05/04/2007 — CV2006015662 ASSOCIATION, REGENCY HOUSE 05/04/2007 JUDGE ROBERT E. MILES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Electronically Filed *** 05/09/2007 8:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2006-015662 05/04/2007 Docket Code 530 Form V530 Page 1 CLERK OF THE COURT JUDGE ROBERT E. MILES K. Ballard Deputy REGENCY HOUSE ASSOCIATION CHARLES E MAXWELL v. BEN ROSNER, et al. HARRY L HOWE HOWARD SCHWARTZ COURT ADMIN-CIVIL-ARB DESK DEPUTY CT ADMINISTRATOR, COURTWIDE SERVICES DOCKET-CIVIL-CCC E-FILE CASE MANAGEMENT FILE ROOM-CSC FINANCIAL SERVICES-BILLING-CCC CASE DESIGNATED FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COURT'S E-FILING PROGRAM The Superior Court is transitioning civil cases to an electronic filing system. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2005-091, IT IS ORDERED that all pleadings in this case be electronically filed. The electronic filing system will be available for use on May 14, 2007 and mandatory e- filing will commence on May 28, 2007. Filing by conventional means may continue until this mandatory date. ALL FILINGS NOT E-FILED AFTER THE MANDATORY DATE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED BY THE DIVISION UNTIL PROPERLY E-FILED. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2006-015662 05/04/2007 Docket Code 530 Form V530 Page 2 To assist in the transition to e-filing, the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court has prepared instruction and training concerning the E-Filing system. All parties and attorneys of record in this case are strongly encouraged to study this material before the mandatory e-filing date. The web site address for training materials is: http://eventures.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/training.asp. The Clerk's Office shall be available for instruction and training as needed. The e-filing system web site address is: https://efiling.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov. The site contains supplemental training and other reference materials, including contact names and phone numbers, to assist with any questions. Upon the mandatory e-filing date, all attorneys of record shall e-file all pleadings in accordance with the guidelines set forth in Administrative Order 2005-091. Self-represented parties or pro per litigants, and other case participants like Mediators, Arbitrators, and Special Discovery Masters are strongly encouraged to e-file all pleadings. If a self-represented party, or other case participant, chooses to file their pleading in paper, they shall include a notation just under the case number on the first page of the pleading that the case is an “E-FILE CASE”. The e-filing system can be accessed from any computer that has an Internet connection. Free internet access terminals are available in the Superior Court Law Library, and other public locations such as most public libraries. Where filing fees may incur on an electronic filing, the filing party will be billed by the Billing Unit of the Clerk of the Superior Court. E-Filed Orders from the Court will be distributed to attorneys in the same manner each attorney has elected to receive Minute Entries from the Court. Attorneys may enroll with the Clerk of the Court to receive their Minute Entries electronically via e-mail. The Minute Entry Distribution Agreement form may be downloaded at: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/forms.asp NOTE: COUNSEL SHALL UPLOAD AND E-FILE ALL PROPOSED ORDERS IN WORD FORMAT TO ALLOW FOR POSSIBLE MODIFICATIONS BY THE COURT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PARTIES SHALL PROVIDE THIS DIVISION WITH HARD COPIES OF ANY FILED DOCUMENT THAT EXCEEDS 10 PAGES, INCLUDING ANY EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2006-015662 05/04/2007 Docket Code 530 Form V530 Page 3 Motion practice: The movant determines the caption of the filing and all captions on subsequent related filings shall bear the same designation. For example, the filing of a motion captioned "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence" shall result in any subsequent related filings referring to that title in the caption: "Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence." No response to a motion shall contain a separate motion, except in the case of a cross-motion bearing the same designation.