Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2009-053748: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Sunrise Desert Vistas Property Owners Association Inc.

Case Number

CV2009-053748

County

Maricopa

Caption

Not captured

Filed

8/19/2009

Case Type

Civil

Judge

Martin, Daniel

Location

Northeast

Official Court Record

Official Court Record

Parties

Minute Entries

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/14/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/12/2010
Docket Code 530
Form V530
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Tenoever
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
COURT ADMIN-CIVIL-ARB DESK
E-FILE CASE MANAGEMENT
CASE DESIGNATED FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COURT'S E-FILING PROGRAM
The Superior Court is transitioning civil cases to an electronic filing system. Pursuant to
Administrative Order 2007-140,
IT IS ORDERED that all pleadings in this case be electronically filed.
The electronic filing system is currently available for use and mandatory eFiling is
effective immediately. ALL FILINGS NOT EFILED AFTER THE MANDATORY DATE
WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED BY THE DIVISION UNTIL PROPERLY EFILED. If service
has not yet been completed as to some or all of the Defendants, then it is the Plaintiff's
responsibility to forward this minute entry to later appearing parties.
You may now choose to use the Clerk of Court hosted eFiling system, or one of the
Court's qualified eFiling service providers to electronically file your pleadings. Please visit the
following web site for more information on your options for eFiling.
http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/12/2010
Docket Code 530
Form V530
Page 2
To assist in the transition to eFiling, the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court has
prepared instruction and training concerning the eFiling system. All parties and attorneys of
record in this case are strongly encouraged to study this material before the mandatory eFiling
date. The web site address for training materials is:
https://efiling.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/fdlogin.asp
Additionally, please be sure to review the eFiling Guidelines set forth by Administrative
Order 2007-140 at the following web site address:
https://efiling.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efilingguidelines
Upon the mandatory eFiling date, all attorneys of record shall eFile all pleadings in
accordance with the guidelines set forth in Administrative Order 2007-140. Self-represented
parties or pro per litigants, and other case participants like Mediators, Arbitrators, and Special
Discovery Masters are strongly encouraged to eFile all pleadings. If a self-represented party, or
other case participant chooses to file their pleading in paper, they shall include a notation just
under the case number on the first page of the pleading that the case is an “EFILE CASE”.
The eFiling system can be accessed from any computer that has an Internet connection.
Free internet access terminals are available in the Superior Court Law Library, and other public
locations such as most public libraries.
Where filing fees may incur on an electronic filing, they may be paid by credit card at the
time of filing if the filing party choose to use a qualified eFiling service provider. If the filing
party chooses to use the Clerk of Court's hosted eFiling system, the filing party is to pay at the
time the document is eFiled by calling 602-506-2565 to pay by phone with Visa or Mastercard,
or the fee is to be paid at the File Counter prior to eFiling a document that requires a fee. Please
do not mail checks for filing fees to the Clerk's Office. Bonds cannot be paid with credit card.
Documents will be rejected within two days if statutorily required fees are not paid.
eFiled Orders from the Court will be distributed to attorneys in the same manner each
attorney has elected to receive Minute Entries from the Court. Attorneys may enroll with the
Clerk of the Court to receive their Minute Entries electronically via e-mail. The Minute Entry
Distribution Agreement form may be downloaded at:
http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/forms.asp

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/12/2010
Docket Code 530
Form V530
Page 3
NOTE: COUNSEL SHALL UPLOAD AND E-FILE ALL PROPOSED ORDERS IN
WORD FORMAT TO ALLOW FOR POSSIBLE MODIFICATIONS BY THE COURT.
Motion practice: The movant determines the caption of the filing and all captions on
subsequent related filings shall bear the same designation. For example, the filing of a motion
captioned "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence" shall result in any
subsequent related filings referring to that title in the caption: "Plaintiff's Response to
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence." No response to a motion shall
contain a separate motion, except in the case of a cross-motion bearing the same designation.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/19/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/15/2010
Docket Code 070
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KENNETH L. FIELDS
E. Morgenstern
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
MINUTE ENTRY
Judge KENNETH FIELDS is appointed to conduct a Settlement Conference and to enter
stipulated orders in this matter, pursuant to Rule 16, A.R.C.P.
A Settlement Conference shall be held at Alternative Dispute Resolution, Downtown Justice Center,
620 W. Jackson St., Suite 2049 (2rd Floor), Phoenix, AZ 85003 on March 3, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. All
parties and their counsel (if parties are represented), shall appear in person at the Settlement Conference.
All Settlement Conference participants should expect to attend the Settlement Conference for at least
three hours, and docket their calendars accordingly.
Pursuant to Maricopa County Local Rule 3.11, counsel are to submit mediation/settlement
conference memorandum no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 24, 2010 by e-mail to:
[email protected] or [email protected]. This memorandum SHALL NOT be filed with the
Clerk of Court. Parties shall exchange the memoranda with each other, or with the consent of all parties,
furnish the memoranda sealed to the Settlement Judge.
The Settlement Conference Memorandum shall include the following information:
1.
A general description of the issues in the lawsuit, and each party’s position with respect to each issue;

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/15/2010
Docket Code 070
Form V000A
Page 2
2.
A general description of the evidence each party intends to present, with respect to each issue stated
in item 1;
3.
A summary of all settlement negotiations that have previously occurred;
4.
An assessment by each party of the anticipated result if the matter did proceed to trial; and
5.
Any other information each party believes would be helpful to the settlement process.
All motions to continue the scheduled Settlement Conference shall be brought before the Settlement
Judge with a copy of the motion to be provided to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). If a
continuance is granted, the requesting party shall provide a signed copy of the Order to ADR. Any pre-
trial motions shall be brought before the judge permanently assigned to the case.
Any agreement the parties enter into, which is memorialized by the Settlement Judge shall be
considered a binding agreement, in accordance with Rule 80(d), A.R.C.P.
Failure to comply with this Court Order may result in the imposition of court sanctions,
pursuant to Rule 16(f) A.R.C.P.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/26/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/22/2010
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Tenoever
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
ORDER ENTERED BY COURT
The Court has received and reviewed Defendant’s Request for Rule 16 Status
Conference.
IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall submit a Joint Pretrial Memorandum as set forth
below.
The Court will review the Joint Pretrial Memorandum and proposed Scheduling Order
prescribed herein. The Court may adopt or modify the discovery and disclosure schedule order
and set a scheduling conference for purposes of setting a trial date. If counsel still believe that a
pretrial conference is still necessary at this stage of the litigation, they should address the reasons
for the need for a pretrial conference in the first paragraph of the Joint Pretrial Memorandum.
If the parties fail to file a timely memorandum, sanctions may issue pursuant to Rule
16(f).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/22/2010
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
All counsel are directed to meet personally to discuss all of the matters set forth in Rule
16(b). Counsel shall prepare and file with the Court by 5:00 p.m. on April 9, 2010, a Joint
Pretrial Memorandum, and prepare a proposed order for Discovery and Disclosure deadlines.
The proposed order shall include dates for the following items and conform substantially with
the attached sample order. Once a scheduling order has been approved by the court, the 150-day
minute entry, issued by Civil Court Administration, is no longer in effect.
NOTICE: The proposed order shall be filed in Word format to conform with the court’s e-file
requirements. Any proposed order not conforming with this requirement may be rejected.
1.
An agreed upon schedule and date for completion of non-expert depositions.
As far as can reasonably be anticipated, each party shall set forth the depositions
they anticipate taking and the approximate time required for each; any and all
medical examinations which may be required of any of the parties; the person or
persons to conduct such examinations; all requests for production; and all tangible
evidence to be disclosed or exchanged.
2.
A date for the final disclosure of the identities subject matters and reports of
expert witnesses, and/or to supplement disclosures made to date.
3.
A date or dates for the initial and final disclosure of all non-expert witnesses,
and/or to supplement disclosures made to date.
4.
A date by which all written discovery will be propounded and concluded.
Further, counsel shall set forth any written discovery outstanding and a date when it
will be complete.
5.
The position of each counsel on whether the Rule 38.1 time limits should be
waived.
6.
A proposed date for a Mandatory Settlement Conference pursuant to Rule
16.1. Alternatively, the parties may propose a deadline by which they will
participate in private mediation. Please specify whether the parties are
requesting a referral to the court’s ADR Office or if they will proceed by private
mediation.
7.
A date for completion of all discovery, including expert discovery.
8.
A date by which all dispositive or partially-dispositive motions shall be filed.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/22/2010
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 3
9.
A proposed trial date agreed upon by all counsel and anticipated length of trial.
If the parties agree as to the dates, they need to only prepare and submit the proposed
order attached hereto. If counsel are unable to agree on any of the items set forth in the attached
form of order, the reasons for their inability to agree shall be set forth in the Pretrial
Memorandum and each shall prepare a separate proposed order. All proposed deadlines shall
be set forth as calendar dates, and not in the form “XX days before trial.”
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall notify the Court of any agreed-upon
extension of any time period provided by the Rules of Civil Procedure. The purpose of this order
is not to discourage extensions as a matter of professionalism, but to ensure that no party suffers
summary disposition of any issue by virtue of an extension of which the Court is not aware.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/22/2010
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 4
[Proposed] Scheduling Order
The Court having received the parties’ Joint Comprehensive Pretrial Conference
Memorandum,
IT IS ORDERED entering the following schedule for disclosure as set forth unless the
parties obtain written modifications by the Court:
(1)
Initial disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(2)
The identities and subject areas of expert testimony shall be disclosed by:
(MM/DD/YYYY)
(3)
Plaintiff’s final expert disclosures shall be served by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
Defendant’s final expert disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
Rebuttal expert disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(4)
Final non-expert disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(5)
Written discovery shall be propounded by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(6)
Dispositive motions shall be filed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(7)
Depositions shall be completed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(8)
Discovery shall be completed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(9)
Any motions to amend pleadings shall be filed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(10)
The parties remaining in this action shall participate in comprehensive mediation
by (MM/DD/YYYY). Please specify whether the parties are requesting a
referral to the court’s ADR Office or if they will proceed by private
mediation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a Telephonic Status Conference in this matter on
[counsel to leave this date blank], (time allotted: 15 minutes), in this Division. Counsel for the
Plaintiff shall initiate the phone conference.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/22/2010
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 5
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
NORTHEAST REGIONAL COURT COMPLEX
18380 N. 40th St.
COURTROOM 109
PHOENIX, AZ 85032
602-506-6086 TEL
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in no less than five days prior to the Status Conference
set herein, the parties shall report to the Court the history and status of the efforts at Alternative
Dispute Resolution.
DISCOVERY DISPUTES: In the event of any dispute concerning discovery, counsel
are directed to confer pursuant to ARCP 26(g). If such conference is unsuccessful, counsel are
directed to initiate a conference call with this Division BEFORE filing a motion to compel or
motion for protective order.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/01/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/27/2010
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Tenoever
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
STATUS CONFERENCE SET
2:41 p.m. This is the time set for Emergency Telephonic Hearing Re: Defendant’s
Request for Rule 16 Status Conference. Plaintiffs are represented by counsel, Frederick E.
Davidson. Defendant is represented by counsel, Dennis L. Hall.
A record of the proceedings is being made by CD (FTR) in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held.
IT IS ORDERED vacating the court’s January 22, 2010 minute entry in its entirety.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED declining to rule or to hold an evidentiary hearing on the
issue of the composition of the defendant corporation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED staying any filing deadlines until the next telephonic
conference.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
01/27/2010
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a Telephonic Status Conference on February 5,
2010 at 9:30 a.m. for purposes of discussing the parties’ positions on staying this case. Counsel
for the Plaintiffs is to initiate the phone conference (602) 506-6086.
2:58 p.m. Hearing concludes.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/10/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
02/05/2010
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Tenoever
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
JUDGE LINDA MILES
STATUS CONFERENCE SET
9:36 a.m. This is the time set for Telephonic Status Conference. Plaintiffs are
represented by counsel, Frederick E. Davidson. Defendant is represented by counsel, Dennis L.
Hall.
A record of the proceedings is being made by CD (FTR) in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held.
Counsel inform the court that a related case (CV2010-002012) has been filed in front of
Judge Linda Miles and is set for hearing on February 12, 2010.
IT IS ORDERED continuing the stay of the deadlines until after Judge Linda Miles has
an opportunity to hear what is presented.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a Telephonic Status Conference on February 16,
2010 at 9:20 a.m. (10 minutes allotted) in this division. Counsel for the Plaintiffs is to initiate
the phone conference (602) 506-6086.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
02/05/2010
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
9:47 a.m. Hearing concludes.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/12/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
02/10/2010
Docket Code 002
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Tenoever
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
HEARING VACATED
On the court’s own motion,
IT IS ORDERED vacating the Telephonic Status Conference set for February 16, 2010 at
9:20 a.m. in this division.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED affirming the Telephonic Status Conference set for
February 18, 2010 at 9:15 a.m. in this division.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/23/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
02/18/2010
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Tenoever
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
STATUS CONFERENCE SET
9:18 a.m. This is the time set for Telephonic Status Conference. Plaintiffs are
represented by counsel, Frederick E. Davidson. Defendant is represented by counsel, Dennis L.
Hall.
A record of the proceedings is being made by CD (FTR) in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held.
Counsel inform the court that an evidentiary hearing is set on March 31, 2010 in the
related case before Judge Miles to determine who the actual board is.
IT IS ORDERED staying this case until the time of the next status conference.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a Telephonic Status Conference on April 13,
2010 at 9:00 a.m. (15 minutes allotted) in this division. Counsel for the Plaintiffs is to initiate
the phone conference (602) 506-6086.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
02/18/2010
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
9:20 a.m. Hearing concludes.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/19/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
02/18/2010
Docket Code 025
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KENNETH L. FIELDS
E. Morgenstern
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
MINUTE ENTRY
LOCATION CHANGE ONLY (SUITE NUMBER)
The minute entry dated 1/15/2010 setting the settlement conference for above matter is changed
as follows. The rest and remainder of the minute entry remains the same.
A Settlement Conference shall be held at Alternative Dispute Resolution, Downtown Justice Center,
620 W. Jackson St., Suite 2049 (2nd Floor) Suite 3076, (3rd Floor), Phoenix, AZ 85003 on March 3,
2010 at 9:00 a.m.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/16/2010 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
04/13/2010
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Tenoever
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
STATUS CONFERENCE HELD
9:00 a.m. This is the time set for Telephonic Status Conference. Plaintiffs are
represented by counsel, Frederick E. Davidson. Defendant is represented by counsel, Dennis L.
Hall.
A record of the proceedings is being made by CD (FTR) in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held.
IT IS ORDERED continuing the stay of this matter pending resolution of the outstanding
motions in the related case (CV2010-002012).
9:03 a.m. Hearing concludes.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/24/2009 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
09/18/2009
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Tenoever
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
HEARING HELD
1:32 p.m. This is the time set for Order to Show Cause Return Hearing Re: Plaintiffs’
Application for Temporary Restraining Order. Plaintiffs are represented by counsel, Frederick
E. Davidson. Defendant is represented by counsel, Dennis L. Hall.
A record of the proceedings is being made by CD (FTR) in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held.
Counsel inform the court that they will file a stipulated scheduling order which will
contain a stipulated temporary restraining order no later than October 2, 2009.
The court will review the stipulation and based upon the parties’ proposed schedule set a
hearing on preliminary and permanent injunctive relief combined.
1:37 p.m. Hearing concludes.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/13/2009 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
10/07/2009
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Tenoever
Deputy
GRACE VIOLETTE, et al.
FREDERICK E DAVIDSON
v.
SUNRISE DESERT VISTAS PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
DENNIS L HALL
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
STATUS CONFERENCE SET
Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation Regarding Case Management filed on October 2,
2009,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall participate in a mandatory Settlement
Conference. This case is referred to the Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution Office for the
appointment of a judge pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and/or the
parties will receive a minute entry from ADR appointing the judge pro tempore.
Counsel and
any "pro per" parties will contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the date, time and
location for the settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is requested to conduct a
settlement conference not later than February 11, 2010. The Office of Alternative Dispute
Resolution will not do the scheduling of the settlement conference so please do not contact that
office. If counsel prefer to use a private mediator to conduct the Settlement Conference, a
Stipulation and Order Re: Alternative to ADR must be presented to the Court.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2009-053748
10/07/2009
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a Telephonic Status Conference in this matter on
February 18, 2010 at 9:15 a.m., (time allotted: 15 minutes), in this division. Counsel for the
Plaintiffs shall initiate the conference call (602) 506-6086.
This case is eFiling eligible: http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efiling/default.asp

Documents