04/05/2011 — CV2010093221 DENOFRE JR., MICHAEL ANTHONY 04/05/2011 HONORABLE KAREN POTTS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/08/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-093221
04/05/2011
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KAREN POTTS
M. Scott
Deputy
CRISMON CROSSING HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
KELLIE J CALLAHAN
v.
MICHAEL ANTHONY DENOFRE JR., et al.
JEREMY T BERGSTROM
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has considered Defendant USAA and GEICO’s Motion to Vacate Defaults,
Plaintiff’s Response, and Defendants’ Sur-Reply.
Insufficient service is a defense. Defendants have the burden of proof as to that defense.
Defendants have failed to meet that burden by proving insufficient service. Defendants USAA
and GEICO having failed to demonstrate that Rule 60(c) relief is appropriate,
IT IS ORDERED denying Defendants USAA and GEICO’s Motion to Vacate [Entry of]
Default.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp.
Attorneys are encouraged to review Supreme Court Administrative Orders 2010-117 and 2011-
10 to determine their mandatory participation in eFiling through AZTurboCourt.
09/10/2010 — CV2010093221 DENOFRE JR., MICHAEL ANTHONY 09/10/2010 HONORABLE KAREN POTTS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/13/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-093221
09/10/2010
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KAREN POTTS
M. Scott
Deputy
CRISMON CROSSING HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
KELLIE J CALLAHAN
v.
MICHAEL ANTHONY DENOFRE JR., et al.
MICHAEL ANTHONY DENOFRE JR.
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
U S A A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
INSURANCE COMPANIES
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Serve and Motion
for an Order Allowing Alternate Service. The Court finds good cause for alternative service but
imposes the following additional requirements upon Plaintiff to best ensure Defendant is given
notice of the Complaint:
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff may serve Defendant by:
Mailing a copy of the Summons, Complaint, this Order, and any other paper filed with
1.
the Complaint via the U.S. Postal Service at the Defendant’s last known address by (a)
regular mail, and (b) registered mail with delivery confirmation, and (c) registered mail
with signature confirmation; and
Attaching/posting a copy of the Summons, Complaint, this Order, and any other paper
2.
filed with the Complaint to the front door of Defendant’s last known residential dwelling;
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-093221
09/10/2010
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
and
Mailing a copy of the Summons, Complaint, this Order, and any other paper filed with
3.
the Complaint via the U.S. Postal Service at the Defendant’s place of employment, if
known.
Defendant is advised that he must answer the Complaint in this matter within the time
mandated by the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure once service is accomplished as set forth in
this Order. Failure to so answer may result in the entry of a default judgment.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp
09/16/2010 — CV2010093221 DENOFRE JR., MICHAEL ANTHONY 09/16/2010 HONORABLE KAREN POTTS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/17/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-093221
09/16/2010
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KAREN POTTS
M. Scott
Deputy
CRISMON CROSSING HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
KELLIE J CALLAHAN
v.
MICHAEL ANTHONY DENOFRE JR., et al.
MICHAEL ANTHONY DENOFRE JR.
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
U S A A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
INSURANCE COMPANIES
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Serve in
this matter.
IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Serve until
October 15, 2010.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp
