Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2007-050542: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Carino Canyon Homeowners Association.

Case Number

CV2007-050542

County

Maricopa

Caption

Not captured

Filed

2/16/2007

Case Type

Civil

Judge

Gordon, Michael

Location

Northeast

Official Court Record

Official Court Record

Parties

Minute Entries

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/08/2008 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
01/03/2008
Docket Code 314
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
ROBERT R BAUER
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
ELIZABETH A WOLDRICH
4619 E CARON STREET
PHOENIX AZ 85028
PENNY L KOEPKE
ALLAN D NEW DELMAN
BANKRUPTCY FILED
The Court has received notification that bankruptcy proceedings are pending as to
Defendant Bruce F. Woldrich, filed on November 29, 2007, in case number bk-06403-RTB.
IT IS ORDERED placing this case on the Inactive Calendar as to Defendant Bruce F.
Woldrich only until May 29, 2008. This case will be dismissed unless, prior to that date, one of
the following occurs: (1) stay relief is obtained from the bankruptcy court and the court is so
advised; (2) the bankruptcy proceedings are dismissed and the court is so advised; (3) a motion
to continue on the Inactive Calendar is filed.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
02/13/2008 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
02/08/2008
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
ROBERT R BAUER
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
ELIZABETH A WOLDRICH
4619 E CARON ST
PHOENIX AZ 85028
PENNY L KOEPKE
RULING
The Court having reviewed the Application by Plaintiff for an Award of Attorney’s Fees
Against Defendant Washington Mutual Bank and Statement of Costs Against Washington
Mutual Bank, Defendant Washington Mutual Bank’s Objection, Plaintiff’s Reply, and good
cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED denying the Application by Plaintiff for an Award of Attorney’s Fees
Against Defendant Washington Mutual Bank but awarding Plaintiff its taxable costs in the
amount of $1,459.55 all in accordance with the formal written Judgment signed by the Court on
February 8, 2008 and entered (filed) by the Clerk on February 8, 2008. This Court in denying
Plaintiff’s application for attorney’s fees finds that while Plaintiff’s claims for relief in part,
arguably sound in contract, there is no privity of contract between Plaintiff and Defendant
Washington Mutual, Plaintiff is in first lien position strictly by good fortune, Washington

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
02/08/2008
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
Mutual’s defenses were pled in good faith, both Plaintiff and Washington Mutual were victims
of fraud perpetrated by the Woldrichs and even if permitted under A.R.S. §12-341.01, it would
be inequitable to award Plaintiff its attorney’s fees.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/21/2008 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
03/14/2008
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
ROBERT R BAUER
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
ELIZABETH A WOLDRICH
4619 E CARON STREET
PHOENIX AZ 85028
ORDER ENTERED BY COURT
The Court having received Defendant Washington Mutual Bank’s Motion to Stay
Execution of Judgment and to Fix Supersedeas Bond filed February 15, 2008 and Notice and
Motion to Stay Ruling On Defendant’s Motion to Set Supersedeas Bond filed March 5, 2008,
and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED staying execution upon the judgment until such time as the Plaintiff
retains new counsel and said attorney has the opportunity to respond to the Motion to Stay
Execution of Judgment and to Fix Supersedeas Bond.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until April 7, 2008 to retain new
counsel and object to this pending Motion.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/28/2009 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
05/27/2009
Docket Code 019
Form J000
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
COMMISSIONER MITCH MICHKOWSKI
E. Gonzales
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
PERRY EDWARD CASAZZA
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
ELIZABETH A WOLDRICH
4619 E CARON STREET
PHOENIX AZ 85028
FINANCIAL SERVICES-CCC
BOND FOR COSTS ON APPEAL – EXONERATED/RELEASED
In conjunction with the filing of a Notice of Appeal, a cash bond in the amount of
$500.00 was posted pursuant to Rule 10, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. The
appeal has been terminated, the Superior Court has not issued orders for the disposition of the
bond and the bond remains under the control of the Clerk of the Court.
Under the circumstances, on the Court’s own Motion,
IT IS ORDERED that the cash bond previously posted be exonerated/released to the
party who posted it unless the Court receives an objection on or before June 19, 2009.
May 27, 2009
/s/ COMMISSIONER MITCH MICHKOWSKI
Date
Court Commissioner
The application of the /s/ designation satisfies the Court’s approval and signature of this minute
entry.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
06/25/2008 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
06/24/2008
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
PERRY EDWARD CASAZZA
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
ELIZABETH A WOLDRICH
4619 E CARON ST
PHOENIX AZ 85028
RULING
The Court having reviewed Defendant Washington Mutual Bank’s Motion to Stay
Execution of Judgment and to Fix Supersedeas Bond, Plaintiff’s Response, WAMU’s Reply, and
good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED denying WAMU’s Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting the supersedeas bond in the amount of $5,000.00.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
07/15/2008 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
06/27/2008
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
M. Wetherell
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
PERRY EDWARD CASAZZA
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
ELIZABETH A WOLDRICH
4619 E CARON STREET
PHOENIX AZ 85028
MINUTE ENTRY
1:46 p.m. This is the time set for telephonic hearing re: request for clarification on the
Court’s ruling on Washington Mutual Bank’s Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment and to Fix
Supersedeas Bond issued June 24, 2008. Plaintiff A to Z Printing, Inc. is represented by counsel,
Perry Casazza, who appears telephonically. Defendant Washington Mutual Bank is represented
by counsel, Nicole Goodwin, who appears on behalf of John M. O’Neal.
A recording of this proceeding is made by CD and videotape in lieu of a Court Reporter.
Discussion is held regarding the status of this case.
IT IS ORDERED staying the execution of the money judgment that A to Z Printing, Inc.
has against Washington Mutual Bank.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
06/27/2008
Docket Code 005
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS ORDERED modifying the Court’s ruling of June 24, 2008 as follows:
The Court requires that a $1,400.00 cash or surety supersedeas bond be posted for the
purposes of staying the execution of the judgment entered in favor of A to Z Printing and against
WAMU.
Because of the Court’s concerns with respect to the non-occupancy and potential waste of
the subject property, and the Court having determined that A to Z Printing’s lien interest is
superior to that of WAMU, and the fact that A to Z Printing was aware of the prior indebtedness,
IT IS ORDERED that WAMU will be required to post a supersedeas bond to stay the
foreclosure proceedings on the subject property in the amount of $200,000.00 in either cash or
surety.
2:05 p.m. Matter concludes.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED signing this minute entry as a formal order of this Court
pursuant to Rule 81, Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure.
/ s / HON. PAUL A KATZ
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
07/29/2008 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
07/25/2008
Docket Code 029
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
PERRY EDWARD CASAZZA
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
ELIZABETH A WOLDRICH
4619 E CARON STREET
PHOENIX AZ 85028
STATUS CONFERENCE HELD
10:46 a.m. This is the time set for Telephonic Status Conference. Plaintiff is represented
by counsel, Perry E. Casazza. Defendant Washington Mutual Bank is represented by counsel,
John M. O’Neal.
Court Reporter, Melody O’Donnell, is present.
Discussion is held regarding supersedeas bond.
IT IS ORDERED staying execution of the judgment for 10 (ten) business days from
today’s date in order to allow Mr. O’Neal time to file the supersedeas bond with the Clerk of
Court.
10:56 a.m. Hearing concludes.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
08/29/2008 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
08/28/2008
Docket Code 530
Form V530H
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE BRIAN R. HAUSER
B. Kredit
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
PERRY EDWARD CASAZZA
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
ELIZABETH A WOLDRICH
4619 E CARON STREET
PHOENIX AZ 85028
COURT ADMIN-CIVIL-ARB DESK
CASE DESIGNATED FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COURT'S E-FILING PROGRAM
The Superior Court is transitioning civil cases to an electronic filing system. Pursuant to
Administrative Order 2007-140,
IT IS ORDERED that all pleadings in this case be electronically filed.
The electronic filing system is currently available for use and mandatory eFiling will
commence on October 1, 2008. Filing by conventional means may continue until this mandatory
date. ALL FILINGS NOT EFILED AFTER THE MANDATORY DATE WILL NOT BE
CONSIDERED BY THE DIVISION UNTIL PROPERLY EFILED.
To assist in the transition to eFiling, the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court has
prepared instruction and training concerning the eFiling system. All parties and attorneys of

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
08/28/2008
Docket Code 530
Form V530H
Page 2
record in this case are strongly encouraged to study this material before the mandatory eFiling
date. The web site address for training materials is:
http://eventures.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/training.asp
Additionally, please be sure to review the eFiling Guidelines set forth by Administrative
Order 2007-140 at the following web site address:
https://efiling.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/efilingguidelines
The e-filing system web site address is https://efiling.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov. The site
contains supplemental training and other reference materials, including contact names and phone
numbers, to assist with any questions.
Upon the mandatory eFiling date, all attorneys of record shall eFile all pleadings in
accordance with the guidelines set forth in Administrative Order 2007-140. Self-represented
parties or pro per litigants, and other case participants like Mediators, Arbitrators, and Special
Discovery Masters are strongly encouraged to eFile all pleadings. If a self-represented party, or
other case participant chooses to file their pleading in paper, they shall include a notation just
under the case number on the first page of the pleading that the case is an “EFILE CASE”.
The eFiling system can be accessed from any computer that has an Internet connection.
Free internet access terminals are available in the Superior Court Law Library, and other public
locations such as most public libraries.
Where filing fees may incur on an electronic filing, they may be paid by credit card at the
time of filing if the filing party choose to use a qualified eFiling service provider. If the filing
party chooses to use the Clerk of Court's hosted eFiling system, the filing party will be contacted
by the Clerk's Office by phone for credit card payment. If we are unable to process payment by
phone, the filing party will be billed by the Billing Unit of the Clerk of Superior Court.
eFiled Orders from the Court will be distributed to attorneys in the same manner each
attorney has elected to receive Minute Entries from the Court. Attorneys may enroll with the
Clerk of the Court to receive their Minute Entries electronically via e-mail. The Minute Entry
Distribution Agreement form may be downloaded at:
http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/forms.asp
NOTE: COUNSEL SHALL UPLOAD AND E-FILE ALL PROPOSED ORDERS IN
WORD FORMAT TO ALLOW FOR POSSIBLE MODIFICATIONS BY THE COURT.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
08/28/2008
Docket Code 530
Form V530H
Page 3
ADDITIONALLY, THE PARTIES SHALL PROVIDE THIS DIVISION WITH HARD
COPIES OF ANY DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, THE RESPONSES, REPLIES AND ANY
FILED DOCUMENT THAT EXCEEDS 10 PAGES, INCLUDING ANY EXHIBITS AND
ATTACHMENTS.
Motion practice: The movant determines the caption of the filing and all captions on
subsequent related filings shall bear the same designation. For example, the filing of a motion
captioned "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence" shall result in any
subsequent related filings referring to that title in the caption: "Plaintiff's Response to
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence." No response to a motion shall
contain a separate motion, except in the case of a cross-motion bearing the same designation.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/04/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
08/30/2007
Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
ROBERT R BAUER
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
JEFFREY S KAUFMAN
KEVIN HAHN
JOHN M O'NEAL
PENNY L KOEPKE
ORAL ARGUMENT SET
IT IS ORDERED setting Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment,
Defendant Washington Mutual Bank’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and
Alternative Motion for Rule 56(f) Relief for November 7, 2007 at 1:30 p.m., in this division.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

Any motion or stipulation for continuance must be filed with the Court no later than four
(4) court days prior to the date set for hearing. After that date, no continuances will be granted
except for extraordinary circumstances.

Counsel are advised that if the answering memorandum is not timely filed in accordance
with the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, oral argument may be vacated and the motion will be
ruled upon in accordance with Rule 7.1(b), A.R.C.P.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
09/13/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
09/10/2007
Docket Code 095
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
ROBERT R BAUER
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
JEFFREY S KAUFMAN
KEVIN HAHN
JOHN M O'NEAL
PENNY L KOEPKE
ORAL ARGUMENT RESET
On the Court's own motion,
IT IS ORDERED vacating Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, Defendant Washington Mutual Bank’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and
Alternative Motion for Rule 56(f) Relief set for November 7, 2007 and resetting the same for
November 19, 2007 at 3:00 p.m., in this division.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/16/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
11/14/2007
Docket Code 095
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
T. Ross
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
ROBERT R BAUER
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
JEFFREY S KAUFMAN
JOHN M O'NEAL
KEVIN HAHN
PENNY L KOEPKE
ORAL ARGUMENT RESET
Due to this Court’s current jury trial and on the Court’s own motion,
IT IS ORDERED vacating the Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, Defendant Washington Mutual Bank’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and
Alternative Motion for Rule 56(f) Relief set for November 19, 2007 and resetting same for
December 10, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. (allotted time: 1 hour)
LET THE RECORD REFLECT that counsel have been sent a copy of this minute entry
by facsimile transmission this date.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/14/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
12/10/2007
Docket Code 020
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
ROBERT R BAUER
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT
8:36 a.m. This is the time set for Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, Defendant Washington Mutual Bank’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and
Alternative Motion for Rule 56(f) Relief. Plaintiff is represented by counsel, Robert R. Bauer.
Defendant Washington Mutual Bank is represented by counsel, John M. O’Neal and Ryan
Schultz.
Court Reporter, Kim Hannan, is present.
Arguments are heard.
IT IS ORDERED taking Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant
Washington Mutual Bank’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Alternative Motion for
Rule 56(f) Relief under advisement.
9:30 a.m. Hearing concludes.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/18/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
12/13/2007
Docket Code 041
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
ROBERT R BAUER
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
JEFFREY S KAUFMAN
JOHN M O'NEAL
PENNY L KOEPKE
TELEPHONIC PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SET
The Court has received Plaintiff’s Motion to Set and Certificate of Readiness.
IT IS ORDERED setting a Telephonic Pretrial Scheduling Conference for February
8, 2008 at 8:45 a.m., in this division (602) 506-5806. Counsel for the Plaintiff shall initiate the
telephone call. Counsel are advised that all parties shall use a landline and that no party will be
allowed to appear by cell phone.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by February 5, 2008, the parties shall submit to the
Court a Joint Pretrial Memorandum setting forth the following:
1. The parties proposed schedule for additional discovery including
depositions and all other discovery pursuant to the rules of procedure or
as agreed upon by the parties. NOTE: The date for disclosure of non-
expert witnesses must be at least forty-five days before the completion of
discovery.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
12/13/2007
Docket Code 041
Form V000A
Page 2
2. The parties' proposed schedule for disclosure of expert witnesses and
designation pursuant to Rule 26(b)(4). NOTE: The disclosure should
be within ninety days of the scheduling conference except upon a
showing of good cause.
3. The parties' proposed schedule for any agreed upon amendments to the
pleadings and any requested amendments to the pleadings.
4. The parties' proposed date for a settlement conference.
5. The parties' proposed date for trial. NOTE: The parties should come to
the scheduling conference with the trial calendars of the attorneys
responsible for trial.
If there are any discovery disputes, they must be filed with the Court by motion at least ten
days prior to the scheduling conference. A response must be filed not less than three days prior to
the conference. No reply will be filed. The Court will assess any appropriate sanction if the Court
finds that any party or attorney engaged in unreasonable, groundless, abusive or obstructionist
discovery.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/21/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2007-050542
12/18/2007
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. PAUL A KATZ
W. Bobrowski
Deputy
A TO Z PRINTING INC
ROBERT R BAUER
v.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH, et al.
BRUCE F WOLDRICH
13502 E DEL TIMBRE
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
JOHN M O'NEAL
UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING
The Court having taken Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant
Washington Mutual Bank’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Alternative Motion for
Rule 56(f) Relief under advisement; having reviewed the memoranda of the parties and legal
authorities cited therein; and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendant Washington Mutual Bank’s Cross-
Motion for Summary Judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendant Washington Mutual Bank’s Alternative
Motion for Rule 56(f) Relief.

Documents