01/18/2012 — CV2010052846 I I I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, HERITAGE VILLAGE 01/18/2012 HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/20/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
01/18/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY
R. Tomlinson
Deputy
HERITAGE VILLAGE I I I HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
BURTON T COHEN
v.
MARY SIM
MARY SIM
8902 EAST VIA LINDA SUITE 110-199
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed
November 17, 2011, Defendant’s Rule 56(f) Affidavit in Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, 1 and Plaintiff’s Reply. The Court has also reviewed Plaintiff’s Statement
of Facts.
There are no genuine issues of material fact and Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a
matter of law. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED awarding judgment to Plaintiff and against Defendant Mary Sim in
the principal amount of $10,118.90 as and for past due HOA assessments, late charges, and
1 No Response or Motion to Extend was filed by Defendant Mary Sim. The “Affidavit in Response” was filed by
David Sim. Mr. Sim is not a party. Nor is he licensed to practice law. He has filed this pleading after he was
admonished that he could not represent his wife.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
01/18/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
collection costs, through October 24, 2011, plus Plaintiff’s reasonably incurred attorneys’ fees
and its costs, and foreclosure upon said lien.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiff shall submit a judgment for
signature of the Court, as well as its Statement of Costs and Application and Affidavit for
attorneys’ fees no later than February 1, 2012.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
02/15/2011 — CV2010052846 I I I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, HERITAGE VILLAGE 02/15/2011 HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/16/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
02/15/2011
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY
R. Tomlinson
Deputy
HERITAGE VILLAGE I I I HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
BURTON T COHEN
v.
MARY SIM
MARY SIM
C/ O DAVID SIM
305-4625 VARSITY ESTATES DR N W
STE 390
CALGARY
CANADA AB T3AOZ9
MARY SIM
8192 E DEL CUARZO DR
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85258
MINUTE ENTRY
Pursuant to the Order Striking Defendant’s Answer signed by the Court on
February 10, 2011,
IT IS ORDERED striking Defendant’ Answer, filed on December 27, 2010.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendant a period of ten (10) days from the
date hereof in which to file a proper Answer to the Complaint.
FILED: Order Striking Defendant’s Answer
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
02/15/2011
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 2
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp.
Attorneys are encouraged to review Supreme Court Administrative Orders 2010-117 and 2011-
10 to determine their mandatory participation in eFiling through AZTurboCourt.
05/04/2012 — CV2010052846 I I I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, HERITAGE VILLAGE 05/04/2012 HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/14/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
05/04/2012
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY
R. Tomlinson
Deputy
HERITAGE VILLAGE I I I HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
BURTON T COHEN
v.
MARY SIM
MARY SIM
8902 EAST VIA LINDA SUITE 110-199
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has reviewed Defendant’s Emergency Motion to Stop Foreclosure of Her
Home on May 24, 2012. This Motion was not filed by Defendant Mary Sim. Rather, the Motion
was again filed by her husband David Sim. Mr. Sim has previously been advised that he is not a
party to this case and since he is not licensed to practice law in this State he may not file legal
pleadings on behalf of his wife.
Even if Mary Sim had signed this Motion, there are no grounds to set aside the judgment
previously entered by this Court under Rule 60(c)(6), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.
Apparently Mr. Sim is aware that Mrs. Sim does have the right to consider the protection
of the Bankruptcy Court. She may also be entitled to protection by filing a homestead exemption
under Arizona law. However, Mary Sim should consult with an attorney and receive legal
advice before proceeding any further. Therefore,
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
05/04/2012
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant’s Emergency Motion to Stop Foreclosure of Her
Home on May 24, 2012.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
07/06/2011 — CV2010052846 I I I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, HERITAGE VILLAGE 07/06/2011 HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/18/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
07/06/2011
Docket Code 041
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY
R. Tomlinson
Deputy
HERITAGE VILLAGE I I I HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
BURTON T COHEN
v.
MARY SIM
MARK BAINBRIDGE
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Continuation on Inactive Calendar, filed
on May 26, 2011. No Response has been filed.
IT IS ORDERED denying the above-referenced Motion.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a Comprehensive Rule 16 Scheduling Conference
for August 5, 2011 at 2:30 p.m. (15 minutes allotted) before:
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. McVEY
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
NORTHEAST REGIONAL COURT CENTER
18380 NORTH 40TH STREET
COURTROOM 112
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85032
(602) 506-3167
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
07/06/2011
Docket Code 041
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:
Counsel and/or the parties are to meet personally to discuss all of the matters set forth in
Rule 16(b), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedures (ARCP). Counsel and/or the parties shall prepare
and file with the Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 29, 2011 a Joint proposed Scheduling
Order for discovery, motion, and disclosure deadlines.
If the parties agree to the dates, they should prepare an Order in the form attached hereto,
containing the provisions which are applicable to their case. For example, paragraph one of the
Order set forth below need not be included in the parties’ proposed Order if the parties intend to
disclose their experts’ identity and opinions at the same time they disclose their experts’ areas of
testimony. Similarly, if the parties agree to simultaneously disclose the identity and opinions of
their expert witnesses, they need not include in their proposed Order the language set forth in
paragraph 2a. and b., below.
The proposed Order shall include specific dates (12/22/2010 rather than 45 days from
close of discovery). Do not incorporate a firm trial date in the proposed Order.
If counsel are unable to agree on any of the items that are to be included in the Order, the
reasons for their inability to agree shall be set forth in their proposed Order.
The Court will review the proposed Scheduling Order. If all is in order, the Court will set
a status conference close to the discovery cutoff date. At the status conference, if the parties
have completed discovery and are ready for trial, the Court will set firm dates for the final
pretrial management conference and the trial. If the parties are not ready for trial, the matter will
be placed on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal within 60 days.
If a Joint proposed Scheduling Order is not timely submitted, the Court will place the
matter back on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal.
NOTE: This Court utilizes FTR for an electronic record of the proceedings. However,
any party may request the presence of a court reporter by contacting the division three (3) court
business days before the scheduled hearing.
ALERT: eFiling through AZTurboCourt.gov is mandatory in civil cases for attorney-
filed documents effective May 1, 2011. See Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Orders
2010-117 and 2011-010. The Court may impose sanctions against counsel to ensure compliance
with this requirement after May 1, 2011.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
07/06/2011
Docket Code 041
Form V000A
Page 3
SCHEDULING ORDER
The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and adopts and/or
modifies the days as follows:
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose areas of expert testimony by
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011. [or]
a. Plaintiffs shall disclose areas of expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on _________,
2011.
b. Defendants shall disclose areas of expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on _________,
2011.
2. The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose the identity and opinions of
their expert witnesses by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011. [or]
a. Plaintiffs shall disclose the identity and opinions of their expert witnesses by
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011.
b. Defendants shall disclose the identity and opinions of their expert witnesses by
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011.
3. Any and all discovery requests shall be served by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011.
4. The parties shall disclose areas of non-expert testimony and the identity of each
witness by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011. [or]
a. Plaintiffs shall disclose areas of non-expert testimony and the identity of each
witness by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011.
b. Defendants shall disclose areas of non-expert testimony and the identity of each
witness by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011.
5. The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose their rebuttal expert witnesses
and opinions by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
07/06/2011
Docket Code 041
Form V000A
Page 4
6. The parties shall have exchanged up-to-date final Rule 26.1 Supplemental Disclosure
Statements by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011. This Order does not replace the parties’
obligation to seasonably disclose on an on-going basis under Rule 26.1 as information
becomes available.
7. All discovery shall be concluded by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011.
8. Settlement conference (choose one):
The parties shall participate in private mediation by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011;
OR
The parties shall participate in a mandatory Settlement Conference and this matter is
referred to the court's Alternative Dispute Resolution for the appointment of a judge
pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and any "pro per" parties
will contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the time and location for the
settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is requested to conduct a settlement
conference not later than ________, 2011. The Office of Alternative Dispute
Resolution will not do the scheduling of the settlement conference so please do not
contact that office. If counsel prefer to use a private mediator to conduct the
Settlement Conference, a Stipulation and Order re: Alternative to ADR must be
presented to the Court by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2011.
9. No expert witnesses, expert opinions, lay witnesses, or exhibits shall be used at trial
other than those disclosed in a timely manner, except for good cause shown or written
agreement of the parties.
10. All pretrial motions, other than motions in limine, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on
________, 2011.
11. A Telephonic Pretrial Status/Scheduling Conference is set for *****, 2011 at
****a.m./p.m. for the purpose of assigning a trial date if the case has not settled.
Counsel shall have their trial calendars available. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiate
the telephonic conference by first arranging the presence of all other counsel on the
conference call and by calling this division at: (602) 506-3167 promptly at the
scheduled time.
NOTE: This Court utilizes FTR for an electronic record of the proceedings.
However, any party may request the presence of a court reporter by contacting the
division three (3) court business days before the scheduled hearing.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
07/06/2011
Docket Code 041
Form V000A
Page 5
12. Should any discovery disputes arise, counsel, prior to filing discovery motions, shall
meet and confer pursuant to Rule 37, ARCP.
13. The dates set forth in this Order are FIRM dates and will not be extended or modified
by this Court absent good cause. Lack of preparation will not ordinarily be
considered good cause.
14. This case is removed from the Inactive Calendar and all requirements of Rule 38.1,
ARCP, are waived unless and until otherwise ordered by the Court.
Approved as to form:
Dated:__________________
Dated:__________________
________________________
________________________
Plaintiff(s) counsel Defendant(s) counsel
Dated:
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
08/04/2011 — CV2010052846 I I I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, HERITAGE VILLAGE 08/04/2011 HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
08/05/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
08/04/2011
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY
R. Tomlinson
Deputy
HERITAGE VILLAGE I I I HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
BURTON T COHEN
v.
MARY SIM
ANDREA LANDEEN
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
MINUTE ENTRY
IT IS ORDERED approving and settling the formal written Scheduling Order except as
specifically modified herein and as signed by the Court on August 4, 2011, and filed (entered) by
the clerk on August 4, 2011,
IT IS ORDERED setting a Telephonic Pretrial Status/Scheduling Conference on
October 21, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. (15 minutes allotted) for the purpose of assigning a trial date
and a final pretrial management conference date if the case has not settled. Counsel shall have
their trial calendars available. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiate the telephonic conference by
first arranging the presence of all other counsel on the conference call and by calling this division
at: (602) 506-3167 promptly at the scheduled time. The parties and counsel shall not be
permitted to participate in conferences via cell phones or speakerphone.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties shall participate in a mandatory
Settlement Conference. This case is referred to the court's Alternative Dispute Resolution for
the appointment of a judge pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and/or
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
08/04/2011
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
the parties will receive a minute entry from ADR appointing the judge pro tempore.
Counsel and any "pro per" parties will contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange
the date, time and location for the settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is directed to
complete a settlement conference not later than October 31, 2011. The Office of Alternative
Dispute Resolution will not do the scheduling of the settlement conference so please do not
contact that office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Comprehensive Rule 16 Scheduling
Conference previously set for August 5, 2011.
Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the order provided with an
electronically filed pleading. Therefore, copies of the order and self-addressed, stamped
envelopes were not available for mailing to the parties. After the order has been scanned and
docketed by the Clerk of Court, copies of this order may be available through ECR Online at
clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through AZTurboCourt.gov and from the Public Access Terminals
at the Clerk of Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
ALERT: eFiling through AZTurboCourt.gov is mandatory in civil cases for attorney-
filed documents effective May 1, 2011. See Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Orders
2010-117 and 2011-010. The Court may impose sanctions against counsel to ensure compliance
with this requirement after May 1, 2011.
10/21/2011 — CV2010052846 I I I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, HERITAGE VILLAGE 10/21/2011 HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/24/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
10/21/2011
Docket Code 089
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY
R. Tomlinson
Deputy
HERITAGE VILLAGE I I I HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
BURTON T COHEN
v.
MARY SIM
MARY SIM
8902 EAST VIA LINDA SUITE 110-199
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260
TRIAL SETTING MINUTE ENTRY
Northeast Courtroom 112
9:01 a.m. This is the time set for Status Conference. All parties appear telephonically.
Appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff is counsel, Burton T. Cohen. Due to Defendant’s medical
inability to appear for this hearing, the Court has permitted her husband, David Sim to appear for
this trial setting hearing only.
References to “counsel” shall be read to include unrepresented parties.
A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.
Court and counsel discuss the status of the case and scheduling matters.
IT IS ORDERED setting a One-Day Trial to the Court on May 7, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
before:
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
10/21/2011
Docket Code 089
Form V000A
Page 2
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. McVEY
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
NORTHEAST REGIONAL COURT CENTER
18380 NORTH 40TH STREET
COURTROOM 112
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85032
(602) 506-3167
THIS IS A FIRM TRIAL SETTING.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED all trial exhibits shall be submitted for marking not later
than April 30, 2012.
No information disclosed after the dates contained in the order may be used at the trial
absent court order on motion and affidavit.
IT IS ORDERED that should any discovery disputes arise, prior to filing discovery
motions, counsel shall MEET AND CONFER FACE TO FACE. If counsel are not able to
resolve the dispute,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any discovery motion must be accompanied by a
Rule 37(2)(C) certification, to include that counsel have met face to face.
The proceedings will take place in the Superior Court’s new “e-courtroom.” A record of
the proceedings will be made by FTR in lieu of a court reporter. With this new technology, a
court reporter is not required and the parties are encouraged to experience the court's video
recording system before requesting a court reporter. If a court reporter is required, the Court
must receive a written request three (3) days prior to trial. Failure to timely request a court
reporter will be deemed consent to proceed without a court reporter. Should you want an
unofficial copy of the proceedings, the parties or counsel may request a CD of the proceedings
for a $20.00 charge. If a CD is requested, please obtain a form from the Self Center to request a
daily copy of a court hearing or trial proceeding being conducted and pay the applicable fee.
Should an official transcript be required, you may request that the court prepare it. The party
ordering the transcript must pay for it.
If the parties are not familiar with the courtroom’s technology, they are encouraged to set
up an appointment with the court’s technology liaison at 602.372.7877.
9:05 a.m. Hearing concludes.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
10/21/2011
Docket Code 089
Form V000A
Page 3
PRETRIAL MANAGEMENT ORDERS
IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Pretrial Statement (JPTS) in accordance with Rule 16(d),
A.R.Civ.P., is due in this division by 5:00 p.m., April 30, 2012.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED with the JPTS, counsel shall deliver to this division,
copies of the following:
A.
A jointly completed time and witness estimate list.
B
Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, if a request has been or will
be filed. If no proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law is received, the request shall
be deemed waived.
C.
Whether or not the Rule of Exclusion of Witnesses has been invoked.
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
All motions, other than motions in limine, shall be filed not later than ninety (90) days
prior to the date set for trial.
Notices of Settlement
In accordance with the provisions of ARCP 41(a), to be effective, any Notice of
Settlement or Dismissal providing for resolution of one or more pending claims that is filed
after service by the opposing party’s answer or dispositive motion, must be signed by each
affected party (or appropriate counsel) prosecuting or defending against the claim(s)
covered by the Notice. Each filed Notice shall state whether it resolves all pending issues in
the case and constitutes a representation to the Court that the claims subject to the Notice
have been fully resolved with respect to Notice signatories, and that the only further relief
to be sought with respect to such claims is entry of an order that each signatory confirms is
consistent with the agreement that gave rise to filing of the Notice.
ATTACHED: SAMPLE FORMAT FOR TIME ESTIMATE FORM AND EXHIBIT
PROCEDURES
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
10/21/2011
Docket Code 089
Form V000A
Page 4
CAUSE NUMBER
CASE CAPTION
PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL
DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL
(NOTE: Add additional lines as needed for additional parties and or witnesses.)
TIME ESTIMATES FOR TRIAL
Opening Statement and Closing Argument
PLAINTIFF'S OPENING STATEMENT
DEFENDANT'S OPENING
PLAINTIFF'S CLOSING
DEFENDANT'S CLOSING
PLAINTIFF'S REBUTTAL
Estimate of Time for Witness Examination
PLAINITIFF'S
WITNESSES
DIRECT
EXAMINATION
CROSS
EXAMINATION
REDIRECT
EXAMINATION
Estimate of Time for Witness Examination
DEFENDANT'S
WITNESSES
DIRECT
EXAMINATION
CROSS
EXAMINATION
REDIRECT
EXAMINATION
The foregoing are based on the best estimates of counsel of the time reasonably needed to
complete the necessary examination of the witnesses listed.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
10/21/2011
Docket Code 089
Form V000A
Page 5
____________________________________
Counsel for Plaintiff
____________________________________
Counsel for Defendant
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
10/21/2011
Docket Code 089
Form V000A
Page 6
GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL WHEN PREPARING EXHIBITS FOR USE IN COURT
COUNSEL PLEASE READ
Exhibits are due to the Court not later than five (5) business days prior to the trial.
If Defendant’s exhibits are received prior to Plaintiff’s exhibits, the Clerk may mark them
first with Plaintiff’s exhibits following.
Exhibits will be marked consecutively. If your list refers to an exhibit and it is not
provided at the time of marking, the numbers of all following exhibits will be moved up. In
addition, if duplicate exhibits are submitted, the clerk will remove the duplicate and the
numbering will be adjusted accordingly. To avoid confusion during trial, it is essential that
counsel avoid submitting duplicate exhibits. The clerk cannot reserve numbers for exhibits that
will be provided at a later date. Exhibits will be marked as they are received. Do not list “Any
and all exhibits listed by ….”
Each multiple page exhibit must be securely fastened together by staple or other
means. No rubber bands may be used. If Acco fasteners are used they must be long
enough to fasten securely.
Counsel are to provide a workable list of exhibits. The list should include a description
of each exhibit. (See blank sample of an exhibit table below as a reference.) Do not put
numbers on the exhibits; however a slip sheet with the exhibit number on it should be placed in
front of each exhibit.
Exhibit Description Information:
The descriptions should be verifiable when viewing the first page of the exhibit.
No bates stamp references or number of pages in documents should be used.
If counsel are submitting large charts, blow-ups or maps, please include a small version
which can be marked as the exhibit and can go into the jury if in evidence. The blow-ups, charts
and/or maps can be used as demonstrative but will not be marked as exhibits and will be returned
to counsel.
For additional assistance in preparation of exhibits contact the courtroom clerk at 602-
372-7736.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
10/21/2011
Docket Code 089
Form V000A
Page 7
Sample of List of Exhibits to be provided to the courtroom clerk:
EXHIBIT LIST
Exhibit
No.
Ideniti-
fied By
Description
Legal Ground
for Objection
10/25/2012 — CV2010052846 I I I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, HERITAGE VILLAGE 10/25/2012 HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/26/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
10/25/2012
Docket Code 049
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. MCVEY
R. Tomlinson
Deputy
HERITAGE VILLAGE I I I HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
BURTON T COHEN
v.
MARY SIM
MARY SIM
8902 EAST VIA LINDA SUITE 110-199
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260
MINUTE ENTRY
IT IS ORDERED approving and settling the formal written Supplemental Judgment and
Decree of Foreclosure and Order of Sale signed by the Court on October 25, 2012, and filed
(entered) by the clerk on October 25, 2012.
Please note: The Court has signed a hard-copy version of the judgment provided with an
electronically filed pleading. Therefore, copies of the judgment and self-addressed, stamped
envelopes were not available for mailing to the parties. After the order has been scanned and
docketed by the Clerk of Court, copies of this order may be available through ECR Online at
clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through AZTurboCourt.gov and from the Public Access Terminals
at the Clerk of Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-052846
10/25/2012
Docket Code 049
Form V000A
Page 2
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.
