Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Holding HOA Boards, Attorneys, and Management Companies Accountable

Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2020-005170

Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2020-005170: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for 10000 North Central Homeowners Association.

Case Number
CV2020-005170
County
Maricopa
Caption
Not captured
Filed
4/28/2020
Case Type
Civil
Judge
Blaney, Scott
Location
Downtown
Official Court Record
Official Court Record

Parties

No parties captured.

Minute Entries

03/23/2021 — CV2020005170 CENTRAL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 10000 NORTH 03/23/2021 HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

03/24/2021 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2020-005170

03/23/2021

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY
P. McKinley

Deputy

10000 NORTH CENTRAL HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
NATHAN TENNYSON

v.

RON PICK, et al.
RON PICK
40 W FOOTHILL DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021

SUSAN ABBASS
40 W FOOTHILL DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
JUDGE MAHONEY

ORDER ENTERED BY COURT

The Court has received Plaintiff’s Partial Joint Report & Request For Rule 7.4(d)
Sanctions, filed 2/25/21.

This Court requires that all motions, responses, replies and other Court filings must be
submitted individually and in Word document format. Counsel shall not combine any motion with
a responsive pleading. All motions are to be filed separately and designated as such. No filings
will be accepted if filed in combination with another.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED rejecting Plaintiff’s Request For Rule 7.4(d) Sanctions,
filed 2/25/21, as part of Plaintiff’s Partial Joint Report. The Court will process the Partial Joint
Report.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2020-005170

03/23/2021

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff may file a separate Request/Motion For Rule
7.4(d) Sanctions no later than 10 days from the filing date of this Minute Entry.

In the Partial Joint Report, Plaintiff requests a Rule 16(d) scheduling conference with no
explanation for why a scheduling conference is being sought. Therefore, THE COURT FINDS
no cause shown to hold a scheduling conference.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED denying the Request for a Rule 16(d) Scheduling Conference.

* * * *

PLEASE NOTE: This Division requires that all motions, responses, replies and other
Court filings in this case must be submitted individually. Counsel shall not combine any motion
with a responsive pleading. All motions are to be filed separately and designated as such. No filing
will be accepted if filed in combination with another. Additionally, all filings shall be fully
self-contained and shall not “incorporate by reference” other separate filings for review and
consideration as part of the pending filing.

ALERT: Due to the spread of COVID-19, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative
Order 2020-79 requires all individuals entering a Court facility to wear a mask or face covering at
all times while they are in the Court facility. With limited exceptions, the Court will not provide
masks or face coverings. Therefore, any individual attempting to enter the Court facility must have
an appropriate mask or face covering to be allowed entry to the Court facility. Any person who
refuses to wear a mask or face covering as directed will be denied entrance to the Court facility or
asked to leave. In addition, all individuals entering a Court facility will be subject to a health
screening protocol. Any person who does not pass the health screening protocol will be denied
entrance to the Court facility.

03/29/2021 — CV2020005170 CENTRAL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 10000 NORTH 03/29/2021 HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

03/30/2021 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2020-005170

03/29/2021

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY
P. McKinley

Deputy

10000 NORTH CENTRAL HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
NATHAN TENNYSON

v.

RON PICK, et al.
RON PICK
40 W FOOTHILL DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021

SUSAN ABBASS
40 W FOOTHILL DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
JUDGE MAHONEY

ORDER ENTERED BY COURT

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Partial Joint Report, filed 2/25/21. By “Partial,” Plaintiff
means that it is not a Joint Report from the parties but is instead a unilateral Report from only
Plaintiff as Plaintiff advises that Defendants were uncooperative in filing a Joint Report as required
by Rule 16(c). See Partial Report, page 1, first paragraph. Plaintiff in fact seeks sanctions against
Defendants for their reported refusal to cooperate as required under Rule 16(c). Defendants are
cautioned to comply with the Rules of Civil Procedure to avoid unfavorable consequences.

IT IS ORDERED rejecting Plaintiff’s Partial Joint Report, filed 2/25/21, as non-compliant
with the requirement in Rule 16(c)(3)(J) that the proposed Scheduling Order “must specify” a
deadline for “filing dispositive motions” “by calendar date, month, and year.” The proposed Order
is altogether silent as to dispositive motions.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2020-005170

03/29/2021

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2

The Court further notes that in ¶ 5, Plaintiff states “The Parties shall participate in a
settlement conference conducted by a judge pro tempore not later than April 26, 2021.” Counsel
may not be aware that a referral to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution office for the
assignment of a Judge Pro Tempore to conduct a settlement conference requires a minimum of 90
days between the date of the referral and the deadline to hold the settlement conference.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendants shall immediately contact Plaintiff’s counsel
to contribute to, and compete, the to-be-filed Revised Joint Report, failing which the Court will
entertain and act on the filing received, even if it is unilateral.

* * * *

PLEASE NOTE: This Division requires that all motions, responses, replies and other
Court filings in this case must be submitted individually. Counsel shall not combine any motion
with a responsive pleading. All motions are to be filed separately and designated as such. No filing
will be accepted if filed in combination with another. Additionally, all filings shall be fully
self-contained and shall not “incorporate by reference” other separate filings for review and
consideration as part of the pending filing.

ALERT: Due to the spread of COVID-19, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative
Order 2020-79 requires all individuals entering a Court facility to wear a mask or face covering at
all times while they are in the Court facility. With limited exceptions, the Court will not provide
masks or face coverings. Therefore, any individual attempting to enter the Court facility must have
an appropriate mask or face covering to be allowed entry to the Court facility. Any person who
refuses to wear a mask or face covering as directed will be denied entrance to the Court facility or
asked to leave. In addition, all individuals entering a Court facility will be subject to a health
screening protocol. Any person who does not pass the health screening protocol will be denied
entrance to the Court facility.

ATTENTION SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS: Unless an attorney files a notice
that he or she represents a party, the person(s) not represented by an attorney will act as his or her
own attorney. The law requires the Court to hold all persons representing themselves to the
same standard as a licensed attorney. Kelly v. NationsBanc Mortgage Corp., 199 Ariz. 284,
287 (App. 2001); Homecraft Corp. v. Fimbres, 119 Ariz. 299, 301 (App. 1978). Self-represented
litigants are encouraged to review and become familiar with the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure,
paying particular attention to Rule 26. Please note that only a licensed attorney may represent
a corporation, LLC, or similar business entity in the Superior Court. Ramada Inns v. Lane &
Bird Advertising, 102 Ariz. 127, 426 P.2d 395 (1967).

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2020-005170

03/29/2021

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 3

Before the Judge can consider anything you send her, you must show her that you have
given a copy of your request:

1. To the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk of the Court is a separately elected official. It is
the Clerk’s job to keep an independent record of everything that happens at the Court.
The Court cannot act on a document that has not been made a part of that record; and

2. To every other party involved in the case. This allows all parties a fair chance to tell the
Judge what they think before the Judge makes a decision.

Because of that, if you want the Judge to consider something you send her, you must file
the original document with the Clerk of the Superior Court, mail or deliver a copy directly to this
Division (that is, to the Judge, using her specific courtroom address), and mail or deliver a copy to
all opposing parties. In addition, on each document, you must include a signed certificate that says
whether you mailed or hand-delivered each copy, when you did so, and states the specific people
and the specific addresses to which you mailed or hand-delivered each copy. If a party is
represented by a lawyer, you must send or deliver the copy to the lawyer, not to the party. All
proposed Orders submitted to this Division in hard copy form must include copies of the Order
with self-addressed, stamped envelopes for all parties/counsel.

Do not mail or send papers for the Clerk or other parties to the Judge.

Information on filing documents with the Clerk of the Court can be found at:
https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/services/filings/filing-counters

Information on eFiling documents with the Clerk of Court can be found at:

https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/records/filings

Additionally, information regarding eFiling in civil cases can be found at:

https://www.azcourts.gov/efilinginformation

If you are not represented by a lawyer, you must keep the Court updated regarding your
current address and telephone number. If your address or phone number changes at any time, you
must file a notice of change of address/phone number with the Clerk of Court. That form (general
form – GN91f – Update Information on Address and/or Name with the Court) can be downloaded
at no charge from the following website:

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/LawLibraryResourceCenter/

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2020-005170

03/29/2021

Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 4

Alternatively, you may purchase printed forms at any of the following Superior Court
Law Library Resource Center locations (Monday-Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.):

Downtown Phoenix Facility

Southeast Facility
East Court Building

222 E. Javelina Ave.
101 W. Jefferson St.

Mesa, AZ 85210-6201
Phoenix, AZ 85003-2243

Northeast Court Facility

Northwest Regional Center
18380 N. 40th Street

14264 W. Tierra Buena Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85032

Surprise, AZ 85374

06/10/2021 — CV2020005170 CENTRAL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 10000 NORTH 06/10/2021 HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY View Minute Entry ↑ top

Source
Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

06/11/2021 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2020-005170

06/10/2021

Docket Code 042
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY
P. McKinley

Deputy

10000 NORTH CENTRAL HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
NATHAN TENNYSON

v.

RON PICK, et al.
RON PICK
40 W FOOTHILL DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021

SUSAN ABBASS
40 W FOOTHILL DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
JUDGE MAHONEY

CASE DISMISSED

On 3/30/21, Defendants Ron Pick and Susan Abbass (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a
Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff 10000 North Central Homeowners Association (“Plaintiff”) filed its
Response thereto on 4/15/21, in which Plaintiff agreed that the case should be dismissed without
prejudice at this time, with all parties to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. No Reply
objecting or opposing Plaintiff’s proposal contained in its Response has been filed and the time
for said Reply has well expired.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED dismissing this cause without prejudice, with each party to bear its own
attorney’s fees and costs.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2020-005170

06/10/2021

Docket Code 042
Form V000A
Page 2

* * * *

PLEASE NOTE: This Division requires that all motions, responses, replies and other
Court filings in this case must be submitted individually. Counsel shall not combine any motion
with a responsive pleading. All motions are to be filed separately and designated as such. No filing
will be accepted if filed in combination with another. Additionally, all filings shall be fully
self-contained and shall not “incorporate by reference” other separate filings for review and
consideration as part of the pending filing.

ALERT: Due to the spread of COVID-19, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative
Order 2020-79 requires all individuals entering a Court facility to wear a mask or face covering at
all times while they are in the Court facility. With limited exceptions, the Court will not provide
masks or face coverings. Therefore, any individual attempting to enter the Court facility must have
an appropriate mask or face covering to be allowed entry to the Court facility. Any person who
refuses to wear a mask or face covering as directed will be denied entrance to the Court facility or
asked to leave. In addition, all individuals entering a Court facility will be subject to a health
screening protocol. Any person who does not pass the health screening protocol will be denied
entrance to the Court facility.

ATTENTION SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS: Unless an attorney files a notice
that he or she represents a party, the person(s) not represented by an attorney will act as his or her
own attorney. The law requires the Court to hold all persons representing themselves to the
same standard as a licensed attorney. Kelly v. NationsBanc Mortgage Corp., 199 Ariz. 284,
287 (App. 2001); Homecraft Corp. v. Fimbres, 119 Ariz. 299, 301 (App. 1978). Self-represented
litigants are encouraged to review and become familiar with the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure,
paying particular attention to Rule 26. Please note that only a licensed attorney may represent
a corporation, LLC, or similar business entity in the Superior Court. Ramada Inns v. Lane &
Bird Advertising, 102 Ariz. 127, 426 P.2d 395 (1967).

Before the Judge can consider anything you send her, you must show her that you have
given a copy of your request:

1. To the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk of the Court is a separately elected official. It is
the Clerk’s job to keep an independent record of everything that happens at the Court.
The Court cannot act on a document that has not been made a part of that record; and

2. To every other party involved in the case. This allows all parties a fair chance to tell the
Judge what they think before the Judge makes a decision.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2020-005170

06/10/2021

Docket Code 042
Form V000A
Page 3

Because of that, if you want the Judge to consider something you send her, you must file
the original document with the Clerk of the Superior Court, mail or deliver a copy directly to this
Division (that is, to the Judge, using her specific courtroom address), and mail or deliver a copy to
all opposing parties. In addition, on each document, you must include a signed certificate that says
whether you mailed or hand-delivered each copy, when you did so, and states the specific people
and the specific addresses to which you mailed or hand-delivered each copy. If a party is
represented by a lawyer, you must send or deliver the copy to the lawyer, not to the party. All
proposed Orders submitted to this Division in hard copy form must include copies of the Order
with self-addressed, stamped envelopes for all parties/counsel.

Do not mail or send papers for the Clerk or other parties to the Judge.

Information on filing documents with the Clerk of the Court can be found at:
https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/services/filings/filing-counters

Information on eFiling documents with the Clerk of Court can be found at:

https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/records/filings

Additionally, information regarding eFiling in civil cases can be found at:

https://www.azcourts.gov/efilinginformation

If you are not represented by a lawyer, you must keep the Court updated regarding your
current address and telephone number. If your address or phone number changes at any time, you
must file a notice of change of address/phone number with the Clerk of Court. That form (general
form – GN91f – Update Information on Address and/or Name with the Court) can be downloaded
at no charge from the following website:

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/LawLibraryResourceCenter/

Alternatively, you may purchase printed forms at any of the following Superior Court
Law Library Resource Center locations (Monday-Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.):

Downtown Phoenix Facility

Southeast Facility
East Court Building

222 E. Javelina Ave.
101 W. Jefferson St.

Mesa, AZ 85210-6201
Phoenix, AZ 85003-2243

Northeast Court Facility

Northwest Regional Center
18380 N. 40th Street

14264 W. Tierra Buena Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85032

Surprise, AZ 85374

Documents

Type Title Content Type Size Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2020005170 CENTRAL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 10000 NORTH 03/23/2021 HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY View Minute Entry application/pdf 214.6 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2020005170 CENTRAL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 10000 NORTH 03/29/2021 HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY View Minute Entry application/pdf 229.1 KB Document Source
minute_entry_pdf CV2020005170 CENTRAL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 10000 NORTH 06/10/2021 HONORABLE MARGARET R. MAHONEY View Minute Entry application/pdf 223.2 KB Document Source

Auto-compiled from public records, pending verification

Review the official court record for the current docket.

To request a correction or removal, contact the site administrator.