Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2011-007501: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Mountain View Village Townhouses Community Association.

Case Number

CV2011-007501

County

Maricopa

Caption

Not captured

Filed

3/30/2011

Case Type

Civil

Judge

Kreamer, Joseph

Location

Downtown

Official Court Record

Official Court Record

Parties

Minute Entries

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/13/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
01/12/2012
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
RULING
Counterclaimant Paul Demos (“Demos”) filed a Motion to Amend Original Civil
Counter-Complaint on November 4, 2011. Counterdefendant filed its opposition on November
23, 2011. No Reply was filed.
Demos’ Motion is denied because his proposed amendment is, in all respects, legally
insufficient. Walls v. Arizona Dep’t of Public Safety, 170 Ariz. 591 (App. 1991); Moore v.
Toshiba Intern. Corp., 160 Ariz. 205 (App. 1989). Simply put, none of Demos’ proposed
counterclaims state valid causes of actions even if the facts set forth therein are accepted as true.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/17/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
01/13/2012
Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
ORAL ARGUMENT SET
IT IS ORDERED setting oral argument on Motion Contempt of Court; Petition for Order
to Show Cause and Return of Monies Owed, filed by Defendant on November 4, 2011, in
conjunction with the oral argument currently scheduled for March 5, 2012 @ 10:30 a.m. in this
division.
The total time allotted for the oral argument is one hour.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/25/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
01/20/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court is in receipt of Counter-Plaintiff’s Request for Reconsideration, filed January
17, 2012.
Upon review of the foregoing,
The Motion for Reconsideration is denied.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/15/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
03/13/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has reviewed Defendant’s Motion Contempt of Court; Petition for Order to
Show Cause, and Return of Monies Owed, filed November 4, 2011.
IT IS ORDERED denying the Motion in light of the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Complaint, entered August 15, 2011.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/05/2012 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
04/03/2012
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
K. Gilmet
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has reviewed Defendant’s March 26, 2012 Counter-Plaintiff’s Request for
Reconsideration and Request for Oral Argument.
IT IS ORDERED denying the Request for Reconsideration.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Request for Oral Argument.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk's
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
08/17/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
08/16/2011
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
MARK K SAHL
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
GORDON LEWIS
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET
The Court is in receipt of Counterdefendant’s Request for Rule 16(b) Scheduling
Conference, filed August 11, 2011.
IT IS ORDERED setting a Comprehensive Pretrial Conference pursuant to Rule 16(b),
Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, for October 17, 2011 @ 8:30 a.m. (time allotted: 30 minutes)
in this division.
If counsel/parties wish to appear telephonically, please contact the division in
advance of the conference by calling: (602) 506-0971.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED counsel for all parties shall personally meet and prepare a
Joint Comprehensive Pretrial Memorandum addressing all subjects set out in Rule 16(b), Arizona
Rules of Civil Procedure. The Joint Comprehensive Pretrial Memorandum shall be submitted to the
Court by 5:00 p.m., October 12, 2011.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
08/16/2011
Docket Code 026
Form V000A
Page 2
Failure to meet, prepare and timely file this memorandum may lead to personal sanctions as
to counsel and/or their clients.
NOTE: Court proceedings are recorded by audio method and not by a court reporter.
All telephonic proceedings held in chambers are not digitally recorded. Any party may
request the presence of a court reporter by contacting the division three (3) court business days
before the scheduled hearing.
ALERT: eFiling through AZTurboCourt.gov is mandatory in civil cases for attorney-
filed documents effective May 1, 2011. See Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Orders
2010-117 and 2011-010. The Court may impose sanctions against counsel to ensure compliance
with this requirement after May 1, 2011.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/15/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
09/14/2011
Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
J. Eaton
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
MARK K SAHL
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
ORAL ARGUMENT SET
TELEPHONIC
IT IS ORDERED setting this matter for telephonic oral argument on September 15,
2011 at 11:00 a.m. (time allotted: 30 minutes) in this division on the following motion(s):
•
Defendants’ Motion to Quash Notices of Depositions/Motion for Protective Order.
The Court shall initiate the call at the aforesaid date and time.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:
If extended oral argument is necessary, counsel must so advise the Court no later than
four court days prior to the date set for hearing so that oral argument can be rescheduled.
Any motion or stipulation for continuance must be filed with the Court no later than four
court days prior to the date set for hearing. After that date, no continuances will be granted
except for extraordinary circumstances.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
09/14/2011
Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 2
All memoranda and affidavits regarding the motion must be filed and copies lodged with
this division no later than four court days prior to the date set for hearing.
Counsel are advised that if the answering memorandum is not timely filed in accordance
with the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, oral argument may be vacated and the motion will be
ruled upon in accordance with Rule 7.1 (b), A.R.C.P.
Court proceedings are recorded by audio method and not by a court reporter.

All telephonic proceedings held in chambers are not digitally recorded. Any party may
request the presence of a court reporter by contacting the division three (3) court business days
before the scheduled hearing.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/22/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
09/15/2011
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
J. Eaton
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
MARK A HOLMGREN
RULING
Courtroom 704 – Central Court Building
11:02 a.m. This is the time set for telephonic oral argument re: Defendants’ Motion to
Quash Notices of Depositions/Motion for Protective Order. Plaintiff/Counterdefendant is
represented by counsel, Gordon Lewis and Mark A. Holmgren. Defendant/Counterclaimant,
Paul Demos, appears on his own behalf.
Argument is presented to the Court.
IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion in part. The Notices of Deposition scheduled for
September 16, 2011 are quashed without prejudice to other discovery. The Motion is denied,
insofar, as it requested a protective order prohibiting Counterclaimant from noticing depositions.
11:49 a.m. Matter concludes.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
09/15/2011
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/23/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
09/22/2011
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
J. Eaton
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
MARK A HOLMGREN
RULING
The Court has reviewed Defendant/Counterclaimant’s Motion to Compel and Motion for
Discovery Order, filed August 8, 2011, and Plaintiff/Counterdefendant’s Response to Motion to
Compel, filed August 29, 2011.
The essence of the Motion is that the Counterdefendant (“Mountain View”) allegedly
failed to timely respond to Counterclaimant’s written discovery served by mail on June 24, 2011.
However, it appears that Mountain View did timely respond to the discovery requests on
August 8, 2011, the same day Counterclaimant (“Demos”) filed the instant motion.
In addition, it should be noted that Demos failed to comply with the requirement of Ariz.
R. Civ. P. 37(a) to attach his certification of personal consultation.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
09/22/2011
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
In the circumstances, the Court declines to award fees to Mountain View given Demos’
pro se status. In the future, however, Demos should heed the legend he applied to his own
motion and insure that all motion papers are filed “in strict accordance to [sic] Arizona Rules of
Civil Procedure.”
The Motion is denied.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/11/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
10/06/2011
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
MARK A HOLMGREN
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
MINUTE ENTRY
Courtroom 704 - Central Court Building.
11:07 a.m. This is the time set for Telephonic Status Conference. Plaintiff is represented
by counsel, Gordon Lewis, Mark A. Holmgren, and Nikita Verma Patel. Defendant Paul Demos
is present on his own behalf.
A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.
The Court has before it Counterdefendant’s Objection to Counterclaimant’s Subponea,
filed September 30, 2011, Motion to Quash Notice of Deposition and Request for Expedited
Ruling, filed October 4, 2011, and Motion to Quash Subpoena to Colby Management, filed
October 5, 2011.
Discussion is held.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
10/06/2011
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 2
For the reasons stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED granting the Motions to Quash concerning the deposition notices
related to Carpenter, Hazelwood, Delgado & Wood, PLC and Colby Management, Inc. as
violative of Ariz. R. Civ. P. 30(a).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Motion to Quash concerning the deposition
notice related to Plaintiff Mountain View Village Townhouses Community Association pursuant
to Rule 30(b)(6). However, Plaintiff need not produce the documents requested at this
deposition.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the deposition of the Plaintiff shall take place at the
Office of Business Needs, Inc., 2415 E. Camelback Road Suite 700 Phoenix, Arizona 85016, on
October 7, 2011 at 11:00 a.m.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED upon request of Defendant, a Court Reporter shall not be
used to transcribe the deposition proceedings and the deposition will not be recorded by audio
and/or videotape. A notary public shall administer the witness oath.
12:00 p.m. Matter concludes.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
10/19/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
10/17/2011
Docket Code 027
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
Courtroom 704 - Central Court Building.
8:35 a.m. This is the time set for Rule 16 Comprehensive Pretrial Conference. Plaintiff is
represented by counsel, Gordon Lewis and Nikita Verma Patel. Defendant Paul Demos is present on
his own behalf.
No court reporter is present.
A Comprehensive Pretrial Conference is conducted and legal matters are discussed.
A Request for Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference having been filed,
IT IS ORDERED suspending the provisions of Rule 38.1, as to the Motion to Set and
Certificate of Readiness practice.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
10/17/2011
Docket Code 027
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1.
DISCLOSURE, DISCOVERY AND MOTIONS.
A.
Expert Witnesses (alternating disclosure): Counterclaimant shall
designate the name, subject matter, address, curriculum vitae, and
opinions
of
all
trial
experts
by
December
15,
2011.
Counterdefendant shall designate the name, subject matter, address,
curriculum vitae, and opinions of all trial experts by January 13,
2012.
B.
Discovery Cutoff:
All discovery shall be completed by

February 15, 2012.
C.
Rule 26.1: All parties shall have exchanged up-to-date Rule 26.1
Supplemental Disclosure Statements including a disclosure of all
final expert witness opinions by February 15, 2012. No information
disclosed after this date may be used at trial absent court order or
motion and affidavit. Such information must be seasonably
disclosed on an ongoing basis pursuant to Rule 26.1 prior to this
date.
D.
Pretrial Motions:
All pretrial motions, other than Motions in
Limine, shall be filed no later than March 15, 2012.
2.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
IT IS ORDERED the parties shall participate in a Settlement Conference. This case is
referred to the Court's Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution for the appointment of a Judge
Pro Tempore to conduct a Settlement Conference. Counsel and/or the parties will receive a
minute entry from ADR appointing the Judge Pro Tempore. Counsel and any "pro per" parties
will contact the appointed Judge Pro Tempore to arrange the date, time and location for the
Settlement Conference. The Judge Pro Tempore is requested to conduct a Settlement
Conference no later than February 29, 2012. The Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution
will not do the scheduling of the Settlement Conference so please do not contact that office.
If the parties prefer to use a private mediator to conduct the Settlement Conference,
a Stipulation and Order re: alternative to ADR must be presented to the Court by no later
than December 1, 2011.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
10/17/2011
Docket Code 027
Form V000A
Page 3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties, insurance adjusters, and representatives of
carriers must personally attend and participate in the settlement conference process. The parties
must participate in good faith even if no settlement is expected.
3.
TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE.
IT IS ORDERED setting a Trial Setting Conference on May 14, 2012 @ 9:00 a.m. in this
division. The parties will appear telephonically. The Court shall initiate the call at the aforesaid
date and time. At that time a firm trial date shall be set. In addition, a Final Pretrial Conference will
be scheduled and the Court shall set deadlines for Motions in Limine, the Joint Pretrial Statement,
Jury Instructions, Verdict Forms and Voir Dire Questions.
9:41 a.m. Matter concludes.
All telephonic proceedings held in chambers are not digitally recorded. Any party
may request the presence of a court reporter by contacting the division three (3) court business
days before the scheduled hearing.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/03/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
11/02/2011
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
STATUS CONFERENCE SET
Upon review of Counterdefendant’s Motion to Quash Notices of Depositions/Motion for
Protective Order, filed November 1, 2011,
IT IS ORDERED setting a telephonic status conference for November 8, 2011 @ 10:00
a.m. in this division. The Court shall initiate the call at the aforesaid date and time.
This is a 30 minute proceeding.
No court reporter is present for telephonic proceedings held in chambers. Any party
may request the presence of a court reporter by contacting the division three (3) court business
days before the scheduled hearing.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/10/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
11/08/2011
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
MINUTE ENTRY
Courtroom 704 - Central Court Building.
10:02 a.m. This is the time set for telephonic status conference. Plaintiff is represented by
counsel, Gordon Lewis and Nikita V. Patel. Defendant Paul Demos is present on his own behalf.
A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is held regarding Counterdefendant’s Motion to Quash Notices of
Depositions/Motion for Protective Order, filed November 1, 2011.
Based upon matters presented on the record,
The Motion to Quash is granted and the depositions of Mark Perry and Keith Moore shall
not go forward absent a Court Order pursuant to Ariz. R. Civ. P. 30(a).
Plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees is denied without prejudice.
10:33 a.m. Matter concludes.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
11/08/2011
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 2
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/14/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
12/13/2011
Docket Code 094
Form V094
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
D. Harding
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
ORAL ARGUMENT SET
IT IS ORDERED setting this matter for oral argument on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant’s
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed October 28, 2011 on March 5, 2012 at 10:30 a.m.
(time allotted: 30 minutes) in this division.
IT IS ORDERED that all Motions, Responses, Replies and other Court requested
filings in this case must be submitted individually. Counsel shall not combine any Motion
within a responsive pleading. All Motions are to be filed separately and designated as such.
The proceedings will take place in the Superior Court’s “e-courtroom.” A record of the
proceedings will be made by videotape and CD in lieu of a court reporter. Should you want an
unofficial copy of the proceedings, the parties or counsel may request a videotape or CD of the
proceedings for a $20.00 charge. If a CD or videotape is requested, please obtain a form from
the courtroom clerk or from the Self Service Center to request a daily copy of a court hearing or
trial proceeding being conducted. Pay the applicable fee at the Self Service Center. Attach the
receipt showing payment of the fee and present both the receipt and the form to the courtroom

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
12/13/2011
Docket Code 094
Form V094
Page 2
clerk or bailiff. For copies of hearings or trial proceedings recorded previously, please call
Electronic Records Services at 602-506-7100.
Should an official transcript be required, you may request that the court prepare it. The
party ordering the transcript must pay for it. To request a transcript call 602-506-7100 and
provide the date of the proceeding, the case number, the case caption, if the transcript is for an
appeal, and your name, address and telephone number. With this new technology, a court
reporter is likely not required and the parties are encouraged to experience the court's video
recording system before requesting a court reporter. If a court reporter is required, the court must
receive a written request at least 3 court days before the commencement of the proceeding.
Failure to timely request a court reporter will be deemed consent to proceed without a court
reporter.
IF ANY ISSUES IN THE MOTION RELATE TO DISCOVERY PROBLEMS,
COUNSEL SHALL CONFER TO ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE THEIR DIFFERENCES OR TO
REDUCE THE AREAS OF DISPUTE. COUNSEL ARE REMINDED THAT THE COURT
WILL LIKELY IMPOSE SANCTIONS AGAINST THE LOSING PARTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH RULE 37(a)(4), RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:
If extended oral argument is necessary, counsel must so advise the Court no later than
four court days prior to the date set for hearing so that oral argument can be rescheduled.
Any motion or stipulation for continuance must be filed with the Court no later than four
court days prior to the date set for hearing. After that date, no continuances will be granted
except for extraordinary circumstances.
All memoranda and affidavits regarding the motion must be filed and copies lodged with
this division no later than four court days prior to the date set for hearing.
Counsel are advised that if the answering memorandum is not timely filed in accordance
with the Arizona Rules Of Civil Procedure, oral argument may be vacated and the motion will be
ruled upon in accordance with Rule 7.1 (b), A.R.C.P.
No agreement by the parties to modify the pleading schedule will be honored by the
Court unless the Court is notified and approves the parties’ agreement. Any such agreement
will not change the argument date without a court Order and will, in any event, require that all
motions are fully briefed and at issue not later than one full week before the argument date.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
12/13/2011
Docket Code 094
Form V094
Page 3
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/27/2011 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2011-007501
12/23/2011
Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOHN A. BUTTRICK
C. Castro
Deputy
MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAGE TOWNHOUSES
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
GORDON LEWIS
v.
PAUL DEMOS
PAUL DEMOS
9722 N 3RD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85021
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
ORAL ARGUMENT SET
IT IS ORDERED setting oral argument on Defendant’s Motion to Compel and Motion
for Discovery Order, filed November 18, 2011, in conjunction with the oral argument currently
scheduled for March 5, 2012 @ 10:30 a.m. in this division.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the time allotted to one hour.
ALERT: Effective September 1, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order
2011-87 directs the Clerk's Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil
cases must still be initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through
AZTurboCourt unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Documents