01/04/2023 — CV2021094251 ASSOCIATION, GILA SPRINGS 01/04/2023 HONORABLE ROGER E. BRODMAN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/10/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
01/04/2023
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ROGER E. BRODMAN
C. Avena
Deputy
GILA SPRINGS ASSOCIATION
KRISTOPHER L AMUNDSEN
v.
MICHAEL B CAMERON
MICHAEL B CAMERON
830 N MAPLE CT.
CHANDLER AZ 85226
B AUSTIN BAILLIO
COMM BRODMAN
MINUTE ENTRY
Courtroom 207 (SEA)
9:52 a.m. This is the time set for Order to Show Cause Return Hearing regarding Plaintiff,
Gila Springs Association Application for Order to Show Cause and Memorandum of Points and
Authorities, filed November 1, 2022. Plaintiff, Gila Springs Association is represented by counsel,
Austin Baillio. Defendant, Michael B. Cameron is present on his own behalf.
Today’s proceeding is being held virtually through Court Connect. A record of the
proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held regarding the status of the case.
For the reasons stated on the record,
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
01/04/2023
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS ORDERED directing the parties to communicate and talk with each other to try and
reach any resolution on all issues. The parties plan to speak immediately after this hearing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting this matter for an Evidentiary Hearing on March
10, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. (time allotted: 90 minutes) in this division.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by February 24, 2023, the parties are to submit a
Pre-Hearing Statement, that identifies:
1. What issues are to be resolved by the Court.
2. What witnesses will be called to testify, and a brief summary as to what each of
those witnesses are going to testify to.
3. Any exhibits that they intend to present at the Evidentiary Hearing. The parties
shall also list any objections to any exhibits.
The parties are to promptly notify the Court if they resolve their issues and the Evidentiary
Hearing can be vacated. In the event the parties do not resolve their issues, each party shall deliver
to the judge at the Evidentiary Hearing a tabbed notebook containing that party’s exhibits.
Procedures for Submitting Exhibits
Depositions will NOT be marked as exhibits. If you plan to read from a deposition or use
the deposition for impeachment purposes, you will need to supply an ORIGINAL to the
Clerk for filing at same time they provide their exhibits.
Please provide an exhibit list with a brief description for each exhibit. The list should
contain the case number, the caption, scheduled trial date, and the party submitting the
exhibits. Do not use Bates numbers in your description of the exhibits.
The parties shall meet and confer to insure that there are NO duplicates submitted.
The parties shall provide a list of any exhibits that have been stipulated into evidence.
Exhibits should include a colored and numbered divider sheet between each
exhibit. Exhibits should be delivered at the time of the Trial Management
Conference.
Exhibits will be marked numerically and consecutively.
Plaintiff(s) exhibits will be marked first followed by Defendant(s).
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
01/04/2023
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 3
Numbers will NOT be skipped or “saved” in anticipation of additional exhibits to
be submitted. If there is a blank, the next exhibit shall be marked consecutively to
the previously numbered exhibit and the numbering of your exhibit list will not
match the numbering of the Court’s exhibit list.
Subsections of exhibits will be marked as the next available number. Do NOT
use subsections of exhibits (ex: 4a or 4.1). If subsection are used, each subsection
will be marked as the next consecutive number and the numbering of your exhibit
list will not match the numbering of the Court’s exhibit list. Please use the next
consecutive number for each exhibit
Blow-ups and large items may only be used for demonstrative purposes. You may
bring them to court to use during trial; however, if you would like them to be
marked as an exhibit, please submit an 8 ½ x 11 photo of the item.
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded by audio and video method and not by a
court reporter. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding
in which a court reporter is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must
submit a written request to the assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance
of the hearing, and must pay the authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial
days before the proceeding. The fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
10:04 a.m. Matter concludes.
03/10/2023 — CV2021094251 ASSOCIATION, GILA SPRINGS 03/10/2023 HONORABLE ROGER E. BRODMAN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/16/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
03/10/2023
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ROGER E. BRODMAN
C. Avena
Deputy
GILA SPRINGS ASSOCIATION
KRISTOPHER L AMUNDSEN
v.
MICHAEL B CAMERON
MICHAEL B CAMERON
830 N MAPLE CT.
CHANDLER AZ 85226
B AUSTIN BAILLIO
COMM BRODMAN
MINUTE ENTRY
Courtroom 207 (SEA)
9:05 a.m. This is the time set for Evidentiary Hearing. Plaintiff Gila Springs Association is
represented by counsel, B Austin Baillio. Defendant Michael B Cameron is present on his own
behalf.
Today’s proceeding is being held virtually through Court Connect. A record of the
proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held regarding the status of the case. Mr. Baillio informs the Court that the
parties are close in resolving this matter.
For the reasons stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED vacating today’s Evidentiary Hearing.
9:08 a.m. Matter concludes.
04/19/2022 — CV2021094251 ASSOCIATION, GILA SPRINGS 04/19/2022 HONORABLE BRIAN D. KAISER View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/20/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
04/19/2022
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN D. KAISER
S. Dickinson
Deputy
GILA SPRINGS ASSOCIATION
KRISTOPHER L AMUNDSEN
v.
MICHAEL B CAMERON
MICHAEL B CAMERON
830 N MAPLE CT
CHANDLER AZ 85226
COMM. KAISER
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s default packet.
THE COURT takes no action. The packet is incomplete and is missing a checklist.
10/07/2021 — CV2021094251 ASSOCIATION, GILA SPRINGS 10/07/2021 HONORABLE STEPHEN M. HOPKINS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/08/2021 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
10/07/2021
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE STEPHEN M. HOPKINS
C. Avena
Deputy
GILA SPRINGS ASSOCIATION
KRISTOPHER L AMUNDSEN
v.
MICHAEL B CAMERON
JUDGE HOPKINS
MINUTE ENTRY
Plaintiff has requested service by alternative means pursuant to Rule 4.1 of the Arizona
Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 4.1 (k) provides as follows:
(k) Alternative Means of Service.
(1) Generally.
If a party shows that the means of service provided in Rule 4.1(c) through Rule 4.1(j) are
impracticable, the court may--on motion and without notice to the person to be served--order that
service may be accomplished in another manner.
(2) Notice and Mailing. If the court allows an alternative means of service, the serving
party must make a reasonable effort to provide the person being served with actual notice of the
action's commencement. In any event, the serving party must mail the summons, the pleading
being served, and any court order authorizing an alternative means of service to the last-known
business or residential address of the person being served.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
10/07/2021
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 2
(3) Service by Publication. A party may serve by publication only if the requirements of
Rule 4.1(l), 4.1(m), 4.2(f), or 4.2(g) are met and the procedures provided in those rules are
followed.
Whether traditional service is “impractical,” defined as “extremely difficult or
inconvenient” is a fact specific inquiry. See Blair v. Burgener, 226 Ariz. 213, 245 P.3d 898
(App. 2010. The Court finds in this case that personal is impractical.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED authorizing Plaintiff to serve Defendants at
Defendants’ last known place of abode by posting this Order as well as the Summons and
Complaint and any other related papers on the front door of Defendants’ last known residence
address or on the front gate of Defendants’ property if unable to gain access to the front door.1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall also mail this Order as well as the
Summons and Complaint and any other related papers by regular first class mail as provided in
Rule 4.1 (k) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall also e-mail this Order as well as the
Summons and Complaint and any other related papers to Defendants at any e-mail address
believed by Plaintiff to be associated with Defendants.2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the time to complete service to January 11,
2022.
The Court has granted an extension of time for Plaintiff to serve the Complaint and
accompanying documents in this case which supersedes the original time computation for
dismissal on the Inactive Calendar. Therefore,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED placing this case on the Inactive Calendar for
dismissal without further notice on January 12, 2022 unless an Affidavit of Service of Process is
1 All of the orders for service shall be in addition to what has already been done, i.e., even if the
Complaint was mailed before it must be mailed again, with a copy of this Order.
2 See generally Baidoo v. Blood-Dzraku, 48 Misc. 3d 309, 310 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2015) (discussing
service via e-mail or Facebook as supplemental methods of providing actual notice to a
defendant of a pending legal proceeding); see also generally Solving Sewer Service: Fighting
Fraud With Technology, Arkansas Law Review, Vol. 70, number 4 (2018); “Hacking” Service
of Process: Using Social Media to Provide Constitutionally Sufficient Notice of Process, 38 U.
Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 559 (2016).
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
10/07/2021
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 3
filed before that date indicating that Defendants have been served in accordance with the Arizona
Rules of Civil Procedure.
10/22/2021 — CV2021094251 ASSOCIATION, GILA SPRINGS 10/22/2021 HONORABLE STEPHEN M. HOPKINS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/26/2021 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
10/22/2021
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE STEPHEN M. HOPKINS
C. Avena
Deputy
GILA SPRINGS ASSOCIATION
KRISTOPHER L AMUNDSEN
v.
MICHAEL B CAMERON
B AUSTIN BAILLIO
JUDGE HOPKINS
MINUTE ENTRY
Courtroom 207 (SEA)
10:06 a.m. This is the time set for Order to Show Cause Hearing. Plaintiff, Gila Springs
Association is represented by counsel, Kristopher L. Amundsen and B. Austin Baillio. Defendant,
Michael B. Cameron is neither present nor represented by counsel.
Today’s proceeding is being held virtually through Court Connect. A record of the
proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
LET THE RECORD REFELECT that Defendant has failed to appear for today’s
proceeding.
Mr. Baillio addresses the Court with the Status of the case.
The Court notes that the Certificate of Service by a Private Process Server has been filed
with the Court on October 14, 2021.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
10/22/2021
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 2
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court will not set any further proceedings in this
matter at this time. If an Evidentiary Hearing is needed, the parties shall file something with the
Court.
10:11 a.m. Matter concludes.
11/17/2021 — CV2021094251 ASSOCIATION, GILA SPRINGS 11/17/2021 HONORABLE STEPHEN M. HOPKINS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/18/2021 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
11/17/2021
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE STEPHEN M. HOPKINS
C. Avena
Deputy
GILA SPRINGS ASSOCIATION
KRISTOPHER L AMUNDSEN
v.
MICHAEL B CAMERON
MICHAEL B CAMERON
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
COMM. KAISER
JUDGE HOPKINS
ORDER ENTERED BY THE COURT
MINUTE ENTRY
This division has received Plaintiff’s e-filed Application/Affidavit for Entry of Default
against Defendant(s), Michael B. Cameron in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner Brian
Kaiser.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be e-filed.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
11/17/2021
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, Section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, and
Application for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate and Statement of Costs, but shall submit a
default judgment packet required by the Court, including the documents identified on the default
judgment packet coversheet, in paper to the assigned commissioner’s division. A commissioner
will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the default judgment packet with
all the required documents has been received by the division in paper form.
The parties/counsel can find additional information in the form of frequently asked
questions at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/howDoI.
asp
The parties/counsel can find additional information regarding the default judgment process
at:
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/.
11/18/2022 — CV2021094251 ASSOCIATION, GILA SPRINGS 11/18/2022 HONORABLE STEPHEN M. HOPKINS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/21/2022 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
11/18/2022
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE STEPHEN M. HOPKINS
C. Avena
Deputy
GILA SPRINGS ASSOCIATION
KRISTOPHER L AMUNDSEN
v.
MICHAEL B CAMERON
MICHAEL B CAMERON
830 N MAPLE CT.
CHANDLER AZ 85226
JUDGE HOPKINS
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received and considered Plaintiff Gila Springs Association Application for
Order to Show Cause and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, filed November 1, 2022.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED setting an Order to Show Cause Return Hearing on January 4, 2023 at
9:45 a.m. (time allotted: 15 minutes) before:
HONORABLE STEPHEN M. HOPKINS
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
SOUTHEAST JUDICIAL FACILITY
COURTROOM 207
222 E. JAVELINA
MESA, AZ 85210
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2021-094251
11/18/2022
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2
Your hearing will be conducted through the new TEAMS program offered by the Superior
Court of Arizona in Maricopa County. Hearings are preferably conducted by video-conference but
can also be conducted by phone. Lawyers (and self-represented litigants) are responsible for
distributing this notice to anyone who will be appearing on their behalf.
FOR VIRTUAL APPEARANCES before Honorable Stephen M. Hopkins, CRJ23.
Virtual Proceedings are held via the Court Connect platform. Please review the brief Court
Connect training prior to the hearing:
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/virtual-justice/.
When you are ready to connect to the proceedings via Court Connect, please follow the
steps below.
1. CLICK THE JOIN MICROSOFT TEAMS MEETING BUTTON BELOW
2. ENTER YOUR FULL NAME AND ROLE IN NAME FIELD.
3. WAIT IN THE LOBBY UNTIL GRANTED ADMISSION BY FACILITATOR.
You can also join by phone if necessary by using the number below with the Conference
ID #
If you have called into your hearing and are still waiting in the lobby after the scheduled
start time, please call the division telephone number at 602-372-5561.
Judge Hopkins’s Virtual Courtroom
Please join my Teams meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://tinyurl.com/jbazmc-cvj22
You can also dial in using your phone.
United States: +1 917-781-4590
Access Code: 969-248-722#
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to the
assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing, and must pay the
authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the proceeding. The
fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
