03/19/2025 — CV2023018119 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, VILLA CAMELBACK 03/19/2025 HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/20/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
03/19/2025
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY
S. Ortega
Deputy
VILLA CAMELBACK HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
v.
JUSTINE L REINARD
JUSTINE L REINARD
5106 N 17TH AVE # 5
PHOENIX AZ 85015
JUDGE COURY
ORDER GRANTING IN-PART MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
The Court has reviewed and considered the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed
on February 18, 2025. No response was filed and oral argument was not requested, nor would it
be helpful.
THE COURT FINDS as follows:
1. Plaintiff seeks judgment on the pleadings based on the Complaint’s allegations,
the statements in Defendant’s Answer, and allegations of the Complaint to
which Defendants did not respond.
2. Plaintiff is correct that, under Arizona law, allegations of a complaint (other
than amounts owed) that are not responded to are deemed admitted.
3. Defendant Justine Reinard has failed to pay assessments due pursuant to the
Declaration of Plaintiff Villa Camelback Homeowners Association (the
“Association”). Defendant made a payment after the Complaint in this matter
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
03/19/2025
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
was filed, and she has admitted to making late payments and apologized. There
is no dispute that Defendant is the owner of the subject property (Exhibit A to
the Complaint). It is undisputed that the Association has a lien against
Defendant’s Property for the assessments and related costs due, and that
Defendant is obligated to pay such assessments and related charges.
4. Given that Defendant expressly acknowledges her breach and failure to pay,
Judgment on the Pleadings is warranted.
5. The amount of the liability has not been admitted. Nor has the liability of any
of the fictitious Defendants been admitted.
Good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED granting in-part the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed on
February 18, 2025 as to the liability only of Defendant Justine L. Reinard.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying in-part the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
in all other respects, including as to damages and any liability of any fictitious Defendant.
03/31/2025 — CV2023018119 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, VILLA CAMELBACK 03/31/2025 HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/01/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
03/31/2025
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY
S. Ortega
Deputy
VILLA CAMELBACK HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
v.
JUSTINE L REINARD
JUSTINE L REINARD
5106 N 17TH AVE # 5
PHOENIX AZ 85015
JUDGE COURY
STATUS CONFERENCE SET
The Court having received Plaintiff’s Rule 26(d) Statement of Discovery Dispute, filed
March 28, 2025,
IT IS ORDERED setting a virtual/telephonic Status Conference on April 3, 2025 at
9:30 a.m. (15 minutes) in this division. Counsel and any unrepresented parties shall appear
through Court Connect for this hearing. Information regarding access to Judge Coury’s virtual
courtroom through Court Connect is listed below.
Please join the courtroom from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://tinyurl.com/jbazmc-cvj23
You can also dial in using your phone:
Teams Phone Number: +1 917-781-4590
Conference ID: 269 483 919#
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
03/31/2025
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
More information regarding Court Connect can be found at:
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/court-connect
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded by audio and video method and not by a court
reporter. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in
which a court reporter is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit
a written request to the assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the
hearing, and must pay the authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days
before the proceeding. The fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
The parties/counsel can find information regarding Judge Coury’s Protocols and Practices at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/JudicialBiographies/profile.asp?jdgID=272&jdgUSID=9683
The Arizona Constitution requires the Arizona Commission on Judicial
Performance Review to conduct performance evaluations of superior court judges.
The Commission is asking for your help to evaluate Maricopa County Superior
Court judges currently undergoing performance review. After your hearing, if the
judge you are in front of is undergoing review, a survey will either be given to you
by court staff or will be emailed to you and you can take the survey online. The
survey is conducted by the Docking Institute of Public Affairs at Fort Hays State
University and is anonymous and confidential. Your participation in the review
process is important! More information on Judicial Performance Review can be
found at azjudges.info.
La Constitución de Arizona exige que la Comisión de la Evaluación del Desempeño
Judicial realice evaluaciones de desempeño de los jueces de los tribunales
superiores. La comisión pide su ayuda para evaluar a los jueces del Tribunal
Superior del Condado de Maricopa a quienes actualmente se les está evaluando su
desempeño. Después de su audiencia, si el juez frente a usted está siendo revisado,
el personal de la corte le entregará una encuesta o se le enviará por correo
electrónico y usted puede realizar la encuesta en línea. La encuesta es realizada por
el Docking Institute of Public Affairs de la Fort Hays State University y se mantiene
anónima y confidencial. ¡Su participación en el proceso de la evaluación es
importante! Para obtener más información sobre la evaluación del desempeño
judicial, diríjase a azjudges.info.
04/03/2025 — CV2023018119 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, VILLA CAMELBACK 04/03/2025 HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/04/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
04/03/2025
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY
S. Ortega
Deputy
VILLA CAMELBACK HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
v.
JUSTINE L REINARD
JUSTINE L REINARD
5106 N 17TH AVE # 5
PHOENIX AZ 85015
EMBER ANN VAN VRANKEN
JUDGE COURY
MINUTE ENTRY
East Court Building – Courtroom 713
9:32 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual/telephonic Status Conference regarding
Plaintiff’s Rule 26(d) Statement of Discovery Dispute. Plaintiff is represented by Counsel, Ember
Van Vranken, for counsel of record, Nikita Verma Patel. Defendant is not present nor represented
by counsel.
A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
LET THE RECORD REFLECT that proper notice of this hearing has been given to the
Defendant, and Defendant has failed to appear. No good cause appearing for Defendant’s failure
to appear, the hearing will proceed.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
04/03/2025
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 2
The Court having reviewed Plaintiff’s Rule 26(d) Statement of Discovery Dispute, filed
March 28, 2025, and there being no responses filed by Defendant,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall serve an initial disclosure statement and respond
to all written discovery requests by April 30, 2025.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED deeming the Requests For Admissions to be admitted
subject to the applicable Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.
LET THE RECORD FURTHER REFLECT that deeming the Requests for Admission
as admitted subject to reconsideration only as permitted by the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure,
and giving Defendant additional time, will be considered an intermediate sanction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because intermediate sanctions have been imposed, if
Defendant fails to serve an initial disclosure statement and to respond to all other written discovery
requests by the deadline above, the Court will entertain a Rule 37 motion seeking to strike
Defendant’s Answer filed May 20, 2024, and if granted, allow the Plaintiff to proceed through
default.
9:37 a.m. Hearing concludes.
06/04/2024 — CV2023018119 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, VILLA CAMELBACK 06/04/2024 HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
06/05/2024 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
06/04/2024
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY
S. Ortega
Deputy
VILLA CAMELBACK HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
v.
JUSTINE L REINARD
JUSTINE L REINARD
5106 N 17TH AVE # 5
PHOENIX AZ 85015
COMM. RICHARD ALBRECHT
JUDGE COURY
MINUTE ENTRY
This Court has received Plaintiff’s e-filed Application for Entry of Default against
defendant(s), Justine L. Reinard, in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment proceedings
and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner Richard Albrecht.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a default
judgment must be e-filed.
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application for
Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, and Application for
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
06/04/2024
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate and Statement of Costs, but shall submit a default judgment packet
required by the Court, including the documents identified on the default judgment packet coversheet
in paper to the assigned commissioner’s division. A commissioner will not act upon a Motion for Entry
of Default Judgment until the default judgment packet with all the required documents has been
received by the division in paper form.
The parties/counsel can find additional information regarding the default judgment process
at: https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/
The parties/counsel can find information regarding Judge Coury’s Protocols and Practices at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/JudicialBiographies/profile.asp?jdgID=272&jdgUSID=9
683
07/09/2025 — CV2023018119 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, VILLA CAMELBACK 07/09/2025 HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/11/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
07/09/2025
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER COURY
S. Ortega
Deputy
VILLA CAMELBACK HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
v.
JUSTINE L REINARD
JUSTINE L REINARD
5106 N 17TH AVE # 5
PHOENIX AZ 85015
EMBER ANN VAN VRANKEN
JUDGE COURY
DISMISSAL CALENDAR
East Court Building – Courtroom 713
9:07 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual Trial Setting Conference. Plaintiff is represented
by Counsel, Ember Van Vranken, for counsel of record Nikita Verma Patel. Defendant is not
present or represented by counsel.
A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
Case status is discussed. Plaintiff’s counsel informs the Court that this matter is in the
process of resolution.
For the reasons stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED vacating today’s Trial Setting Conference.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-018119
07/09/2025
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED placing this matter on the Dismissal Calendar for
dismissal on or after September 30, 2025, without further notice, unless prior to said date a
judgment is entered or filed, a stipulation of dismissal is presented, or a request is made to set
another trial setting conference.
9:09 a.m. Hearing concludes.
