Case Summary
| Case ID | 22F-H2222039-REL |
|---|---|
| Agency | ADRE |
| Tribunal | OAH |
| Decision Date | 2022-10-03 |
| Administrative Law Judge | Tammy L. Eigenheer |
| Outcome | loss |
| Filing Fees Refunded | $500.00 |
| Civil Penalties | $0.00 |
Parties & Counsel
| Petitioner | Oak Creek Knolls Property Owners Association, Inc. | Counsel | Augustus H. Shaw, IV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent | Kim M. Grill | Counsel | Lawrence J. Felder |
Alleged Violations
Article 2, Section 2.11 of the Restatement of Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs)
Outcome Summary
The Administrative Law Judge denied the petition, finding that the HOA failed to prove the homeowner violated the CC&Rs regarding leasing/occupancy rules, as the homeowner and her roommate's arrangement met the undefined term 'common household' required for a 'Single Family' occupancy.
Why this result: The HOA failed to meet the burden of proving that the homeowner's temporary roommate agreement constituted a violation of CC&R Article 2, Section 2.11.
Key Issues & Findings
Residential Use/Leasing Restrictions
Petitioner HOA alleged Respondent homeowner violated CC&R Article 2, Section 2.11 by entering into a roommate agreement while residing in the home, interpreting this as leasing less than the entire unit and arguing the parties did not constitute a 'Single Family' maintaining a 'common household.'
Orders: Petitioner’s petition denied.
Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: No
Disposition: petitioner_loss
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. §§ 32-2102
- 32-2199 et seq.
- ARIZ. ADMIN. CODE R2-19-119
Analytics Highlights
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. §§ 32-2102
- 32-2199 et seq.
- ARIZ. ADMIN. CODE R2-19-119
- CC&Rs Article 2, Section 2.11
Video Overview
Audio Overview
Decision Documents
22F-H2222039-REL Decision – 1003618.pdf
22F-H2222039-REL Decision – 972982.pdf
22F-H2222039-REL Decision – 973826.pdf
22F-H2222039-REL Decision – 974120.pdf
Questions
Question
Who has the burden of proof when an HOA alleges a violation of the CC&Rs?
Short Answer
The HOA (Petitioner) bears the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
Detailed Answer
In a dispute before the OAH between an owner and an association, the HOA must prove that the homeowner violated the specific provision of the CC&Rs. The standard is 'preponderance of the evidence,' meaning it is more probable than not that the violation occurred.
Alj Quote
In this proceeding, Petitioner bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent violated Article 2, Section 2.11 of the CC&Rs.
Legal Basis
ARIZ. ADMIN. CODE R2-19-119
Topic Tags
- burden of proof
- legal standards
- dispute resolution
Question
Can an HOA enforce a rule interpretation found in a 'Disclosure Statement' that isn't explicitly in the CC&Rs?
Short Answer
No, a disclosure statement representing the HOA's interpretation is not necessarily a binding agreement.
Detailed Answer
Even if a homeowner acknowledges a disclosure statement during purchase, if that statement merely reflects the HOA's interpretation of the governing documents (e.g., claiming an owner cannot occupy the home while renting it), it does not constitute a binding contract separate from the CC&Rs themselves.
Alj Quote
Notably, Petitioners assertion on the Disclosure Statement that '[a]n owner may NOT occupy a home at the same time as renting out the home' did not constitute a binding agreement between Petitioner and Respondent, but was merely Respondent’s statement indicating its interpretation of the governing documents.
Legal Basis
Contract Law Principles
Topic Tags
- disclosure statements
- enforceability
- governing documents
Question
If my CC&Rs prohibit leasing 'less than the entire unit,' can I still have a roommate?
Short Answer
Potentially yes, if the roommate has full access to the entire property and shares living expenses.
Detailed Answer
The ALJ found that a 'roommate agreement' granting the tenant full access to all living spaces and sharing expenses (utilities, internet, etc.) did not violate a ban on leasing less than the entire unit, as the tenant was not restricted to a specific portion of the home.
Alj Quote
By its terms, the Agreement was for a period of greater than 30 days and afforded Mr. Snyder access to the entire unit.
Legal Basis
CC&R Interpretation
Topic Tags
- rentals
- roommates
- leasing restrictions
Question
How does an HOA define a 'Single Family' if unrelated people live together?
Short Answer
It may depend on whether the group maintains a 'common household.'
Detailed Answer
If the CC&Rs define 'Single Family' to include a group of unrelated persons maintaining a 'common household,' acts like sharing utility costs, living expenses, and having full access to the property can serve as evidence of a common household.
Alj Quote
This arrangement, together with the fact that Mr. Snyder had full access to the entire property, could reasonably be interpreted to constitute evidence of a 'common household.'
Legal Basis
CC&R Definitions
Topic Tags
- single family definition
- occupancy limits
- common household
Question
What happens if a key term like 'common household' is not defined in the CC&Rs?
Short Answer
Undefined terms are open to different reasonable interpretations.
Detailed Answer
When the governing documents fail to define a critical term, it creates ambiguity. In this case, the lack of a definition for 'common household' allowed for an interpretation that included a homeowner and a roommate sharing expenses.
Alj Quote
The term 'common household' was not defined in the CC&Rs and is open to different interpretations.
Legal Basis
Contract Interpretation
Topic Tags
- ambiguity
- definitions
- legal interpretation
Question
Can I rent out a room if my CC&Rs require leases to be for a minimum of 30 days?
Short Answer
Yes, as long as the lease meets the time requirement and grants access to the whole unit (if partial leasing is banned).
Detailed Answer
The ALJ ruled in favor of the homeowner where the roommate agreement was for 12 months (satisfying the 30-day minimum) and granted access to the entire home, distinguishing it from short-term transient use or partial leasing.
Alj Quote
By its terms, the Agreement was for a period of greater than 30 days and afforded Mr. Snyder access to the entire unit.
Legal Basis
CC&R Compliance
Topic Tags
- rental restrictions
- lease terms
- minimum stay
Case
- Docket No
- 22F-H2222039-REL
- Case Title
- Oak Creek Knolls Property Owners Association, Inc. vs Kim M. Grill
- Decision Date
- 2022-10-03
- Alj Name
- Tammy L. Eigenheer
- Tribunal
- OAH
- Agency
- ADRE
Questions
Question
Who has the burden of proof when an HOA alleges a violation of the CC&Rs?
Short Answer
The HOA (Petitioner) bears the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
Detailed Answer
In a dispute before the OAH between an owner and an association, the HOA must prove that the homeowner violated the specific provision of the CC&Rs. The standard is 'preponderance of the evidence,' meaning it is more probable than not that the violation occurred.
Alj Quote
In this proceeding, Petitioner bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent violated Article 2, Section 2.11 of the CC&Rs.
Legal Basis
ARIZ. ADMIN. CODE R2-19-119
Topic Tags
- burden of proof
- legal standards
- dispute resolution
Question
Can an HOA enforce a rule interpretation found in a 'Disclosure Statement' that isn't explicitly in the CC&Rs?
Short Answer
No, a disclosure statement representing the HOA's interpretation is not necessarily a binding agreement.
Detailed Answer
Even if a homeowner acknowledges a disclosure statement during purchase, if that statement merely reflects the HOA's interpretation of the governing documents (e.g., claiming an owner cannot occupy the home while renting it), it does not constitute a binding contract separate from the CC&Rs themselves.
Alj Quote
Notably, Petitioners assertion on the Disclosure Statement that '[a]n owner may NOT occupy a home at the same time as renting out the home' did not constitute a binding agreement between Petitioner and Respondent, but was merely Respondent’s statement indicating its interpretation of the governing documents.
Legal Basis
Contract Law Principles
Topic Tags
- disclosure statements
- enforceability
- governing documents
Question
If my CC&Rs prohibit leasing 'less than the entire unit,' can I still have a roommate?
Short Answer
Potentially yes, if the roommate has full access to the entire property and shares living expenses.
Detailed Answer
The ALJ found that a 'roommate agreement' granting the tenant full access to all living spaces and sharing expenses (utilities, internet, etc.) did not violate a ban on leasing less than the entire unit, as the tenant was not restricted to a specific portion of the home.
Alj Quote
By its terms, the Agreement was for a period of greater than 30 days and afforded Mr. Snyder access to the entire unit.
Legal Basis
CC&R Interpretation
Topic Tags
- rentals
- roommates
- leasing restrictions
Question
How does an HOA define a 'Single Family' if unrelated people live together?
Short Answer
It may depend on whether the group maintains a 'common household.'
Detailed Answer
If the CC&Rs define 'Single Family' to include a group of unrelated persons maintaining a 'common household,' acts like sharing utility costs, living expenses, and having full access to the property can serve as evidence of a common household.
Alj Quote
This arrangement, together with the fact that Mr. Snyder had full access to the entire property, could reasonably be interpreted to constitute evidence of a 'common household.'
Legal Basis
CC&R Definitions
Topic Tags
- single family definition
- occupancy limits
- common household
Question
What happens if a key term like 'common household' is not defined in the CC&Rs?
Short Answer
Undefined terms are open to different reasonable interpretations.
Detailed Answer
When the governing documents fail to define a critical term, it creates ambiguity. In this case, the lack of a definition for 'common household' allowed for an interpretation that included a homeowner and a roommate sharing expenses.
Alj Quote
The term 'common household' was not defined in the CC&Rs and is open to different interpretations.
Legal Basis
Contract Interpretation
Topic Tags
- ambiguity
- definitions
- legal interpretation
Question
Can I rent out a room if my CC&Rs require leases to be for a minimum of 30 days?
Short Answer
Yes, as long as the lease meets the time requirement and grants access to the whole unit (if partial leasing is banned).
Detailed Answer
The ALJ ruled in favor of the homeowner where the roommate agreement was for 12 months (satisfying the 30-day minimum) and granted access to the entire home, distinguishing it from short-term transient use or partial leasing.
Alj Quote
By its terms, the Agreement was for a period of greater than 30 days and afforded Mr. Snyder access to the entire unit.
Legal Basis
CC&R Compliance
Topic Tags
- rental restrictions
- lease terms
- minimum stay
Case
- Docket No
- 22F-H2222039-REL
- Case Title
- Oak Creek Knolls Property Owners Association, Inc. vs Kim M. Grill
- Decision Date
- 2022-10-03
- Alj Name
- Tammy L. Eigenheer
- Tribunal
- OAH
- Agency
- ADRE
Case Participants
Petitioner Side
- Augustus H. Shaw, IV (HOA Attorney)
SHAW & LINES LLC
Represented Petitioner Oak Creek Knolls Property Owners Association, Inc. - Lisa Frost (Board Member/Witness)
Oak Creek Knolls POA
Association Secretary and testifying witness - Brenda Keller (Board Member/Witness)
Oak Creek Knolls POA
Alternate Director/Chair of the Architectural Committee and testifying witness - Dana Shel (Board Member)
Oak Creek Knolls POA
Association Board President - Denise Dotto (Neighbor/Complainant)
Adjacent property owner whose concerns were noted by Petitioner's witnesses
Respondent Side
- Kim M. Grill (Respondent)
Property owner and Association member - Lawrence J. Felder (Respondent Attorney)
Doncaster Law, PLLC
Represented Respondent Kim M. Grill
Neutral Parties
- Tammy L. Eigenheer (ALJ)
OAH
Administrative Law Judge - Louis Dettorre (ADRE Commissioner)
ADRE
Commissioner of the Arizona Department of Real Estate - AHansen (ADRE Staff)
ADRE
Transmittal recipient - vnunez (ADRE Staff)
ADRE
Transmittal recipient - djones (ADRE Staff)
ADRE
Transmittal recipient - labril (ADRE Staff)
ADRE
Transmittal recipient - Miranda Alvarez (Legal Secretary)
Transmitting administrative staff - c. serrano (Administrative Staff)
Transmitting administrative staff
Other Participants
- Ken Snyder (Housemate/Non-party)
Individual renting under the temporary roommate agreement with Respondent - David Goldman (Housemate/Non-party)
Another individual residing at Respondent's property - Bruce Eert (Neighbor)
- Chris Green (Neighbor)