02/22/2011 — CV2011091749 5 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, SUMMERFIELD UNIT 02/22/2011 HONORABLE KAREN POTTS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/23/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-091749
02/22/2011
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KAREN POTTS
M. Scott
Deputy
SUMMERFIELD UNIT 5 HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
CHAD A HESTER
v.
DENISE SCHUBEL
DENISE SCHUBEL
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Alternative Service.
Plaintiff has not shown that personal service upon Defendants is impracticable, or that
Defendants reside at the address stated in the Motion. Absent the foregoing,
IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Alternative Service.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp.
Attorneys are encouraged to review Supreme Court Administrative Orders 2010-117 and 2011-
10 to determine their mandatory participation in eFiling through AZTurboCourt.
04/22/2011 — CV2011091749 5 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, SUMMERFIELD UNIT 04/22/2011 HONORABLE KAREN POTTS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
04/25/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-091749
04/22/2011
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KAREN POTTS
M. Scott
Deputy
SUMMERFIELD UNIT 5 HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
CHAD A HESTER
v.
DENISE SCHUBEL
DENISE SCHUBEL
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Alternate Service. The Court finds that
service under Ariz.R.Civ.P. 4.1(d) is impracticable but imposes the following additional
requirements to best ensure Defendants are given notice of the Complaint:
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff may serve Defendants by:
1.
Mailing a copy of the Summons, Complaint, this Order, and any other paper filed with
the Complaint via the U.S. Postal Service at the Defendants’ last known address as set
forth in the Motion (N. 84th Pl.) by (a) regular mail, and (b) registered mail with delivery
confirmation, and (c) registered mail with signature confirmation; and
2.
Attaching/posting a copy of the Summons, Complaint, this Order, and any other paper
filed with the Complaint to the front door of Defendants’ last known residential dwelling
as set forth in the Motion; and
3.
Mailing a copy of the Summons, Complaint, this Order, and any other paper filed with
the Complaint via the U.S. Postal Service at the Defendants’ place of employment, if
known.
4.
Filing an affidavit attesting to service in accordance with the foregoing paragraphs
within ten days of compliance.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-091749
04/22/2011
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
Defendants are advised that they must answer the Complaint in this matter within the
time mandated by the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure once service is accomplished as set forth
in this Order. Failure to so answer may result in the entry of a default judgment.
/ s / HONORABLE KAREN POTTS
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp.
Attorneys are encouraged to review Supreme Court Administrative Orders 2010-117 and 2011-
10 to determine their mandatory participation in eFiling through AZTurboCourt.
05/26/2011 — CV2011091749 5 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, SUMMERFIELD UNIT 05/26/2011 HONORABLE KAREN POTTS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/31/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-091749
05/26/2011
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KAREN POTTS
M. Scott
Deputy
SUMMERFIELD UNIT 5 HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
CHAD A HESTER
v.
DENISE SCHUBEL
DENISE SCHUBEL
1224 N. 84TH PLACE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85257
COMM. KONGABLE
MINUTE ENTRY
This Court has received Plaintiff Summerfield Unit 5 Homeowners Association’s e-filed
Application for Entry of Default against Defendant Denise Schubel in the above-captioned case
pursuant to Rule 55, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff is advised that default
proceedings assigned to Judge Potts are heard by Commissioner Kongable. Pursuant to Supreme
Court Administrative Order No. 2010-117, Plaintiff is further advised that Commissioner
Divisions cannot access e-filed documents at this time. Accordingly, parties are directed to
deliver copies of the necessary documents, including Plaintiff’s e-filed Application/Motion for
Default, to Commissioner Kongable’s Division. Plaintiff is further advised that Commissioner
Kongable will not set any default proceedings or issue any default Judgment until Plaintiff
completes and delivers a default coversheet and packet to Commissioner Kongable’s Division.
Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall deliver copies of its previously filed
Application/Motion for Default and all other default related papers to the Commissioner’s
Division as set forth above.
Parties/Counsel can find the coversheets on the website at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/forms.asp
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-091749
05/26/2011
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
ALERT: eFiling through AZTurboCourt.gov is mandatory in civil cases for attorney-
filed documents effective May 1, 2011. See Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Orders
2010-117 and 2011-010. The Court may impose sanctions against counsel to ensure compliance
with this requirement after May 1, 2011.
