02/18/2022 — CV2021095828 FEREGRINO, MARIA DE LORDES 02/18/2022 HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/22/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-095828
02/18/2022
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY
K. Tiero
Deputy
TEMPE VILLAGES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
ASHLEY N MOSCARELLO
v.
MARIA DE LORDES FEREGRINO
MARIA DE LORDES FEREGRINO
1647 W VILLAGE WAY
TEMPE AZ 85282
JUDGE COFFEY
MINUTE ENTRY
Plaintiff has requested service by alternative means pursuant to Rule 4.1 of the Arizona
Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 4.1 (k) provides as follows:
Alternative Means of Service.
(1) Generally.
If a party shows that the means of service provided in Rule 4.1(c) through Rule 4.1(j) are
impracticable, the court may--on motion and without notice to the person to be served--
order that service may be accomplished in another manner.
(2) Notice and Mailing. If the court allows an alternative means of service, the serving
party must make a reasonable effort to provide the person being served with actual notice
of the action's commencement. In any event, the serving party must mail the summons, the
pleading being served, and any court order authorizing an alternative means of service to
the last-known business or residential address of the person being served.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-095828
02/18/2022
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
(3) Service by Publication. A party may serve by publication only if the requirements of
Rule 4.1(l), 4.1(m), 4.2(f), or 4.2(g) are met and the procedures provided in those rules are
followed.
Whether traditional service is “impractical,” defined as “extremely difficult or
inconvenient” is a fact specific inquiry. See Blair v. Burgener, 226 Ariz. 213, 245 P.3d 898 (App.
2010). Plaintiff has not demonstrated that service is impractical in this case. Only two attempts
were made to serve Defendant and they occurred over a one week period. Multiple additional
unsuccessful attempts at varying times and additional efforts to perform skip tracing are required
before the Court will authorize alternative service. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s request for service by alternative means, without
prejudice to Plaintiff filing a renewed motion if further efforts at personal service are unsuccessful.
05/31/2022 — CV2021095828 FEREGRINO, MARIA DE LORDES 05/31/2022 HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
06/01/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-095828
05/31/2022
Docket Code 049
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE RODRICK COFFEY
K. Tiero
Deputy
TEMPE VILLAGES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
ASHLEY N MOSCARELLO
v.
MARIA DE LORDES FEREGRINO, et al.
MARIA DE LORDES FEREGRINO
1647 W VILLAGE WAY
TEMPE AZ 85282
ESPINOZA FERNANDO PEREZ
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
DOCKET-CIVIL-SE
JUDGE COFFEY
JUDGMENT SIGNED
MINUTE ENTRY
IT IS ORDERED approving and settling the formal written judgment signed by the Court
on May 24, 2022 and filed [entered] by the clerk on May 31, 2022.
Please note: The Court has signed a paper copy of the judgment. After the judgment has
been scanned and docketed by the Clerk of Court, a copy of the judgment will be available online
through the ECR at www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov, through www.AZTurboCourt.gov, and from
the public access terminals at the Clerk of Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
