06/18/2012 — CV2010082719 ASSOCIATION, REGENCY HOUSE 06/18/2012 JUDGE PRO TEM COLLEEN L. FRENCH View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
06/20/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-082719
06/18/2012
Docket Code 079
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
JUDGE PRO TEM COLLEEN L. FRENCH
J. Eaton
Deputy
LAUREN HUNTER
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCNAMARA
v.
REGENCY HOUSE ASSOCIATION, et al.
WALTER GROCHOWSKI
STEVEN GERVAIS
JAMES WM JUNKER
PARTIAL CASE DISMISSAL
The claims against Defendant(s) Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. were on the
Inactive Calendar for dismissal on April 23, 2012, unless specified action was taken. The date
has passed, and the specific action has not been taken. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED dismissing the claims against Defendant(s) Securitas Security
Services USA, Inc only, without prejudice for lack of prosecution.
/ s / COLLEEN L. FRENCH
JUDGE PRO TEM COLLEEN L. FRENCH
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
07/26/2011 — CV2010082719 ASSOCIATION, REGENCY HOUSE 07/26/2011 HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/27/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-082719
07/26/2011
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS
I. Ostrander
Deputy
LAUREN HUNTER
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCNAMARA
v.
REGENCY HOUSE ASSOCIATION, et al.
WALTER GROCHOWSKI
STEVEN GERVAIS
JAMES WM JUNKER
ORDER SIGNED
IT IS ORDERED approving the parties’ Stipulation to Continue Deadline to Conduct
Arbitration Hearing electronically filed on July 14, 2011, all in accordance with formal written
Order to Continue Deadline to Conduct Arbitration Hearing signed by the Court on July 22,
2011, and filed (entered) by the clerk on July 25, 2011.
Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading; therefore, copies of the order and self-addressed, stamped
envelopes were not available for mailing to the parties. After the order has been scanned and
docketed by the Clerk of the Court, copies of the order may be available through ECR Online at
clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through AZTurboCourt.gov and from the public access terminals at
the Clerk of the Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
ALERT: eFiling through AZTurboCourt.gov is mandatory in civil cases for attorney-
filed documents effective May 1, 2011. See Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Orders
2010-117 and 2011-010. The Court may impose sanctions against counsel to ensure compliance
with this requirement after May 1, 2011.
10/11/2011 — CV2010082719 ASSOCIATION, REGENCY HOUSE 10/11/2011 HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/12/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-082719
10/11/2011
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS
I. Ostrander
Deputy
LAUREN HUNTER
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCNAMARA
v.
REGENCY HOUSE ASSOCIATION, et al.
WALTER GROCHOWSKI
STEVEN GERVAIS
JAMES WM JUNKER
ORDER SIGNED
IT IS ORDERED approving the Stipulation to Continue Deadline for Arbitration
electronically filed on September 27, 2011, all in accordance with formal written Order signed
by the Court on October 4, 2011, and filed (entered) by the clerk on October 6, 2011.
Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading; therefore, copies of the order and self-addressed, stamped
envelopes were not available for mailing to the parties. After the order has been scanned and
docketed by the Clerk of the Court, copies of the order may be available through ECR Online at
clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through AZTurboCourt.gov and from the public access terminals at
the Clerk of the Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
12/01/2011 — CV2010082719 ASSOCIATION, REGENCY HOUSE 12/01/2011 HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/02/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-082719
12/01/2011
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS
I. Ostrander
Deputy
LAUREN HUNTER
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCNAMARA
v.
REGENCY HOUSE ASSOCIATION, et al.
WALTER GROCHOWSKI
STEVEN GERVAIS
JAMES WM JUNKER
COMPREHENSIVE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE SETTING
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s Motion to Set and Certificate of Readiness filed
November 17, 2011.
IT IS ORDERED setting this matter for Comprehensive Pre-Trial Conference on
February 9, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. (time allotted: 15 minutes) before:
HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS
SOUTHEAST ADULT FACILITY
222 EAST JAVELINA AVENUE
COURTROOM 206
MESA, ARIZONA 85210
IT
IS
FURTHER
ORDERED
the
parties
shall
submit
a
Joint
Pre-
Trial Memorandum as set forth below.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-082719
12/01/2011
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 2
The Court will review the Joint Pre-Trail Memorandum and proposed scheduling order
prescribed herein. The Court may adopt or modify the discovery and disclosure schedule order
and set a scheduling conference for the purpose of setting a trial date. If the parties agree to the
discovery and disclosure schedule and the Court signs the proposed scheduling order, the Court
shall vacate the Comprehensive Pre-Trial Conference pursuant to Rule 16(b). If counsel still
believe that a pre-trial conference is necessary at this stage of the litigation, they should address
the reasons for the need for a pre-trial conference in the first paragraph of the Joint Pre-Trial
Memorandum.
If the parties fail to file a timely memorandum, the pre-trial conference may be vacated,
the Court may place the matter on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal, and sanctions may issue
pursuant to Rule 16(f).
Counsel and any self-represented litigants are directed to meet personally to discuss all of
the matters set forth in Rule 16(b), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties shall prepare
and file with the Court no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 2, 2012, a Joint Pre-Trial
Memorandum and a proposed scheduling order for discovery, motion, and disclosure deadlines.
The proposed order shall include dates for the following items and shall conform substantially
with the attached sample order.
If the parties agree as to the dates, they need only prepare and submit one proposed order
attached to the Joint Pre-Trial Memorandum. If counsel are unable to agree on any of the
provisions that are to be included in the form of order, the reasons for their inability to agree
shall be set forth in the Pre-Trial Memorandum and each counsel shall prepare a separate
proposed order. All proposed deadlines shall be set forth as calendar dates and not in the
form “XX days before trial.”
Counsel are reminded that the Court will impose sanctions against counsel and/or their
clients for failure to participate in good faith in the preparation of the Joint Pre-Trial Statement.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in no less than five days prior to the Status
Conference set herein, the parties shall submit a Joint Statement and shall report to the Court the
history and status of the efforts at Alternative Dispute Resolution pursuant to Rule 16(g).
DISCOVERY DISPUTES: In the event of any dispute concerning discovery, counsel
are directed to confer pursuant to Rule 26(g). If such conference is unsuccessful, counsel are
directed to initiate a conference call with this division BEFORE filing a motion to compel and/or
a motion for protective order.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-082719
12/01/2011
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED counsel shall notify the Court of any agreed-upon
extension of any time period provided by the Rules of Civil Procedure. The purpose of this order
is not to discourage extensions as a matter of professionalism but, rather, to ensure that no party
suffers summary disposition of any issue by virtue of an extension of which the Court is
unaware.
PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER FORM
The Court has received the parties’ Joint Pre-Trial Memorandum. In accordance
therewith,
IT IS ORDERED entering the following schedule for disclosure as set forth unless the
parties obtain written modifications by the Court:
1. Plaintiff’s final expert disclosure (in accordance with Rule 26.1 (a)(6), Arizona Rules
of Civil Procedure) shall be served by MM/DD/YYYY.
2. Defendant’s final expert disclosure (in accordance with Rule 26.1 (a)(6), Arizona
Rules of Civil Procedure) shall be served by MM/DD/YYYY.
3. Final expert disclosures by either party (in accordance with Rule 26.1 (a)(6), Arizona
Rules of Civil Procedure) shall be served by MM/DD/YYYY.
4. Final non-expert disclosures by either party (in accordance with Rule 26.1 (a)(6),
Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure) shall be served by MM/DD/YYYY.
5. All discovery shall be completed by MM/DD/YYYY.
6. Dispositive motions shall be filed by MM/DD/YYYY.
7. The parties remaining in this action shall complete mediation by MM/DD/YYYY.
IT IS ORDERED the parties shall participate in private mediation. The cost of
private mediation shall be paid proportionately by the parties.
OR
The parties shall participate in a mandatory settlement conference. This matter is
referred to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution for the appointment of a judge
pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and any self-represented
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-082719
12/01/2011
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 4
litigants will contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the time and location
for the settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is requested to conduct a
settlement conference no later than MM/DD/YYYY. The Office of Alternative
Dispute Resolution will not schedule the settlement conference, so please do not
contact that office.
8. No expert witnesses, expert opinions, lay witnesses, or exhibits shall be allowed at
trial other than those disclosed in a timely manner, except for good cause shown or by
written agreement of the parties.
9. A telephonic status conference is set for [counsel to leave this date and time blank]
(time allotted: 15 minutes) for the purpose of assigning a trial date, if the case has
not settled.
NOTE: Plaintiff shall initiate the telephonic conference by first arranging the
presence of all other counsel or self-represented parties on the conference call and
then calling this division at (602) 506-1541 promptly at the scheduled time.
10. Should any discovery disputes arise, the parties shall meet and confer prior to filing
discovery motions pursuant to Rule 37(a)(2)(C), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. If
a discovery issue is time sensitive, the Court will hear the matter on an expedited
basis.
NOTE: ALL COURT PROCEEDINGS ARE RECORDED BY AUDIO METHOD
AND NOT BY A COURT REPORTER. ANY PARTY MAY REQUEST THE
PRESENCE OF A COURT REPORTER BY CONTACTING THIS DIVISION THREE
(3) COURT BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED HEARING.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
12/16/2011 — CV2010082719 ASSOCIATION, REGENCY HOUSE 12/16/2011 HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/20/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-082719
12/16/2011
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS
I. Ostrander
Deputy
LAUREN HUNTER
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCNAMARA
v.
REGENCY HOUSE ASSOCIATION, et al.
WALTER GROCHOWSKI
STEVEN GERVAIS
JAMES WM JUNKER
SETTLEMENT/PLACED ON INACTIVE CALENDAR
The Court having been advised this case has settled,
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Inactive Calendar, for dismissal without
further notice on February 14, 2012, unless prior to said date a judgment is entered or filed, a
stipulation of dismissal is presented, or a motion to set and certificate of readiness is filed.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
12/22/2011 — CV2010082719 ASSOCIATION, REGENCY HOUSE 12/22/2011 HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/23/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-082719
12/22/2011
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LINDA A. AKERS
I. Ostrander
Deputy
LAUREN HUNTER
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCNAMARA
v.
REGENCY HOUSE ASSOCIATION, et al.
WALTER GROCHOWSKI
STEVEN GERVAIS
JAMES WM JUNKER
SETTLEMENT/PLACED ON INACTIVE CALENDAR
The Court having been advised this case has settled,
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Inactive Calendar, for dismissal without
further notice on February 20, 2012, unless prior to said date a judgment is entered or filed, a
stipulation of dismissal is presented, or a motion to set and certificate of readiness is filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating Comprehensive Pre-Trial Conference on
February 9, 2012.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
