidelines were drafted to "encourage creativity and diversity". He argued that Section N Miscellaneous (7) of the guidelines specifically lists "shutters" as a type of exterior change, which he interpreted as explicit authorization for their installation. He asserted that during his tenure, the committee intended to offer shutters to allow homeowners to show individuality. He also testified that no neighbors opposed the project.
**Respondent's Argument:**
The HOA, represented by legal counsel, presented testimony from current Board members James Wooley and Brian McNamara. Mr. Wooley testified that the inclusion of the word "shutters" in the guidelines was merely an example of a potential change requiring review, not an express approval. He stated there was no intent to establish shutters as an approved feature and that the guidelines do not prohibit them but require approval. Mr. McNamara noted that no residences in Cresta Norte currently have exterior shutters and that the Board determined they were not a "desirable architectural feature" for the community.
**Legal Findings**
Administrative Law Judge M. Douglas analyzed the case under the "preponderance of the evidence" standard. The findings focused on the text of the 2011 Design Guidelines, which state: "Any change to the exterior appearance of the house (garage door, stone work, shutters, etc.) must be consistent with the design and color palette of the community. Architectural Committee written approval is
Case Participants
Petitioner Side
- David Janusz (petitioner)
Cresta Norte HOA (former board member)
Appeared on own behalf; testified as witness - Loree Janusz (petitioner)
Cresta Norte HOA
Appeared on own behalf
Respondent Side
- Curtis S. Ekmark (HOA attorney)
Ekmark & Ekmark LLC - Molly J. Streiff (HOA attorney)
Ekmark & Ekmark LLC - James A. Wooley (witness)
Cresta Norte HOA Board of Directors
Board member and Architectural Committee member - Brian McNamara (witness)
Cresta Norte HOA Board of Directors
Board member and Architectural Committee member
Neutral Parties
- M. Douglas (ALJ)
Office of Administrative Hearings - Cliff J. Vanell (Director)
Office of Administrative Hearings
Certified the ALJ decision - Gene Palma (Director)
Department of Fire, Building and Life Safety - Joni Cage (agency staff)
Department of Fire, Building and Life Safety
Listed on mailing certificate c/o Gene Palma - Rosella J. Rodriguez (administrative staff)
Office of Administrative Hearings
Signed mailing certificate