Holding HOA Boards, Attorneys, and Management Companies Accountable
Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2025-033417
Case Header
Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2025-033417: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Arizona Silverado Condominium Association.
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/16/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
03/13/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE GREG S. COMO
C. Lacey
Deputy
ARIZONA SILVERADO CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
ELIZABETH LINDBLOM
v.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE, et al.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE
7500 E DEER VALLEY RD UNIT 2
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255
MARIA PAPAS
24887 SPRINGBROOK
FARMINGTON HILL MI 48336
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
3939 N DRINKWATER BLVD
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
COMM. OWEN
JUDGE COMO
MINUTE ENTRY
This Court has received Plaintiff’s eFiled Application/Motion for Default against
defendant(s), The Estate of Nick L. Lentzos, in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Addison Owen.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
03/13/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be either e-filed or filed in paper form.
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, Application
for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate, and Statement of Costs.
Self-represented litigants are exempt from any mandatory eFiling requirements but may
eFile if they prefer.
Attorneys and Self-Represented Litigants must submit a default judgment packet required
by the Court, including the documents identified on the default judgment packet coversheet in
paper to the assigned commissioner’s division.
A commissioner will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the
default judgment packet with all the required documents has been received by the division
in paper form.
If the paper packet is not received by the above-named Commissioner division by May 12,
2026, the matter will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution as to the defaulted
party.
You may wish to review the following resources for additional information regarding the
default process:
Applications for Default
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/
Motions
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/n30m54ah/gn10fz.pdf
Civil Default Checklist
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/jitjlp0s/cvc50fz.pdf
Civil Court Administration Processing Information
civil-department-post-filing-information-and-instructions.pdf (maricopa.gov)
04/13/2026 — CV2025033417 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA SILVERADO 04/13/2026 HONORABLE GREG S. COMO View Minute Entry ↑ top
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/14/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
04/13/2026
Docket Code 079
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE GREG S. COMO
C. Lacey
Deputy
ARIZONA SILVERADO CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
ELIZABETH LINDBLOM
v.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE, et al.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE
7500 E DEER VALLEY RD UNIT 2
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255
MARIA PAPAS
24887 SPRINGBROOK
FARMINGTON HILL MI 48336
VASILIKI PAPPAS
23244 MONTCLAIR ST
FARMINGTON HILL MI 48336
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
3939 N DRINKWATER BLVD
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
DOCKET CV TX
JUDGE COMO
MINUTE ENTRY
Pending before the Court are:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant Maia Papas’ Answer filed on 2-19-2026; and
2. Defendant Papas’ Motion for Partial Dismissal filed on 3-22-2026.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
04/13/2026
Docket Code 079
Form V000A
Page 2
The Court has reviewed both motions and the response briefs. The Court finds that oral
argument is not necessary to resolve the motions.
Motion to Strike
Plaintiff moves to strike Maria Papas’ answer that was filed on 2-10-2026. Plaintiff
argues that the Answer does not meet the procedural requirements of Rule 8(c) because it does
not admit or deny each of the allegations in the First Amended Complaint.
Ms. Papas has filed two answers to the First Amended Complaint. The first one was filed
on October 15, 2025. In that answer she issued a general denial to the allegation sin the
Complaint.
Although Ms. Papas’ pleadings have been somewhat confusing, the Court does not find a
basis to strike her Answer(s). Plaintiff’s motion to strike is denied.
Motion for Partial Dismissal
Ms. Papas’ motion for partial dismissal seeks to dismiss “the claims asserted against her
in her individual capacity.” The motion, however, is inconsistent and contradictory. In the same
motion, she seeks to assert counterclaims that were not pled in her Answer. She also objects to
default proceedings that do not apply to her and asks to “remain as a named Defendant and
interested party.”
Plaintiff’s response to the motion notes the above inconsistencies. Plaintiff
also states that Ms. Papas was only named in the First Amended Complaint because she claims
to be an heir to The Estate of Nick Lentzos. Ms. Papas’ motion attaches, as Exhibit A, Letters of
Authority for Personal Representative. The Letters indicate Vasiliki Pappas is the personal
representative of The Estate of Nick Lentzos. Plaintiff asks that Ms. Papas be dismissed from
the case entirely.
The Court agrees with Plaintiff that there is no basis for Ms. Papas to remain in the
case. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Maria Papas’ Answer.
2. Dismissing Maria Papas from the case entirely.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing Clerk of Court, Docket personnel, to remove the
dismissed Maria Papas only, referenced above from the caption of this case.
04/13/2026 — CV2025033417 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA SILVERADO 04/13/2026 HONORABLE GREG S. COMO View Minute Entry ↑ top
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/21/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
04/13/2026
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE GREG S. COMO
C. Lacey
Deputy
ARIZONA SILVERADO CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
ELIZABETH LINDBLOM
v.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE, et al.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE
7500 E DEER VALLEY RD UNIT 2
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255
VASILIKI PAPPAS
23244 MONTCLAIR ST
FARMINGTON HILL MI 48336
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
3939 N DRINKWATER BLVD
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
COMM. OWEN
JUDGE COMO
MINUTE ENTRY
On April 7, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Response to Joinder by Personal Representative. In its
Response, Plaintiff requests that the Court set an evidentiary hearing to clarify the parties’
interest in this matter.
After Plaintiff’s Response, the Court entered an Order dismissing Maria Papas from the
case. However, the Court finds that a status conference is warranted to verify Vasiliki Pappas’
position as the personal representative of The Estate of Nick Lentzos, and to address whether this
case should be consolidated with CV2024-019435. Accordingly,
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
04/13/2026
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS ORDERED setting a virtual status conference for April 30, 2026, at 10:30 a.m.
(time allotted: 30 minutes).
This hearing is set as a virtual hearing. If you wish to attend in-person, you must
inform this Division's staff at least three business days before the hearing by emailing either
Shawne
Kepner
at
[email protected]
or
Nancy
Ortega
at
[email protected].
Virtual hearings will be held by phone/video conference via the Court Connect using
Microsoft Teams Meeting. Please join my Teams meeting from your computer, tablet or
smartphone.
Click here to join the meeting
www.tinyurl.com/jbazmc-cvj10
You can also dial in using your phone (audio only)
+1 (917) 781-4590
Phone Conference ID: 803 526 856#
Use of the above link can be made easier by downloading the Microsoft Teams application first;
for more on the new platform, including an introduction video and participant guide, please visit
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/court-connect/
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to the
assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing and must pay the
authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the proceeding. The
fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
04/14/2026 — CV2025033417 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA SILVERADO 04/14/2026 HONORABLE GREG S. COMO View Minute Entry ↑ top
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/20/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
04/14/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE GREG S. COMO
C. Lacey
Deputy
ARIZONA SILVERADO CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
ELIZABETH LINDBLOM
v.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE, et al.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE
7500 E DEER VALLEY RD UNIT 2
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255
VASILIKI PAPPAS
23244 MONTCLAIR ST
FARMINGTON HILL MI 48336
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
3939 N DRINKWATER BLVD
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
COMM. OWEN
JUDGE COMO
MINUTE ENTRY
This Court has received Plaintiff’s eFiled Application/Motion for Default against
defendant(s), The Estate of Nick L. Lentzos, in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Addison Owen.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
04/14/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be either e-filed or filed in paper form.
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, Application
for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate, and Statement of Costs.
Self-represented litigants are exempt from any mandatory eFiling requirements but may
eFile if they prefer.
Attorneys and Self-Represented Litigants must submit a default judgment packet required
by the Court, including the documents identified on the default judgment packet coversheet in
paper to the assigned commissioner’s division.
A commissioner will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the
default judgment packet with all the required documents has been received by the division
in paper form.
If the paper packet is not received by the above-named Commissioner division by June 15,
2026, the matter will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution as to the defaulted
party.
You may wish to review the following resources for additional information regarding the
default process:
Applications for Default
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/
Motions
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/n30m54ah/gn10fz.pdf
Civil Default Checklist
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/jitjlp0s/cvc50fz.pdf
Civil Court Administration Processing Information
civil-department-post-filing-information-and-instructions.pdf (maricopa.gov)
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
04/14/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 3
04/30/2026 — CV2025033417 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA SILVERADO 04/30/2026 HONORABLE GREG S. COMO View Minute Entry ↑ top
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/11/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
04/30/2026
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE GREG S. COMO
C. Lacey
Deputy
ARIZONA SILVERADO CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
ELIZABETH LINDBLOM
v.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE, et al.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE
7500 E DEER VALLEY RD UNIT 2
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255
VASILIKI PAPPAS
23244 MONTCLAIR ST
FARMINGTON HILL MI 48336
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
3939 N DRINKWATER BLVD
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
DOCKET CV TX
JUDGE COMO
MINUTE ENTRY
Central Court Building - Courtroom 401
10:31 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual Status Conference. Plaintiff Arizona
Silverado Condominium Association is represented by counsel, Elizabeth Lindblom. Defendant
Vasiliki Pappas is present on her own behalf.
A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
04/30/2026
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 2
Discussion is held regarding Ms. Pappas’ relation to Defendant Nick Lentzos, and his
estate. She informs the Court that she is his sister.
Discussion is held regarding Ms. Pappas’ representation of Mr. Lentzos’ estate.
The Court notes that when Ms. Pappas appeared in this action, she asked to be substituted
in as the party for Nick Lentzos and his estate. She has provided documentation that she is the
personal representative. Until related issues are resolved more conclusively, the Court finds that
it is appropriate to grant Ms. Pappas’ request. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Superior Court – Docket personnel to
substitute Vasiliki Pappas as the Defendant party in place of both Nick Lentzos, and also the
Estate of Nick L. Lentzos.
Discussion is held regarding consolidation between this matter and CV2024-091435.
Plaintiff objects to consolidation because the two cases involve different properties. Accordingly,
the Court will not consolidate the cases at this time.
Discussion is held regarding the lack of an answer by Ms. Pappas in both cases.
For reasons stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Vasiliki Pappas shall file an answer to the Complaint
by no later than May 14, 2026. Defendant is advised to make sure that she additionally sends a
copy of any pleading that she intends to file with the Court to Plaintiff’s counsel.
10:42 a.m. Matter concludes.
12/30/2025 — CV2025033417 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA SILVERADO 12/30/2025 HONORABLE GREG S. COMO View Minute Entry ↑ top
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/31/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
12/30/2025
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE GREG S. COMO
C. Lacey
Deputy
ARIZONA SILVERADO CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
ELIZABETH LINDBLOM
v.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE, et al.
ESTATE OF NICK L LENTZOS, THE
7500 E DEER VALLEY RD UNIT 2
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255
MARIA PAPAS
24887 SPRINGBROOK
FARMINGTON HILL MI 48336
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
3939 N DRINKWATER BLVD
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
COMM. RICHARD ALBRECHT
JUDGE COMO
MINUTE ENTRY
This Court has received Plaintiff’s eFiled Application/Motion for Default against
defendant(s), Unknown Heir and Devisees of Nick L. Lentzos, in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Richard Albrecht.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-033417
12/30/2025
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be either e-filed or filed in paper form.
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, Application
for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate, and Statement of Costs.
Self-represented litigants are exempt from any mandatory eFiling requirements but may
eFile if they prefer.
Attorneys and Self-Represented Litigants must submit a default judgment packet required
by the Court, including the documents identified on the default judgment packet coversheet in
paper to the assigned commissioner’s division.
A commissioner will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the
default judgment packet with all the required documents has been received by the division
in paper form.
If the paper packet is not received by the above-named Commissioner division by March
2, 2026, the matter will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution as to the defaulted
party.
You may wish to review the following resources for additional information regarding the
default process:
Applications for Default
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/
Motions
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/n30m54ah/gn10fz.pdf
Civil Default Checklist
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/jitjlp0s/cvc50fz.pdf
Civil Court Administration Processing Information
civil-department-post-filing-information-and-instructions.pdf (maricopa.gov)
Documents
Type
Title
Content Type
Size
Source
minute_entry_pdf
CV2025033417 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA SILVERADO 03/13/2026 HONORABLE GREG S. COMO View Minute Entry
