Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Holding HOA Boards, Attorneys, and Management Companies Accountable

Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2023-009506

Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2023-009506: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Arden Park Homeowners Association.

Case Number
CV2023-009506
County
Maricopa
Caption
Not captured
Filed
6/23/2023
Case Type
Civil
Judge
Easterday, Jason
Location
Downtown
Official Court Record
Official Court Record

Parties

Party Relationship Attorney
Arden Park Homeowners Association Defendant Marcus Martinez
Christopher J Scoggin Defendant Pro Per
City Of Chandler Plaintiff John Lemaster
Denny Weinberg Hay Company Defendant Pro Per
Estate Of Adolph Weinberg, The Defendant Pro Per
Maricopa County Treasurer Defendant Davina Bressler
Rhona Weinberg Gewelber Defendant Pro Per
Robert Alan Weinberg Defendant Pro Per
William M Poindexter Defendant Pro Per

Minute Entries

01/24/2024 — CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 01/24/2024 HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

01/25/2024 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

01/24/2024

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER
C. Curley

Deputy

CITY OF CHANDLER
JOHN C LEMASTER

v.

DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY, et al.
DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY
ICO ARIZONA CORPORATION
COMMISSION
1300 W WASHINGTON ST
PHOENIX AZ 85007

ESTATE OF ADOLPH WEINBERG, THE
C/O CHRISTOPHER J SCOGGIN
4532 S GOLD ST
CHANDLER AZ 85248
DAVINA DANA BRESSLER
RHONA WEINBERG GEWELBER
C/O CHRISTOPHER J SCOGGIN
4532 S GOLD CT
CHANDLER AZ 85248
MARCUS R MARTINEZ
WILLIAM M POINDEXTER
PO BOX 869
CHANDLER AZ 85224
CHRISTOPHER J SCOGGIN
4532 S GOLD CT
CHANDLER AZ 85248
ROBERT ALAN WEINBERG
C/O CHRISTOPHER J SCOGGIN
4532 S GOLD CT
CHANDLER AZ 85248
COMM. PALMER

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

01/24/2024

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2

DEFAULT HEARING SET

The Court having received and reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Judgment by
Default filed on December 20, 2023,

IT IS ORDERED setting a virtual Default Hearing utilizing Microsoft Teams on
February 29, 2024, at 9:15 a.m. (time allotted: 15 minutes) before:

Honorable Brian J. Palmer
Northeast Regional Court, Courtroom 105
18380 N. 40th Street, Phoenix AZ 85032
Judicial Assistant: Sarah Percival
[email protected]
Phone: 602-372-3131

NOTE: Effective November 27, 2023, all cases assigned to Honorable Cynthia Gialketsis
will be reassigned to Honorable Brian Palmer due to Honorable Cynthia Gialketsis’ retirement.
Honorable Brian Palmer will be located at the Northeast Regional Court, 18380 N. 40th Street,
Suite C, Phoenix AZ 85032

Please join the hearing using via following link:

https://tinyurl.com/jbazmc-nec02

Electronic notifications with the Microsoft Teams link will be sent out via email. To the
extent the Court does not have your preferred email address, please contact this Division at 602-
372-3131 or [email protected] with correct email information.

More information regarding Court Connect can be found at:

https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/court-connect/

NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to the
assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing and must pay the

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

01/24/2024

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 3

authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the proceeding. The
fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties, and if represented by counsel, shall provide
to this Division their documents supportive of the request for default judgment by no later than
5:00 p.m. on February 22, 2024.

02/27/2024 — CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 02/27/2024 HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

02/28/2024 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

02/27/2024

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER
C. Curley

Deputy

CITY OF CHANDLER
JOHN C LEMASTER

v.

DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY, et al.
DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD

ESTATE OF ADOLPH WEINBERG, THE
C/O CHRISTOPHER J SCOGGIN
4532 S GOLD CT
CHANDLER AZ 85248
DAVINA DANA BRESSLER
RHONA WEINBERG GEWELBER
C/O CHRISTOPHER J SCOGGIN
4532 S GOLD CT
CHANDLER AZ 85248
MARCUS R MARTINEZ
WILLIAM M POINDEXTER
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
CHRISTOPHER J SCOGGIN
4532 S GOLD CT
CHANDLER AZ 85248
ROBERT ALAN WEINBERG
PO BOX 869
CHANDLER AZ 85224
COMM. PALMER

MINUTE ENTRY

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

02/27/2024

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2

The Court having received and reviewed the Plaintiff’s Motion to Conduct Default
Hearings as to the Estate of Adolph Weinberg, Robert Alan Weinberg and Rhona Weinberg
Gewelber on February 29, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. filed on February 13, 2024,

IT IS ORDERED granting said Motion.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Default Hearing on February 29, 2024 at 9:15 a.m.
will be consolidated to include all defaulted parties, including Denny Weinberg Hay Company,
The Estate of Adolph Weinberg (William M. Poindexter, administrator), Robert Alan Weinberg,
and Rhona Weinberg Gewelber.

The above is all in accordance with formal written Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to
Conduct Default Hearing as to the Estate of Adolph Weinberg, Robert Alan Weinberg and Rhona
Weinberg Gewelber on February 29, 2024 at 9:15 a.m. signed by the Court on February 22, 2024
and filed (entered) by the Clerk on February 27, 2024.

02/29/2024 — CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 02/29/2024 HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

03/05/2024 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

02/29/2024

Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER
C. Curley

Deputy

CITY OF CHANDLER
JOHN C LEMASTER

v.

DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY, et al.

DAVINA DANA BRESSLER
MARCUS R MARTINEZ
CHRISTOPHER J SCOGGIN
4532 S GOLD CT
CHANDLER AZ 85248
COMM. PALMER

DEFAULT HEARING

Courtroom 105 – Northeast Regional Court

9:15 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual Default Hearing. Plaintiff, City of Chandler, is
represented by counsel, John Lemaster. Defendants, Denny Weinberg Hay Company, The Estate
of Adolph Weinberg, William M. Poindexter, Administrator, Robert Alan Weinberg and Rhona
Weinberg, are neither present nor represented by counsel.

A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.

Counsel for Plaintiff makes avowals to the Court.

Based on the matters presented,

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

02/29/2024

Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 2

THE COURT FINDS that service is proper, and Defendants have failed to appear and
answer or otherwise defend.

THE COURT FURTHER FINDS Plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default.

IT IS ORDERED entering judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, Denny
Weinberg Hay Company, The Estate of Adolph Weinberg, William M. Poindexter, Administrator,
Robert Alan Weinberg and Rhona Weinberg, all in accordance with the formal written Default
Judgment signed by the Court on February 29, 2024 and filed (entered) by the clerk on February
29, 2024.

Please note: The court has signed a paper copy of the order. After the order has been
scanned and docketed by the Clerk of the Court, copies of this order will be available through the
ECR online at www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or the Public Access Terminals at the Clerk of
Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County. Information on obtaining a certified copy of
a court document can be found at: www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/records/obtaining-records.

Please further note: As of October 31, 2023, this Court will not be accepting copies for
conforming and stamped envelopes for mailing.

9:21 p.m. Matter concludes.

05/15/2024 — CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 05/15/2024 HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

05/16/2024 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

05/15/2024

Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER
P. Kavanagh

Deputy

CITY OF CHANDLER
JOHN C LEMASTER

v.

DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY, et al.

DAVINA DANA BRESSLER
MARCUS R MARTINEZ
COMM. PALMER

MINUTE ENTRY

IT IS ORDERED approving and settling the formal written Final Order of Condemnation
signed by the Court on May 15, 2024 and filed (entered) by the Clerk on May 15, 2024.

Please note: The Court has signed a paper copy of the order. After the order has been
scanned and docketed by the Clerk of the Court, copies of this order will be available through the
ECR online at www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through the Public Access Terminals at the
Clerk of Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County. Information on obtaining a certified
copy of a court document can be found at: www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/records/obtaining-
records.

07/21/2023 — CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 07/21/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

07/24/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

07/21/2023

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD
E. Wong/C. Hall

Deputy

CITY OF CHANDLER
JOHN C LEMASTER

v.

DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY, et al.
DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD

ESTATE OF ADOLPH WEINBERG, THE
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
DAVINA DANA BRESSLER
RHONA WEINBERG GEWELBER
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
WILLIAM M POINDEXTER
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
ROBERT ALAN WEINBERG
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
MARCUS R MARTINEZ
JUDGE BLANCHARD
CHRIS SCOGGIN
4532 S GOLD COURT
CHANDLER ARIZONA 85248

STATUS CONFERENCE AND EVIDENTIARY HEARING SET

Courtroom 201- Old Courthouse

10:04 a.m. This is the time set for a virtual Order to Show Cause Return Hearing regarding
Plaintiff’s Complaint and Application for Immediate Possession, filed on June 23, 2023. Plaintiff,
City of Chandler, is represented by counsel, Colin C. Quinn on behalf of counsel, John C.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

07/21/2023

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2

Lemaster. Defendant, Arden Park Homeowners Association, is represented by counsel, Marcus
Martinez. Chris Scoggin is present on behalf of the Estate of Adolph Weinberg.

A record of the proceeding is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.

Discussion is held.

IT IS ORDERED setting a Status Conference regarding any settlement, discovery
disputes, and/or affirm the Preliminary Injunction Hearing set forth below on September 8, 2023
at 9:15 a.m.

This is a 15 minute proceeding. The court will determine if more time is needed. If there
is a failure to appear, the court may make such orders as are just, including granting the relief
requested by the party who does appear.

Counsel and self-represented parties should appear promptly 5 minutes prior to the
scheduled time.

The parties shall appear virtually via Court Connect using Microsoft Teams Meeting.
Video appearance (i.e., live use of the camera) is strongly preferred.

Join Microsoft Teams Meeting
tinyurl.com/jbazmc-cvj06

To call into the meeting using your phone:
+1 917-781-4590 United States, New York City (Toll)
Conference ID: 942 024 389#

NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to the
assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing, and must pay the
authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the proceeding. The
fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.

Superior Court proceedings are preserved using digital audio/video recording. To order a
copy
of
the
digital
recording
please
email
Electronic
Records
Services
at:
[email protected] or call 602-506-7100. To obtain a copy of a hearing on the day
it is conducted, you must first fill out a “Request for Daily Copy” form and pay the fee at the
Court’s Law Library Resource Center. Forms are available at the Law Library Resource Center.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

07/21/2023

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 3

To order transcripts of digitally recorded court proceedings call Electronic Records Services (602-
506-7100) for instructions.

IT IS ORDERED setting a Preliminary Injunction Hearing regarding Plaintiff’s Complain
and Application for Immediate Possession along with the merits, on October 13, 2023 at 10:00
a.m. (allotted time: two hours) in this Division:

THE HONORABLE JOHN BLANCHARD
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
OLD COURT HOUSE
125 W. WASHINGTON STREET
SUITE 201
PHOENIX, AZ 85003
PHONE: (602) 506-3005

This is a 2 hour proceeding. The Court will determine if more time is needed. If there is
a failure to appear, the Court may make such orders as are just, including granting the relief
requested by the party who does appear.

Counsel and self-represented parties should appear promptly 5 minutes prior to the
scheduled time.

THE COURT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VACATE OR RESET THE HEARING
IF THE PARTIES FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THIS
ORDER.

Exhibits should be delivered to this division by no later than September 29, 2023. The
parties should deliver an original set to the clerk for marking (See Section E Infra) and a
bench copy of ALL Exhibits including the Exhibits identified in the Parties’ Notice of
Stipulations and Objections. The bench copy should be provided in a binder with numbered
tabs separating each exhibit.

Based on the setting of the Evidentiary Hearing, the Court sets the following deadlines and
makes the following orders. The dates set forth in this order are firm dates and will not be extended
or modified by this court absent good cause. Lack of preparation will not ordinarily be considered
good cause.

Requests for court interpreters, court reporters or for witnesses to appear virtually
must be made at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the trial/hearing date.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

07/21/2023

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 4

Time will be divided between Plaintiff and Defendant.

JOINT STATEMENT

A Joint Statement must be filed no later than September 29, 2023. The parties shall
include the following:

A. A jointly-completed time and witness estimate list. (A sample form is incorporated in
this order). The Court will use the list to predict the length of the hearing. Any time
limitation set will be reasonable presumptive limits subject to modification upon a
showing of good cause.

B. A list of all deposition or other transcribed testimony that may be offered at the hearing.
The proposed testimony is to be identified by reference to page and line numbers.
Objections, if any, to such testimony, and the reasons for such objections, are also to be
set forth.

C. A list of all exhibits that may be offered at the hearing. Objections, if any, to each exhibit
and the reasons therefore shall also be set forth. Any rulings will be stated on the record.
All objections to known exhibits and witnesses must be made before the hearing.

Exhibits: The following procedure applies as to all exhibits sought to be utilized:

1. If you have any questions regarding the guidelines set forth below or
procedures relating to exhibits, contact this division’s Courtroom Clerk at
(602) 506-7988.

2. Organization: Exhibits should be submitted to the Courtroom Clerk
separated by a colored sheet that includes the exhibit number. Each multiple
page exhibit MUST be securely stapled (preferred method), binder clipped
(only if staple does not hold), or secured with a paper file fastener. Binders
are acceptable only if none of the above can securely hold the Exhibit. DO
NOT use paper clips or submit loose sheets of paper (the only loose item
should be the colored sheet, do not staple or paper clip the colored sheet to
the exhibit itself). Exhibits not securely bound using the above-noted
methods will not be accepted.

The list of exhibits should contain the case number and caption, the
scheduled hearing date, the party submitting the exhibits, the exhibit
number, and a simple description of the exhibit. Keep the descriptions of

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

07/21/2023

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 5

the exhibits simple. Do not use a description that cannot be verified by
looking at the document or item. Do not include Bates numbers in your
description of the exhibits.

Exhibit
No.
Identified By
Description
Should be verifiable when viewing the first page
of the exhibit

Exhibits shall be marked numerically and consecutively beginning with
Plaintiff’s exhibits and continuing sequentially with Defendant’s exhibits
(e.g. Plaintiff’s exhibits 1, 2, 3, Defendant’s exhibits 4, 5, 6). Do not skip
numbers. Numbers will not be skipped or saved in anticipation of
additional exhibits not yet submitted. The parties should not reserve exhibit
numbers for exhibits to be provided at a later date. Any missing or skipped
exhibits shall be designated as “Unused.” Additional exhibits, if necessary,
may be marked during the course of the hearing, although the parties are
discouraged from waiting until the hearing to mark additional exhibits.

Counsel shall eliminate duplication of exhibits; duplicate exhibits will not
be marked. If duplicate exhibits exist and they are removed by the
Courtroom Clerk and not marked, the Court’s numbering will not be
consistent with the numbering counsel provided. Counsel shall, therefore,
confer regarding exhibits to ensure that there are no duplicates.

3. Use of Depositions: Depositions should not be listed on the exhibit
description list because depositions are not marked as exhibits. Original
depositions shall be provided to the Courtroom Clerk at the time of the
hearing for filing directly into the court record. Counsel shall retain a copy
of the depositions for their use during the hearing. The original depositions
remain with the Courtroom Clerk to be used as reference by the hearing
judge during testimony.

4. Demonstrative Evidence: Poster boards and large items may only be used
for demonstrative purposes. Counsel shall advise opposing/other counsel of
any demonstrative poster boards or other items at least three (3) judicial
days prior to the hearing. Counsel may bring poster boards and large items
to court to use during the hearing. However, if counsel intends any poster
boards or large items marked as an exhibit, they must provide the

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

07/21/2023

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 6

Courtroom Clerk with an 8-1/2 x 11 photograph/copy of the item and
include the photograph/copy in the submitted list of exhibits.

5. Use of Exhibits or Electronic Media During Opening Statement: If
either party intends to show an exhibit or electronic media presentation
during opening statements, that party shall inform the other party by 9:00
a.m. on the business day prior to the first day of the hearing. If an electronic
medial presentation is planned, it shall be shown to opposing counsel prior
to the beginning of the hearing selection.

6. Failure to Comply: If a party fails to comply with the terms set forth about,
it may result in that party’s exhibit(s) being precluded at the hearing.

7. Disclosure Objections: If an objection is made at the hearing relating to
untimely or non-disclosure, the burden is on the proponent of the evidence
to establish that disclosure was properly made. The parties are strongly
encouraged to create their own log for each hearing exhibit as to the date
and manner of disclosure.

8. Stipulations and Objections: The Parties shall jointly file a list of Exhibits
identifying the stipulated and objected to exhibits in the following format:

a. Stipulated Exhibits;
b. Plaintiff’s Proposed Exhibits with Defendant’s written objections, if
any, following each proposed exhibit; and
c. Defendant’s Proposed Exhibits with Plaintiff’s written objections, if
any, following each proposed Exhibit.

NOTICE: EXHIBITS MARKED BUT NOT OFFERED

All exhibits (electronic or paper) not offered/received into evidence the day of the hearing
will be disposed of by the courtroom clerk, unless a party requests that the evidence be returned
prior to the conclusion of the hearing.

USE OF COURTROOM EQUIPMENT

All parties are expected to be familiar with the workings of the courtroom’s electronic
equipment. If there is a need to becoming familiar with this division’s electronic equipment, please
make an appointment to test the equipment by no later than one week prior to the scheduled
proceeding via email through the Division at: [email protected].

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

07/21/2023

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 7

COMMUNICATION WITH THE DIVISION

Preferred communication with this division is via email to the Division at:
[email protected].

For any and all such written communication, all other parties to the case shall be endorsed.

TIME ESTIMATES

CAUSE NUMBER_______________________________________
CASE CAPTION________________________________________
PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL__________________________________
DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL________________________________
(NOTE: Add additional lines as needed for additional parties and or witnesses.)

Opening Statement and Closing Argument

PLAINTIFF'S OPENING STATEMENT

DEFENDANT'S OPENING STATEMENT

PLAINTIFF'S REBUTTAL

Closing arguments will be submitted in the form of findings of facts and conclusions of
law on a date to be set at the close of evidence. Briefing are to be submitted simultaneously.
Courtesy copies should be emailed to this division’s staff in Word format; on paper with no in-
marks; no lines; and no formatting.

ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk’s
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be e-filed through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

In accordance with Rule 2.21 of the Local Rules of Practice for Maricopa County Superior
Court, a self-represented party shall inform the Court of his or her current address, telephone
number, and email address (if any). The self-represented party has a continuing duty to advise the
Court of any change in address, telephone number, or e-mail address (if any) and shall notify the
Court within ten (10) days of such changes. A change of address form may be downloaded through
the Clerk of Court’s website.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

07/21/2023

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 8

WITNESS INFORMATION FORM

WITNESSES FOR PLAINTIFF:

WITNESS NAME
DIRECT
CROSS
REDIRECT
1

2

3

4

5

PLAINTIFF’S TOTAL WITNESS TIME ESTIMATE: ___________________________

WITNESSES FOR DEFENDANT:

WITNESS NAME
DIRECT
CROSS
REDIRECT
1

2

3

4

5

DEFENDANT’S TOTAL WITNESS TIME ESTIMATE: _________________________

TIME ESTIMATE FOR:
PLAINTIFF(S)
DEFENDANT(S)
VOIR DIRE

OPENING STATEMENTS

PLAINTIFF’S TOTAL TIME ESTIMATE: ________________________

DEFENDANT’S TOTAL TIME ESTIMATE: _______________________

NOTE: if there are multiple parties on the same side who are represented by different
attorneys, then each party being represented by different attorneys shall fill out his/her own time
estimates.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

07/21/2023

Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 9

NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded digitally and not by a court reporter. Pursuant
to Local Rule 2.22, if a party desires a court reporter for any proceeding in which a court reporter
is not mandated by Arizona Supreme Court Rule 30, the party must submit a written request to the
assigned judicial officer at least ten (10) judicial days in advance of the hearing, and must pay the
authorized fee to the Clerk of the Court at least two (2) judicial days before the proceeding. The
fee is $140 for a half-day and $280 for a full day.

Superior Court proceedings are preserved using digital audio/video recording. To order a
copy
of
the
digital
recording
please
email
Electronic
Records
Services
at:
[email protected] or call 602-506-7100. To obtain a copy of a hearing on the day
it is conducted, you must first fill out a “Request for Daily Copy” form and pay the fee at the
Court’s Law Library Resource Center. Forms are available at the Law Library Resource Center.
To order transcripts of digitally recorded court proceedings call Electronic Records Services (602-
506-7100) for instructions.

10:16 a.m. Matter concludes.

09/08/2023 — CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 09/08/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

09/11/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

09/08/2023

Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD
Y. Rodriguez

Deputy

CITY OF CHANDLER
JOHN C LEMASTER
COLIN C QUINN

v.

DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY, et al.

DAVINA DANA BRESSLER
MARCUS R MARTINEZ
JUDGE BLANCHARD

MINUTE ENTRY

Old Court House – 201

9:12 a.m. This is the time set for Status Conference. Plaintiff, City of Chandler is
represented by counsel, Colin Quinn. Defendant, Arden Park Homeowners Association is
represented by counsel, Marcus Martinez. All parties are present telephonically/virtually.

A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.

Discussion is held regarding the status of the case.

Based on the matters presented,

IT IS ORDERED affirming the evidentiary hearing currently set for October 13, 2023,
10:00 a.m.

9:17 a.m. Matter concludes.

09/25/2023 — CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 09/25/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

09/26/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

09/25/2023

Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD
T. DeRaddo

Deputy

CITY OF CHANDLER
JOHN C LEMASTER

v.

DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY, et al.
DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD

DAVINA DANA BRESSLER
RHONA WEINBERG GEWELBER
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
MARCUS R MARTINEZ
WILLIAM M POINDEXTER
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
ROBERT ALAN WEINBERG
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
JUDGE BLANCHARD

MINUTE ENTRY

The Court has received and considered the parties’ Stipulation for Leave to Amend the
Complaint, filed September 15, 2023. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED granting/approving the parties’ Stipulation for Leave to Amend the
Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is due by not later than
October 5, 2023.

10/13/2023 — CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 10/13/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

10/16/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

10/13/2023

Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD
T. Aird

Deputy

CITY OF CHANDLER
JOHN C LEMASTER

v.

DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY, et al.
DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD

ESTATE OF ADOLPH WEINBERG, THE
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
DAVINA DANA BRESSLER
RHONA WEINBERG GEWELBER
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
MARCUS R MARTINEZ
WILLIAM M POINDEXTER
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
CHRISTOPHER J SCOGGIN
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
ROBERT ALAN WEINBERG
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
COLIN C QUINN
JUDGE BLANCHARD

MINUTE ENTRY – HEARING
COURT SIGNS ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR IMMEDIATE POSSESSION

Please see the LATER on Page 3 of this Minute Entry.

Prior to commencement of today’s proceeding, Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1-6 were each already
marked for identification.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

10/13/2023

Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 2

Courtroom 201 – Old Courthouse

10:01 a.m. This is the time set for an Evidentiary Hearing conducted as a hybrid
proceeding regarding the First Amended Complaint and Application for Immediate Possession –
Tier 2 filed by counsel for Plaintiff on September 26, 2023, as to the above-numbered case.
Plaintiff, City Of Chandler, is represented by counsel, Colin C. Quinn, who appears inside
Courtroom 201 for John Lemaster. Defendant, Arden Park Homeowners Association, is
represented by counsel, Marcus R. Martinez, who appears via videoconference. Appraiser,
Dennis L. Lopez, MAI, SRA, is present inside Courtroom 201 as Plaintiff’s potential Witness.

A record of the proceedings is made digitally in lieu of a court reporter.

Discussion is held regarding the status of the case.

LET THE RECORD REFLECT the avowal of counsel present today that the
appearance of counsel for the Maricopa County Treasurer has already been waived as to today’s
proceeding.

Counsel, Colin C. Quinn, presents statements to the Court.

Counsel, Marcus R. Martinez, addresses the Court.

Discussion is held.

On the oral motion/offering of Plaintiff’s counsel, there being no objection by counsel for
Arden Park Homeowners Association, Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1-6 are all received in evidence
simultaneously.

Further discussion is held.

LET THE RECORD REFLECT that counsel for Arden Park Homeowners Association
states no objection to the form of Order discussed on the record being lodged by counsel for City
Of Chandler.

Based on the foregoing,

IT IS ORDERED directing counsel for the City Of Chandler to provide to this Division
the form of Order discussed on the record, for the Court’s review and signature.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

10/13/2023

Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 3

10:16 a.m. Matter concludes.

LATER

LET THE RECORD REFLECT that counsel for City Of Chandler has indeed provided
the form of Order discussed earlier on the record.

IT IS ORDERED settling and approving the formal written Order Granting Plaintiff’s
Application for Immediate Possession – Tier 2, which is signed (issued) by this Court on October
13, 2023, and filed (entered) by the Clerk same morning.

11/14/2023 — CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 11/14/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

11/16/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

11/14/2023

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD
Y. Rodriguez

Deputy

CITY OF CHANDLER
JOHN C LEMASTER

v.

DENNY WEINBERG HAY COMPANY, et al.

DAVINA DANA BRESSLER
MARCUS R MARTINEZ
COMM. GIALKETSIS
JUDGE BLANCHARD

MINUTE ENTRY

This division has received Plaintiff’s e-filed Application for Entry of Default (filed
November 9, 2023), against Defendant, Denny Weinberg Hay Company, in the above-
captioned case.

IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above referenced
document(s).

The parties are advised that Commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Gialketsis.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be e-filed.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2023-009506

11/14/2023

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2

Pursuant to the Maricopa County e-Filing Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, and
Application for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate and Statement of Costs, but shall submit a
default judgment packet required by the Court, including the documents identified on the default
judgment packet coversheet in paper to the assigned Commissioner’s division. A Commissioner
will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the default judgment packet with
all the required documents has been received by the division in paper form.

The parties/counsel can also find additional information regarding the default judgment
process at: https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/.

Documents

Type Title Content Type Size Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 01/24/2024 HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER View Minute Entry application/pdf 130.1 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 02/27/2024 HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER View Minute Entry application/pdf 120.7 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 02/29/2024 HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER View Minute Entry application/pdf 122.8 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 05/15/2024 HONORABLE BRIAN J. PALMER View Minute Entry application/pdf 117.0 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 07/21/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry application/pdf 512.4 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 09/08/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry application/pdf 116.3 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 09/25/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry application/pdf 115.2 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 10/13/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry application/pdf 296.8 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2023009506 CHANDLER, CITY OF 11/14/2023 HONORABLE JOHN L. BLANCHARD View Minute Entry application/pdf 121.6 KB Document Source

Auto-compiled from public court records — pending verification

Review the official court record for the current docket.

To request a correction or removal, contact the site administrator.