Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2013-001827: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Coronado Ranch Community Association.

Case Number

CV2013-001827

County

Maricopa

Caption

Not captured

Filed

2/25/2013

Case Type

Civil

Judge

Blanchard, John

Location

Downtown

Official Court Record

Official Court Record

Parties

No parties captured.

Minute Entries

Clerk of the Superior Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

01/12/2021 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-001827

01/08/2021

Docket Code LED
Form EXHCVREL
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
EXHIBITS UNIT
C. Concholar (EXB)

Deputy

CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN

v.

CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

NOTICE REGARDING DISPOSITION OF EXHIBITS

The Clerk of the Superior Court is in possession of exhibits in the above captioned case.
This case has been reviewed pursuant to Rules of Court Criminal Procedure, Rule 28.1; Superior
Court - Local Rules of Maricopa County, Rule 2.8(d); Rules of Civil Appellate Procedures, Rule
11(a)(6); and is not subject to further modification.

To claim your exhibits, please call 602-372-2284 to make an appointment. Appointments
are available Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. If the
exhibits need to be retained, a request must be made in writing within ten (10) days of the
mailing of this notice.

The subject exhibits will not be eligible for release until January 13, 2021 and must be
collected by February 19, 2021 or the exhibits shall be disposed. The following party(ies) have
exhibits that need to be collected: Plaintiff. Exhibits may only be released to the party which
presented the exhibits. For further verification please contact the Exhibits Unit at 602-372-2284.

This notice serves as the only written notification regarding disposition of these exhibits.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-001827

01/08/2021

Docket Code LED
Form EXHCVREL
Page 2

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Filed ***

03/03/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-001827

02/27/2014

Docket Code 047
Form V047
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard

Deputy

CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN

v.

CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Pursuant to the court’s December 10, 2013 minute entry, this case was on the inactive
calendar for dismissal on February 10, 2014 unless specified action was taken before a certain
date. The date has passed, and the action has not been taken.

IT IS ORDERED dismissing this case without prejudice for lack of prosecution as to
any unadjudicated claims/parties.

/ s / RANDALL H. WARNER

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Effective April 15, 2014, new civil rules and forms are in effect for managing cases
moving to trial. Be sure to review the new Civil Rules 16, 26, 37, 38, 72 through 74 and 77.

ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the
Clerk’s Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-001827

02/27/2014

Docket Code 047
Form V047
Page 2

initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt
unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court

*** Electronically Filed ***

03/13/2014 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-001827

03/11/2014

Docket Code 044
Form V000A
Page 1

CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard

Deputy

CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN

v.

CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL

CASE REINSTATED

Before the court is the parties’ March 7, 2014 Stipulation to Reinstate Case to Inactive
Calendar.

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion and reinstating the case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a telephonic status conference on April 25, 2014
at 8:45 a.m. (time allotted: 15 minutes) in this division to discuss the progress of the parties’
settlement and to determine further proceedings in the case. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall initiate the
conference call to this division at 602-372-2966. All persons appearing shall appear on land
lines and not on cellular phones, and shall not use the speakerphone features of their telephones,
in order to maximize all participants’ ability to hear and be heard. Counsel shall have their
calendars available for this proceeding.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in no less than five (5) days prior to the status
conference set herein, the parties shall submit a joint status report to the court that includes (1) a
very brief description of the case; (2) the status of discovery and other pertinent matters; (3) a list
of pending motions or other matters, whether at issue or not; (4) the status of alternative dispute

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY

CV 2013-001827

03/11/2014

Docket Code 044
Form V000A
Page 2

resolution; (5) when the parties anticipate the case will be ready for trial; and (6) how many trial
days the parties estimate will be needed.

NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded by audio and video method and not by a
court reporter. Any party may request the presence of a court reporter by contacting this division
(602-372-2966) three (3) court business days before the scheduled hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting this matter for dismissal on April 25, 2014.
Unless a stipulated judgment or a stipulation for dismissal, along with a proposed form of order,
is submitted to the court before that date, or the court otherwise extends the deadline for good
cause shown, all remaining claims and parties will be dismissed.

Effective April 15, 2014, new civil rules and forms are in effect for managing cases
moving to trial. Be sure to review the new Civil Rules 16, 26, 37, 38, 72 through 74 and 77.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/29/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
04/25/2013
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard
Deputy
CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN
v.
CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
STATUS CONFERENCE SET
Courtroom: ECB-512
11:34 a.m.
This is the time set for hearing regarding Plaintiffs’ April 25, 2013
Application for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order. Plaintiffs are represented by Counsel
Ian D. Quinn. Defendant is represented (telephonically) by Counsel Nikita V. Patel.
A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.
The court has reviewed the Application.
Oral argument is presented.
IT IS ORDERED denying the Application for Temporary Restraining Order.
The court finds no irreparable harm. The court finds there was delay in bringing this
Application in such that there is no current emergency and no indication that there is a real threat
of this pipe bursting until a hearing can be held in the normal course. The court further finds the

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
04/25/2013
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
balance of hardships favors the Association in that the pipe brings water to the landscaping for
the entire area.
The court will construe the Application for Temporary Restraining Order as an
Application for Preliminary Injunction.
IT IS ORDERED setting a telephonic status conference on April 29, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.
(time allotted: 15 minutes) in this division for the purpose of discussing a potential schedule for
an evidentiary hearing on the Application for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall
initiate the conference call to this division at 602-372-2966. All persons appearing shall appear
on land lines and not on cellular phones, and shall not use the speakerphone features of their
telephones, in order to maximize all participants’ ability to hear and be heard. Counsel shall
have their calendars available for this proceeding.
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded by audio and video method and not by a
court reporter. Any party may request the presence of a court reporter by contacting this division
(602-372-2966) three (3) court business days before the scheduled hearing.
11:45 a.m. Matter concludes.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the
Clerk’s Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be
initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt
unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/01/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
04/29/2013
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard
Deputy
CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN
v.
CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
HEARING SET
Courtroom: ECB-512
9:30 a.m. This is the time set for status conference. Plaintiffs are represented
(telephonically) by Counsel Ian D. Quinn. Defendant is represented (telephonically) by Counsel
Nikita V. Patel.
A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.
Discussion is briefly held regarding the setting of an evidentiary hearing.
Defendant’s counsel advises the court that Defendant will be filing a response to the
Application for Preliminary Injunction as it does not believe an injunction hearing is warranted.
IT IS ORDERED setting this matter for an evidentiary hearing regarding Plaintiff’s
Application for Preliminary Injunction for May 31, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in this division. Counsel
and the parties, if representing themselves, are to appear in person before:

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
04/29/2013
Docket Code 056
Form V000A
Page 2
The Honorable Randall H. Warner
Maricopa County Superior Court
East Court Building
101 W. Jefferson
5th Floor, Courtroom 512
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Phone: 602-372-2966
Fax: 602-372-8746
The hearing will be limited to two (2) hours with the available time divided equally
between the sides.
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded by audio and video method and not by a
court reporter. Any party may request the presence of a court reporter by contacting this division
(602-372-2966) three (3) court business days before the scheduled hearing.
9:33 a.m. Matter concludes.
Later:
IT IS ORDERED counsel shall present all exhibits (as well as a list of brief descriptions
of said exhibits) to be used at the hearing to the courtroom clerk (602-372-3180) for marking no
later than noon on May 28, 2013. Counsel shall meet and confer prior to that time to exchange
exhibits and remove any duplicates prior to delivering the exhibits to the clerk for marking.
The exhibits will be marked numerically and serially with plaintiff’s exhibits being marked first
and then defendant’s. The exhibits should not contain lettered subparts. Should an exhibit
consist of multiple pages, it shall be securely fastened with a staple or two-prong ACCO-type
fastener.
The exhibits presented to the clerk should not be placed in a three-ring notebook.
However, counsel are asked to provide the court, on the day of the hearing, a joint notebook
containing a complete copy of all exhibits for the court’s use throughout the hearing. If you have
any questions regarding the marking of exhibits, please contact the courtroom clerk directly at
602-372-3180.
ALERT:
The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the
Clerk’s Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be
initiated on paper; however; subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt
unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
06/04/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
05/31/2013
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard
Deputy
CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN
v.
CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
HEARING
Courtroom: ECB-512
Prior to the commencement of the hearing, Plaintiffs’ exhibits 1-9 are marked for
identification.
10:00 a.m. This is the time set for evidentiary hearing regarding Plaintiff’s Application
for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs Craig Kittinger and Katherine Kittinger are present and are
represented by Counsel Ian D. Quinn. Defendant Coronado Ranch Community Association is
represented by Counsel Nikita V. Patel. Also present is Robert Hicks, the board president for the
Defendant Association.
A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.
By stipulation, Plaintiffs’ exhibits 1-7 and 9 are received in evidence.
Craig Kittinger is sworn and testifies.
Plaintiffs’ exhibit 8 is received in evidence.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
05/31/2013
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 2
10:52 a.m. Court stands at recess.
11:04 a.m. Court reconvenes with respective counsel and the parties present.
A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.
Robert Hicks is sworn and testifies.
Procedural issues are addressed.
Closing arguments are presented.
IT IS ORDERED taking this matter under advisement.
11:51 a.m. Matter concludes.
Later:
To obtain a preliminary injunction, Plaintiffs must show:
1.
A strong likelihood of success at trial on the merits;
2.
The possibility of irreparable injury not remediable by damages if a preliminary
injunction is not granted;
3.
The balance of hardships favors a preliminary injunction; and
4.
Public policy favors an injunction.
IB Property Holdings, LLC v. Rancho Del Mar Apartments Ltd. Partnership, 228 Ariz. 61, 64-
65, 263 P.3d 69, 72-73 (App. 2011). On these factors, the court finds as follows.
First, there is some likelihood of success on the merits. Although the parties agree that
the question of whether Defendant has an easement over Plaintiffs’ property is a legal question, a
definitive resolution of that issue will require full briefing and possibly further factual
development.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
05/31/2013
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 3
For preliminary injunction purposes, the court finds that Plaintiffs have a strong case on
the merits. If, as appears to be the case, Plaintiffs neither knew nor had any reason to know of
the pipe on their property, it is hard to see how they can be bound by an easement. Even if the
CC&R’s provide for an easement of this kind, an easement for this specific pipe is not recorded.
It is not clear how Defendant can have an unrecorded, unknown and unknowable easement.
Second, Plaintiffs have demonstrated a possibility of irreparable injury; there is at least
some chance that the pipe could rupture on its own while this action is pending. But this is a
remote possibility. Defendant’s water pipe that runs beneath Plaintiffs’ property is not likely to
burst or be damaged now that Plaintiffs know where it is.
Third, the balance of hardships militates against a preliminary injunction. The water pipe
at issue carries irrigation water for the landscaping of common areas in this development.
Without that water, Defendant would suffer a great hardship by being forced to either allow the
landscaping to go without water, or finding some expensive alternative such as trucking in water
or re-routing the pipe. Against that hardship is the slight chance that the pipe might burst on its
own and cause further damage to Plaintiffs’ property.
Fourth, for the same reason that the balance of hardships favors Defendant, public policy
does not favor a preliminary injunction. Moreover, denying a preliminary injunction would
preserve the status quo until this matter can be resolved on the merits.
Plaintiffs may or may not ultimately prevail on the merits of this dispute. But, balancing
the hardships, the court finds that a preliminary injunction is not warranted.
IT IS ORDERED denying the Application for Preliminary Injunction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint pretrial memorandum
and proposed scheduling order as set forth below.
The court will review the joint pretrial memorandum and may adopt or modify the
proposed scheduling order, set a scheduling conference to resolve disputed scheduling issues, or
resolve the disagreements without argument. If the parties believe a conference would be
beneficial irrespective of whether there are disagreements, they should say so in the joint pretrial
memorandum.
If the parties fail to file a timely memorandum, sanctions may issue pursuant to Rule
16(f).

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
05/31/2013
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel are directed to meet personally to discuss all
matters set forth in Rule 16(b). Counsel shall file with the court by 5:00 p.m. on July 1, 2013, a
joint pretrial memorandum, and shall lodge a proposed scheduling order that includes dates for
the following items and conforms substantially with the attached sample order.
1.
A date or dates for initial disclosures and/or to supplement disclosures made to
date.
2.
An initial and final date to propound written discovery requests that shall
include, as far as can reasonably be anticipated, any and all medical examinations
which may be required of any of the parties; the person or persons to conduct such
examinations; and all tangible evidence to be disclosed or exchanged.
3.
A date for the initial and final disclosure of all non-expert witnesses, and/or to
supplement disclosures made to date.
4.
A date for the initial and final disclosure of the identities, subject matter, and
reports of expert witnesses, and/or to supplement disclosures made to date.
5.
A date for completion of all depositions.
6.
A date by which any motions to amend the pleadings must be filed.
7.
A date by which any discovery motions must be filed.
8.
A date by which any dispositive or partially dispositive motions must be filed.
9.
A proposed date for a mandatory settlement conference pursuant to Rule 16.1.
Alternatively, the parties may propose a deadline by which they will
participate in private mediation.
10.
The anticipated length of trial.
11.
Any other deadline or topics the parties wish to include.
If the parties agree as to the dates, they need only lodge the proposed scheduling order
and file a notice of lodging evidencing the parties’ stipulation to it. If counsel are unable to
agree on some or all of the items set forth in the attached form of order, they shall submit their
agreements in the form of the attached form of order and, as to any disagreements, state their

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
05/31/2013
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 5
separate proposals and reasons for any disagreements. All proposed deadlines shall be set forth
as calendar dates, not in the form “XX days before trial.”
The court prefers that lodged orders be in a word processing format that will permit it to
make modifications.
The parties are encouraged to view Judge Warner’s online profile of the Superior
Court’s website for additional information on appearing before Judge Warner.
FILED: Exhibit Worksheet
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the
Clerk’s Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be
initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt
unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
05/31/2013
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 6
[Proposed] Scheduling Order
The court having received the parties’ joint pretrial memorandum, and good cause
appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that the following deadlines shall govern this matter unless modified
by the court:
(1)
Initial disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(2)
Written discovery shall be propounded by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(3)
Written discovery shall be completed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(4)
Final non-expert disclosures shall be made by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(5)
The identities and subject areas of expert testimony shall be disclosed by:
(MM/DD/YYYY)
(6)
Plaintiff’s final expert disclosures shall be made by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
Defendant’s final expert disclosures shall be made by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
Rebuttal expert disclosures shall be made by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(7)
Depositions shall be completed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(8)
Any discovery motions shall be filed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(9)
Any motions to amend pleadings shall be filed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(10)
Any dispositive motions shall be filed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(11)
The parties remaining in this action shall participate in private mediation by
(MM/DD/YYYY).
OR

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
05/31/2013
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 7
The parties remaining in this action shall participate in a Mandatory Settlement
Conference (ADR) by (MM/DD/YYYY)
(Note: only one of the preceding two options shall be included in the
proposed order.)
(12)
The following number of days will be required to pick a jury and try this matter:
____
(13)
The provisions of subsections (a) through (g) of Rule 38.1, ARCP, shall not apply
to this proceeding.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court will set one or more status conferences by
minute entry.
DATED:

_______________________________
Randall H. Warner
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/05/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
07/03/2013
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard
Deputy
CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN
v.
CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
ORDER SIGNED
Before the court is the parties’ July 1, 2013 Joint Pretrial Memorandum and proposed
Scheduling Order.
IT IS ORDERED approving and settling the formal written Scheduling Order signed by
the court on July 3, 2013 and entered (filed) by the clerk on July 3, 2013.
Pursuant to the Scheduling Order,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties shall participate in a mandatory settlement
conference no later than December 13, 2013.
This case is hereby referred to the Superior
Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Department for the appointment of a judge pro tempore
to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and/or the parties will receive a minute entry
from ADR appointing the judge pro tempore. Counsel and any “pro per” parties will contact
the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the date, time, and location for the settlement
conference. The Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution will not do the scheduling of the
settlement conference so please do not contact that office.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
07/03/2013
Docket Code 022
Form V000A
Page 2
All counsel and their clients, or non-lawyer representatives who have full and complete
authority to settle the case, and all self-represented parties must personally appear and
participate in good faith in the settlement conference. Sanctions may be imposed for failure to
participate.
Please note: The court has signed a paper copy of the Scheduling Order which was
originally provided electronically. Therefore, copies of the order and self-addressed, stamped
envelopes are not available for mailing to the parties. After the order has been scanned and
docketed by the Clerk of Court, copies of this order will be available through the ECR online at
www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov or through www.AZTurboCourt.gov and from the Public
Access Terminals at the Clerk of Court’s offices located throughout Maricopa County.
ALERT:
The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the
Clerk’s Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be
initiated on paper; however; subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt
unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/05/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
07/03/2013
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard
Deputy
CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN
v.
CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
STATUS CONFERENCE SET
The court having signed a Scheduling Order in this matter on July 2, 2013,
IT IS ORDERED setting a telephonic status conference on March 26, 2014 at
8:45 a.m. (time allotted: 15 minutes) in this division for the purpose of determining whether the
case is ready for trial and, if appropriate, to set trial. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall initiate the
conference call to this division at 602-372-2966. All persons appearing shall appear on land
lines and not on cellular phones, and shall not use the speakerphone features of their telephones,
in order to maximize all participants’ ability to hear and be heard. Counsel shall have their
calendars available for this proceeding.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in no less than five (5) days prior to the status
conference set herein, the parties shall submit a joint status report to the court that includes (1) a
very brief description of the case; (2) the status of discovery and other pertinent matters; (3) a list
of pending motions or other matters, whether at issue or not; (4) the status of alternative dispute
resolution; (5) when the parties anticipate the case will be ready for trial; and (6) how many trial
days the parties estimate will be needed.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
07/03/2013
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
NOTE: All court proceedings are recorded by audio and video method and not by a
court reporter. Any party may request the presence of a court reporter by contacting this division
(602-372-2966) three (3) court business days before the scheduled hearing.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the
Clerk’s Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be
initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt
unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/27/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
11/25/2013
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard
Deputy
CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN
v.
CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
ORDER OF THE COURT
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ October 22, 2013 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint.
For the reasons stated in the Motion and Reply,
IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the Clerk’s
Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be initiated
on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt unless an
exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/27/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
11/25/2013
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard
Deputy
CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN
v.
CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
RULING
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ November 22, 2013 Motion to Set and Certificate of
Readiness. The court will determine whether the case is ready to set trial at the status conference
scheduled for March 26, 2014 at 8:45 a.m. Because there is a scheduling order in place, the case
is not set for administrative dismissal.
IT IS ORDERED denying the Motion.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the
Clerk’s Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be
initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt
unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/12/2013 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2013-001827
12/10/2013
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. RANDALL H. WARNER
K. Ballard
Deputy
CRAIG KITTINGER, et al.
IAN D QUINN
v.
CORONADO RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION
NIKITA VERMA PATEL
CASE ON INACTIVE CALENDAR
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ December 10, 2013 Notice of Settlement.
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the inactive calendar for dismissal on February
10, 2014. Unless a stipulated judgment or a stipulation for dismissal, along with a proposed
form of order, is submitted to the court before that date, all remaining unadjudicated claims may
be dismissed without further notice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the status conference set for March 26, 2014.
ALERT: The Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Order 2011-140 directs the
Clerk’s Office not to accept paper filings from attorneys in civil cases. Civil cases must still be
initiated on paper; however, subsequent documents must be eFiled through AZTurboCourt
unless an exception defined in the Administrative Order applies.

Documents