02/10/2026 — CV2025034002 CHULLINO, SARA MICHELE 02/10/2026 HONORABLE QUINTIN CUSHNER View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/11/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-034002
02/10/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE QUINTIN CUSHNER
A. Hayes
Deputy
STETSON VALLEY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
JAVIER B DELGADO
v.
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
5522 W MOLLY LN
PHOENIX AZ 85083
COMM. OWEN
JUDGE Q CUSHNER
MINUTE ENTRY
This Court has received Plaintiff’s e-filed/ filed Application/Motion for Default against
Defendant(s), Sara Michele Chullino, in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Addison Owen.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be either e-filed or filed in paper form.
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-034002
02/10/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, Application
for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate, and Statement of Costs.
Self-represented litigants are exempt from any mandatory eFiling requirements but may
eFile if they prefer.
Attorneys and Self-Represented Litigants must submit a default judgment packet required
by the Court, including the documents identified on the default judgment packet coversheet in
paper to the assigned commissioner’s division.
A commissioner will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the
default judgment packet with all the required documents has been received by the division
in paper form.
If the paper packet is not received by the above-named Commissioner division by April
13, 2026, the matter will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution as to the defaulted
party.
You may wish to review the following resources for additional information regarding the
default process:
Applications for Default
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/
Motions
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/n30m54ah/gn10fz.pdf
Civil Default Checklist
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/jitjlp0s/cvc50fz.pdf
Civil Court Administration Processing Information
civil-department-post-filing-information-and-instructions.pdf (maricopa.gov)
03/26/2026 — CV2025034002 CHULLINO, SARA MICHELE 03/26/2026 HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/27/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-034002
03/26/2026
Docket Code 002
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN
L. Palmert
Deputy
STETSON VALLEY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
JAVIER B DELGADO
v.
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
5522 W MOLLY LN
PHOENIX AZ 85083
COMM. OWEN
JUDGE Q CUSHNER
MINUTE ENTRY
The Plaintiff has filed an Application for Entry of Default and Motion for Entry of
Default Judgment against the Defendant. Plaintiff’s Application for Entry of Default against the
Defendant is not compliant with Rule 55(a)(2)(F) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.
Effective January 1, 2026, this rule requires the Application for Entry of Default to include in
bold, no less than 13-point typeface font the following language, “Under the authority of Arizona
Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a)(2), an application has been filed requesting entry of default against
[insert party name]. If [insert party name] pleads or otherwise defends within 10 days after the
application is filed, default does not become effective, and the court may not enter a default
judgement against the party. The 10-day period begins the day after the application is filed with
the court, it does not include Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays, and no additional time is added for
service by mail.” The filed Application lacks this required language.
IT IS ORDERED striking the Application for Entry of Default as non-compliant.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-034002
03/26/2026
Docket Code 002
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any entry of default entered as to the non-compliant
Application is set aside.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is denied
as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Default hearing scheduled for April 2, 2026,
at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is returned to the Judge’s division for
further proceedings
04/03/2026 — CV2025034002 CHULLINO, SARA MICHELE 04/03/2026 HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/06/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-034002
04/03/2026
Docket Code 025
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN
L. Palmert
Deputy
STETSON VALLEY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
JAVIER B DELGADO
v.
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
5522 W MOLLY LN
PHOENIX AZ 85083
COMM. OWEN
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s default packet. Given the Court’s prior minute entry
setting aside default for failure to comply with Rule 55(a)(2)(F), no action will be taken as to this
packet.
04/22/2026 — CV2025034002 CHULLINO, SARA MICHELE 04/22/2026 HONORABLE QUINTIN CUSHNER View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/23/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-034002
04/22/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE QUINTIN CUSHNER
A. Hayes
Deputy
STETSON VALLEY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
JAVIER B DELGADO
v.
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
5522 W MOLLY LN
PHOENIX AZ 85083
COMM. OWEN
JUDGE Q CUSHNER
MINUTE ENTRY
This Court has received Plaintiff’s e-filed/ filed Application/Motion for Default against
Defendant(s), Sara Michele Chullino, in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Addison Owen.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be either e-filed or filed in paper form.
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-034002
04/22/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, Application
for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate, and Statement of Costs.
Self-represented litigants are exempt from any mandatory eFiling requirements but may
eFile if they prefer.
Attorneys and Self-Represented Litigants must submit a default judgment packet required
by the Court, including the documents identified on the default judgment packet coversheet in
paper to the assigned commissioner’s division.
A commissioner will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the
default judgment packet with all the required documents has been received by the division
in paper form.
If the paper packet is not received by the above-named Commissioner division by June 22,
2026, the matter will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution as to the defaulted
party.
You may wish to review the following resources for additional information regarding the
default process:
Applications for Default
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/
Motions
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/n30m54ah/gn10fz.pdf
Civil Default Checklist
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/jitjlp0s/cvc50fz.pdf
Civil Court Administration Processing Information
civil-department-post-filing-information-and-instructions.pdf (maricopa.gov)
05/21/2026 — CV2025034002 CHULLINO, SARA MICHELE 05/21/2026 HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/22/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-034002
05/21/2026
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN
L. Palmert
Deputy
STETSON VALLEY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
JAVIER B DELGADO
v.
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
SARA MICHELE CHULLINO
5522 W MOLLY LN
PHOENIX AZ 85083
COMM. OWEN
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court having received Plaintiff’s Request for Default Hearing filed on April 27,
2026,
IT IS ORDERED setting a virtual Default Hearing on June 24, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. (time
allotted: 15 minutes) in this Division via Microsoft Teams/Court Connect.
www.tinyurl.com/jbazmc-pcc07
You can also dial in using your phone (audio only).
+1 (917) 781-4590, Phone Conference ID: 604 064 885#
Commissioner Owen’s division prefers video appearances through Court Connect and
Microsoft TEAMS, if possible, as it ensures it is easier to know who is appearing at the hearing
and being able to see the other parties reduces interruptions and delays. Additionally, appearing
by video increases the chance that the Court can use features such as shared screens to show
everyone exhibits or forms that may be helpful for the hearing. However, no party shall be
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-034002
05/21/2026
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2
penalized for appearing by phone. Whether parties appear by videoconference, phone, or a
hybrid of the two, they should try as much as possible to contact the court from an area with no
background noise as noise and echoes prevent the parties from hearing the proceedings in the
courtroom and prevent the court from making a good record of the proceedings. The parties
are especially discouraged from appearing virtually from an outdoor location.
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter.
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a
court reporter is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a
written request to the assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the
hearing and must pay the authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days
before the proceeding. The fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.