02/12/2014 — CV2011008247 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, LA CONTESSA 02/12/2014 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
02/18/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
02/12/2014
Docket Code 047
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
C. Keller
Deputy
SHARON MCWEENY
MARK A RACZKOWSKI
v.
LA CONTESSA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
This matter having been placed on the inactive calendar for dismissal on January 6, 2014,
IT IS ORDERED dismissing this action without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED signing this minute entry as a formal order of this court
pursuant to Rule 58, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.
/s/ HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES________
HON. LISA DANIEL FLORES
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
02/15/2012 — CV2011008247 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, LA CONTESSA 02/15/2012 HONORABLE EILEEN S. WILLETT View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/22/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
02/15/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE EILEEN S. WILLETT
J. Rutledge
Deputy
SHARON MCWEENY
MARK A RACZKOWSKI
v.
LA CONTESSA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
JOINT PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM
The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Comprehensive Pretrial
Conference and Plaintiff’s Motion to Set and Certificate of Readiness, filed February 14, 2012.
IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall submit a Joint Pretrial Memorandum as set forth
below.
The Court will review the Joint Pretrial Memorandum and proposed Scheduling Order
prescribed herein. The Court may adopt or modify the discovery and disclosure schedule order
and set a scheduling conference for purposes of setting a trial date. If counsel still believe that a
pretrial conference is still necessary at this stage of the litigation, they should address the reasons
for the need for a pretrial conference in the first paragraph of the Joint Pretrial Memorandum.
If the parties fail to file a timely memorandum, sanctions may issue pursuant to Rule
16(f).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
02/15/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
All counsel are directed to meet personally to discuss all of the matters set forth in Rule
16(b). Counsel shall prepare and file with the Court by 5:00 p.m. on March 15, 2012, a Joint
Pretrial Memorandum, and prepare a proposed order for Discovery and Disclosure deadlines.
The proposed order shall include dates for the following items and conform substantially with
the attached sample order.
1.
An agreed upon schedule and date for completion of non-expert depositions.
As far as can reasonably be anticipated, each party shall set forth the depositions
they anticipate taking and the approximate time required for each; any and all
medical examinations which may be required of any of the parties; the person or
persons to conduct such examinations; all requests for production; and all tangible
evidence to be disclosed or exchanged.
2.
A date for the final disclosure of the identities subject matters and reports of
expert witnesses, and/or to supplement disclosures made to date.
3.
A date or dates for the initial and final disclosure of all non-expert witnesses,
and/or to supplement disclosures made to date.
4.
A date by which all written discovery will be propounded and concluded.
Further, counsel shall set forth any written discovery outstanding and a date when it
will be complete.
5.
The position of each counsel on whether the Rule 38.1 time limits should be
waived.
6.
A proposed date for a Mandatory Settlement Conference pursuant to Rule
16.1. Alternatively, the parties may propose a deadline by which they will
participate in private mediation.
7.
A date for completion of all discovery, including expert discovery.
8.
A date by which all dispositive or partially-dispositive motions shall be filed.
9.
A proposed trial date agreed upon by all counsel and anticipated length of trial.
If the parties agree as to the dates, they need to only prepare and submit the proposed
order attached hereto. If counsel are unable to agree on any of the items set forth in the attached
form of order, the reasons for their inability to agree shall be set forth in the Pretrial
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
02/15/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 3
Memorandum and each shall prepare a separate proposed order. All proposed deadlines shall
be set forth as calendar dates, and not in the form “XX days before trial.”
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall notify the Court of any agreed-upon
extension of any time period provided by the Rules of Civil Procedure. The purpose of this order
is not to discourage extensions as a matter of professionalism, but to ensure that no party suffers
summary disposition of any issue by virtue of an extension of which the Court is not aware. No
agreements between/among counsel for extensions of time regarding briefing shall be considered
unless the Court is advised of the extension and approves it in advance of briefing deadline
which conform to the Rules of Civil Procedure.
HONORABLE EILEEN S. WILLETT
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CENTRAL COURT BUILDING
201 W. JEFFERSON
4TH FLOOR, COURTROOM 401
PHOENIX, AZ 85003
602-506-3343
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
02/15/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 4
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
The Court having received the parties’ Joint Comprehensive Pretrial Conference
Memorandum,
IT IS ORDERED entering the following schedule for disclosure as set forth unless the
parties obtain written modifications by the Court:
(1)
Initial disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
(2)
The identities and subject areas of expert testimony shall be disclosed by:
(MM/DD/YYYY).
(3)
Plaintiff’s final expert disclosures shall be served by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
Defendant’s final expert disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
Rebuttal expert disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
(4)
Final Non-expert disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
(5)
Written discovery shall be propounded by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
(6)
Dispositive Motions shall be filed by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
(7)
Depositions shall be completed by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
(8)
Discovery shall be completed by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
(9)
Any motions to amend pleadings shall be filed by: (MM/DD/YYYY).
(10)
The parties remaining in this action shall participate in comprehensive mediation
by (MM/DD/YYYY).
IT IS ORDERED setting Status Conference in this matter on [counsel to leave this date
blank], (time allotted: 15 minutes), in this Division.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in no less than five days prior to the Status Conference
set herein, the parties shall submit a Joint Statement pursuant to ARCP 16(d) and report to the
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
02/15/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 5
Court the history and status of the efforts at Alternative Dispute Resolution pursuant to ARCP
Rule 16(g).
No agreements between/among counsel for extensions of time regarding briefing shall be
considered unless the Court is advised of the extension and approves it in advance of briefing
deadlines which conform to the Rules of Civil Procedure.
DISCOVERY DISPUTES: In the event of any dispute concerning discovery, counsel
are directed to confer pursuant to ARCP 26(g). If such conference is unsuccessful, counsel are
directed to initiate a conference call with this Division BEFORE filing a motion to compel or
motion for protective order.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
03/26/2013 — CV2011008247 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, LA CONTESSA 03/26/2013 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/28/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
03/26/2013
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
D. Glab
Deputy
SHARON MCWEENY
MARK A RACZKOWSKI
v.
LA CONTESSA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
ORDER SIGNED
IT IS ORDERED approving/granting the formal written Order Vacating Telephonic
Status Conference Scheduled for Tuesday, March 26, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. signed by the Court on
March 25, 2013, and entered (filed) by the clerk on March 26, 2013.
Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading. Therefore, copies of the order and self-addressed, stamped
envelopes were not available for mailing to the parties. After the order has been scanned and
docketed by the Clerk of Court, copies of this order may be available through ECR Online at
clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through AZTurboCourt.gov and from the Public Access Terminals
at the Clerk of Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
03/28/2012 — CV2011008247 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, LA CONTESSA 03/28/2012 HONORABLE EILEEN S. WILLETT View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/30/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
03/28/2012
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE EILEEN S. WILLETT
J. Rutledge
Deputy
SHARON MCWEENY
MARK A RACZKOWSKI
v.
LA CONTESSA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
ORDER SIGNED
IT IS ORDERED
approving the Joint Comprehensive Pretrial Conference
Memorandum electronically filed on March 15, 2012, all in accordance with the formal written
Order modified and signed by the Court on March 28, 2012 and entered (filed) by the clerk on
March 28, 2012.
Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading. Therefore, copies of the order and self-addressed, stamped
envelopes were not available for mailing to the parties. Copies of this order may be obtained
through AZTurboCourt.gov and from the Customer Service Center located at 601 W. Jackson
St., Phoenix, AZ 85003 once the order has been scanned and docketed by the Clerk of Court.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
04/25/2013 — CV2011008247 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, LA CONTESSA 04/25/2013 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/29/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
04/25/2013
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
D. Glab
Deputy
SHARON MCWEENY
MARK A RACZKOWSKI
v.
LA CONTESSA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
CASE ON INACTIVE CALENDAR
Pursuant to the Stipulation, filed March 25, 2013, reflecting the parties have reached a
settlement,
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal on June 10,
2013, without further notice unless prior to said date a proper Motion to Set and Certificate of
Readiness, a Judgment, a Stipulation to Dismiss, or a proper Motion to Continue is filed.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
08/17/2012 — CV2011008247 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, LA CONTESSA 08/17/2012 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
08/22/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
08/17/2012
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
D. Glab
Deputy
SHARON MCWEENY
MARK A RACZKOWSKI
v.
LA CONTESSA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
MINUTE ENTRY
On the Court’s own motion,
IT IS ORDERED vacating the Status Conference set February 25, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. and
resetting Telephonic Status Conference on February 25, 2013, at 9:15 a.m. in this division.
Plaintiff’s counsel shall initiate the call by calling 602 372-0825.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
10/14/2013 — CV2011008247 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, LA CONTESSA 10/14/2013 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/16/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
10/14/2013
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
S. Uppendahl
Deputy
SHARON MCWEENY
MARK A RACZKOWSKI
v.
LA CONTESSA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received Plaintiff’s Motion for Status Conference, filed September 12,
2013. Good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED setting a Telephonic Status Conference on November 7, 2013 at 9:15
a.m. (15 minutes). Plaintiff’s counsel shall initiate the call to the Court by calling 602-372-0825.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
12/17/2012 — CV2011008247 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, LA CONTESSA 12/17/2012 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/19/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
12/17/2012
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
D. Glab
Deputy
SHARON MCWEENY
MARK A RACZKOWSKI
v.
LA CONTESSA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
ORDER SIGNED
IT IS ORDERED approving/granting the formal written Order to Extend Disclosure
Deadlines signed and modified by the Court on December 14, 2012, and entered (filed) by the
clerk on December 17, 2012.
The modification is as follows:
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Telephonic Status Conference on
February 25, 2013, at 9:15 a.m. and resetting same on March 26, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
Plaintiff’s counsel to initiate the call.
Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading. Therefore, copies of the order and self-addressed, stamped
envelopes were not available for mailing to the parties. After the order has been scanned and
docketed by the Clerk of Court, copies of this order may be available through ECR Online at
clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through AZTurboCourt.gov and from the Public Access Terminals
at the Clerk of Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-008247
12/17/2012
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 2
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
