01/13/2009 — CV2008092661 ASSOCIATION, REGENCY HOUSE 01/13/2009 HON. MARK F. ACETO View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/15/2009 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2008-092661
01/13/2009
Docket Code 066
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. MARK F. ACETO
M. Sahli
Deputy
REGENCY HOUSE ASSOCIATION
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
MARK SCHWELLING
MARK SCHWELLING
1314 E SAINT JOHN RD
PHOENIX AZ 85022
JUDGE ARANETA
JUDGE KREAMER
CASE REASSIGNMENT - CIVIL PRESIDING JUDGE
This case was previously assigned to the Honorable Joseph Kreamer. A Notice of
Change of Judge has been filed by Plaintiff. The case was transferred to the Presiding Civil
Judge for reassignment.
IT IS ORDERED that this case be assigned to Civil Calendar CVJ22, the Honorable
Louis Araneta, for all further proceedings. If any objections to the Notice of Change of Judge
are filed, the noticed judge retains jurisdiction to hear and decide the objections. Any objections
must be filed and a copy delivered to the noticed judge within twenty days of the date of this
order.
Pending:
⋅Motion for Summary Judgment
⋅Motion to Continue Disclosure Deadline
01/26/2009 — CV2008092661 ASSOCIATION, REGENCY HOUSE 01/26/2009 THE HONORABLE LOUIS ARANETA View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/28/2009 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2008-092661
01/26/2009
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
THE HONORABLE LOUIS ARANETA
M. Brady
Deputy
REGENCY HOUSE ASSOCIATION
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
MARK SCHWELLING
MARK SCHWELLING
1314 E SAINT JOHN RD
PHOENIX AZ 85022
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the responsive
filing entitled Reply to Motion to Continue Disclosure and Request for Summary Judgment.
Denial by Defendant that he did not receive Exhibit B to the motion is insufficient to
preserve a genuine issue as to a material fact. Exhibit C to the Motion shows various prior
warnings, late notices, intents to lien and a returned check for insufficient funds.
IT IS ORDERED granting Summary Judgment in favor of Plaintiff which renders moot
the Motion to Continue Disclosure Requirements Under Rule 26(b)(1).
Plaintiff shall submit a form of judgment consistent with the ruling.
