03/15/2006 — CV2005011731 ASSOCIATION INC, TALAS HOMEOWNERS 03/15/2006 JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-011731
03/15/2006
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES
A. Beery
Deputy
FILED: 03/17/2006
TALAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
J ROGER WOOD
v.
JOHN S SUTTO, et al.
ROGER C DECKER
INACTIVE CALENDAR
8:45 a.m. This is the time set for telephonic pretrial conference. Plaintiff is represented
by counsel, J. Roger Wood. Defendants are represented by counsel, Roger C. Decker.
Court reporter is not present.
Counsel report a settlement in this case.
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal without
further notice on May 15, 2006, unless prior thereto judgment or order of dismissal is entered or
either party requests further action by the Court in writing.
8:50 a.m. Conference concludes.
05/22/2006 — CV2005011731 ASSOCIATION INC, TALAS HOMEOWNERS 05/22/2006 JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-011731
05/22/2006
Docket Code 047
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES
A. Beery
Deputy
FILED: 05/24/2006
TALAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
J ROGER WOOD
v.
JOHN S SUTTO, et al.
ROGER C DECKER
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
The Court having placed this matter on the Inactive Calendar on March 15, 2006 for
dismissal without further notice on May 15, 2006, and no further action having occurred,
IT IS ORDERED dismissing this case without prejudice due to lack of prosecution.
DATED:
May 23, 2006
/S/ JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES
PENDLETON GAINES
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
05/24/2006 — CV2005011731 ASSOCIATION INC, TALAS HOMEOWNERS 05/24/2006 JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-011731
05/24/2006
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES
A. Beery
Deputy
FILED: 05/26/2006
TALAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
J ROGER WOOD
v.
JOHN S SUTTO, et al.
ROGER C DECKER
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court having signed an order this date dismissing this matter with prejudice,
IT IS ORDERED vacating the minute entry issued in this matter on May 22, 2006.
08/12/2005 — CV2005011731 ASSOCIATION INC, TALAS HOMEOWNERS 08/12/2005 JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-011731
08/12/2005
Docket Code 002
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
FILED: 08/16/2005
TALAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
J ROGER WOOD
v.
JOHN S SUTTO
JOHN S SUTTO
C/O THOMAS M BAKER
5050 N 8TH PLACE
PHOENIX AZ 85014
HEARING VACATED
The Court having received notice that there has not been proper service in this matter,
IT IS ORDERED vacating the OSC Return Hearing set in this matter for August 15, 2005
at 8:45 a.m. in this division.
09/09/2005 — CV2005011731 ASSOCIATION INC, TALAS HOMEOWNERS 09/09/2005 JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-011731
09/09/2005
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES
E. Schneider
Deputy
FILED: 09/13/2005
TALAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
J ROGER WOOD
v.
JOHN S SUTTO
ROGER C DECKER
MINUTE ENTRY
10:01 a.m. This is the time set for a return hearing on Plaintiff’s Order to Show
Cause/Request for Permanent Injunction. Plaintiff is represented by J. Roger Wood. Defendant
is present with counsel Roger C. Decker.
Court Reporter: Debbie Croci
Discussion is held.
IT IS ORDERED that discovery may commence immediately.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting this matter for a telephonic Pretrial Conference on
Tuesday, October 4, 2005 at 10:15 a.m. in this division. Counsel for the Plaintiff is to initiate
the telephonic conference by first arranging the presence of all other counsel or self-represented
parties on the conference call and by calling this division (602-506-3940) promptly at the
scheduled time.
All counsel and unrepresented parties are to meet personally before the Pretrial
Conference to discuss the subjects listed in Civil Rule 16(b). Counsel shall prepare and file a
Joint Pretrial Conference Memorandum no later than noon on September 23, 2005, addressing all
applicable subjects listed in Civil Rule 16. Suggested dates for disclosure and discovery will be
stated as dates certain and not, for example, as “____ days before trial.”
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-011731
09/09/2005
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 2
If counsel are unable to agree on any of the items in the Joint Pretrial Conference
Memorandum, the reasons for their inability to agree shall be set forth in the memorandum.
Counsel are reminded that the Court may impose sanctions against counsel and/or the
parties for failure to participate in good faith in the Joint Pretrial Conference Memorandum or
the Pretrial Conference.
10:15 a.m. Hearing concludes.
09/15/2005 — CV2005011731 ASSOCIATION INC, TALAS HOMEOWNERS 09/15/2005 JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-011731
09/15/2005
Docket Code 083
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES
A. Beery
Deputy
FILED: 09/19/2005
TALAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
J ROGER WOOD
v.
JOHN S SUTTO
ROGER C DECKER
MINUTE ENTRY
On the Court’s own motion, due to a calendar conflict,
IT IS ORDERED vacating the telephonic Pretrial Conference set in this matter for
October 4, 2005 and resetting same for October 6, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. in this division. Counsel
for Plaintiff is to initiate the phone conference.
10/06/2005 — CV2005011731 ASSOCIATION INC, TALAS HOMEOWNERS 10/06/2005 JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-011731
10/06/2005
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES
A. Beery
Deputy
FILED: 10/10/2005
TALAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
J ROGER WOOD
v.
JOHN S SUTTO, et al.
ROGER C DECKER
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
CONTINUED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET;
SCHEDULING ORDER ENTERED
9:45 a.m. This is the time set for telephonic pretrial conference. Plaintiff is represented
by counsel, J. Roger Wood. Defendants are represented by counsel, Roger C. Decker.
A court reporter is not present.
Discussion is held.
Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Pretrial Conference Memorandum, the Court enters the
following scheduling order:
1. Both parties shall disclose any expert witnesses on or before December 6, 2005. With
the disclosure of the identity of the expert witness, the parties will either disclose the
expert’s report or a description of the scope and subject matter of the expert’s
testimony and opinion.
2. Both parties will disclose the identity and subject matter of testimony of any rebuttal
experts, if any, on or before January 6, 2006.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-011731
10/06/2005
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 2
3. The parties shall disclose expert and non-expert witnesses on or before January 6,
2006.
4. The parties shall complete discovery on or before February 16, 2006.
5. The parties shall comply with Rule 26.1 on a timely basis, both as to the Initial
Disclosure Statement and Supplemental Disclosure Statements.
6. The parties are referred to a mandatory settlement conference, to the Court’s
Alternative Dispute Resolution Office for the appointment of a pro tem judge. The
settlement conference shall be conducted and concluded not later than March 1, 2006.
A separate minute entry shall be issued by the ADR Coordinator. Counsel (or party
if “pro per”) upon receipt of the minute entry from ADR will contact the
assigned pro tempore judge for scheduling of a settlement conference. The ADR
Settlement Conference will proceed unless the parties present a specific Stipulation
and Order to the court agreeing to proceed with an alternative to the ADR Settlement
Conference prior to the scheduled Settlement Conference.
7. The Court sets a telephonic Continued Pretrial Conference on March 15, 2006 at
8:45 a.m. in this division, for the purpose of setting a trial date, if necessary. Counsel
for the Plaintiff is to initiate the telephonic conference by first arranging the presence
of all other counsel or self-represented parties on the conference call and by calling
this division (602-506-3940) promptly at the scheduled time.
In the event of any disputes regarding disclosure, discovery, compliance with this
scheduling order or anything else, the Court is always available for a joint telephone call from
counsel.
9:50 a.m. Conference concludes.
