01/21/2016 — CV2014012425 I I COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, PARKWOOD EAST 01/21/2016 HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/25/2016 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-012425
01/21/2016
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE
T. Nosker
Deputy
PARKWOOD EAST I I COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN
v.
TIMOTHY NORDER
TIMOTHY NORDER
11361 E ESCONDIDO AVE
MESA AZ 85208
DISMISSAL CALENDAR
On the court’s own motion,
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Dismissal Calendar for dismissal on
March 23, 2016, without prejudice and without further notice, unless prior to said date a
judgment is entered or filed or a stipulation of dismissal is presented.
03/29/2016 — CV2014012425 I I COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, PARKWOOD EAST 03/29/2016 HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
03/31/2016 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-012425
03/29/2016
Docket Code 047
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE
T. Nosker
Deputy
PARKWOOD EAST I I COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN
v.
TIMOTHY NORDER
TIMOTHY NORDER
11361 E ESCONDIDO AVE
MESA AZ 85208
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
This case was on the Dismissal Calendar for dismissal on March 23, 2016, unless
specified action was taken before a certain date. The date has passed, and the specific action has
not been taken.
IT IS ORDERED dismissing this action with prejudice.
/ s / LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE
JUDGE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
04/24/2015 — CV2014012425 I I COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, PARKWOOD EAST 04/24/2015 HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/27/2015 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-012425
04/24/2015
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE
T. Nosker
Deputy
PARKWOOD EAST I I COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN
v.
TIMOTHY NORDER
MARK BAINBRIDGE
COMM. VATZ
MINUTE ENTRY
This division has received an e-filed Application for Entry of Default. No action will be
taken by this division on the above referenced document. The parties are advised that
commissioners handle Rule 55(b) default judgment proceedings and that such proceedings in this
matter are to be heard by Commissioner Vatz.
IT IS ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a default judgment
must be e-filed.
Pursuant to Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 2010-117, default judgment
packets are not permitted to be e-filed. Accordingly, parties are directed to hand-deliver a
default coversheet and copies of the necessary filed documents to the Commissioner’s division
for the entry of a default judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further action will be taken by the assigned
commissioner until the necessary filed documents and coversheet are delivered to the
commissioner.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-012425
04/24/2015
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
The parties/counsel can find the default judgment coversheet on the Court’s website at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/forms.asp
The parties/counsel can find additional information in the form of frequently asked
questions at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/howDol.asp
06/23/2015 — CV2014012425 I I COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, PARKWOOD EAST 06/23/2015 HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
06/24/2015 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-012425
06/23/2015
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE
T. Nosker
Deputy
PARKWOOD EAST I I COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN
v.
TIMOTHY NORDER
MARK BAINBRIDGE
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has read Plaintiff’s Joint Report filed on June 18, 2015.
IT IS ORDERED approving the parties’ deadlines, all as set forth in the formal written
Scheduling Order electronically signed by the Court on June 22, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties shall participate in a mandatory Settlement
Conference. This case is referred to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution for the
appointment of a judge pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and/or the
parties will receive a minute entry from ADR appointing the judge pro tempore. Counsel and
any “pro per” parties will contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the date, time, and
location for the settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is requested to conduct a
settlement conference not later than September 30, 2015. The Office of Alternative Dispute
Resolution will not do the scheduling of the settlement conference so please do not contact that
office.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-012425
06/23/2015
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED all counsel and their clients, or non-lawyer
representatives who have full and complete authority to settle the case, shall personally
appear and participate in good faith in the Settlement Conference. Sanctions may be
imposed for failure to participate.
09/15/2015 — CV2014012425 I I COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, PARKWOOD EAST 09/15/2015 HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/16/2015 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-012425
09/15/2015
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE
T. Nosker
Deputy
PARKWOOD EAST I I COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN
v.
TIMOTHY NORDER
TIMOTHY NORDER
11361 E ESCONDIDO AVE
MESA AZ 85208
MINUTE ENTRY
The court is in receipt of the Settlement Conference Memo indicating the parties reached
a settlement. As part of the settlement, the case is to remain open for the next two years and will
not be dismissed until the settlement amount is paid in full.
The court does not want to interfere with the settlement but the court is unable to keep a
pending case “open” for such an extended period of time for the sole purpose of securing the
settlement agreement. The court suggests the parties consider stipulating to a judgment to secure
payment and then request to reopen the case to enter a stipulated judgment. Another option
would be to shorten the time frame to six months rather than 24 months. Certainly, the parties
are free to come up with a different resolution as long as it does not entail the case remaining
open past a six month time frame.
According to the settlement notice, the parties intend on filing a final settlement
agreement in the near future so the court directs the parties to not include the case remaining
pending for such an extended period of time as a term of the settlement.
