04/04/2005 — CV2004016433 CLAYCOMB, FORREST C 04/04/2005 HON. THOMAS DUNEVANT, III View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2004-016433
04/04/2005
Docket Code 042
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. THOMAS DUNEVANT, III
D. Raybon
Deputy
FILED: 04/06/2005
CASA DEL MONTE INC
ALLISON B MURRAY
v.
FORREST C CLAYCOMB
FORREST C CLAYCOMB
4525 N 66TH ST #133
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
DISMISSAL MINUTE ENTRY
Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice having been presented to the
Court; and good cause appearing,
DISPOSITION:
Pursuant to Rule 41(a), ARCP, the dismissal is effective without court order.
09/15/2004 — CV2004016433 CLAYCOMB, FORREST C 09/15/2004 HON. THOMAS DUNEVANT, III View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2004-016433
09/15/2004
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. THOMAS DUNEVANT, III
D. Raybon
Deputy
FILED: 09/17/2004
CASA DEL MONTE INC
PENNY L KOEPKE
v.
FORREST C CLAYCOMB
FORREST C CLAYCOMB
A999259 INFIRMARY 4-9-A-05
225 W MADISON ST AZ 85003
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has considered Defendant Forrest C. Claycomb’s “Motion for Stay of
Proceedings” (Motion for Extension of Time to File Formal Answer) and Plaintiff’s Response
indicating no objection to the Motion.
IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant an extension of time through October 1, 2004 to
file an answer.
10/08/2004 — CV2004016433 CLAYCOMB, FORREST C 10/08/2004 HON. THOMAS DUNEVANT, III View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2004-016433
10/08/2004
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. THOMAS DUNEVANT, III
B. Navarro
Deputy
FILED: 10/11/2004
CASA DEL MONTE INC
PENNY L KOEPKE
v.
FORREST C CLAYCOMB
FORREST C CLAYCOMB
#A999259 INFIRMARY 4-9-A-05
225 W MADISON ST
PHOENIX AZZ 85003
INMATE LEGAL SERVICES
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court’s September 15, 2004 Minute Entry is augmented to make clear that Mr.
Claycomb’s Motion for Stay was treated as a Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Stay is denied, as an extension was
granted.
