Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2013-010310: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Montelena Master Community Association.

Case Number

CV2013-010310

County

Maricopa

Caption

Not captured

Filed

7/25/2013

Case Type

Civil

Judge

Blaney, Scott

Location

Downtown

Official Court Record

Official Court Record

Parties

No parties captured.

Minute Entries

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Filed ***

02/24/2015 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

02/20/2015

Docket Code 042
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JAMES T. BLOMO
G. Verbil

Deputy

MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN

v.

THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This case was on the dismissal calendar for dismissal on January 19, 2015, unless
specified action was taken before a certain date. The date has passed and the action has not been
taken.

IT IS ORDERED dismissing this case without prejudice for lack of prosecution.

/ S / HONORABLE JAMES T. BLOMO

___________________________________________

JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

06/09/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

06/05/2014

Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL J. HERROD
L. Stogsdill

Deputy

MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN

v.

THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE

MINUTE ENTRY

In Chambers.

8:47 a.m. This is the time set for a telephonic Status Conference. Plaintiff is represented
by counsel, John Fyke (appearing in place of Troy B Stratman.) Defendant is represented by
counsel, Mark Bainbridge. The parties appear telephonically.

A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.

Case status is discussed. Counsel requests that the matter be set for trial following the
Court’s ruling on the pending Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED setting a telephonic Status Conference for August 11, 2014 at 8:30
a.m. for the purposes of setting the matter for trial, (time allotted: 15 minutes) with Plaintiff to
initiate call to this Division, telephone number 602-372-4537.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 3 days prior to the Status Conference, the parties
shall submit a written Joint Notice of Statement of the Case indicating the following:

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

06/05/2014

Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2

 The status of the case;
 Compliance with the Court’s deadlines,
 Issue(s) that they have resolved; and
 Any problems or motions to address.

Suggestions to conference call attendees calling from outside the court system:

 Do not use a speaker phone.
 Do not use a cell phone. If possible, use a desk phone.
 Avoid noisy areas.
 Mute phone when not speaking.
 State your name every time you address the Court.

Counsel are advised that the Court is available to discuss, by joint telephone call,
discovery disputes or any other matter that may impact the parties’ ability to resolve this case in
a just, speedy, and inexpensive manner. See Rule 1, Ariz.R.Civ.P.

With respect to discovery disputes, counsel are also advised that, as the Court interprets
Civil Rule 37(a)(2)(c), an exchange of correspondence between counsel is not sufficient to
satisfy the “personal consultation” requirement of the Rule, except in extraordinary
circumstances. At a minimum, counsel must speak to each other by telephone to attempt to
resolve the dispute in good faith before involving the Court.

The proceeding will take place in the Superior Court’s “e-courtroom.” A record of the
proceedings will be made by audio and CD in lieu of a court reporter. Should you want an
unofficial copy of the proceedings, the parties or counsel may request a CD of the proceedings
for a $20.00 charge. If a CD is requested, please obtain a form from the courtroom clerk or from
the Self Service Center to request a daily copy of a court hearing or trial proceeding being
conducted. Pay the applicable fee at the Self Service Center. Attach the receipt showing
payment of the fee and present both the receipt and the form to the bailiff. For copies of
hearings or trial proceedings recorded previously, please call Electronic Records Services
at 602-506-7100. Should an official transcript be required, you may request that the court
prepare it. The party ordering the transcript must pay for it. To request a transcript, call 602-
506-7100 and provide the date of the proceeding, the case number, the case caption, if the
transcript is for an appeal, and your name, address, and telephone number.

With this new technology, a court reporter is likely not required and the parties are
encouraged to experience the court's video recording system before requesting a court

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

06/05/2014

Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 3

reporter. If a court reporter is required, the Court must receive a written request at least 3 court
days before the commencement of the proceeding. Failure to timely request a court reporter will
be deemed consent to proceed without a court reporter.

NOTE: The parties are advised that failure to appear at a hearing may result in sanctions,
including a Default Judgment.

8:55 a.m. Matter concludes.

NOTE: Effective June 27, 2014, this Division’s calendar will be assigned to the Honorable
James T. Blomo (telephone number: 602-372-4537), located in the East Court Building, 101
West Jefferson, Suite 411, Phoenix, Arizona 85003.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

06/10/2015 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

06/05/2015

Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JAMES T. BLOMO
G. Verbil

Deputy

MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN

v.

THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE

MINUTE ENTRY

The Court having received Plaintiff’s Expedited Motion to Reinstate Case filed June 2,
2015,

IT IS ORDERED setting a Telephonic Status Conference on June 8, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.
(time allotted: 15 minutes), in this division before,

Honorable James T. Blomo
East Court Building
101 West Jefferson, Courtroom 411
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2202
Telephone: (602) 372-4537

NOTE: Counsel for the Plaintiff is to initiate the telephonic conference by first
arranging the presence of all other counsel or self-represented parties on the conference call and
by calling this division at the scheduled time.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

06/05/2015

Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2

The proceeding will take place in the Superior Court’s “e-courtroom.” A record of the
proceedings will be made by videotape and CD in lieu of a court reporter. Should you want an
unofficial copy of the proceedings, the parties or counsel may request a videotape or CD of the
proceedings for a $30.00 charge. If a CD or videotape is requested, please obtain a form from
the courtroom clerk or from the Self Service Center to request a daily copy of a court hearing or
trial proceeding being conducted. Pay the applicable fee at the Self Service Center. Attach the
receipt showing payment of the fee and present both the receipt and the form to the bailiff. For
copies of hearings or trial proceedings recorded previously, please call Electronic Records
Services at 602-506-7100. Should an official transcript be required, you may request that the
court prepare it. The party ordering the transcript must pay for it. To request a transcript, call
602-506-7100 and provide the date of the proceeding, the case number, the case caption, if the
transcript is for an appeal, and your name, address, and telephone number.

With this new technology, a court reporter is likely not required and the parties are
encouraged to experience the court's video recording system before requesting a court
reporter. If a court reporter is required, the Court must receive a written request at least three
(3) court days before the commencement of the proceeding. Failure to timely request a court
reporter will be deemed consent to proceed without a court reporter.

PLEASE NOTE: This division requires that all motions, responses, replies and other
Court requested filings in this case must be submitted individually. Counsel shall not combine
any motion with a responsive pleading. All motions are to be filed separately and designated as
such. No pleadings will be accepted if filed in combination with another.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

06/12/2015 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

06/08/2015

Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JAMES T. BLOMO
G. Verbil

Deputy

MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN

v.

THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE

MINUTE ENTRY

Courtroom 411 – East Court Building

9:03 a.m. This is the time set for a Telephonic Status Conference on Plaintiff’s Motion to
Reinstate. Plaintiff is represented by counsel, Troy B. Stratman. Defendant is represented by
counsel, Mark Bainbridge.

A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.

Discussion is held with the Court.

The Court is informed that the parties previously reached a settlement agreement that was
signed by the parties and the matter was dismissed. Plaintiffs believe the terms of the agreement
have not been met and request that the matter be reinstated.

IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate.

9:11 a.m. Matter concludes.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

08/13/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

08/11/2014

Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JAMES T. BLOMO
S. Uppendahl

Deputy

MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN

v.

THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE

MINUTE ENTRY

Courtroom 411 – East Court Building

8:36 a.m. This is the time set for Telephonic Status Conference. Plaintiff is represented
by counsel, Troy B. Stratman. Defendant is represented by counsel, Mark Bainbridge.

A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.

Discussion is held. The Court will schedule oral argument once the parties have fully
briefed their motions for summary judgment.

8:38 a.m. Matter concludes.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

10/03/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

09/29/2014

Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JAMES T. BLOMO
G. Verbil

Deputy

MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN

v.

THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE

ORAL ARGUMENT SET

The Court having received and considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
filed January 6, 2014, Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of Facts in Support of Motion for Summary
Judgment filed January 6, 2014, Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment filed June 12, 2014,
Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Defendant’s
Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed August 15, 2014, Plaintiff’s Supplemental Statement
of Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Defendant’s Cross-
Motion and Controverting Statement of Facts filed August 15, 2014 and Defendant’s Reply in
Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed September 10, 2014,

IT IS ORDERED setting Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on November 14, 2014 at 11:00 a.m.
(time allotted: 30 minutes with the time divided equally between the parties), before:

HONORABLE JAMES T. BLOMO
EAST COURT BUILDING
101 WEST JEFFERSON, COURTROOM 411
PHOENIX, AZ 85003-2202
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (602) 372-4537

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

09/29/2014

Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 2

The proceeding will take place in the Superior Court’s “e-courtroom.” A record of the
proceedings will be made by videotape and CD in lieu of a court reporter. Should you want an
unofficial copy of the proceedings, the parties or counsel may request a videotape or CD of the
proceedings for a $20.00 charge. If a CD or videotape is requested, please obtain a form from
the courtroom clerk or from the Self Service Center to request a daily copy of a court hearing or
trial proceeding being conducted. Pay the applicable fee at the Self Service Center. Attach the
receipt showing payment of the fee and present both the receipt and the form to the bailiff. For
copies of hearings or trial proceedings recorded previously, please call Electronic Records
Services at 602-506-7100. Should an official transcript be required, you may request that the
court prepare it. The party ordering the transcript must pay for it. To request a transcript, call
602-506-7100 and provide the date of the proceeding, the case number, the case caption, if the
transcript is for an appeal, and your name, address, and telephone number.

With this new technology, a court reporter is likely not required and the parties are
encouraged to experience the court's video recording system before requesting a court
reporter. If a court reporter is required, the Court must receive a written request at least 3 court
days before the commencement of the proceeding. Failure to timely request a court reporter will
be deemed consent to proceed without a court reporter.

PLEASE NOTE: This division requires that all motions, responses, replies and other
Court requested filings in this case must be submitted individually. Counsel shall not combine
any motion with a responsive pleading. All motions are to be filed separately and designated as
such. No pleadings will be accepted if filed in combination with another.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/18/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-010310
10/17/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL J. HERROD
L. Stogsdill
Deputy
MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN
v.
THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE
ORDER TO FILE JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Rule 16(b) Conference, electronically filed
on October 16, 2013. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
Counsel and/or the parties are to meet personally to discuss all of the matters set forth in
Rule 16(b), Ariz. R. Civ. P. Counsel and/or the parties shall prepare and file with the Court, no
later than 5:00 p.m. on November 18, 2013, a Joint proposed Scheduling Order, for discovery,
motion and disclosure deadlines.
If the parties agree to the dates, they should prepare a Stipulation and Order in the form
attached hereto, containing the provisions which are applicable to their case. For example,
paragraph one of the Order set forth below need not be included in the parties’ proposed Order if
the parties intend to disclose their experts’ identity and opinions at the same time they disclose
their experts’ areas of testimony. Similarly, if the parties agree to simultaneously disclose the
identity and opinions of their expert witnesses, they need not include in their proposed Order the
language set forth in paragraph 2a. and b., below.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-010310
10/17/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
The proposed Order shall include specific dates (06/05/2013 rather than 45 days from
close of discovery). Do not incorporate a firm trial date in the proposed Order.
The Court will review the proposed Scheduling Order. If all is in order, the Court will set
a status conference close to the discovery cutoff date. At the status conference, if the parties
have completed discovery and are ready for trial, the Court will set firm dates for the final
pretrial management conference and the trial. If the parties are not ready for trial, the matter will
be placed on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal within 60 days.
If counsel feel a pretrial conference is still necessary at this stage of the litigation, they
should address the reasons why in the first paragraph of the proposed Scheduling Order.
If a Joint proposed Scheduling Order is not timely submitted, the Court will place the
matter back on the Inactive Calendar for dismissal.
ALERT: eFiling through AZTurboCourt.gov is mandatory in civil cases for attorney-
filed documents effective May 1, 2011. See Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Orders
2010-117 and 2011-010. The Court may impose sanctions against counsel to ensure compliance
with this requirement after May 1, 2011.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-010310
10/17/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 3
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and adopts and/or
modifies the days as follows:
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose areas of expert testimony by
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013. [or]
a. Plaintiffs shall disclose areas of expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on _________,
2013.
b. Defendants shall disclose areas of expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on _________,
2013.
2. The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose the identity and opinions of
their expert witnesses by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013. [or]
a. Plaintiffs shall disclose the identity and opinions of their expert witnesses by
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
b. Defendants shall disclose the identity and opinions of their expert witnesses by
5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
3. Any and all discovery requests shall be served by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
4. The parties shall disclose all non-expert witnesses by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
[or]
a. Plaintiffs shall disclose areas of non-expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on ________,
2013.
b. Defendants shall disclose areas of non-expert testimony by 5:00 p.m. on
________, 2013.
5. The parties shall mutually and simultaneously disclose their rebuttal expert witnesses
and opinions by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.
6. All discovery shall be concluded by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-010310
10/17/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 4
7. The parties shall have exchanged up-to-date final Rule 26.1 Supplemental Disclosure
Statements by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013. This Order does not replace the parties’
obligation to seasonably disclose on an on-going basis under Rule 26.1 as information
becomes available.
8. Settlement conference (choose one):
The parties shall participate in private mediation by 5:00 p.m. on ________, 2013;
OR
The parties shall participate in a mandatory settlement conference. This case is
referred to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution for the appointment of a judge
pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and/or the parties will
receive a minute entry from ADR appointing the judge pro tempore. Counsel and
any “pro per” parties will contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the date,
time, and location for the settlement conference. The judge pro tempore is requested
to conduct a settlement conference not later than __________. The Office of
Alternative Dispute Resolution will not do the scheduling of the settlement
conference so please do not contact that office. If counsel prefer to use a private
mediator to conduct the settlement conference, a Stipulation and Order re: Alternative
to ADR must be presented to the Court by no later than 5:00 p.m. on (2 months
before SC deadline). All counsel and their clients, or non-lawyer representatives who
have full and complete authority to settle the case, shall personally appear and
participate in good faith in the Settlement Conference. Sanctions may be imposed for
failure to participate.
All counsel and their clients, or non-lawyer representatives who have full and
complete authority to settle the case, shall personally appear and participate in
good faith in the Settlement Conference. Sanctions may be imposed for failure
to participate.
9. No expert witnesses, expert opinions, lay witnesses, or exhibits shall be used at trial
other than those disclosed in a timely manner, except for good cause shown or written
agreement of the parties.
10. All pretrial motions, other than motions in limine, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on
________, 2013.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-010310
10/17/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 5
11. A Telephonic Pretrial Status/Scheduling Conference is set for ______, 2013 at
____a.m./p.m. for the purpose of assigning a trial date if the case has not settled.
Counsel shall have their trial calendars available. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiate
the telephonic conference by first arranging the presence of all other counsel on the
conference call and by calling this division at: (602) 372-0359 promptly at the
scheduled time.
12. Should any discovery disputes arise, counsel, prior to filing discovery motions, shall
meet and confer pursuant to Rule 37, Ariz.R.Civ.P.
13. The dates set forth in this Order are FIRM dates and will not be extended or modified
by this Court absent good cause. Lack of preparation will not ordinarily be
considered good cause.
14. This case is removed from the Inactive Calendar and all requirements of Rule 38.1,
Ariz.R.Civ.P., are waived unless and until otherwise ordered by the Court.
Dated:
HONORABLE MICHAEL J. HERROD
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

11/21/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

11/14/2014

Docket Code 020
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JAMES T. BLOMO
G. Verbil

Deputy

MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN

v.

THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE

MINUTE ENTRY

Courtroom 411 – East Court Building

10:57 a.m. This is the time set for Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment and Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is represented by
counsel, Troy B. Stratman. Defendant is represented by counsel, Mark Bainbridge.

A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.

Counsel present argument to the Court.

IT IS ORDERED the parties shall have until November 21, 2014 to reach a resolution in
this matter.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED taking this matter under advisement if the issues are not
resolved by November 21, 2014.

11:31 a.m. Matter concludes.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/20/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-010310
11/19/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MICHAEL J. HERROD
L. Stogsdill
Deputy
MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN
v.
THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
MINUTE ENTRY
Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Scheduling Order electronically signed by the Court on
November 19, 2013,
IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall participate in a mandatory settlement conference.
This case is referred to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution for the appointment of a judge
pro tempore to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and/or the parties will receive a minute
entry from ADR appointing the judge pro tempore. Counsel and any “pro per” parties will
contact the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the date, time, and location for the settlement
conference. The judge pro tempore is requested to conduct a settlement conference not later than
May 30, 2014. The Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution will not do the scheduling of the
settlement conference so please do not contact that office.
All counsel and their clients, or non-lawyer representatives who have full and
complete authority to settle the case, shall personally appear and participate in good faith
in the Settlement Conference. Sanctions may be imposed for failure to participate.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-010310
11/19/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

12/08/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-010310

12/03/2014

Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JAMES T. BLOMO
G. Verbil

Deputy

MONTELENA MASTER COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
TROY B STRATMAN

v.

THOMAS PETRILLO
MARK BAINBRIDGE

CASE ON DISMISSAL CALENDAR

The Court has received a Notice of Settlement.

IT IS ORDERED setting this matter for dismissal on January 19, 2015. Unless a
stipulated judgment or a stipulation for dismissal, along with a proposed form of order, is
submitted to the court before that date, or the court otherwise extends the deadline for good
cause shown, all remaining claims and parties will be dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating all future hearings.

Documents