02/08/2010 — CV2009024484 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, VILLA GREEN 02/08/2010 HON. EDWARD O. BURKE View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/10/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-024484
02/08/2010
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. EDWARD O. BURKE
L. Nixon
Deputy
VILLA GREEN HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
CRAIG L ARMSTRONG
v.
SARAMAE TEICH
DAPHNE REAUME
CASE SETTLED/INACTIVE CALENDAR
The court is advised that this case has been settled.
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal on
March 30, 2010, without further notice, unless prior to said date a judgment is entered or filed, a
stipulation of dismissal is presented, or a motion to set and certificate of readiness is filed.
05/26/2010 — CV2009024484 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, VILLA GREEN 05/26/2010 HON. EDWARD O. BURKE View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/28/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-024484
05/26/2010
Docket Code 042
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. EDWARD O. BURKE
L. Nixon
Deputy
VILLA GREEN HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
CRAIG L ARMSTRONG
v.
SARAMAE TEICH
DAPHNE REAUME
MINUTE ENTRY
The court has received and reviewed the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice
and proposed Order thereto.
The parties request is GRANTED.
IT IS ORDERED dismissing cause CV2009-024484 with prejudice, all in accordance
with the formal written Order signed by the court on May 20, 2010, and filed by the clerk on
May 26, 2010.
10/05/2009 — CV2009024484 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, VILLA GREEN 10/05/2009 HON. EDWARD O. BURKE View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/07/2009 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-024484
10/05/2009
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. EDWARD O. BURKE
K. Sinclair
Deputy
VILLA GREEN HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
CRAIG L ARMSTRONG
v.
SARAMAE TEICH
DAPHNE REAUME
COMPREHENSIVE PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE SETTING
The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiff’s Request for Settlement Conference and
Motion for Stay of Discovery.
IT IS ORDERED setting this matter for a Comprehensive Pretrial Conference, pursuant
to Rule 16(b) on November 9, 2009, at 8:45 a.m. (15 min.) before:
HON. EDWARD O. BURKE
Judge of Superior Court of Arizona
125 W. Washington - OCH
Courtroom 103 – 1st Floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
(602) 506-6538
The parties may appear telephonically. Counsel will need to confer as the court cannot
accept multiple calls. If all parties wish to appear telephonically, Plaintiff’s counsel shall initiate
the conference call. The court’s phone number is (602) 506-6538. Transmissions over cellular
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-024484
10/05/2009
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 2
telephones and speaker phones are not clearly received by the court’s phone system and,
therefore, are not allowed.
The court will set a firm trial date at this conference. Counsel are advised to have their
trial calendars with them.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a Joint Pretrial Memorandum
as set forth below.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:
All counsel are directed to meet personally to discuss all of the matters set forth in Rule
16(b). Counsel shall prepare and file with the court by 5:00 p.m. on November 4, 2009, a Joint
Pretrial Memorandum. The memorandum shall address all the matters listed in Rule 16(b) and
additional items set forth below.
1.
The nature of the case; the issues, and each party’s position with respect to the
issues.
2.
An agreed upon schedule and date for completion of non-expert depositions.
As far as can reasonably be anticipated, each party shall set forth the depositions
they anticipate taking and the approximate time required for each; any and all
medical examinations which may be required of any of the parties; the person or
persons to conduct such examinations; all requests for production; and all tangible
evidence to be disclosed or exchanged.
3.
A date for the final disclosure of the identities, subject matters, and reports of
expert witnesses, and/or to supplement disclosures made to date.
4.
A date or dates for the initial and final disclosure of all non-expert witnesses,
and/or to supplement disclosures made to date.
5.
A date by which all written discovery will be propounded and concluded.
Further, counsel shall set forth any written discovery outstanding and a date when it
will be complete.
6.
The position of each counsel on whether the Rule 38.1 time limits should be
waived.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-024484
10/05/2009
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 3
7.
The court will order the parties to participate either in a settlement conference with
a judge pro tem or a mediation with a private mediator. An agreement of all parties
is required for private mediation. The parties are to advise if such an agreement is
reached. The parties are also to advise a proposed date for the completion of the
settlement conference or mediation.
8.
Set forth any discovery disputes to date or Rule 26.1 compliance issues.
9.
A date for completion of all discovery, including expert discovery.
10.
A date by which all dispositive or partially-dispositive motions shall be filed.
11.
A proposed trial date agreed upon by all counsel and anticipated length of trial.
If counsel are unable to agree on any of the items of the Pretrial Memorandum, the
reasons for their inability to agree shall be set forth in the Pretrial Memorandum. All proposed
deadlines shall be set forth as calendar dates, and not in the form “XX days before trial.”
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall notify the court of any agreed-upon
extension of any time period provided by the Rules of Civil Procedure. The purpose of this order
is not to discourage extensions as a matter of professionalism, but to ensure that no party suffers
summary disposition of any issue because the court is unaware that an extension had been
granted.
Counsel are reminded that the court may impose sanctions, pursuant to Rule 16(f),
against counsel and/or their clients for failure to participate in good faith in the preparation or
timely filing of the memorandum.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp
11/09/2009 — CV2009024484 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, VILLA GREEN 11/09/2009 HON. EDWARD O. BURKE View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/10/2009 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-024484
11/09/2009
Docket Code 350
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. EDWARD O. BURKE
L. Nixon
Deputy
VILLA GREEN HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
CRAIG L ARMSTRONG
v.
SARAMAE TEICH
DAPHNE REAUME
KENNETH L FIELDS
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
COURT ADMIN-CIVIL-ARB DESK
MINUTE ENTRY
8:46 a.m. This is the time set for Comprehensive Pretrial Conference. Plaintiff, Villa
Green Homeowners Association is represented by counsel, Craig L. Armstrong. Defendant,
Saramae Teich is represented by counsel, Daphne Reaume.
A recording of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court
reporter.
Discussion is held regarding case status.
The parties having agreed that this matter is subject to arbitration,
IT IS ORDERED transferring this matter to the Civil Court Administration Arbitration
Desk for appointment of an arbitrator.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-024484
11/09/2009
Docket Code 350
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel and/or the parties shall direct all future
pleadings, except motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment that would dispose of the
entire case as to any party, motions to consolidate and motions to continue on the inactive
calendar, to the arbitrator for consideration and ruling.
In addition, upon counsels’ request,
IT IS ORDERED this case is referred to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution for
the appointment of a judge pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and/or the
parties will receive a minute entry from ADR appointing the judge pro tempore. Counsel and
any “pro per” parties will contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the date, time, and
location for the settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is requested to conduct a
settlement conference at their earliest convenience.
The Office of Alternative Dispute
Resolution will not do the scheduling of the settlement conference so please do not contact that
office. All counsel and their clients, or non-lawyer representatives who have full and complete
authority to settle the case, shall personally appear and participate in good faith in the Settlement
Conference. Sanctions may be imposed for failure to participate.
If possible, counsel request Judge Kenneth L. Fields (ret.) to conduct the settlement
conference.
8:52 a.m. Hearing concludes.
