01/23/2024 — CV2022012844 C FINANCIAL INC, M T 01/23/2024 HONORABLE MARY C. CRONIN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/24/2024 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-012844
01/23/2024
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MARY C. CRONIN
K. Cabral
Deputy
M T C FINANCIAL INC
RICHARD J REYNOLDS
v.
TREASURER OF MARICOPA COUNTY
TREASURER OF MARICOPA COUNTY
301 W JEFFERSON STE 100
PHOENIX AZ 85003
MARC STEVEN WINDTBERG
COMM. CRONIN
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received an Application for Release of Excess Proceeds filed by Applicant
on January 17, 2024. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Applicant shall file a Certificate of Compliance with all service
requirements as required by A.R.S. § 33-812(G). If the Applicant needs more time to comply with
the mailing requirements, Applicant must file a motion to extend time with the Court. Failure to
do so may result in the denial of the application for excess proceeds without further notice to the
Applicant.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the expiration of the deadline for interested
parties to file a response to the Application under A.R.S. § 33-812(I), Applicant shall either: (1)
request a hearing if there are competing claims to the proceeds; or (2) file a notice of lodging and
lodge an appropriate form of order for release of the proceeds.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any apparent lien, encumbrance or interest that could
have priority over Applicant, Applicant shall acknowledge the existence of such lien, encumbrance
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-012844
01/23/2024
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
or interest either in the Application or in a subsequent filing mailed to all persons who have
received a copy of the complaint or filed a responsive pleading. If a lien, encumbrance or interest
with priority over Applicant’s interest may exist, the Court will not enter an order directing the
Treasurer to release the proceeds until 180 days from the date on which the Complaint was filed.
A.R.S. § 33-812(J).
02/27/2024 — CV2022012844 C FINANCIAL INC, M T 02/27/2024 HONORABLE MARY C. CRONIN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/28/2024 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-012844
02/27/2024
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MARY C. CRONIN
K. Cabral
Deputy
M T C FINANCIAL INC
RICHARD J REYNOLDS
v.
TREASURER OF MARICOPA COUNTY
TREASURER OF MARICOPA COUNTY
301 W JEFFERSON STE 100
PHOENIX AZ 85003
W WILLIAM NIKOLAUS
MARC STEVEN WINDTBERG
KARAN LEE WESTT
908 S POWER ROAD
#1818
MESA AZ 85206
COMM. CRONIN
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received and reviewed Petitioner’s Response to Complaint and Petition for
release of Surplus Funds From Trustee’s Sale Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 33-
812 filed January 31, 2024.
Each applicant should make sure that they have completed the process prescribed in
A.R.S. § 33-812 prior to the hearing. As this is a statutory action, the Court cannot order the
release excess proceeds until those requirements are met.
IT IS ORDERED setting this matter for a Hearing to determine entitlement to the excess
proceeds on March 25, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. (time allotted: 20 minutes) in this Division via
Microsoft Teams/Court Connect.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2022-012844
02/27/2024
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2
HEARING WEBSITE LINK:
https://Tinyurl.com/jbazmc-pcc05
Or call in (audio only)
+1 917-781-4590 Phone ID: 755 033 080#
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each applicant shall lodge a proposed form of order
for release of excess proceeds for the court to review during the hearing.
If an applicant does not have a proposed form of order available for review at the time of
the hearing, that applicant will likely have to have their portion of the hearing reset to a later
date.
The Court prefers video appearances, if possible, as it ensures it is easier to know
who is appearing at the hearing and being able to see the other parties reduces
interruptions and delays. Additionally, appearing by video increases the chance that the
Court can use features such as shared screens to show everyone exhibits or forms that may
be helpful for the hearing. However, no party shall be penalized for appearing by phone.
Whether parties appear by videoconference, phone, or a hybrid of the two, they should try
as much as possible to contact the court from an area with no background noise as noise
and echoes prevent the parties from hearing the proceedings in the courtroom and prevent
the court from making a good record of the proceedings. The parties are especially
discouraged from appearing virtually from an outdoor location.
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter.
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a
court reporter is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a
written request to the assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the
hearing, and must pay the authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days
before the proceeding. The fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
