Case Header

Maricopa County Superior Court Case CV2005-094018: public docket details, parties, minute entries, documents, and official source links for Golden Eagle Estates Homeowners Association Inc.

Case Number

CV2005-094018

County

Maricopa

Caption

Not captured

Filed

12/16/2005

Case Type

Civil

Judge

Driggs, Adam

Location

Southeast

Official Court Record

Official Court Record

Parties

Minute Entries

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
01/17/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
01/08/2007
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. MARK F. ACETO
T. Melius
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DONALD A LOOSE
JUDGE WHITTEN
MINUTE ENTRY
On August 21, 2006, the Court issued a ruling regarding summary judgment motions. On
August 30, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Reconsideration”. Through a minute entry dated
October 23, the Court authorized further briefing regarding the port-a-john claim.
The pivotal question presented is this: Was the port-a-john which had been placed on
Defendants’ lot a “structure” for purposes of the CC&Rs?
Article II.C.2. of the CC&Rs prohibits the “erection” or “placement” of a “structure of
any kind” absent prior written approval of the Committee of Architecture. The American
Heritage College Dictionary defines structure alternatively as “something made up of a number
of parts that are held or put together in a particular way” or “something constructed.” When
interpreting the word “structure” as used in CC&Rs, courts should use the normal meaning of the
word, unless the CC&Rs disclose an intention to use a different meaning. Horton v. Mitchell,
200 Ariz. 523, 527 (App. 2001). While the port-a-john at issue may be a temporary structure, it
is still a “structure” within the normal meaning of the word and within the intent of the CC&R’s.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
01/08/2007
Docket Code 019
Form V000A
Page 2
Defendants argue that the applicable municipal code required the homeowners to provide
an on-site restroom for construction employees. If true, under certain circumstances,
unreasonable refusal to approve of placement of a port-a-john might be problematic. But
Defendants suggest more. Defendants suggest that the existence of such a code provision
precludes a homeowners association from enforcing its CC&R’s relating to port-a-johns. In
other words, Defendants suggest that a code provision making mandatory an on-site restroom for
construction employees empowers a homeowner to place a port-a-john on his lot, no matter what
the condition of the port-a-john. No legal or logical support has been provided for the argument.
Given the circumstances,
IT IS ORDERED granting Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration regarding the port-a-
john claim. More specifically, IT IS ORDERED granting summary judgment in favor of
Plaintiff regarding that claim.
/ s / HON. MARK F. ACETO
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
01/30/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
01/26/2007
Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WHITTEN
M. Brady
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DONALD A LOOSE
MINUTE ENTRY
10:35 a.m. In chambers. This is the time set for telephonic scheduling conference.
Charles Maxwell participates telephonically on behalf of Plaintiff. Donald Loose participates
telephonically on behalf of defendants.
A Court Reporter is not present nor is an electronic recording being made of this hearing.
As to the deadlines submitted by counsel,
IT IS ORDERED granting the stipulation, all in accordance with the formal written Order
signed by the Court on January 26, 2007 and entered (filed) by the Clerk on January 26, 2007.
Any motions that counsel wish to raise shall be submitted to the Court no later than
February 15, 2007.
ORAL ARGUMENT SET
IT IS ORDERED setting oral argument on March 30, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. before:
THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WHITTEN
SOUTHEAST ADULT FACILITY
222 EAST JAVELINA

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
01/26/2007
Docket Code 094
Form V000A
Page 2
COURTROOM 207
MESA AZ 85210
602-372-1164
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

Oral argument shall not exceed fifteen (15) minutes for each side. If extended oral
argument is necessary, counsel must so advise the Court no later than four (4) court days prior to
the date set for hearing so that oral argument can be rescheduled.

Any motion or stipulation for continuance must be filed with the Court no later than four
(4) court days prior to the date set for hearing. After that date, no continuances will be granted
except for extraordinary circumstances.

Counsel are advised that if the answering memorandum is not timely filed in accordance
with the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, oral argument may be vacated and the motion will be
ruled upon in accordance with Rule 7.1(b), A.R.C.P.
10:46 a.m. Hearing concludes.
PLEASE NOTE: IMPORTANT INFORMATION RE: CD/VIDEOTAPE
FEE CURRENTLY IN EFFECT
This is a JAVS courtroom. In the event a record is made, the Court will provide, upon
request, CDs and videotapes regardless of when the copies are made. A fee of $20.00 will apply
to all copies requested, either on the day of the hearing or for hearings recorded on an earlier
date. Forms to request a recording of a proceeding are available in the Self-Service Centers and
in the JAVS and FTR courtrooms.
If a party wants a court reporter to record a proceeding in this Court, a written request
must be filed at least 48 hours before the commencement of the proceedings.
A person requesting a daily copy CD or videotape must complete the appropriate request
form and pay the applicable fee at the Self-Service Center. Upon payment of the appropriate
fees through the Self-Service Center, a receipt will be issued which shall then be presented to
Court staff for preparation of the CD or videotape in the customary manner.
A person wanting a copy of a hearing from a previous occasion must contact Ken
Crenshaw at 602-506-7100.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
03/26/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
03/21/2007
Docket Code 019
Form J000
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. MARK F. ACETO
A. Gonzalez
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DONALD A LOOSE
JUDGE WHITTEN
RULING
On February 14, 2007, Defendants filed a “Motion for Reconsideration.”
IT IS ORDERED denying this motion1.
/s/ Mark F. Aceto
HON. MARK F. ACETO
JUDGE OF SUPERIOR COURT

1 To the extent Defendants’ motion includes new arguments that could have been but were not made in earlier
pleadings, Defendants have waived the right to make such arguments.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
03/28/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
03/26/2007
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WHITTEN
M. Brady
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DONALD A LOOSE
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received a Stipulation (Second) to Continue Settlement Conference
Deadline.
IT IS ORDERED accepting the stipulation.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/02/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
03/30/2007
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WHITTEN
M. Brady
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DONALD A LOOSE
MINUTE ENTRY
11:02 a.m. This is the time set for oral argument. Charles Maxwell participates on behalf
of plaintiff. Donald Loose participates telephonically on behalf of defendants.
A record of the proceedings is made by CD/videotape in lieu of a court reporter.
As to the jury trial demand filed by defendants,
The Court will set this matter for jury trial.
Argument is heard regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend, the response and the reply.
IT IS ORDERED allowing the Plaintiff to amend the Complaint. Said Amended
Complaint shall be filed within 10 business days of today’s date.
Argument is heard regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, the response and the reply.
IT IS ORDERED granting the motion in part and denying in part. More specifically,

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
03/30/2007
Docket Code 028
Form V000A
Page 2
Defendants are compelled to provide the following: any documents that relate to the
landscaping of the property. Defendants are also compelled to provide Plaintiff with a log that
displays what other documentation relates to construction that are not believed by defendants to
be relevant to the issues in this case.
IT IS ORDERED setting this matter for a telephonic scheduling conference on April 24,
2007 at 3:15 p.m.
NOTE: This division will place the conference call at the time of the hearing.
11:52 p.m. Hearing concludes.
PLEASE NOTE: IMPORTANT INFORMATION RE: CD/VIDEOTAPE
FEE CURRENTLY IN EFFECT
This is a JAVS courtroom. In the event a record is made, the Court will provide, upon
request, CDs and videotapes regardless of when the copies are made. A fee of $20.00 will apply
to all copies requested, either on the day of the hearing or for hearings recorded on an earlier
date. Forms to request a recording of a proceeding are available in the Self-Service Centers and
in the JAVS and FTR courtrooms.
If a party wants a court reporter to record a proceeding in this Court, a written request
must be filed at least 48 hours before the commencement of the proceedings.
A person requesting a daily copy CD or videotape must complete the appropriate request
form and pay the applicable fee at the Self-Service Center. Upon payment of the appropriate
fees through the Self-Service Center, a receipt will be issued which shall then be presented to
Court staff for preparation of the CD or videotape in the customary manner.
A person wanting a copy of a hearing from a previous occasion must contact Ken
Crenshaw at 602-506-7100.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
04/25/2007 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
04/23/2007
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WHITTEN
M. Brady
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DONALD A LOOSE
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received notice that this matter has settled,
IT IS ORDERED placing this matter on the inactive calendar for dismissal on June 22,
2007, unless prior to that date a stipulated judgment or a stipulation for dismissal along with a
proposed form of Order is submitted to the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating all pending hearings.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
08/23/2006 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
08/21/2006
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. MARK F. ACETO
M. Brady
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DONALD A LOOSE
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION - CCC
MINUTE ENTRY
On June 1, 2006, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. On June 6, 2006,
Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court has reviewed the pleadings. Pursuant
to Rule 7.1, the Court declines to schedule oral argument.
PORT-A-JOHN
Section C2 of the CC&Rs requires approval of the Committee of Architecture regarding
construction of structures and additions or modifications to such construction. Defendants
allowed a port-a-john to be temporarily placed on their property for use by construction workers.
Plaintiff claims that the port-a-john constitutes construction for purposes of the CC&R’s. As a
matter of law, the Court concludes that Plaintiff is wrong. Therefore, on the port-a-john claim,

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
08/21/2006
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
IT IS ORDERED granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
TIMELY LANDSCAPING
Pursuant to the Golden Eagle Estates Architectural Guidelines & Standards (the
“Standards”), home construction “should” begin within six months of architectural committee
approval and be completed within one year of the first construction disturbance of the property.
Standard 4.6. However, the standards make it clear that the deadline for completion of
landscaping is not tied to the recommendations regarding when home construction “should” be
completed. Rather, the standards repeatedly specify that the landscaping must be installed within
two months/sixty days of actual completion of the home. Standards 1.0(step 10), 4.7 and 5.0. The
landscaping in question was completed before the home was completed. Therefore, as to the
timeliness of landscaping claim,
IT IS ORDERED granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion and denying
Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion.
LANDSCAPING CHANGES
Plaintiff asserts claims regarding landscaping changes apparently not approved of by the
architectural committee. It appears that landscaping changes which alter the exterior appearance
of any residence shall not be done without the prior written approval of the architectural
committee. Standards, p. 4. However, neither party has established that it is in entitled to
judgment as a matter of law regarding the landscaping change claims. Under the circumstances,
with respect to these claims,
IT IS ORDERED denying the motions for summary judgment of both Plaintiff and
Defendants.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
The parties shall participate in a mandatory settlement conference. This case is
referred to the court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution for the appointment of a judge pro tempore
to conduct a settlement conference. Counsel and/or the parties will receive a minute entry
from ADR appointing the judge pro tempore. Counsel and any “pro per” parties will contact
the appointed judge pro tempore to arrange the date, time, and location for the settlement
conference. The judge pro tempore is requested to conduct a settlement conference not later than
December 14, 2006. The Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution will not do the scheduling of
the settlement conference so please do not contact that office.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
08/21/2006
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 3
All counsel and their clients, or non-lawyer representatives who have full and complete
authority to settle the case, shall personally appear and participate in good faith in the Settlement
Conference. Sanctions may be imposed for failure to participate.
DATED this 21st day of August, 2006
/ s / HON. MARK F. ACETO
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Filed ***
10/24/2006 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
10/23/2006
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HON. MARK F. ACETO
M. Brady
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DONALD A LOOSE
MINUTE ENTRY
On August 21, 2006, the Court ruled on summary judgment motions which had been filed
both by Plaintiff and Defendants. The Court’s rulings were regarding three separate claims: The
port-a-john claim, the timely landscaping claim, and the landscaping changes claim.
On August 30, 2006, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Reconsideration”.
IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration regarding the timely
landscaping claim. Further,
IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration regarding the
landscaping changes claim.
Regarding the port-a-john claim,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion for
Reconsideration. The deadline for this response shall be eleven calendar days after this minute

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
10/23/2006
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 2
entry is filed by the Clerk of the Court. The deadline for any reply shall be pursuant to the Rules
of Civil Procedure.
IT IS ORDERED that the above-referred to response may not exceed three pages and that
the above-referred to reply may not exceed three pages.
A new judicial officer will soon be assuming responsibility for the below-signed judge’s
calendar and for this case; however, the below-signed judge will rule on the pending Motion for
Reconsideration.
DATED this 23rd day of October, 2006.
/ s / HON. MARK F. ACETO
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
11/15/2006 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
11/14/2006
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WHITTEN
M. Brady
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DONALD A LOOSE
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue on the Inactive Calendar.
IT IS ORDERED granting the motion and continuing the matter on the inactive calendar
until February 9, 2007.
IT IS ORDERED setting a telephonic Comprehensive Pretrial Conference on January 26,
2007 at 10:45 a.m.
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WHITTEN
SOUTHEAST ADULT FACILITY
222 EAST JAVELINA
COURTROOM 207
MESA AZ 85210
NOTE: This division will place the conference call at the time of the hearing.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
11/14/2006
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 2
If all parties agree that all claims should be subject to compulsory arbitration, then a
schedule for completing arbitration will be set.
If all parties do not agree that all claims should be subject to arbitration, then all parties and
all counsel are directed to meet personally to discuss all of the matters set forth in Rule 16(b).
Counsel shall prepare and file with the court by 5:00 p.m. on January 19, 2007, a Joint
Pretrial Memorandum, and prepare a proposed order for Discovery and Disclosure
deadlines. The memorandum shall address all the matters listed in Rule 16(b) and additional
items set forth below. The proposed order shall include specific dates for the following items
and conform substantially with the attached sample order.
1.
The nature of the case; the issues, and each party’s position with respect to the
issues.
2.
An agreed upon schedule and date for completion of non-expert depositions.
As far as can reasonably be anticipated, each party shall set forth the depositions
they anticipate taking and the approximate time required for each; any and all
medical examinations which may be required of any of the parties; the person or
persons to conduct such examinations; all requests for production; and all tangible
evidence to be disclosed or exchanged.
3.
A date for the final disclosure of the identities, subject matters, and reports of
expert witnesses, and/or to supplement disclosures made to date.
4.
A date or dates for the initial and final disclosure of all non-expert witnesses,
and/or to supplement disclosures made to date.
5.
A date by which all written discovery will be propounded and concluded.
Further, counsel shall set forth any written discovery outstanding and a date when it
will be complete.
6.
The position of each counsel on whether the Rule 38.1 time limits should be
waived.
7.
The court shall order the parties to participate either in a settlement conference with
a judge pro tem or a mediation with a private mediator. An agreement of all parties
is required for private mediation. The parties are to advise if such an agreement is
reached. The parties are also to advise a proposed date for the completion of the
settlement conference or mediation.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
11/14/2006
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 3
8.
Set forth any discovery disputes to date or Rule 26.1 compliance issues.
9.
A date for completion of all discovery, including expert discovery.
10.
A date by which all dispositive or partially-dispositive motions shall be filed.
11.
A proposed trial date agreed upon by all counsel and anticipated length of trial.
If the parties agree as to the dates, they need to only prepare the proposed order, and
incorporate it by reference. If counsel are unable to agree on any of the items of the Pretrial
Memorandum, the reasons for their inability to agree shall be set forth in the Pretrial
Memorandum and each shall prepare a separate proposed order. All proposed deadlines shall
be set forth as calendar dates, and not in the form “XX days before trial.”
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall notify the court of any agreed-upon
extension of any time period provided by the Rules of Civil Procedure. The purpose of this order
is not to discourage extensions as a matter of professionalism, but to ensure that no party suffers
summary disposition of any issue by virtue of an extension of which the court is not aware.
Counsel are reminded that the court may impose sanctions, pursuant to Rule 16(f),
against counsel and/or their clients for failure to participate in good faith in the preparation or
timely filing of the memorandum.1

1 The court will strictly enforce Rule 38.1(a)(3)(1) and Local Rule 3.4.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
11/14/2006
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 4
The Court having received the parties’ Joint Comprehensive Pretrial Conference
Memorandum,
IT IS ORDERED entering the following schedule for disclosure as set forth unless the
parties obtain written modifications by the Court:
(1)
Initial disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(2)
The identities and subject areas of expert testimony shall be disclosed by:
(MM/DD/YYYY)
(3)
Plaintiff’s final expert disclosures shall be served by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
Defendant’s final expert disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
Rebuttal expert disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(4)
Final Non-expert disclosures shall be exchanged by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(5)
Written discovery shall be propounded by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(6)
Dispositive Motions shall be filed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(7)
Depositions shall be completed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(8)
Discovery shall be completed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(9)
Any motions to amend pleadings shall be filed by: (MM/DD/YYYY)
(10)
The parties remaining in this action shall complete mediation or a settlement
conference by (MM/DD/YYYY).
IT IS ORDERED setting Status Conference in this matter on [counsel to leave this date
blank], 2006 at * a.m. (time allotted: 15 minutes), in this Division.
HON. CHRISTOPHER WHITTEN
222 EAST JAVELINA
Courtroom 207
Mesa, Arizona 85210
(602) 372-1164

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
11/14/2006
Docket Code 078
Form V000A
Page 5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in no less than five days prior to the Status Conference
set herein, the parties shall submit a joint memorandum supplementing the previous joint
memorandum and reporting the history and status of the efforts at Alternative Dispute Resolution
pursuant to ARCP Rule 16(g).
PLEASE NOTE: IMPORTANT INFORMATION RE: CD/VIDEOTAPE
FEE CURRENTLY IN EFFECT
This is a JAVS courtroom. In the event a record is made, the Court will provide, upon
request, CDs and videotapes regardless of when the copies are made. A fee of $20.00 will apply
to all copies requested, either on the day of the hearing or for hearings recorded on an earlier
date. Forms to request a recording of a proceeding are available in the Self-Service Centers and
in the JAVS and FTR courtrooms.
If a party wants a court reporter to record a proceeding in this Court, a written request
must be filed at least 48 hours before the commencement of the proceedings.
A person requesting a daily copy CD or videotape must complete the appropriate request
form and pay the applicable fee at the Self-Service Center. Upon payment of the appropriate
fees through the Self-Service Center, a receipt will be issued which shall then be presented to
Court staff for preparation of the CD or videotape in the customary manner.
A person wanting a copy of a hearing from a previous occasion must contact Ken
Crenshaw at 602-506-7100.

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/21/2006 8:00 AM
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2005-094018
12/19/2006
Docket Code 023
Form V000A
Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WHITTEN
M. Brady
Deputy
GOLDEN EAGLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION INC
CHARLES E MAXWELL
v.
DUSAN MILIC, et al.
DENISE A SCAMMON
BRIAN SCHULMAN
MINUTE ENTRY
The Court has received the parties’ Stipulation to Continue Settlement Conference
Deadline.
IT IS ORDERED accepting the stipulation and continuing the deadline for settlement
conference to March 15, 2007.

Documents