01/29/2026 — CV2025029914 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, PALOMA PASEO 01/29/2026 HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/30/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
01/29/2026
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN
L. Palmert
Deputy
PALOMA PASEO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
EMILY ELIZABETH COOPER
v.
JOHN PRIEVE
LEVI T CLARIDGE
COMM. OWEN
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court having received Plaintiff’s Motion to Set a Default Hearing and to Appear
Telephonically filed on January 22, 2026, and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED setting a virtual Default Hearing on March 11, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., in
this Division via Microsoft Teams/Court Connect.
www.tinyurl.com/jbazmc-pcc07
You can also dial in using your phone (audio only).
+1 (917) 781-4590, Phone Conference ID: 604 064 885#
The Default Judgment packet with supporting documents must be received by the division
AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR to your hearing, or it may be vacated.
Commissioner Owen’s division prefers video appearances through Court Connect and
Microsoft TEAMS, if possible, as it ensures it is easier to know who is appearing at the hearing
and being able to see the other parties reduces interruptions and delays. Additionally, appearing
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
01/29/2026
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2
by video increases the chance that the Court can use features such as shared screens to show
everyone exhibits or forms that may be helpful for the hearing. However, no party shall be
penalized for appearing by phone. Whether parties appear by videoconference, phone, or a
hybrid of the two, they should try as much as possible to contact the court from an area with no
background noise as noise and echoes prevent the parties from hearing the proceedings in the
courtroom and prevent the court from making a good record of the proceedings. The parties
are especially discouraged from appearing virtually from an outdoor location.
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter.
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a
court reporter is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a
written request to the assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the
hearing and must pay the authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days
before the proceeding. The fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
03/10/2026 — CV2025029914 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, PALOMA PASEO 03/10/2026 HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/11/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
03/10/2026
Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN
P. Reyes/L. Palmert
Deputy
PALOMA PASEO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
EMILY ELIZABETH COOPER
v.
JOHN PRIEVE
LEVI T CLARIDGE
COMM. OWEN
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Default filed January 27,
2026, Plaintiff’s Response filed February 18, 2026, and Defendant’s Reply filed February 20,
2026.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED vacating the March 11, 2026, Default Hearing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a virtual Oral Argument regarding the above-
mentioned motions on March 30, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. (time allotted: 1 hour) in this Division via
Microsoft Teams.
Please join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone using the following
connection information:
www.tinyurl.com/jbazmc-pcc07
You can also dial in using your phone (audio only).
+1 (917) 781-4590,
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
03/10/2026
Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 2
Phone Conference ID: 604 064 885#
More information regarding Court Connect can be found at:
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/court-connect/
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter.
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a
court reporter is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a
written request to the assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the
hearing and must pay the authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days
before the proceeding. The fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
03/30/2026 — CV2025029914 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, PALOMA PASEO 03/30/2026 HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/15/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
03/30/2026
Docket Code 020
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN
L. Palmert
Deputy
PALOMA PASEO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
EMILY ELIZABETH COOPER
v.
JOHN PRIEVE
LEVI T CLARIDGE
COMM. OWEN
MINUTE ENTRY
Courtroom 513-VC-CV East Court Building
10:02 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual Oral Argument regarding Defendant’s Motion
to Set Aside Default filed January 27, 2026. Plaintiff Paloma Paseo Homeowners Association
Inc. is represented by counsel, Emily Elizabeth Cooper. Defendant John Prieve is present and
represented by counsel, Levi T. Claridge. No other parties are present.
A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
Oral argument is presented.
Based upon the arguments presented,
IT IS ORDERED taking this matter under advisement.
10:20 a.m. Matter concludes.
05/29/2026 — CV2025029914 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, PALOMA PASEO 05/29/2026 HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
06/01/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
05/29/2026
Docket Code 926
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN
L. Palmert
Deputy
PALOMA PASEO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
EMILY ELIZABETH COOPER
v.
JOHN PRIEVE
LEVI T CLARIDGE
COMM. OWEN
RULING
Before this Court is Defendant John Prieve’s Motion to Set Aside Default filed on
January 27, 2026, Plaintiff Paloma Paseo Homeowners Association Inc.’s Response filed
February 17, 2026, and Defendant John Prieve’s Reply filed February 20, 2026. The Court heard
oral arguments on March 30, 2026. The Court has considered the filings and arguments of the
parties, the relevant authorities and applicable law, as well as the entire record of the case, and
hereby finds as follows.
I.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY.
On August 21, 2025, Paloma Paseo Homeowners Association, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) filed a
complaint against John Prieve (“Defendant”) for Breach of Contract seeking Injunctive Relief,
Attorney’s Fees and Costs.
On September 12, 2025, Defendant was personally served the Complaint and Order to
Show Cause regarding a request for a permanent injunction.
On October 6, 2025, Plaintiff’s filed an Application for Entry of Default. On October 29,
2025, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Enter Default Judgment.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
05/29/2026
Docket Code 926
Form V000A
Page 2
Plaintiff filed a Motion to Vacate Evidentiary Hearing and Request for Default Hearing
on November 14, 2025. On January 22, 2026, Plaintiff filed another Motion requesting to set a
Default Hearing.
On January 27, 2026, Defendant filed an Answer and the Motion to Set Aside before the
Court.
II.
ANALYSIS.
This Court will consider whether default should be set aside under Rule 55(c) of the
Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. The court may set aside an entry of default for good cause,
and it may set aside a final default judgment under Rule 60(b).” Ariz. R. Civ. P. 55(c). “The
good cause necessary for setting aside or vacating entry of default is the same as that required for
relief from a judgment by default.” Richas v. Superior Court, 133 Ariz. 512, 514 (1982). The
moving party, therefore, must demonstrate” “(1) that it acted promptly in seeking relief from the
entry of default; (2) that its failure to file a timely answer was due to either mistake,
inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; and (3) that it had a meritorious defense.” Id. It is
Defendants’ burden to establish all three requirements because of the Arizona Supreme Court’s
use of the word “and.” “The law favors resolution on the merits and therefore resolves all doubts
in favor of the moving party.” Id. (citing Union Oil Co. of Cal. V. Hudson Oil Co., 131 Ariz. 285
(1982)).
The test of what is excusable and, hence, sufficient to set aside a default judgment is
whether the neglect or inadvertence is such as might be the act of a reasonably prudent person
under similar circumstances. Daou v. Harris, 139 Ariz. 353 (1984); State ex rel. Husky v. Oaks 3
Ariz.App. 174 (1966); Gray v. Dillon, 97 Ariz. 16 (1964). Carelessness is not synonymous with
‘excusable neglect’ as a basis for setting aside a default judgment. Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal
Products, Inc., 76 Ariz. 54 (1953).
Defendant offers a single argument in support of their request for a finding of mistake,
inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect – that Defendant was actively engaged in
negotiations and filed the Motion to Set Aside only after the parties reached an impasse. No
additional supporting facts are presented. Plaintiff, on the other hand, provides several email
exchanges, including an email dated October 29, 2025, between Plaintiff and Defendant’s
counsel. In this email, Plaintiff’s counsel sends documents, including the Application for
Default, to Defendant’s counsel. Later that same day, Defendant’s counsel responded, “He’ll file
the answer tomorrow. Thanks.” No further action was taken until the Motion to Set Aside was
filed months later. This exchange demonstrates awareness of the deadline and the need to file an
answer – even in the midst of negotiations. Further, communication continued into November
preparing for the Order to Show Cause hearing related to the permanent injunction which is
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
05/29/2026
Docket Code 926
Form V000A
Page 3
similar to the relief sought in the Complaint. The Court finds Defendant’s failure to act was not
due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Because all elements must be
satisfied, the absence of any single element is fatal to the motion.
The Court also notes Defendant failed to present argument or evidence showing that they
acted promptly, and this email exchange undermines that assertion as well.
With respect to the requirement of a meritorious defense, the Court has not analyzed the
sufficiency of Defendant’s showing because the first two elements have not been satisfied.
III.
CONCLUSION.
Because Defendant has failed to meet his burden,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Set Aside is denied.
/ s / ADDISON OWEN _
HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
06/10/2026 — CV2025029914 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, PALOMA PASEO 06/10/2026 HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
06/11/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
06/10/2026
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADDISON OWEN
L. Palmert
Deputy
PALOMA PASEO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
EMILY ELIZABETH COOPER
v.
JOHN PRIEVE
LEVI T CLARIDGE
COMM. OWEN
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Set
Aside Default filed June 4, 2026. Having reviewed the Motion,
IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Set Aside Default filed
June 4, 2026 is denied.
09/16/2025 — CV2025029914 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, PALOMA PASEO 09/16/2025 HONORABLE GREG S. COMO View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/24/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
09/16/2025
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE GREG S. COMO
C. Lacey
Deputy
PALOMA PASEO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
EMILY ELIZABETH COOPER
v.
JOHN PRIEVE
JOHN PRIEVE
14026 E BECKER LN
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JUDGE COMO
MINUTE ENTRY
Central Court Building - Courtroom 401
10:15 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual Order to Show Cause Return Hearing.
Plaintiff Paloma Paseo Homeowners Association Inc. is represented by counsel, Emily E.
Cooper. Defendant John Prieve is present on his own behalf.
A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.
Brief discussion is held regarding service of Defendant.
Defendant advises the Court that he has not had an opportunity to review court
documents or make a decision about legal representation in the matter.
For reasons stated on the record,
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
09/16/2025
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS ORDERED setting this matter for an Evidentiary Hearing regarding Plaintiff’s
request for injunctive relief on October 20, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. (time allotted: 90 minutes) in this
Division. The parties are to appear in-person.
THE HONORABLE GREGORY COMO
Maricopa County Superior Court
Central Court Building
Courtroom 401
201 W. Jefferson St
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
PHONE: 602-372-0754
NOTE REGARDING COURTROOM TECHNOLOGY: Parties who intend to use a
personal device in conjunction with the courtroom’s technology are encouraged to set up an
appointment with the Division’s Courtroom Assistant at 602-372-0755.
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to the
assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing and must pay the
authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the proceeding. The
fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.
EXHIBIT REQUIREMENTS
IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall exchange exhibits, and file a list of intended
witnesses and exhibits with the Court, by no later than October 13, 2025. Please include a brief
description of anticipated testimony in the list of intended witnesses.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties submit any proposed hearing exhibits as
follows:
1. Submit Hearing Exhibits through Case Center. This division is using Case Center
(also known as Case Lines), a statewide electronic exhibit portal. Attorneys must
submit exhibits through Case Center; Self-Represented Litigants can request to opt-
out of Case Center by contacting the judge’s division at 602-372-2958. Unless
otherwise ordered, Exhibits must be submitted at least 5 business days before the
hearing as provided below.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
09/16/2025
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 3
2. Opting Out of Case Center (Self-Represented Litigants only). A Self-Represented
Litigant may opt out of Case Center no less than 10 calendar days before the
trial/evidentiary hearing (or within 24 hours of being served with notice if the party is
served less than 10 calendar days before the evidentiary hearing). The Self-
Represented Litigant must email the other Self-Represented Litigants or counsel and
the assigned judicial division to notify the court that they are opting out and to request
instructions for submitting exhibits. Self-Represented Litigants must comply with the
deadline for submitting Exhibits. Each party must make sure the Court has the party’s
valid current email address. If you do not have an email address, you can obtain a free
one through accounts.google.com. Each party must register for Case Center at
https://digitalevidence.azcourts.gov/?tlang=en-US. The website has links to training
resources that will guide you through uploading exhibits and navigating Case Center.
The Clerk of Court will email each party (or their attorney of record) a case-specific
Case Center link that the party will use to upload exhibits. For assistance with Case
Center invitations only, email the Clerk of Court at
[email protected]. The email subject line should include the case
number. The body of the email should include the parties’ names, the assigned
judge’s name, and explain that the sender is requesting help with a Case Center
invitation.
3. Exhibit Format. Case Center accepts most digital formats (including photographs,
PDFs, Word files, audio files, and video files). Case Center automatically numbers
the exhibits. Plaintiff/Petitioner’s exhibits have either a P- prefix or can be referred to
as Plaintiff’s exhibit (i.e. Plaintiff’s exhibit 5, or Exhibit P5) and
Defendant/Respondent’s exhibits have a D- prefix or can be referred to as
Defendant’s exhibit (i.e. Defendant’s exhibit 5, or Exhibit D5). During the
proceedings, parties are strongly advised to refer to exhibits using the Case Center
exhibit numbers, for purposes of a clear record. For assistance with Case Center,
contact AOC Support Services at (602) 452-3519 (option 5) or
[email protected], Monday – Friday 7 AM – 6 PM, excluding State holidays.
4. Exhibit Upload Assistance. Scanners are available at each of the regional court Law
Library Resource Centers. Each scanner has an attached computer and instructions
on how to upload exhibits into Case Center.
5. Physical Exhibits. The Courtroom Clerk will handle marking physical exhibits for
Self-Represented Litigants who opt out of Case Center. Attorneys who submit
physical exhibits must create a placeholder in Case Center and include “Physical
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
09/16/2025
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 4
Exhibit” in the name of the exhibit prior to submitting the physical exhibit(s) to the
Division. The collection of physical exhibits must have a Physical Exhibit Case
Coversheet that includes the following: (1) the name of the party submitting the
exhibit(s); (2) the case number; (3) the date of hearing; and (4) the exhibit number(s)
and description(s). In addition, each individual exhibit must have an Exhibit
Coversheet printed on color paper indicating the physical exhibit’s exhibit number in
Case Center. For Self-Represented Litigants, if any individual exhibit is a document
that is longer than ten (10) pages, each page of the exhibit shall be numbered.
Division staff will provide the exhibits to the Courtroom Clerk for marking. The
Courtroom Clerk will mark any physical exhibit(s) with the same exhibit number
used in Case Center.
6. Devices and WiFi. If needed, hearing participants may request to use a court-
provided device to view and present exhibits during an evidentiary hearing. All
requests for access to a court-provided device must be submitted to the Division via
email 5 calendar days before the hearing. Hearing participants can connect to the
court’s free MCPUBLIC WiFi in 90-minute intervals, after which they are
automatically disconnected. If disconnected, users may follow the intranet prompts
to reconnect. If parties determine that this may interfere with the presentation of their
case, they may request access to MCSponsored WiFi, which will allow uninterrupted
access to court WiFi. This request must be made by emailing the assigned division
10 calendar days in advance of any Hearing. Self-Represented Litigant access will
be valid for 60 days; lawyer and nonlawyer representative access will be valid for 365
days.
7. Remote Witnesses. Any party who calls a witness who is appearing remotely (i.e.,
by telephone or videoconference) should either (1) provide the witness with a copy of
all exhibits or (2) ensure that the remote witness has an electronic device available
that allows them to view exhibits displayed on a screen through either Case Center, or
Teams.
8. Exhibit Presentation During Hearings. Unless indicated otherwise in any hearing-
specific court minute entry or order, offerors may, but are not required to, use Case
Center to present (e.g., show to the court, a witness, or the jury) evidence during a
Hearing. Options for presentation of evidence include but are not limited to the
following: (1) use of paper copies of the exhibits that have been uploaded to Case
Center; (2) use of evidence presentation software and/or PDF viewers to display
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
09/16/2025
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 5
PDFs of exhibits that have been uploaded to Case Center; (3) screen sharing of Case
Center through Court Connect (Teams); and (4) use of Case Center “Presentation”
mode to share exhibits. Parties are strongly encouraged to download PDFs of their
Case Center exhibits and/or have paper copies available in the event there are
technological difficulties in the courtroom.
9. Additional Resources. For Case Center related training and questions, the parties
may wish to visit the Thomson Reuters Case Center Home Page at
https://answers.legalprof.thomsonreuters.com/casecenter-us/search. For technical
issues with Case Center, parties may contact AOC Support Services Monday – Friday
from 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM, excluding State holidays, at (602) 452-3519, 1-800-720-
7743 (toll free), or [email protected]. The parties may also wish to review
A.O. 2024-080 at https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/30ylnjsa/ao2024-080-re-
use-of-case-center-in-the-civil-department.pdf for additional information regarding
Case Center.
10:24 a.m. Matter concludes.
Self-Represented Litigant Advisory
ATTENTION SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS: Unless an attorney files a notice
that he or she represents a party, the person(s) not represented by an attorney will act as his or her
own attorney. The law requires the court to hold all persons representing themselves to the
same standard as a licensed attorney. Self-represented litigants are encouraged to review the
Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, paying particular attention to Rule 26. Please note that only a
licensed attorney may represent a corporation, LLC, or similar business entity in the
Superior Court. Ramada Inns v. Lane & Bird Advertising, 102 Ariz. 127, 426 P.2d 395
(1967). You may not file motions or request for relief on behalf of another self-represented party.
Before a judge can consider anything you send them, you must show them that you have
given a copy of your request:
1. To the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk of the Court is a separately elected official. It is
the clerk’s job to keep an independent record of everything that happens at the
court. The court cannot act on a document that has not been made a part of that record;
and
2. To every other party involved in the case. This is so all parties have a fair chance to tell
the judge what they think before they make a decision.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
09/16/2025
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 6
Because of that, if you want the judge to consider something you send, you must file the
original document with the Clerk of the Superior Court, mail or deliver a copy directly to
this division (that is, to the judge, using their specific courtroom address)
THE HONORABLE GREGORY COMO
Maricopa County Superior Court
Central Court Building
Courtroom 401
201 W. Jefferson St
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
PHONE: 602-372-0754
and mail or deliver a copy to all opposing parties. In addition, on each document you must include
a signed certificate that says whether you mailed or hand delivered each copy, when you did so,
and states the specific people and the specific addresses to which you mailed or hand delivered
each copy. If a party is represented by a lawyer, you must send or deliver the copy to the lawyer,
not to the party. All proposed orders submitted to this division must include copies of the order
with self-addressed, stamped envelopes for all parties/counsel.
Do not mail or send papers for the clerk or other parties to the judge.
If you want to file papers with the Clerk of the Court by mail, please send them to:
Clerk of the Superior Court’s Office
Civil File Counter
201 W. Jefferson
Phoenix, AZ 85003
The clerk’s guidelines for filing by mail can be found at:
Civil and Tax Filing | Maricopa County Clerk of Superior Court
If you are not represented by a lawyer you must contact this division immediately and give
us a current address, telephone number, and email address. If your address, phone number, or email
address changes in the future, you must file a notice of change of address/phone number/email
address. That form can be downloaded at no charge from the following website:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/LawLibraryResourceCenter/
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
09/16/2025
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 7
REFERRAL INFORMATION
Community Outreach & Education Arizona Attorney General's Office
2005 N Central Ave Phoenix, AZ 85004
(602) 542-2123 (Phoenix)
(800) 352-8431*
*Toll free in AZ (outside Maricopa and Pima counties)
[email protected]
Maricopa County Bar Lawyer Referral Service
(602) 257-4434
https://maricopabar.org/index.cfm?pg=LRSHome
Community Legal Services
(602) 258-3434
(800) 852-9075
Home
All parties representing themselves must keep the Court updated with name and
address changes.
An update form may be downloaded at: https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/fc_gn9/
10/13/2025 — CV2025029914 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, PALOMA PASEO 10/13/2025 HONORABLE GREG S. COMO View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/15/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
10/13/2025
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE GREG S. COMO
C. Lockhart
Deputy
PALOMA PASEO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
EMILY ELIZABETH COOPER
v.
JOHN PRIEVE
JOHN PRIEVE
14026 E BECKER LN
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
COMM. RICHARD ALBRECHT
JUDGE COMO
ORDER ENTERED BY COURT
This Court has received Plaintiff’s e-filed/ filed Application/Motion for Default against
defendant(s), John Prieve, in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Richard Albrecht.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be either e-filed or filed in paper form.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
10/13/2025
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, Application
for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate, and Statement of Costs.
Attorneys and Self-Represented Litigants must submit a default judgment packet required
by the Court, including the documents identified on the default judgment packet coversheet in
paper to the assigned commissioner’s division.
A commissioner will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the
default judgment packet with all the required documents has been received by the division
in paper form.
NOTE: If the paper packet is not received by the above-named Commissioner division by
December 12, 2025, the matter is placed on the Dismissal Calendar as to the above-named
defaulted party or parties until January 12, 2026.
You may wish to review the following resources for additional information regarding the
default process:
Applications for Default
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/
Motions
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/n30m54ah/gn10fz.pdf
Civil Default Checklist
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/media/jitjlp0s/cvc50fz.pdf
Civil Court Administration Processing Information
civil-department-post-filing-information-and-instructions.pdf (maricopa.gov)
11/17/2025 — CV2025029914 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC, PALOMA PASEO 11/17/2025 HONORABLE GREG S. COMO View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/18/2025 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2025-029914
11/17/2025
Docket Code 002
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE GREG S. COMO
C. Lacey
Deputy
PALOMA PASEO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
EMILY ELIZABETH COOPER
v.
JOHN PRIEVE
JOHN PRIEVE
14026 E BECKER LN
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JUDGE COMO
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court previously vacated the preliminary injunction hearing set for October 20,
2025, and tentatively reset it for November 19, 2025, at 9:00 am.
Defendant has failed to file an Answer or other responsive pleading. The matter is
pending entry of a default judgment. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED vacating the preliminary injunction hearing on November 19, 2025 at
9:00 a.m.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED affirming the Court’s order entered on October 15, 2025,
referring this matter to Commissioner Richard Albrecht for the default proceedings.
