05/22/2026 — CV2026005929 ASSOCIATION, CADENCE HOMEOWNERS 05/22/2026 HONORABLE JOSEPH KREAMER View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
05/26/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2026-005929
05/22/2026
Docket Code 375
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH KREAMER
A. Walker
Deputy
CADENCE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
PENNY L KOEPKE
v.
NICHOLAS S DEL VECCHIO, et al.
NICHOLAS S DEL VECCHIO
9726 E TUMERIC AVE
MESA AZ 85212
MADISON F DEL VECCHIO
9726 E TUMERIC AVE
MESA AZ 85212
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
40 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1800
PHOENIX AZ 85004
JUDGE KREAMER
DISMISSAL CALENDAR
The Court having reviewed this case file,
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the Dismissal Calendar for dismissal for lack of
prosecution without further notice on or after June 19, 2026, if the parties have neither filed a
stipulation to dismiss nor asked to have the case restored to the active calendar.
06/10/2026 — CV2026005929 ASSOCIATION, CADENCE HOMEOWNERS 06/10/2026 HONORABLE JOSEPH KREAMER View Minute Entry ↑ top
- Source
- Minute Source
Clerk of the Superior Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
06/11/2026 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2026-005929
06/10/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE JOSEPH KREAMER
A. Walker
Deputy
CADENCE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
PENNY L KOEPKE
v.
NICHOLAS S DEL VECCHIO, et al.
NICHOLAS S DEL VECCHIO
9726 E TUMERIC AVE
MESA AZ 85212
MADISON F DEL VECCHIO
9726 E TUMERIC AVE
MESA AZ 85212
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
40 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1800
PHOENIX AZ 85004
JUDGE KREAMER
MINUTE ENTRY
Pending before the Court is an application for default. Rule 55(a)(2) of the Arizona Rules
of Civil Procedure lists many requirements for an effective Application for Entry of Default,
including new requirements that went into effect in January 2026 specifying that certain
language must be stated in the application and be identified in bold type and 13-point typeface.
The application received by the Court does not contain the required language in Rule 55(a)(2)(F)
designated properly. Therefore, the Application for Entry of Default is non-compliant.
IT IS ORDERED the Application for Entry of Default is rejected because it does not
comply with the rules.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED any default entered under this non-rule compliant
application is set aside.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2026-005929
06/10/2026
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED any Motion/Request for Default Judgment is denied as
moot because a rule-compliant application has not been filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a rule-compliant Application may be submitted and
thereafter, a motion/request for default may be filed as provided in the Rules of Civil Procedure.
