04/12/2023 — CV2023001102 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, SCOTTSDALE NORTH 04/12/2023 HONORABLE JOHN REA View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/13/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-001102
04/12/2023
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN REA
J. Eaton
Deputy
DANIEL MAYER, et al.
DAVID ERIC WOOD
v.
SCOTTSDALE NORTH HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
BRADLEY R JARDINE
COMM. CRONIN
COMM. JOHN REA
MINUTE ENTRY
This Court has received Plaintiff’s e-filed Application for Entry of Default, filed April 11,
2023 against Defendant(s) Scottsdale North Homeowners’ Association in the above-captioned
case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Cronin.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be e-filed.
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, Section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-001102
04/12/2023
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, and
Application for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate and Statement of Costs, but shall submit a
default judgment packet required by the Court, including the documents identified on the default
judgment packet coversheet, in paper to the assigned commissioner’s division. A commissioner
will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the default judgment packet with
all the required documents has been received by the division in paper form.
The parties/counsel can find additional information in the form of frequently asked
questions at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/howDoI.asp.
The parties/counsel can also find additional information regarding the default judgment
process at: https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/.
05/22/2023 — CV2023001102 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, SCOTTSDALE NORTH 05/22/2023 HONORABLE SUSANNA C. PINEDA View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/23/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-001102
05/22/2023
Docket Code 028
Form J000
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE SUSANNA C. PINEDA
M. Brickman
Deputy
DANIEL MAYER, et al.
DAVID ERIC WOOD
v.
SCOTTSDALE NORTH HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
BRADLEY R JARDINE
JUDGE PINEDA
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received and reviewed Defendant’s Request for Status Conference
Regarding Mediation filed April 24, 2023, Plaintiff’s Response to Request for Status Conference
Regarding Mediation filed April 26, 2023, and Defendant’s Reply Memorandum in Support of
Request for Status Conference Regarding Mediation filed May 3, 2023. Good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED setting a virtual Status Conference regarding Mediation on May 25,
2023 at 11:00 a.m., (20 minutes allotted) in this Division via Court Connect. The Court expects
the parties to appear by videoconference unless permission is otherwise given by the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to contact the Division via
video conference using Court Connect on the date and time of hearing. Information regarding
access to this Division’s virtual courtroom is listed below:
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-001102
05/22/2023
Docket Code 028
Form J000
Page 2
The video call should be placed from an area with no background noise as this will prevent
the parties from hearing the proceedings in the courtroom.
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to the
assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing and must pay the
authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the proceeding. The
fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
If either party wishes to register and/or access their case via the Electronic Court Record,
they may do so by visiting the following website:
https://ecr.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/login.aspx
Court Connect Information
Enter the following address into your web browser and connect
through Microsoft Teams or your browser
www.tinyurl.com/jbazmc-cvj12
Use of the above link can be made easier by downloading the Microsoft
Teams application first; for more on the new platform, including an
introduction video and participant guide, please visit
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/court-connect/
If necessary, you may connect to the meeting via telephone:
+1 (917) 781-4590
Microsoft Conference ID: 508 176 593#
05/25/2023 — CV2023001102 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, SCOTTSDALE NORTH 05/25/2023 HONORABLE SUSANNA C. PINEDA View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/26/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-001102
05/25/2023
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE SUSANNA C. PINEDA
E. Wolf
Deputy
DANIEL MAYER, et al.
DAVID ERIC WOOD
v.
SCOTTSDALE NORTH HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
BRADLEY R JARDINE
JUDGE PINEDA
MINUTE ENTRY
East Court Building – Courtroom 913
11:04 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual Status Conference regarding Defendant’s
Request for Status Conference regarding Mediation, filed April 24, 2023, and all other pleadings
thereto. Plaintiffs, Daniel Mayer and Jeffery A. Dangelo, are represented by counsel of record,
David Eric Wood. Defendant, Scottsdale North Homeowners Association, Inc., is represented by
counsel of record, Bradley R. Jardine. All participants appear virtually via Court Connect.
A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held regarding the status of the case, the separate matter before the Arizona
Department of Real Estate (“ADRE”), and separate civil rights violation claim.
The Parties stipulate to participate in mediation.
Therefore, based upon the Parties’ stipulation, and discussion held on the record,
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-001102
05/25/2023
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS ORDERED that the Parties shall file a Joint Report and proposed form of
Scheduling Order which shall include a deadline for mediation within ten (10) business days, by
no later than June 9, 2023.
LET THE RECORD REFLECT that, consistent with the recommendation set forth in
Comment 5 to Rule 2.11, Arizona Rules of Judicial Conduct, to “disclose on the record information
that the judge believes the parties or their lawyers might reasonably consider relevant to a possible
motion for disqualification,” out of an abundance of caution, and to permit counsel an opportunity
to confer with their clients outside of the presence of the Court pursuant to Rule 2.11, Arizona
Rules of Judicial Conduct, this judicial officer makes the following disclosures:
1. This judicial officer presided over a criminal matter in which Plaintiff’s counsel, David
Eric Wood, was the representing attorney for the Attorney General’s Office.
Additional disclosures are made by Defendant regarding a prior counsel within the law
firm having worked with this judicial officer sometime during her tenancy at the Attorney
General’s Office.
The parties have no objections to this judicial officer presiding over this matter.
11:20 a.m. Matter concludes.
The Arizona Constitution requires the Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance
Review to conduct performance evaluations of superior court judges. The Commission is asking
for your help to evaluate Maricopa County Superior Court judges currently undergoing
performance review. After your hearing, if the judge you are in front of is undergoing review, a
survey will be emailed to you, and you can take the survey online. The survey is conducted by
the Docking Institute of Public Affairs at Fort Hays State University and is anonymous and
confidential. Your participation in the review process is important! More information on Judicial
Performance Review can be found at www.azjudges.info.
La Constitución de Arizona exige que la Comisión de la Evaluación del Desempeño
Judicial realice evaluaciones de desempeño de los jueces de los tribunales superiores. La
comisión pide su ayuda para evaluar a los jueces del Tribunal Superior del Condado de Maricopa
a quienes actualmente se les está evaluando su desempeño. Después de su audiencia, si el juez
ante el cual comparece está sometido a una evaluación se le enviará por correo electrónico una
encuesta que usted podrá tomar por Internet. La encuesta es realizada por el Docking Institute of
Public Affairs de la Fort Hays State University y se mantiene anónima y confidencial. ¡Su
participación en el proceso de la evaluación es importante! Para obtener más información sobre
la evaluación del desempeño judicial, diríjase a www.azjudges.info.
07/21/2023 — CV2023001102 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, SCOTTSDALE NORTH 07/21/2023 HONORABLE SUSANNA C. PINEDA View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/26/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-001102
07/21/2023
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE SUSANNA C. PINEDA
J. Holguin
Deputy
DANIEL MAYER, et al.
DAVID ERIC WOOD
v.
SCOTTSDALE NORTH HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
BRADLEY R JARDINE
JUDGE PINEDA
CASE ON DISMISSAL CALENDAR
The Court having received a Notice of Settlement,
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Dismissal Calendar for dismissal August
21, 2023, without further notice, unless prior to said date a judgment is entered or filed, a
stipulation of dismissal is presented, a proper joint report and proposed scheduling order is filed,
or the parties have taken action in this case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the February 20, 2024 Status/Trial Setting
Conference set for 8:45 a.m. in this division.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED deeming any pending motions moot due to the parties’
settlement.
