02/09/2024 — CV2023091763 PHASE 5 COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, SURPRISE FARMS 02/09/2024 HONORABLE ADAM D. DRIGGS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/12/2024 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-091763
02/09/2024
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADAM D. DRIGGS
V. Felix
Deputy
SURPRISE FARMS PHASE 5 COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
JEFFREY B CORBEN
v.
HEATHER WEBB, et al.
HEATHER WEBB
16838 N 183RD DR
SURPRISE AZ 85388
JASON DAVID CORLEY
LEROY PERALTA
11833 W ALTADENA AVE
EL MIRAGE AZ 85335
COMM. KAISER
JUDGE DRIGGS
MINUTE ENTRY
This Court has received Plaintiff’s e-filed Application/Motion for Default against
defendant(s), Heather Webb and Leroy Peralta, in the above-captioned case.
IT IS ORDERED that no action will be taken by this division on the above-referenced
document(s).
The parties are advised that commissioners handle Rule 55(b) Default Judgment
proceedings and that the default proceedings in this matter are to be heard by Commissioner Brian
Kaiser.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-091763
02/09/2024
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents necessary to support the entry of a
default judgment must be e-filed.
Pursuant to the Maricopa County eFiling Guidelines, section 2.09, attorneys shall
electronically file all the documents required to request a default judgment, such as the Application
for Entry of Default, Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Sum Certain Affidavit, and
Application for Attorneys’ Fees when appropriate and Statement of Costs, but shall submit a
default judgment packet required by the Court, including the documents identified on the default
judgment packet coversheet in paper to the assigned commissioner’s division. A commissioner
will not act upon a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment until the default judgment packet with
all the required documents has been received by the division in paper form.
The parties/counsel can find additional information in the form of frequently asked
questions at:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/SuperiorCourt/CivilDepartment/howDoI.asp and
https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/llrc/cv_cvc6/
07/20/2023 — CV2023091763 PHASE 5 COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, SURPRISE FARMS 07/20/2023 HONORABLE ADAM D. DRIGGS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/21/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-091763
07/20/2023
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADAM D. DRIGGS
C. Avena
Deputy
SURPRISE FARMS PHASE 5 COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
JEFFREY B CORBEN
v.
HEATHER WEBB, et al.
HEATHER WEBB
16838 N 183RD DR
SURPRISE AZ 85388
STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT
OF ECONOMIC SECURITY
DIRECTORS OFFICE
1717 W JEFFERSON
PHOENIX AZ 85007
LEROY PERALTA
11833 W ALTADENA AVE
EL MIRAGE AZ 85335
JUDGE DRIGGS
ORDER SIGNED
The Court has received Plaintiff’s Rile 4(i) Motion for Extension of Service Deadline as
to Defendant Leroy Peralta, filed on July 6, 2023,
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-091763
07/20/2023
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS ORDERED approving/granting Plaintiff’s Rile 4(i) Motion for Extension of Service
Deadline as to Defendant Leroy Peralta, all in accordance with the formal written Order signed by
the Court on July 18, 2023, and filed (entered) by the Clerk on July 20, 2023.
It is important that counsel and self-represented parties read the order that the court
signed. The Court may have made changes to the order that the parties submitted.
Please note: The court has signed a paper copy of the Order. After the Order has been
scanned and docketed by the Clerk of Court, copies of the Order will be available through the ECR
online at www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through www.AZTurboCourt.gov and from the
Public Access Terminals at the Clerk of Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
08/01/2023 — CV2023091763 PHASE 5 COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, SURPRISE FARMS 08/01/2023 HONORABLE ADAM D. DRIGGS View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
08/02/2023 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-091763
08/01/2023
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE ADAM D. DRIGGS
C. Avena
Deputy
SURPRISE FARMS PHASE 5 COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
JEFFREY B CORBEN
v.
HEATHER WEBB, et al.
HEATHER WEBB
16838 N 183RD DR
SURPRISE AZ 85388
STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT
OF ECONOMIC SECURITY
DIRECTORS OFFICE
1717 W JEFFERSON
PHOENIX AZ 85007
LEROY PERALTA
11833 W ALTADENA AVE
EL MIRAGE AZ 85335
JUDGE DRIGGS
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received and fully considered Plaintiff’s A.R.C.P. 4.1(1) Motion to Service
Through Publication As to Leroy Peralta Only. For the reasons set forth below the motion is
denied.
Under Rule 4.1, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure the Defendant is entitled to actual
notice of the proceedings when possible. When it is necessary to use constructive notice, it must
be given in a way that is likely to provide actual notice. You must disclose the last known
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2023-091763
08/01/2023
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
address of the Defendant. Additional documentation to increase the likelihood of actual notice is
helpful. The presence of vehicles currently registered to the Defendant or family members,
current or recent utility records, United States Postal Service records or other such indicia of
current residence/ownership are instructive.
A generalized boiler plate statement that the process server and/or law firm has usual and
customary skip tracing practices is not helpful. The documentation presented should include a
list of specific efforts performed to locate the Defendant such as checking county jail records,
state prison records, current criminal and civil litigation records, known email addresses and
social media databases. The efforts to provide actual notice of the litigation should be
comparable with the robust efforts to locate the defendant after a judgment is obtained.
There is no mandatory checklist of efforts to locate the Defendant. Furthermore,
authorization to use alternative service does not require a search of all of these places suggested
herein. However, the Court must believe that you have made a very serious effort to get
information about the Defendant’s location and that you have followed up on any information
you received.
In this case, the documentation submitted does not meet the criteria for approval of
alternative service pursuant to Rule 4.1(k), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Court notes that it previously granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time for Service
until October 14, 2023. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED denying the Motion for Alternative Service.
