Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2021-010556: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Las Hadas Villas Association.

Case Number

CV2021-010556

County

Maricopa

Caption

Not captured

Filed

7/1/2021

Case Type

Civil

Judge

Pineda, Susanna

Location

Downtown

Official Court Record

Official Court Record

Parties

Minute Entries

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

02/28/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

02/25/2022

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH
E. Wolf

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

COMM. RICHARD ALBRECHT
JUDGE MIKITISH

MINUTE ENTRY

This Court has received Plaintiff’s e-filed Application for Entry of Default, filed February
22, 2022 against Defendant(s), Matthew B. Siegel, in the above-captioned case.

IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).

The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Albrecht.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be e-filed.

Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, Section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, and
Application for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate and Statement of Costs, but shall submit a

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

02/25/2022

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2

default judgment packet required by the Court, including the documents identified on the default
judgment packet coversheet, in paper to the assigned commissioner’s division. A commissioner
will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the default judgment packet with
all the required documents has been received by the division in paper form.

The parties/counsel can find additional information in the form of frequently asked
questions at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/howDoI.asp

The parties/counsel can also find additional information regarding the default judgment
process at: https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/

FOR ALL IN-PERSON APPEARANCES: Due to the spread of Covid-19, the Arizona
Supreme Court Administrative Order 2021-187 and the Maricopa County Superior Court
Administrative Order 2021-169 require all individuals entering a court facility in Maricopa
County to wear a mask or face covering at all times that they are inside the facility. Any person
who refuses to wear a mask or face covering as directed by court personnel will be denied access
to the facility. If a participant is denied physical access to a courthouse for refusing to wear a face
covering, the participant must contact the assigned judicial division to determine whether the
person can participate in the proceeding using an audio or video connection.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

03/15/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

03/13/2023

Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN REA
Y. Rodriguez/S. Brown

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

COMM. JOHN REA

MINUTE ENTRY

The Court having received Plaintiff’s Expedited Request for Status Conference and to
Continue on the Dismissal Calendar, filed February 8, 2023, and Response of Defendant to
Request of Plaintiff for Status Conference and Continuance on Dismissal Calendar, filed
February 14, 2023.

IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Request and extending this case on the dismissal
calendar until May 31, 2023.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED on April 7, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. (15 minutes allotted), the
Court will conduct a virtual status conference.

Please join the hearing via:
www.tinyurl.com/jbazmc-cvj12

You can also dial in using your phone.
Phone +1 (917) 781-4590 and Conference ID: 508 176 593#

Use of the above link can be made easier by downloading the

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

03/13/2023

Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2

Microsoft Teams application first; for more on the new platform,
including an introduction video and participant guide, please visit:
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/court-connect/

NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to
the assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing, and must
pay the authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the
proceeding. The fee is $140 for half-day and $280 for a full day.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

04/03/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

03/29/2023

Docket Code 083
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN REA
J. Holguin

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

COMM. JOHN REA

MINUTE ENTRY

On the Court’s own motion,

IT IS ORDERED vacating the virtual Status Conference scheduled April 7, 2023 at 8:30
a.m. and resetting same to April 11, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. (time allotted: 15 minutes) in this
division.

Please join the hearing via:
www.tinyurl.com/jbazmc-cvj12

You can also dial in using your phone.
Phone +1 (917) 781-4590 and Conference ID: 508 176 593#

Use of the above link can be made easier by downloading the Microsoft Teams
application first; for more on the new platform, including an introduction video and
participant guide, please visit:
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/court-connect/

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

04/14/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

04/11/2023

Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN REA
E. Wolf

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

CHARLENE A CRUZ

COMM. JOHN REA

MINUTE ENTRY

Courtroom 913 – East Court Building

8:39 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual Status Conference regarding Plaintiff’s
Expedited Request for Status Conference and to Continue on the Dismissal Calendar, filed
February 8, 2023. Plaintiff, Las Hadas Villas Association, is represented by counsel, Charlene
Cruz, for counsel of record, Nikita Verma Patel. Defendant, Matthew B. Siegel, is represented by
counsel of record, Byron Siegel. All participants appear virtually via Court Connect.

A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.

Discussion is held regarding the Rule 80 Agreement subsequently signed by the parties
during a settlement conference held on November 21, 2022, before Judge Pro Tempore Justin
DePaul.

Discussion is further held on Plaintiff’s lodged proposed form of judgment and covenant
not to execute, and the Defendant’s objections as to the prior drafts of the proposed forms.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

04/11/2023

Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 2

Based upon the discussion held on the record,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall review the Plaintiff’s proposed form of judgment
and covenant not to execute, and submit his specific objections in a response by April 19, 2023.
If no response is filed by the deadline, the Court shall sign the Plaintiff’s proposed form of order
and covenant not to execute as provided. If a response is filed, Defendant shall email the Court a
courtesy copy to this division’s judicial assistant at [email protected].

Effective April 21, 2023, the Honorable Susanna Pineda is rotating and will be assigned
to this civil calendar, CVJ-12. The parties may file a request for change of judge, as found
necessary.

9:07 a.m. Matter concludes.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

04/15/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

04/14/2022

Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH
E. Wolf

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
JUDGE MIKITISH

MINUTE ENTRY

The Court has received, reviewed, and considered Plaintiff’s Proposed Joint Report, filed
April 4, 2022. Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Parties’ pretrial deadlines and stipulations regarding
scheduling, all in accordance with the formal written Scheduling Order signed by the Court April
8, 2022, and filed (entered) by the Clerk, April 14, 2022.

In further accordance with the aforementioned Scheduling Order,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall participate in a mandatory settlement conference.
This case is referred to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Department for the
appointment of a judge pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. The judge pro tempore
is requested to conduct the settlement conference no later than October 21, 2022.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

04/14/2022

Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a virtual Trial Setting Conference on November
4, 2022 at 11:30 a.m. (time allotted: 15 minutes) in this division for the purpose of assigning a
trial date and a final pretrial management conference date.

Counsel and self-represented parties shall have their trial calendars available.

The hearing(s) will be held by phone/video conference via the Court Connect platform.
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.

www.tinyurl.com/jbazmc-cvj12

You can also dial in using your phone (audio only)
+1 (917) 781-4590
Phone Conference ID: 508 176 593#

More information regarding Court Connect can be found at:
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/court-connect/

NOTE: If a message is received stating that the courtroom is locked, stay on the line. The
previous hearing has not concluded. Once the prior hearing has concluded, admission shall be
granted into the virtual courtroom.

NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to the
assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing, and must pay the
authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the proceeding. The
fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.

If the parties are not familiar with the courtroom’s technology, they are encouraged to set
up an appointment with the court’s technology liaison at (602) 506-3269.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that prior to the Trial Setting Conference the parties jointly
discuss and attorneys must separately discuss with their clients the following items and arrive
prepared to discuss with the Court.

A) Prospects for settlement of this matter.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

04/14/2022

Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 3

B) Conversion of the trial from an in-person jury trial to a bench trial or virtual jury trial. In
considering the option of a bench trial, the parties can propose a reassignment of the case
to a different civil division for a bench trial upon agreement of the parties and the Court;

C) Prospects for referral to a Late Case Fair Limits Proceeding (please see:
 http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/AdministrativeOrders/Ad
minOrders/AO%202020-072.pdf );

D) Prospects for resolution through the Certified Arbitrator Program (please see:
 http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/AdministrativeOrders/Ad
minOrders/AO%202020-071.pdf
 https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/6533/certified-arbitrator-list-
9112020.pdf )

E) If the case will proceed to an in-person jury trial, available dates for trial, anticipated length
of trial, essential in-person trial participants, and other issues that may be relevant in setting
the matter for trial.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must jointly prepare and submit 60 days
prior to the commencement date of trial a Trial Readiness Form, which includes the following
information:

 Filing date of the Complaint;
 Number of trial days including jury selection and anticipated time for deliberations;
 Name and position of essential trial participants;1

1 Essential trial participants include necessary attorney(s), parties or party representatives, individuals identified by
the judge as essential, court reporter, interpreter, and expert witness(es) if observing trial in-person rather than
virtually. Remember, all civil courtrooms have the capability for hybrid trials with some participants virtual and
others in-person. Therefore, individuals can participate in the trial without being physically present in the courtroom.
Witnesses are considered essential trial participants and regardless of the number of witnesses called on a particular
day, the number of essential trial participants should only identify “Witness” and list the number as “1.” For example:

Essential trial participants:
1. Bob Jones: Plaintiff’s attorney
2. Cindy Shell: Plaintiff
3. Interpreter for Cindy Shell
4. John Shell: Plaintiff (John would prefer to appear in-person, but is willing to appear virtually)
5. Susan Wall: Defendant’s attorney
6. Jordan Glass: Defendant party representative
7. Witness

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

04/14/2022

Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 4

 Number of jurors and whether the parties agree to a reduction in the number of
jurors;
 Whether the parties request virtual jury selection, in-person jury selection or hybrid
jury selection;2
 Whether the parties consent to the jurors utilizing Court Connect rather than
appearing in-person for trial;
 Whether the case is appropriate for “stand-by status”;3
 Number of prior trial settings and reasons for continuance;
 Preferred dates for trial; and
 Whether the case has unique challenges or scheduling issues.

Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading. After the order has been scanned and docketed by the Clerk of Court,
additional
copies
of
the
order
will
be
available
through
ECR
Online
at
www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov and from the Public Access Terminals at the Clerk of Court’s
offices located throughout Maricopa County.

8. Court reporter

Requested additional participants if spacing permits:
1. Plaintiffs’ paralegal
2. Defendant’s expert for Day 4 of trial (Defendant’s expert can appear virtually to observe trial is
spacing does not permit his physically appearance).
3. Defendant’s co-counsel

2 Hybrid jury selection refers to jurors who can appear from home entering the virtual courtroom while jurors who are
unable to appear virtually participate in-person.
3 Stand-by status refers to a trial that can begin if parties are given one-week notice.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Filed ***

05/26/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

05/24/2023

Docket Code 901
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE SUSANNA C. PINEDA
E. Wolf

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

JUDGE PINEDA

MINUTE ENTRY

This Court has reviewed the case file in this matter, the parties Rule 80 agreement,
Plaintiff’s Notice of Proposed Form of Judgment, and argument held before the Honorable John
Rea on April 11, 2023. After discussions regarding the parties Rule 80 agreement, and Defendant’s
claim that the documents submitted by Plaintiff contained additional provisions not contained in
the Rule 80 agreement, the Court gave Defendant until April 19, 2023, to review and submits his
“specific” objections to the language contained in the documents submitted by Plaintiff. On April
14, 2023, Defendant filed his Response to Plaintiff’s Proposed Form of Judgment. While
Defendant made some conclusory remarks pertaining to the alleged actions of plaintiff’s
“paralegal”, he did not point to any language in the submitted proposed form of order that was
contrary to the Rule 80 agreement reached by the parties.

IT IS ORDERED overruling Defendant’s Objection and affixing the Court’s signature
today’s date, May 24, 2023, to the formal proposed form of written Judgment and Decree of
Foreclosure and Order of Sale, filed (entered) by the Clerk May 25, 2023.

No further matters pending, the Court signs this Minute Entry as formal written judgment
of the Court and consistent with the Rule 54(c), Ariz. R. Civ. P.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

05/24/2023

Docket Code 901
Form V000A
Page 2

Date: May 25, 2023

/s/ Susanna C. Pineda

THE HONORABLE SUSANNA C. PINEDA
Judicial Officer of the Superior Court of Arizona

The Arizona Constitution requires the Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance
Review to conduct performance evaluations of superior court judges. The Commission is asking
for your help to evaluate Maricopa County Superior Court judges currently undergoing
performance review. After your hearing, if the judge you are in front of is undergoing review, a
survey will be emailed to you, and you can take the survey online. The survey is conducted by the
Docking Institute of Public Affairs at Fort Hays State University and is anonymous and
confidential. Your participation in the review process is important! More information on Judicial
Performance Review can be found at www.azjudges.info.

La Constitución de Arizona exige que la Comisión de la Evaluación del Desempeño
Judicial realice evaluaciones de desempeño de los jueces de los tribunales superiores. La comisión
pide su ayuda para evaluar a los jueces del Tribunal Superior del Condado de Maricopa a quienes
actualmente se les está evaluando su desempeño. Después de su audiencia, si el juez ante el cual
comparece está sometido a una evaluación se le enviará por correo electrónico una encuesta que
usted podrá tomar por Internet. La encuesta es realizada por el Docking Institute of Public Affairs
de la Fort Hays State University y se mantiene anónima y confidencial. ¡Su participación en el
proceso de la evaluación es importante! Para obtener más información sobre la evaluación del
desempeño judicial, diríjase a www.azjudges.info.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

09/28/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

09/27/2022

Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH
E. Wolf

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

JUSTIN R DEPAUL
JUDGE MIKITISH

MINUTE ENTRY

The Court has received and reviewed the Civil Settlement Conference Report, filed
September 22, 2022. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED accepting the notice of settlement and placing this matter on the
Dismissal Calendar for dismissal on or after November 30, 2022, without further notice unless a
Judgment is entered or filed or a Stipulation for Dismissal is presented.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED deeming any pending matters moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Trial Setting Conference set for November 4,
2022 in this division.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

10/26/2021 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

10/25/2021

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH
E. Wolf

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
MATTHEW B SIEGEL
5640 E BELL RD # 1103
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260

JUDGE MIKITISH

MINUTE ENTRY

The Court has received, reviewed, and considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time
to Serve, filed September 29, 2021. Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED approving and settling Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to
Serve, all in accordance with the formal written Order for Extension of Time to Serve signed by
the Court October 20, 2021, and filed (entered) by the Clerk October 25, 2021.

Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading. After the order has been scanned and docketed by the Clerk of Court,
additional
copies
of
the
order
will
be
available
through
ECR
Online
at
www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov and from the Public Access Terminals at the Clerk of Court’s
offices located throughout Maricopa County.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

10/26/2021 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

10/25/2021

Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH
E. Wolf

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
MATTHEW B SIEGEL
5640 E BELL RD # 1103
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260

JUDGE MIKITISH

MINUTE ENTRY

The Court has received, reviewed, and considered Plaintiff’s Expedited Motion for an
Order Allowing Alternate Service, filed September 16, 2021. Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED approving and settling Plaintiff’s Expedited Motion for an Order
Allowing Alternate Service, all in accordance with the formal written Order Allowing Alternate
Service signed by the Court October 20, 2021, and filed (entered) by the Clerk October 25, 2021.

Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading. After the order has been scanned and docketed by the Clerk of Court,
additional
copies
of
the
order
will
be
available
through
ECR
Online
at
www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov and from the Public Access Terminals at the Clerk of Court’s
offices located throughout Maricopa County.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

12/09/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

12/07/2022

Docket Code 376
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH
C. Ladden

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

JUDGE MIKITISH

MINUTE ENTRY

The Court has received, reviewed, and considered Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue on the
Dismissal Calendar filed December 1, 2022. Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue on the Dismissal Calendar
and continuing this matter on the Dismissal Calendar for dismissal on December 31, 2022, all in
accordance with the formal written Order to Continue on the Dismissal Calendar signed by the
Court December 2, 2022 and filed (entered) by the Clerk December 6, 2022.

This matter will be dismissed without further notice unless prior to that date a proper
Judgment is entered or filed, or a Stipulation for Dismissal is presented.

Please note: The above mentioned Order has been digitally processed. After the Order
has been docketed by the Clerk of the Court, copies of this Order including certified copies will
be available. More information regarding how to obtain copies and/or certified copies of records
may be found here: https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/records/obtaining-records.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

12/12/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

12/09/2022

Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH
E. Wolf

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

CHARLENE A CRUZ
JUDGE MIKITISH

MINUTE ENTRY

The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiff’s Request for Status Conference, filed
December 6, 2022. Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Request for Status Conference and setting a virtual
Status Conference on December 16, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. (time allotted: 30 minutes) in this
division regarding discussion as set forth in Plaintiff’s request, all in accordance with the formal
written Order Setting Status Conference signed by the Court December 8, 2022, and filed (entered)
by the Clerk December 9, 2022.

The hearing(s) will be held by phone/video conference via the Court Connect platform.
Please join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.

www.tinyurl.com/jbazmc-cvj12

You can also dial in using your phone (audio only)
+1 (917) 781-4590
Phone Conference ID: 508 176 593#

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

12/09/2022

Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2

More information regarding Court Connect can be found at:
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/court-connect/

NOTE: If a message is received stating that the courtroom is locked, please remain on the
line. The previous hearing has not concluded. Once the prior hearing has concluded, admission
shall be granted into the virtual courtroom.

NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to the
assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing, and must pay the
authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the proceeding. The
fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.

If the parties are not familiar with the courtroom’s technology, they are encouraged to set
up an appointment with the court’s technology liaison at (602) 506-3269.

Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading. After the order has been scanned and docketed by the Clerk of Court,
additional
copies
of
the
order
will
be
available
through
ECR
Online
at
www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov and from the Public Access Terminals at the Clerk of Court’s
offices located throughout Maricopa County.

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

01/05/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

12/16/2022

Docket Code 376
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. MIKITISH
E. Wolf

Deputy

LAS HADAS VILLAS ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

v.

MATTHEW B SIEGEL
BYRON SIEGEL

CHARLENE A CRUZ
JUSTIN R DEPAUL
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
JUDGE MIKITISH

MINUTE ENTRY

East Court Building – Courtroom 913

9:37 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual Status Conference regarding discussion as set
forth in Plaintiff’s request, filed December 6, 2022. Plaintiff, Las Hadas Villas Association, is
represented by counsel, Charlene A. Cruz, for counsel of record, Nikita Verma Patel. Defendant,
Matthew B. Siegel, is represented by counsel of record, Byron Siegel. All participants appear
virtually via Court Connect.

A record of the proceeding is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.

Discussion is held settlement conference held on September 21, 2022.

Based upon discussion held, and for reasons stated on the record,

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2021-010556

12/16/2022

Docket Code 376
Form V000A
Page 2

IT IS ORDERED continuing this matter on the Dismissal Calendar for sixty (60) days.

The Parties may meet and confer prior to this deadline regarding the issues as raised on the
record specifically as to a signed stipulated judgment, the Rule 80 Agreement, and covenant not
to execute. Any appropriate motion(s) and/or pleading(s) may be filed in due course.

10:01 a.m. Matter concludes.

Documents