Case Summary
| Case ID | 22F-H2221003-REL |
|---|---|
| Agency | ADRE |
| Tribunal | OAH |
| Decision Date | 2021-12-08 |
| Administrative Law Judge | Sondra J. Vanella |
| Outcome | loss |
| Filing Fees Refunded | $500.00 |
| Civil Penalties | $0.00 |
Parties & Counsel
| Petitioner | Kathy Padalino | Counsel | — |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent | Legend Trail Parcel A | Counsel | Kelsey Dressen, Esq. |
Alleged Violations
CC&Rs Article 1 Section 26, Article 4 Section 4.6, and Article 2, Section 2.4
Outcome Summary
The Administrative Law Judge ordered that the Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed after finding that the Petitioner failed to sustain her burden to establish a violation by the Respondent of the cited sections of the CC&Rs.
Why this result: Petitioner failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent violated the CC&Rs, and did not establish that Respondent was obligated to provide her with an individual access code separate from the one already provided to the Lot.
Key Issues & Findings
The dispute between Petitioner and Respondent arises from Community Document Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions Article 1 Section 26, Article 4 Section 4.6, and Article 2, Section 2.4.
Petitioner filed an HOA Dispute Process Petition alleging a violation of community documents because the HOA refused to grant her a personal access gate code. Petitioner argued that as an owner and member, she was entitled to her own personal and individual access code. Respondent disputed the violation, asserting the lot already had multiple modes of access, and was not obligated to provide an additional individual code.
Orders: Petitioner’s Petition is dismissed.
Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: No
Disposition: respondent_win
- CC&Rs Article 1 Section 26
- CC&Rs Article 4 Section 4.6
- CC&Rs Article 2, Section 2.4
- A.R.S. § 32-2199
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. section 41-1092.07(G)(2)
- A.A.C. R2-19-119(A)
- A.A.C. R2-19-119(B)(1)
- A.A.C. R2-19-119(B)(2)
Analytics Highlights
- A.R.S. § 32-2199
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. section 41-1092.07(G)(2)
- A.A.C. R2-19-119(A)
- A.A.C. R2-19-119(B)(1)
- A.A.C. R2-19-119(B)(2)
- A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)
- A.R.S. § 32-2199.04
- A.R.S. § 41-1092.09
Video Overview
Audio Overview
Decision Documents
22F-H2221003-REL Decision – 930504.pdf
Questions
Question
Who is responsible for proving that a violation occurred in an HOA dispute hearing?
Short Answer
The Petitioner (the person filing the complaint) bears the burden of proof.
Detailed Answer
In an administrative hearing regarding an HOA dispute, the burden is not on the HOA to prove they are innocent. Instead, the homeowner filing the petition must prove that the HOA committed the violation.
Alj Quote
Petitioner bears the burden of proof to establish that Respondent committed the alleged violation by a preponderance of the evidence.
Legal Basis
ARIZ. REV. STAT. section 41-1092.07(G)(2); A.A.C. R2-19-119(A) and (B)(1)
Topic Tags
- Burden of Proof
- Hearing Procedures
Question
What is the legal standard of proof required to win a hearing against an HOA?
Short Answer
Preponderance of the evidence.
Detailed Answer
This standard means that the evidence must show that the claim is more likely true than not true. It is based on the convincing force of the evidence rather than just the number of witnesses.
Alj Quote
“A preponderance of the evidence is such proof as convinces the trier of fact that the contention is more probably true than not.”
Legal Basis
Morris K. Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence § 5 (1960)
Topic Tags
- Legal Standards
- Evidence
Question
If Association Rules conflict with the CC&Rs (Declaration), which document controls?
Short Answer
The Declaration (CC&Rs) prevails.
Detailed Answer
The governing documents usually establish a hierarchy. If the Board adopts rules that are inconsistent with the recorded Declaration, the Declaration is the superior document.
Alj Quote
In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Declaration and the Association Rules, the provisions of this Declaration shall prevail.
Legal Basis
CC&Rs Article 4 Section 4.3
Topic Tags
- Governing Documents
- Rules vs CC&Rs
Question
Is an HOA obligated to provide a unique gate access code to every individual owner?
Short Answer
Not necessarily, if access is provided to the Lot.
Detailed Answer
If the HOA provides valid methods of access for a Lot (such as a shared code, key fob, or remote), they may not be legally obligated to provide a specific 'personal' code for each individual owner of that Lot.
Alj Quote
Petitioner did not establish that Respondent is obligated to provide her with a “personal” or “individual” access code.
Legal Basis
Findings of Fact / Conclusions of Law 4
Topic Tags
- Access Rights
- Gate Codes
- Security
Question
Can the Administrative Law Judge resolve disputes between co-owners regarding access to the property?
Short Answer
No, disputes between co-owners are personal matters.
Detailed Answer
If one co-owner restricts another co-owner from using a shared access code, the Department of Real Estate views this as a private issue between the owners, not a violation by the HOA.
Alj Quote
Mr. Gribble, as co-owner, has placed restrictions upon Petitioner’s use of the code for the Lot. That is an issue for Petitioner to take up with Mr. Gribble, not the Department.
Legal Basis
Conclusions of Law 4
Topic Tags
- Co-owner Disputes
- Jurisdiction
Question
Are Association Rules as enforceable as the CC&Rs?
Short Answer
Yes, generally rules are enforceable to the same extent as the Declaration.
Detailed Answer
Once validly adopted, Association Rules regarding the management and operation of the community can be enforced just like the recorded covenants.
Alj Quote
The Association Rules shall be enforceable in the same manner and to the same extent as the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Declaration.
Legal Basis
CC&Rs Article 4 Section 4.3
Topic Tags
- Enforcement
- Rules
Case
- Docket No
- 22F-H2221003-REL
- Case Title
- Kathy Padalino v. Legend Trail Parcel A
- Decision Date
- 2021-12-08
- Alj Name
- Sondra J. Vanella
- Tribunal
- OAH
- Agency
- ADRE
Questions
Question
Who is responsible for proving that a violation occurred in an HOA dispute hearing?
Short Answer
The Petitioner (the person filing the complaint) bears the burden of proof.
Detailed Answer
In an administrative hearing regarding an HOA dispute, the burden is not on the HOA to prove they are innocent. Instead, the homeowner filing the petition must prove that the HOA committed the violation.
Alj Quote
Petitioner bears the burden of proof to establish that Respondent committed the alleged violation by a preponderance of the evidence.
Legal Basis
ARIZ. REV. STAT. section 41-1092.07(G)(2); A.A.C. R2-19-119(A) and (B)(1)
Topic Tags
- Burden of Proof
- Hearing Procedures
Question
What is the legal standard of proof required to win a hearing against an HOA?
Short Answer
Preponderance of the evidence.
Detailed Answer
This standard means that the evidence must show that the claim is more likely true than not true. It is based on the convincing force of the evidence rather than just the number of witnesses.
Alj Quote
“A preponderance of the evidence is such proof as convinces the trier of fact that the contention is more probably true than not.”
Legal Basis
Morris K. Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence § 5 (1960)
Topic Tags
- Legal Standards
- Evidence
Question
If Association Rules conflict with the CC&Rs (Declaration), which document controls?
Short Answer
The Declaration (CC&Rs) prevails.
Detailed Answer
The governing documents usually establish a hierarchy. If the Board adopts rules that are inconsistent with the recorded Declaration, the Declaration is the superior document.
Alj Quote
In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Declaration and the Association Rules, the provisions of this Declaration shall prevail.
Legal Basis
CC&Rs Article 4 Section 4.3
Topic Tags
- Governing Documents
- Rules vs CC&Rs
Question
Is an HOA obligated to provide a unique gate access code to every individual owner?
Short Answer
Not necessarily, if access is provided to the Lot.
Detailed Answer
If the HOA provides valid methods of access for a Lot (such as a shared code, key fob, or remote), they may not be legally obligated to provide a specific 'personal' code for each individual owner of that Lot.
Alj Quote
Petitioner did not establish that Respondent is obligated to provide her with a “personal” or “individual” access code.
Legal Basis
Findings of Fact / Conclusions of Law 4
Topic Tags
- Access Rights
- Gate Codes
- Security
Question
Can the Administrative Law Judge resolve disputes between co-owners regarding access to the property?
Short Answer
No, disputes between co-owners are personal matters.
Detailed Answer
If one co-owner restricts another co-owner from using a shared access code, the Department of Real Estate views this as a private issue between the owners, not a violation by the HOA.
Alj Quote
Mr. Gribble, as co-owner, has placed restrictions upon Petitioner’s use of the code for the Lot. That is an issue for Petitioner to take up with Mr. Gribble, not the Department.
Legal Basis
Conclusions of Law 4
Topic Tags
- Co-owner Disputes
- Jurisdiction
Question
Are Association Rules as enforceable as the CC&Rs?
Short Answer
Yes, generally rules are enforceable to the same extent as the Declaration.
Detailed Answer
Once validly adopted, Association Rules regarding the management and operation of the community can be enforced just like the recorded covenants.
Alj Quote
The Association Rules shall be enforceable in the same manner and to the same extent as the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Declaration.
Legal Basis
CC&Rs Article 4 Section 4.3
Topic Tags
- Enforcement
- Rules
Case
- Docket No
- 22F-H2221003-REL
- Case Title
- Kathy Padalino v. Legend Trail Parcel A
- Decision Date
- 2021-12-08
- Alj Name
- Sondra J. Vanella
- Tribunal
- OAH
- Agency
- ADRE
Case Participants
Petitioner Side
- Kathy Padalino (petitioner)
Appeared on her own behalf
Respondent Side
- Kelsey Dressen (attorney)
LAW OFFICES OF CHOATE & WOOD
Represented Respondent Legend Trail Parcel A
Neutral Parties
- Sondra J. Vanella (ALJ)
- Louis Dettorre (Commissioner)
Arizona Department of Real Estate - AHansen (ADRE staff)
Arizona Department of Real Estate - djones (ADRE staff)
Arizona Department of Real Estate - DGardner (ADRE staff)
Arizona Department of Real Estate - vnunez (ADRE staff)
Arizona Department of Real Estate
Other Participants
- Vance Gribble (co-owner)
Co-owns home with Petitioner