02/12/2015 — CV2014093701 ACKLIN, KRISTINA L BOYNTON 02/12/2015 HON. MARK F. ACETO View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
02/17/2015 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-093701
02/12/2015
Docket Code 042
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. MARK F. ACETO
M. Scott
Deputy
BRIDGEVIEW AT HAYDEN FERRY
LAKESIDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
JEFFREY B CORBEN
v.
KRISTINA L BOYNTON ACKLIN, et al.
KRISTINA L BOYNTON ACKLIN
KAGAY, ALBERT, DIEHL & GROEBER
6877 N. HIGH ST., STE 300
WORTHINGTON OH 43085
JOHN P ACKLIN
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal Involving Kristina
L. Boynton Acklin and John Doe Acklin Personally electronically filed February 11, 2015 in this
case.
IT IS ORDERED dismissing without prejudice any remaining unadjudicated claims
involving Kristina L. Boynton Acklin and John Doe Acklin.
DATED this 12th day of February, 2015.
/ s / HON. MARK F. ACETO
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
04/07/2015 — CV2014093701 ACKLIN, KRISTINA L BOYNTON 04/07/2015 HON. MARK F. ACETO View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/08/2015 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-093701
04/07/2015
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. MARK F. ACETO
M. Scott
Deputy
BRIDGEVIEW AT HAYDEN FERRY
LAKESIDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
JEFFREY B CORBEN
v.
KRISTINA L BOYNTON ACKLIN, et al.
KRISTINA L BOYNTON ACKLIN
765 TIM TAM AVENUE
COLUMBUS OH 43230
JOHN P ACKLIN
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
COMM. BENNY
MINUTE ENTRY
This division has received Plaintiff’s e-filed Application for Entry of Default
electronically filed April 3, 2015 against Defendant(s) Kristina L. Boynton Acklin as Trustee
of the JWG Ohio Trust, Under Agreement Dated December 1, 2010 in the above-captioned
case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that Commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner
Margaret Benny.
IT IS ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a default
judgment must be e-filed.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-093701
04/07/2015
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
Pursuant to Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 2010-117, default judgment
packets are not permitted to be e-filed. Accordingly, parties are directed to hand-deliver a
default coversheet and copies of the necessary filed documents to the Commissioner’s division
for the entry of a default judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, no further action will be taken by the assigned
Commissioner until the necessary filed documents and coversheet are delivered to the division.
The parties/counsel can find the default judgment coversheet on the Court’s website at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/forms.asp
The parties/counsel can find additional information in the form of frequently asked
questions at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/howDol.asp
08/14/2014 — CV2014093701 ACKLIN, KRISTINA L BOYNTON 08/14/2014 HON. MARK F. ACETO View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
08/15/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2014-093701
08/14/2014
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. MARK F. ACETO
M. Scott
Deputy
BRIDGEVIEW AT HAYDEN FERRY
LAKESIDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
JEFFREY B CORBEN
v.
KRISTINA L BOYNTON ACKLIN
KRISTINA L BOYNTON ACKLIN
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
EXTENSION OF SERVICE DEADLINE
Pursuant to Plaintiff’s Rule 6(b) and 4(i) Motion for Extension of Service Deadline
electronically filed on August 13, 2014 in this case,
IT IS ORDERED extending the deadline for service to January 16, 2015. Unless
service is accomplished and proof of service is filed before that date, all claims against unserved
Defendants will be dismissed without further notice.
THE COURT NOTES THAT IT IS QUITE UNLIKELY THAT ANY REQUEST FOR
FURTHER EXTENSION OF THE SERVICE DEADLINE WILL BE GRANTED.
/ s / HON. MARK F. ACETO
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT