02/16/2024 — CV2022092294 HAYDEN, LINDA 02/16/2024 HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/21/2024 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-092294
02/16/2024
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY
L. Mooney
Deputy
LINDA HAYDEN
THOMAS L BROWN JR.
v.
JOYCE HAYNIE, et al.
JOYCE HAYNIE
2145 S FARNSWORTH DR
MESA AZ 85209
LORI N BROWN
JUDGE COFFEY
DISMISSAL CALENDAR
The Court having received Defendant’s Notice of Settlement, filed February 13, 2024,
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Dismissal Calendar for dismissal of all
remaining claims and parties on or after April 16, 2024, without further notice unless, prior to that
date, a Joint Report and Proposed Scheduling Order is filed, Judgment is entered, a Stipulation for
Dismissal is filed, or the dismissal deadline is otherwise extended by the Court for good cause
shown.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED deeming any pending motions moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Telephonic Trial Setting Conference set for
March 1, 2024 at 3:30 p.m. in this matter.
03/01/2023 — CV2022092294 HAYDEN, LINDA 03/01/2023 HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/02/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-092294
03/01/2023
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY
K. Tiero
Deputy
LINDA HAYDEN
THOMAS L BROWN JR.
v.
JOYCE HAYNIE, et al.
JOYCE HAYNIE
2145 S FARNSWORTH DR
MESA AZ 85209
LORI N BROWN
JUDGE COFFEY
STATUS CONFERENCE SET
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received the Joint Statement on the Discovery Dispute filed February 17,
2023.
IT IS ORDERED setting telephonic Status Conference on March 10, 2023 at 3:00_p.m.
(30 minutes allotted). The telephonic Status Conference is set before:
The Honorable Rodrick J. Coffey
Southeast Judicial District
222 East Javelina Avenue
Courtroom 205
Mesa, Arizona 85210
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiff(s) shall initiate the telephonic
conference by first arranging the presence of all other counsel or self-represented parties on the
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-092294
03/01/2023
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
conference call and then calling this division at 602-372-1783 promptly at the scheduled time. All
parties appearing telephonically must be joined in a single conference call and be prepared to hold
until called upon.
The call should be placed in an area with no background noise and not in a moving vehicle.
Failure to do so may prevent the parties from hearing the proceedings in the courtroom and/or may
prevent the Court from hearing the parties. State your name so there may be a clear record as to
which party is speaking.
The proceeding will take place in the Superior Court’s e-courtroom. A record of the
proceedings will be made digitally in lieu of a court reporter. Should you want an unofficial copy
of the proceedings, the parties or counsel may request a videotape or CD of the proceedings for a
$30.00 charge. If a CD or videotape is requested, please obtain a form from the courtroom clerk
or from the Self-Service Center to request a daily copy of a court hearing or trial proceeding being
conducted. Pay the applicable fee at the Self-Service Center. Attach the receipt showing
payment of the fee and present both the receipt and the form to the bailiff. For copies of hearings
or trial proceedings recorded previously, please call Electronic Records Services at (602)
506.7100. Should an official transcript be required, you may request that the court prepare it. The
party ordering the transcript must pay for it. To request a transcript, call (602) 506.7100 and
provide the date of the proceeding, the case number, the case caption, if the transcript is for an
appeal, and your name, address, and telephone number.
With this technology, a court reporter is likely not required and the parties are
encouraged to experience the court's video recording system before requesting a court
reporter. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in
which a court reporter is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit
a written request to the assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the
hearing and must pay the authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days
before the proceeding. The fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
PLEASE NOTE: This division requires that all motions, responses, replies and other
Court-requested filings in this case must be submitted individually. Counsel shall not combine
any motion with a responsive pleading. All motions are to be filed separately and designated as
such. No pleadings will be accepted if filed in combination with another.
03/10/2023 — CV2022092294 HAYDEN, LINDA 03/10/2023 HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/16/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-092294
03/10/2023
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY
K. Tiero
Deputy
LINDA HAYDEN
THOMAS L BROWN JR.
v.
JOYCE HAYNIE, et al.
JOYCE HAYNIE
2145 S FARNSWORTH DR
MESA AZ 85209
LORI N BROWN
JUDGE COFFEY
MINUTE ENTRY
Courtroom 205 - SEA
3:00 p.m. This is the time set for Telephonic Status Conference re: discovery dispute.
Counsel, Thomas Brown, is present on behalf of Plaintiff, who is not present. Counsel, Lori
Brown, is present on behalf of Defendants, who are not present.
A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held.
IT IS ORDERED that the deposition of Mr. Robert Welsh shall be scheduled to occur
no later than May 15, 2023.
3:14 p.m. Matter concludes.
06/09/2023 — CV2022092294 HAYDEN, LINDA 06/09/2023 HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
06/12/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-092294
06/09/2023
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY
K. Tiero
Deputy
LINDA HAYDEN
THOMAS L BROWN JR.
v.
JOYCE HAYNIE, et al.
JOYCE HAYNIE
2145 S FARNSWORTH DR
MESA AZ 85209
LORI N BROWN
JUDGE COFFEY
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has considered Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff’s
Response to that Motion; Defendant, State of Arizona’s Response to that Motion; Mesa’s Reply
in support of its Motion; and the parties’ respective statements of facts.
Motions for summary judgment “should be granted if the facts produced in support of the
claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that
reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or
defense.” Orme School v. Reeves, 166 Ariz. 301, 309 (1990). When considering a motion for
summary judgment, all evidence of the non-moving party is to be believed, and all justifiable
inferences are to be drawn in the non-movant’s favor. Id. at 309-10. Summary judgment should
not be used as a substitute for a trial simply because the Court may believe the moving party will
probably prevail or that the moving party should prevail at trial. Id.
The party moving for summary judgment must produce evidence that it believes
demonstrates the absence of a genuine issue of material fact and must explain why summary
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-092294
06/09/2023
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
judgment is warranted. Nat'l Bank of Ariz. v. Thruston, 218 Ariz. 112, 115 (App. 2008). If the
non-moving party has the burden of proof of the claim or defense at trial, the moving party need
not disprove the nonmoving party's claim or defense, but need only point out the lack of evidence
on an essential element of the claim or defense. Id. at 117. If the moving party meets its burden,
the burden shifts to the nonmoving party to present sufficient evidence demonstrating the existence
of a disputed fact. Id. at 119. The nonmoving party cannot then rest on its pleadings, but must call
to the Court's attention evidence to explain why the motion should be denied. Id. The opponents
of a motion for summary judgment do not raise a genuine issue of fact by merely stating in the
record that such an issue exists. Rather, they must show that competent evidence is available which
will justify a trial on the issue. Flowers v. K-Mart Corp., 126 Ariz. 495, 499 (App. 1980). “If the
party with the burden of proof on the claim or defense cannot respond to the motion by showing
that there is evidence creating a genuine issue of fact on the element in question, then the motion
for summary judgment should be granted.” Orme School at 310.
The parties’ filings demonstrate that there are genuine disputed issues of material fact
regarding the facts, circumstances and reasons for Plaintiff’s termination. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
09/08/2022 — CV2022092294 HAYDEN, LINDA 09/08/2022 HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/09/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-092294
09/08/2022
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY
K. Tiero
Deputy
LINDA HAYDEN
THOMAS L BROWN JR.
v.
JOYCE HAYNIE, et al.
JOYCE HAYNIE
2145 S FARNSWORTH DR
MESA AZ 85209
LORI N BROWN
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
JUDGE COFFEY
ORDER ENTERED BY THE COURT
MINUTE ENTRY
Pursuant to the parties’ joint Scheduling Order filed by the Court on September 8, 2022,
IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall participate in a mandatory settlement conference.
This case is referred to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Department for the
appointment of a judge pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is
requested to conduct the settlement conference no later than December 15, 2022.
All counsel and their clients, or non-lawyer representatives who have full and
complete authority to settle the case, shall personally appear and participate in good faith in
the settlement conference. Sanctions may be imposed for failure to participate.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-092294
09/08/2022
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
This Division no longer sets trial setting conferences as part of an initial scheduling
order. Once the parties can certify to the Court in writing that: 1) all discovery is complete; and
2) they have already participated in a settlement conference or a mediation, they may request that
the Court schedule a trial setting conference. The Court will then endeavor to set the trial setting
conference shortly after it receives a request to do so as long as the request includes such a
certification.
12/08/2023 — CV2022092294 HAYDEN, LINDA 12/08/2023 HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/11/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-092294
12/08/2023
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY
I. Ostrander
Deputy
LINDA HAYDEN
THOMAS L BROWN JR.
v.
JOYCE HAYNIE, et al.
JOYCE HAYNIE
2145 S FARNSWORTH DR
MESA AZ 85209
LORI N BROWN
JUDGE COFFEY
CASE ON DISMISSAL CALENDAR
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Dismissal Calendar, for dismissal without
further notice on January 8, 2024, unless prior thereto a proper judgment is entered or filed, a
stipulation for dismissal is presented, or a proper joint report and proposed scheduling order is
filed. Motions to continue on the dismissal calendar must demonstrate good cause and be granted
prior to the dismissal date.
