11/04/2025 — CV2025027628 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, CLEMENTE RANCH 11/04/2025 HONORABLE SCOTT A. BLANEY View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/05/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-027628
11/04/2025
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE SCOTT A. BLANEY
P. McKinley
Deputy
CLEMENTE RANCH HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
KATHRYN A BATTOCK
v.
MEI YANG, et al.
MEI YANG
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
RUOPENG LUI
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
COMM. CRONIN
JUDGE BLANEY
ORDER ENTERED BY COURT
This Court has received Plaintiff’s e-filed Application/Motion for Default against
Defendant(s), Mei Yang and Ruopeng Lui, in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Mary Cronin.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be either e-filed or filed in paper form.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-027628
11/04/2025
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, Application
for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate, and Statement of Costs.
Attorneys and Self-Represented Litigants must submit a default judgment packet required
by the Court, including the documents identified on the default judgment packet coversheet in
paper to the assigned commissioner’s division.
A commissioner will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the
default judgment packet with all the required documents has been received by the division
in paper form.
If the paper packet is not received by the above-named Commissioner division by January
5, 2026, the matter is placed on the Dismissal Calendar as to the above-named defaulted party or
parties until February 4, 2026.
You may wish to review the following resources for additional information regarding the
default process:
Applications for Default
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/
Motions
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/n30m54ah/gn10fz.pdf
Civil Default Checklist
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/jitjlp0s/cvc50fz.pdf
Civil Court Administration Processing Information
civil-department-post-filing-information-and-instructions.pdf (maricopa.gov)
12/23/2025 — CV2025027628 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, CLEMENTE RANCH 12/23/2025 HONORABLE MARY C. CRONIN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/24/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-027628
12/23/2025
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MARY C. CRONIN
D. McNulty
Deputy
CLEMENTE RANCH HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
KATHRYN A BATTOCK
v.
MEI YANG, et al.
MEI YANG
5378 ARMONK CT
SAN JOSE CA 95123
RUOPENG LUI
5378 ARMONK CT
SAN JOSE CA 95123
COMM. CRONIN
MINUTE ENTRY
On the Court’s own motion,
IT IS ORDERED setting a virtual Default Hearing on February 4, 2026 at 1:40 p.m.
(time allotted: 10 minutes) in this Division via Microsoft Teams/Court Connect.
HEARING WEBSITE LINK:
https://Tinyurl.com/jbazmc-pcc05
Or call in (audio only)
+1 917-781-4590 Phone ID: 755 033 080#
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-027628
12/23/2025
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff shall deliver a physical default packet to the
division no later than 5 (five) business days prior to the hearing. Failure to do so may result in
the hearing being vacated.
The Court prefers video appearances, if possible, as it ensures it is easier to know
who is appearing at the hearing and being able to see the other parties reduces
interruptions and delays. Additionally, appearing by video increases the chance that the
Court can use features such as shared screens to show everyone exhibits or forms that may
be helpful for the hearing. However, no party shall be penalized for appearing by phone.
Whether parties appear by videoconference, phone, or a hybrid of the two, they should try
as much as possible to contact the court from an area with no background noise as noise
and echoes prevent the parties from hearing the proceedings in the courtroom and prevent
the court from making a good record of the proceedings. The parties are especially
discouraged from appearing virtually from an outdoor location.
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter.
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a
court reporter is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a
written request to the assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the
hearing and must pay the authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days
before the proceeding. The fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
