Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Holding HOA Boards, Attorneys, and Management Companies Accountable

Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2006-007856

Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2006-007856: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Tatum Ranch Community Association.

Case Number
CV2006-007856
County
Maricopa
Caption
Not captured
Filed
5/24/2006
Case Type
Civil
Judge
Como, Greg
Location
Downtown
Official Court Record
Official Court Record

Parties

Party Relationship Attorney
Ameriquest Mortgage Company Defendant Nancy Swift
Kimberly R Crosby Defendant Pro Per
M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank Plaintiff Matthew Sloan
Mark E Squire Defendant Pro Per
Mark E Squire Photography L L C Defendant Pro Per
Tatum Ranch Community Association Defendant Pro Per

Minute Entries

07/18/2007 — CV2006007856 I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK, M & 07/18/2007 HONORABLE KRISTIN HOFFMAN View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/23/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2006-007856
07/18/2007
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KRISTIN HOFFMAN
D. Glab
Deputy
M & I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK
MATTHEW H SLOAN
v.
MARK E SQUIRE, et al.
MARK E SQUIRE
MARK SQUIRE PHOTOGRAPHY LLC
29425 N 49TH ST
CAVE CREEK AZ 85331
TATUM RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
KIMBERLY R CROSBY
MARK SQUIRE PHOTOGRAPHY LLC
29425 N 49TH ST
CAVE CREEK AZ 85331
PARTIES TO FILE JOINT PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM
The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion to Set and Certificate of
Readiness.
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
Counsel are to meet personally to discuss all of the matters set forth in Rule 16(b), Ariz.
R. Civ. P. Counsel shall prepare and file with the Court, no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 17,
2007, a Joint Pretrial Memorandum, and a proposed Order, for discovery, motion and disclosure
deadlines.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2006-007856
07/18/2007
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
If the parties agree to the dates, they should prepare an Order in the form set forth below,
containing the provisions which are applicable to their case. For example, paragraph 1 of the
Order set forth below need not be included in the parties’ proposed Order if the parties intend to
disclose their experts’ identity and opinions at the same time they disclose their experts’ areas of
testimony. Similarly, if the parties agree to simultaneously disclose the identity and opinions of
their expert witnesses, they need not include in their proposed Order the language set forth in
paragraph 2a. and b., below.
The proposed Order shall include specific dates (“December 5, 2002” is a specific date.
“90 days prior to trial” is a date in reference to a trial date and is not a specific date). Do not
incorporate a firm trial date in the proposed Order.
If counsel are unable to agree on any of the items that are to be included in the Order, the
reasons for their inability to agree shall be set forth in their Pretrial Memorandum and each shall
prepare a separate proposed Order.
The Court will review the Joint Pretrial Memorandum and proposed Scheduling Order. If
all is in order, the Court will set a status conference close to the discovery cutoff date. At the
status conference, if the parties have completed discovery and are ready for trial, the Court will
set firm dates for the final pretrial management conference and the trial. There will be no
telephonic appearances at the status conference without prior Court approval. Counsel who will
be the trial lawyers in the case must appear in person with their trial calendar. If the parties are
not ready for trial, the matter will be placed on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal within 60
days.
If counsel feel a pretrial conference is still necessary at this stage of the litigation, they
should address the reasons why in the first paragraph of the Joint Pretrial Memorandum.
If a Joint Pretrial Conference Memorandum and proposed Scheduling Order are not
timely submitted, the Court will place the matter back on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal.
PROPOSED ORDER LANGUAGE:
The Court has received and reviewed the parties’ Joint Pretrial Memorandum and
proposed Scheduling Order.
In accordance therewith,

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2006-007856
07/18/2007
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 3
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose areas of expert testimony by
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2006. [or]
a. Plaintiffs shall disclose areas of expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on _________,
2006.
b. Defendants shall disclose areas of expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on _________,
2006.
2. The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose the identity and opinions of
their expert witnesses by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2006. [or]
a. Plaintiffs shall disclose the identity and opinions of their expert witnesses by
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2006.
b. Defendants shall disclose the identity and opinions of their expert witnesses by
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2006.
3. Any and all discovery requests shall be served by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2006.
4. The parties shall disclose all non-expert witnesses by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2006.
[or]
a. Plaintiffs shall disclose areas of non-expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on ________,
2006.
b. Defendants shall disclose areas of non-expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on
________, 2006.
5. The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose their rebuttal expert witnesses
and opinions by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2006.
6. All discovery shall be concluded by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2006.
7. The parties shall have exchanged up-to-date final Rule 26.1 Supplemental Disclosure
Statements by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2006. This Order does not replace the parties’

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2006-007856
07/18/2007
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 4
obligation to seasonably disclose on an on-going basis under Rule 26.1 as information
becomes available.
8. Settlement conference (choose one):
a. The parties shall participate in private mediation by 5:00 p.m. on ________,
2006;
OR
b. The parties shall participate in a mandatory Settlement Conference and this matter
is referred to the court's Alternative Dispute Resolution for the appointment of a
judge pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and any "pro
per" parties will contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the time and
location for the settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is requested to
conduct a settlement conference not later than ________, 2006. The Office of
Alternative Dispute Resolution will not do the scheduling of the settlement
conference so please do not contact that office. If counsel prefer to use a private
mediator to conduct the Settlement Conference, a Stipulation and Order re:
Alternative to ADR must be presented to the Court by 5:00 p.m. on ________,
2006.
9. No expert witnesses, expert opinions, lay witnesses, or exhibits shall be used at trial
other than those disclosed in a timely manner, except for good cause shown or written
agreement of the parties.
10. All pretrial motions, other than motions in limine, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on
________, 2006.
11. A telephonic status conference is set for ________, 2006 at ________*.m. for the
purpose of assigning a trial date if the case has not settled.
12. Should any discovery disputes arise, counsel, prior to filing discovery motions, shall
meet and confer pursuant to Rule 37, Ariz.R.Civ.P., then telephonically contact the
Court to set up a telephonic conference to discuss any remaining issues.
13. The dates set forth in this Order are FIRM dates and will not be extended or modified
by this Court absent good cause. Lack of preparation will not ordinarily be
considered good cause.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2006-007856
07/18/2007
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 5
14. This case is removed from the Inactive Calendar and all requirements of Rule 38.1,
Ariz.R.Civ.P., are waived unless and until otherwise ordered by the Court.

08/15/2007 — CV2006007856 I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK, M & 08/15/2007 HONORABLE KRISTIN HOFFMAN View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
08/17/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2006-007856
08/15/2007
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KRISTIN HOFFMAN
D. Glab
Deputy
M & I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK
MATTHEW H SLOAN
v.
MARK E SQUIRE, et al.
MARK E SQUIRE
MARK SQUIRE PHOTOGRAPHY LLC
29425 N 49TH ST
CAVE CREEK AZ 85331
KIMBERLY R CROSBY
MARK SQUIRE PHOTOGRAPHY LLC
29425 N 49TH ST
CAVE CREEK AZ 85331
CASE ON INACTIVE CALENDAR
The Court has received Notice of Settlement.
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal on October
15, 2007, without further notice unless prior to said date a proper Motion to Set and Certificate of
Readiness, a Judgment, a Stipulation to Dismiss, or a proper Motion to Continue is filed.

Documents

Type Title Content Type Size Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2006007856 I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK, M & 07/18/2007 HONORABLE KRISTIN HOFFMAN View Minute Entry application/pdf 16.7 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2006007856 I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK, M & 08/15/2007 HONORABLE KRISTIN HOFFMAN View Minute Entry application/pdf 6.3 KB Document Source

Auto-compiled from public records, pending verification

Review the official court record for the current docket.

To request a correction or removal, contact the site administrator.